Yun Cai
Qiqi Xin
Jinjin Lu4
Weihong Cong
Keji Chen- 1Doctoral Candidate, Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- 2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases, Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- 3National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Beijing, China
- 4Dongfang Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- 5Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in the world. However, due to the limited effectiveness and potential adverse effects of current treatments, the long-term prognosis of CVD patients is still discouraging. In recent years, several studies have found that berberine (BBR) has broad application prospects in the prevention and treatment of CVD. Due to its effectiveness and safety for gastroenteritis and diarrhea caused by bacterial infections, BBR has been widely used in China and other Asian countries since the middle of the last century. The development of pharmacology also provides evidence for the multi-targets of BBR in treating CVD. Researches on CVD, such as arrhythmia, atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, myocarditis and cardiomyopathy, heart failure, etc., revealed the cardiovascular protective mechanisms of BBR. This review systematically summarizes the pharmacological research progress of BBR in the treatment of CVD in recent years, confirming that BBR is a promising therapeutic option for CVD.
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in the world, including arrhythmia, atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, myocarditis and cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. These diseases are the results of multiple pathological factors, and their pathogenesis have not been fully elucidated (Mozaffarian et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2018a; Xu et al., 2018b; Timmis et al., 2018). The effects of the current treatment strategies for CVD, including antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, statins, beta blockers and nitrates, are still limited (Squizzato et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2017; Blessberger et al., 2018), and the potential adverse effects of some drugs impaired the long-term prognosis and life quality of patients. New drugs discovery and development are constantly being desired.
Berberine (BBR), also known as Huang Lian Su, is an isoquinoline alkaloid. The chemical structure of BBR is shown in Figure 1, and its molecular structure is C20H18NO4 and molecular weight is 336.39 g/mol. It is present in the root, rhizome and stem bark of many medicinally important plants, such as Hydrastis canadensis (goldenseal), Coptis chinensis Franch (Coptis or goldenthread), Berberis aquifolium (Oregon grape), Berberis vulgaris (barberry), and Berberis aristata (tree turmeric) (Chen et al., 2012). The main forms of BBR’s clinical application are hydrochloride and sulfate. In the past, it was mostly used as a kind of antibiotic for intestinal infections. In recent years, BBR has been found to exhibit biological activities including the reduction of blood sugar, regulation of lipids, as well as anti-arrhythmic and cardio-protective effects (Ye et al., 2009). As a natural product-derived drug with development prospects, it has been widely used in China and other Asian countries for its effectiveness and safety (Jin et al., 2016; Ju et al., 2018). With the progress of modern pharmacological research, the properties of BBR in the treatment of multiple diseases have gradually been discovered. Thus, we reviewed the molecular targets and development potential of BBR in the treatment of CVD.
FIGURE 1. Chemical structure of berberine. Berberine has been found to exhibit biological activities including the reduction of blood sugar, regulation of lipids, as well as anti-arrhythmic and cardio-protective effects. With the progress of modern pharmacological research, the properties of BBR in the treatment of multiple disease have gradually been discovered.
Arrhythmia
Cardiac arrhythmia is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death. Evidence from a retrospective clinical study showed that BBR (1.2–2.0 g/d, p.o., 12 weeks) had the same efficacy as amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), and no adverse effects was observed (Zheng et al., 2017). The anti-arrhythmic effect of BBR was first demonstrated in 1989. The author established an ischemic model by ligating the anterior descending coronary artery in dog. The results showed that BBR could significantly inhibit the occurrence of ischemic ventricular arrhythmias (Huang et al., 1989). In recent years, several studies have further confirmed the antiarrhythmic effect of BBR. To evaluate the effects and mechanisms of BBR on arrhythmia, Cao et al. (2012) established an arrhythmia model by stretching the heart of wistar rats with myocardial infarction. The results showed that BBR inhibited the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia by decreasing the prolongation of repolarization of single-phase action potential and reducing the incidence of ventricular premature beats. Wang et al. (2011) verified the antiarrhythmic effect of BBR (180 mg/kg/d, i.g., 2 weeks) in myocardial infarction model in diabetic rats, and showed such effects may result from BBR regulating inward rectifier K+ channels/Kir2.1. Zhou et al. (2015) assessed the effect of BBR on acetylcholine intravenous injection induced AF model in rabbits. The results showed that BBR (1 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly reduced the rate of acetylcholine-induced persistent AF and terminated most of the acetylcholine-induced AF, and BBR (2 mg/kg, i.v.) terminated AF by prolonging the effective refractory period of atrium and the action potential duration of atrial myocytes. The effects may result from BBR prolonging atrial repolarization by blockading the components of the delayed rectifying K+ current (Zhou et al., 2015). Hua and Wang, 1994 also confirmed the effect of BBR on K+ channels. The results showed that BBR was able to block inward rectifier K+ channels and delay rectifier K+ channels, and thereby prolong the action potential duration. Furthermore, Li et al. (1995) showed that BBR (10 mg/kg) was able to reduce the incidence of ventricle tachycardia (VT), shorten the VT duration, inhibit Ca2+ inwards in at a high Ca2+ concentration in reperfusion-induced arrhythmias rats, and the results of in vitro experiments showed that BBR (30 μmol/L) promoted Ca2+ inwards at a low Ca2+ concentration, indicating that BBR may have an effect against reperfusion-induced arrhythmia by inhibiting Ca2+ channels. Meanwhile, BBR derivatives such as p-chlorobenzyltetrahydroberberine chloride (Cui et al., 2003) and dihydroberberine (Zhang et al., 1997) have also been confirmed to have an effect on arrhythmia. In summary, BBR have effects against ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, which might result from inhibiting K+ and Ca2+ currents.
Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis (AS) is a chronic traumatic disease and the main cause of various cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. Its pathology starts from endometrial damage. The plaque is formed by local deposition of lipids, complex carbohydrates, fibrous tissue, and calcium. The pathogenesis of AS is complex. A current study has found that multiple factors including low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) oxidation, platelet adhesion, inflammation, macrophage activation, endothelial cell damage, and smooth muscle cell proliferation are closely related to the development of AS (Spence, 2016). BBR was demonstrated to significantly lower the levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in both serum of apolipoprotein E gene knockout (Apo-/-E) mice (5 mg/kg/d, i.v., 12 weeks) and supernatant of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (50 μmol/L). Furthermore, it decreased the expression of visfatin protein in aorta and down-regulated the protein expression of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK), c-Jun N- terminal kinases (p-JNK), and Bax while up-regulated the expression of Bcl-2 in HUVECs. The results of this study indicated that BBR suppressed the inflammatory response and reduced blood lipid levels possibly by inhibiting the p38 MAPK and JNK signaling pathways, which improve endothelial dysfunction and prevent the occurrence of AS (Wan et al., 2018). In a recent study, BBR (78 and 156 mg/kg, p.o., 12 weeks) reduced aortic reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and decreased serum malondialdehyde (MDA), oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) and IL-6 levels in an Apo−/−E mice model, demonstrating that BBR may improve endothelial dysfunction by restoring endothelium-dependent vasodilation and attenuating oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, thereby preventing AS (Tan et al., 2020). In addition, an evidence from 16S rRNA sequencing showed that BBR (100 mg/kg, i.g., 13 weeks) significantly altered the community composition structure of the gut microbiota by anti-inflammation and regulating glucose and lipid metabolism (Wu et al., 2020). An in vitro experiment reported that BBR (25 µmol/L) was able to inhibit the expression of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) and matrix metalloprotein (MMP)-9 in macrophages stimulated by ox-LDL, which inhibited the progression of AS. The mechanism of action of BBR was possibly through the activation of NF-κB in macrophages, the prevention of IκB-α degradation, and the inhibition of p65 in the cytoplasm from entering the nucleus, resulting in MMP-9 and EMMPRIN expression downregulation and AS plaque stabilization (Huang et al., 2012). In-stent restenosis and neoatherosclerosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are closely related to inflammatory response. Galectin-3 is an important regulatory factor of inflammation, which is mainly expressed in macrophages. The results of an in vitro study demonstrated that BBR (25 µmol/L) might reduce ox-LDL-induced macrophage activation and down-regulate galectin-3 expression by inhibiting the activation of NF-κB and AMPK signaling pathways. However, the clinical results of the same study showed that an additive 300 mg of BBR hydrochloride t.i.d. treatment on top of standard therapy did not further reduce plasma levels of galectin-3 in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI. This discrepancy between in vitro and clinical results is worth being further discussed (Pei et al., 2019). In a rat model, BBR (1–100 µmol/kg, i.v., 4 weeks) combined with atorvastatin calcium reduced the levels of serum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and LDL-C. It also reduced the levels of plasma endothelium ET-1 (ET1) and decreased the expression of lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX1), which may prevent the transport of LOX1-mediated ox-LDL into macrophages to promote foam cell formation (Chi et al., 2014). BBR (150 mg/kg/d, p.o.) reduced foam cells and macrophage infiltration, decreased TNF-α and IL-1β levels, upregulated LC3-II protein expression and downregulated P62 protein expression in the aortic tissues in AS rats, indicating that BBR might inhibit plaque formation and attenuated the inflammatory response in aortic tissue by promoting autophagy (Ke et al., 2020). BT1500M, a kind of BBR-entrapped micelle, increased BBR deposition in liver and adipose by 107.6 and 172.3%, respectively. BT1500M (BBR, 100 mg/kg/day, i.p., 5 months) showed anti-atherosclerotic efficacy in high-fat diet-fed Apo−/−E mice in vivo and in adipocytes and macrophages AS models in vitro (Ma et al., 2020).The development of oxidative stress is also associated with the pathogenesis of AS. BBR can selectively inhibit the expression of gp91phox protein and enhance the activity of superoxide dismutase, thereby reducing the level of superoxide produced by NADPH oxidase in LPS-stimulated macrophages, which may play a role in the prevention and treatment of AS (Sarna et al., 2010).
Neointimal hyperplasia (NH), is the universal response of the vessels to injury which is manifested by abnormal migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells within the intima, accompanied by deposition of new extracellular matrix. Histologically, NH is similar to AS but consists almost entirely of smooth muscle cells (approximately 20%) and newly synthesized extracellular matrix (ECM) (approximately 80%), and NH is the leading cause of vessel restenosis in both medium term and long term (McMonagle, 2020). With respect to inhibiting the proliferation of smooth muscle cells, a study reported that BBR (10 μmol/L) may inhibit the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) by inhibiting the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), which inhibits ERK1/2 activation and therefore suppresses the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) (Cho et al., 2005). It was confirmed in a rat carotid artery injury model that BBR (100 µg/kg/d, i.v., 4 weeks) may delay or partially inhibit protein kinase B (Akt) phosphorylation, thereby inhibiting the proliferation and migration of VSMCs induced by angiotensin II and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (Lee et al., 2006). Several recent studies have confirmed the role of BBR in inhibiting VSMC proliferation from several angles. BBR (30 μmol/L) inhibited angiotensin IV-induced VSMC proliferation by activating the PPARα-nitric oxide (NO) signaling pathway (Qiu et al., 2017). BBR (100 µmol/L) may also restrain the migration of human aortic smooth muscle cells by inhibiting the activator protein-1 (AP-1) and NF-κB signaling pathways and decreasing MMP-2/9 and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA) expression (Liu et al., 2014). BBR (50 µmol/L) inhibited chlamydia pneumoniae infection induced VSMC migration by downregulating MMP3 and MMP9 expression via PI3K (Ma et al., 2015). Furthermore, BBR (10 µmol/L) ameliorated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and vascular remodeling by inhibiting the thioredoxin (Trx)1/β-catenin pathway and inhibited hypoxia-induced pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells proliferation, providing a new target toward the pathological mechanism of PAH (Wande et al., 2020). More recent studies have demonstrated that mechanical stretch promoted VSMC proliferation and apoptosis by activating the protein disulfide bond isomerase (PDI) redox system. BBR (100 µmol/L) inhibited the PDI-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress system and downregulated caspase-3 and caspase-12 expression, and thereby attenuate the concomitant increase in proliferation and apoptosis of VSMC in response to mechanical stretch (Wang et al., 2020).
As shown above, BBR shows treatment potential for AS and arterial restenosis, and may indirectly prevent and treat AS through certain signaling pathways closely related to AS, such as MAPK, JNK, NF-κB, AMPK, ERK, AKT, PPARα-NO, AP-1, PI3K, Trx1/β-catenin, and PDI/MAPK/ERS.
Hyperlipidemia
The abnormal metabolism of blood lipids, including TC, TG, LDL-C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), is regarded as the main risk factor for the progression of AS and the development of cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. It has been confirmed in animal studies and clinical trials that BBR could reduce blood lipid levels (Wang and Zidichouski, 2018). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin9 type (PCSK9) is an enzyme that mediates LDL receptor (LDLR) degradation. Endotoxin (LPS) can stimulate PCSK9 expression, reduce the level of LDLR protein in liver, and increase TC, TG, and LDL-C levels while decrease HDL-C level, which can be antagonized by BBR through the up-regulation of LDLR mRNA expression. Moreover, BBR (10 or 30 mg/kg/d, i.g., 4 weeks) can down-regulate PCSK9 expression to reduce the plasma concentrations of LDL-C, TG and TC in mice. Therefore, BBR may inhibit LPS-induced dyslipidemia by regulating the PCSK9-LDLR pathway (Xiao et al., 2012). Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF-4α) is a key transcription factor for hepatocyte differentiation, and miR122 is the main microRNA in liver that participates in lipid and glucose metabolism. BBR attenuated TC, TG and LDL-C and increased HDL-C in high-fat diet-induced diabetic mice. In experimental animals, a high dose of BBR (160 mg/kg, i.p.) appeared more effective compared to the lower dose BBR (40 mg/kg, i.p.) in improving the lipid profiles. In addition, the presence of BBR (10 μmol/L) attenuated the elevation of HNF-4α protein and miR122 expression in palmitate (PA)-incubated HepG2 cells. The above data indicated that BBR treatment could reduce the dysregulation of gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism changes in diabetic mice and PA-induced HepG2 cells by regulating the HNF-4α-modulated miR122 pathway (Wei S et al. (2016). Olanzapine (OLZ), a second-generation antipsychotic drug, has adverse effects such as dyslipidemia and insulin resistance mediated by the regulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase-α (AMPKα)-sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) pathway, which also increases the risk of CVD. However, in an OLZ-induced adipogenesis model established in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, it was confirmed that BBR (5 µmol/L) may reverse the upregulation of SREBP and the downregulation of AMPKα phosphorylation to prevent OLZ-induced lipid metabolism disorders (Li et al., 2016). In clinical trials, a pre-mixed nutraceutical combination approved in Italy, consisting of 500 mg BBR, 200 mg red yeast rice and 10 mg policosanols, showed a cholesterol-lowering effect. It significantly reduced TC and LDL-C levels in high cholesterol patients (Affuso et al., 2010) and in elderly patients with high cholesterol who were intolerant to statins (Marazzi et al., 2011). In a parallel controlled study, a combination of BBR with policosanol, red yeast extract, folic acid and astaxanthin, and BBR alone were found to have similar efficacy and both could reduce TC, TG and LDL-C levels to different degrees (Cicero et al., 2007). Some meta-analyses have also confirmed that BBR or BBR-containing health products have beneficial effects on TC, LDL-C and HDL regulation with good safety (Lan et al., 2015; Wei X et al., 2016; Pirro et al., 2016), showing similar cholesterol-lowering effects of statins (Weng et al., 2010). In a recent double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study, an ionic salt berberine ursodeoxycholic acid (BUDCA) formed between BBR and ursodeoxycholic acid significantly reduced serum concentrations of TC and LDL-C, but not TG and HDL-C concentrations, with the maximum dose of 2,000 mg/d at day 28. BUDCA shown to be well tolerated, and no significant adverse effects were reported even at doses of 2,000 mg/d (Di Bisceglie et al., 2020). In summary, the lipid-lowering effect of BBR may be related to its regulating effects on PCSK9-LDLR, HNF-4α-miR122, and AMPKα-SREBP pathways. However, although BBR is proved to reduce the levels of TC, TG, and LDL-C, its effect on HDL has not been confirmed, and hence, clinical administration of BBR as a lipid-lowering drug needs to be further explored.
Hypertension
As a chronic disease, hypertension is a major risk factor for increased mortality in patients with CVD. The control of blood pressure is related to the reduction of the occurrence of complications such as stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, AS, and ventricular arrhythmia (Ventura and Lavie, 2019). A meta-analysis showed that in the treatment of hypertension, lifestyle intervention combined with BBR reduces blood pressure better than lifestyle intervention or placebo alone, and BBR combined with oral antihypertensive drug also reduced blood pressure better than the same antihypertensive drug. The usual intake of BBR was 0.6–2.7 g per day. Additionally, it is noteworthy that no serious adverse effects were reported in 27 randomized controlled clinical trials with BBR treatment alone (Lan et al., 2015). In a 2 years clinical study that analyzed biochemical markers of renal function and color Doppler ultrasound imaging, BBR showed a renal protective effect for hypertensive patients with type-2 diabetes. In addition to baseline treatment, patients in the add-on group received oral BBR for 24 months. The dose of BBR was 0.1 g three times per day, with a 2 weeks no-treatment intervals every 5 months. The associated mechanism may be the suppression of inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with hypertension and diabetes, thereby improving renal hemodynamics and curtailing kidney injury (Dai et al., 2015). Nitric oxide (NO) can promote vasodilation, prevent vasodilation disorders, and protect the vascular endothelium. In a recent clinical study, trimetazidine combined with BBR was administered to coronary heart disease patients with comorbid essential hypertension for the first time. It was found that trimetazidine combined with BBR could significantly enhance the expression of endothelial NO synthase gene (eNOS), increase the expression of NO, and improve flow-mediated dilation, indicating the improved efficacy of combined drugs (Zhang et al., 2018). In a recent animal experiment, BBR (50 mg/kg/d) was used as an intervention in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The findings showed that blood pressure and circulating endothelial microparticles level were partly reduced. In addition, BBR maintained arterial elasticity by reducing aortic pulse wave velocity and increasing the content of arterial media elastin fiber, indicating that endothelial function was improved by maintaining better endothelium-dependent vasodilation. (Zhang et al., 2020). The contraction of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) is the main cause of vascular stiffness, mainly influenced by the regulation of calmodulin (CaM)-dependent myosin light chain (MLC). Increased Ca2+ influx causes intracellular Ca2+ concentration to rise momentarily, which leads to MLC phosphorylation and causes VSMC contraction (Ratz et al., 2005). Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) is a Ca2+ permeable cation channel (Ueda et al., 2011). It was reported that BBR (100 mg/kg/d, p.o., 7 days) reduced blood pressure in deoxycorticosterone acetate-induced hypertensive mice and the dose of 50 mg/kg/d alleviated vascular stiffness in elderly Apo−/−E mice. Such results were possibly mediated by the reduction of Ca2+ levels and CaM/MLC activity by BBR through the inhibition of the TRPV4 channel, which caused VSMC to relax and induced the anti-hypertensive as well as anti-vascular aging effects (Wang et al., 2015a). The progression of hypertension usually involves damage to the vascular endothelial cells, accompanied by inflammation and apoptosis (Chung et al., 2004). The activation of myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-dependent toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway can promote the expression of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and AP-1, and thus lead to the production of a large number of inflammatory factors, such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), IL-1 and IL-6, which are associated with hypertension-induced endothelial damage. BBR (1.25, 2.5, and 5 µmol/L) could inhibit the apoptosis of aortic endothelial cells isolated from SHR, decrease the expression of TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB, IL-6 and TNF-α, and have a certain protective effect on hypertension-induced vascular endothelial injury (Romero et al., 2011; Wang and Ding, 2015). CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) plays a key role in the mediation of EPCs for endothelial repair (Sainz and Sata, 2007). In a recent study, EPCs were isolated from prehypertensive patients, cultured, and transplanted into the nude mice model of carotid artery injury. In the BBR (5 μmol/L) pretreated group, EPC significantly accelerated in vivo re-endothelialization and decreased the expression of CXCR4 and downstream Janus kinase-2 (JAK-2), indicating that BBR might protect endothelial cells by interfering with the CXCR4/JAK-2 signaling pathway (Shao et al., 2018). ER stress is closely related to the occurrence of hypertension and ROS is one of the major mediators (Schröder and Kaufman, 2005). BBR (1 μmol/L) may inhibit endothelium-dependent contractions by activating the AMPK pathway, thereby inhibiting ER stress, eliminating ROS, and consequently downregulating COX-2expression in carotid arteries of SHR, which shows a protective effect on vascular function (Liu et al., 2015). In short, BBR may reduce blood pressure and prevent arteriosclerosis and endothelial damage caused by hypertension by regulating the TRPV4, MyD88-TLR4, CXCR4/JAK-2 and AMPK pathways.
Ischemic Heart Disease
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major contributor to the global disease burden, and remains a substantial public health challenge worldwide (Dai et al., 2020a; Virani et al., 2020). Myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IR)-induced myocardial cell death are the main cause of increased IHD morbidity and mortality (Perricone and Heide, 2014). MI is the death of myocardial cells caused by local ischemia, while timely myocardial reperfusion through thrombolytic or PCI restores blood flow in the occluded coronary artery. However, this process will inevitably cause further injury to myocardia (Hashmi and Al-Salam, 2015). Oxidative stress, Ca2+ overload, inflammatory response, and apoptosis are key factors in the ischemic process (Hausenloy and Yellon, 2013; Perricone and Heide, 2014). Results of many animal experiments have confirmed that BBR has a protective effect on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (MI/R) injury. In an experimental study, after being pre-administrated into rat models of ischemia in vivo, BBR (100 mg/kg/d, i.g., 2 weeks) was found to significantly reduce the infarct area during IR injury, improve cardiac function, and reduce the concentration of AMPK, the ADP/ATP ratio and the AMP/ATP ratio in myocardial ischemic areas. Therefore, BBR may regulate AMPK activity in non-ischemic and ischemic areas of the heart (Chang et al., 2012). Despite the improvement of coronary ischemia after myocardial reperfusion, a large number of MI patients suffer from insufficient myocardial perfusion due to impaired microvascular function. The induction of angiogenesis can reduce the progression of myocardial infarction and improve cardiac function (Van der Laan et al., 2009). A recent study reported that BBR (100 μmol/L) can increase miR-29b expression, activate Akt in endothelial cells, and promote endothelial cell proliferation and migration, which confirmed the importance of miR-29b in ischemic myocardial remodeling (Zhu et al., 2017). Diabetes increases the risk of ischemic heart disease. BBR (200 mg/kg/d, i.g., 12 weeks) improved cardiac functional recovery in diabetic rats subjected to I/R (Chen et al., 2014). It has also been reported that BBR (200 mg/kg/d, i.g., 2 weeks) may reduce oxidative stress and myocardial inflammation by activating the silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) signaling pathway (Yu et al., 2016), reduce ER stress-induced apoptosis by activating the AK2/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 signaling pathway (Zhao et al., 2016), reduce cardiomyocyte apoptosis by improving mitochondrial dysfunction (Wang et al., 2015b), and protected the myocardial injury via the HIF-1a/BNIP3 pathway (Zhu et al., 2020) in MI/R injury rats. In vitro experiments revealed the mechanism of the protective effect of BBR on MI/R injury might be it (50 μmol/L) inhibited apoptosis by activating the AMPK, PI3K-Akt-eNOS, Smad7, and Notch1/Hes1-PTEN/Akt signaling pathways in cardiomyocytes (Chen et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2018). In addition, BBR (50 μmol/L) may protect myocytes by reducing the expression of caspase-3 (Yao et al., 2018), inhibiting autophagy activation (Huang et al., 2015), promoting mitochondrial autophagy, and promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation (Zhu et al., 2020). When BBR (10 mg/kg/d, i.g., 5 days) extract was combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in a rat model of myocardial IR injury, the transcript levels of vascular endothelial cell growth factor, fibroblast growth factor-2, and platelet response factor-1 were significantly increased. In addition, caspase-3 protein level and infarct size were significantly reduced after 7 days of reperfusion. It can be suggested that HIIT and BBR, alone or in combination, might exert an effect on reducing myocardial infarct size by reducing caspase-3 protein expression and increasing the expression of angiogenesis-promoting factors (Banaei et al., 2020). In summary, BBR may reduce apoptosis and improve myocardial I/R injury by regulating the expression and/or activity of the molecular factors including AMPK, miR-29b, PI3K-Akt-eNOS, SIRT1, Notch1/Hes1-PTEN/Akt, AK2/STAT3, HIF-1a/BNIP3, and Smad7.
Myocarditis and Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis is an inflammation of the myocardium caused by infectious, idiopathic or autoimmune causes. A wide spectrum of infectious pathogens including viruses, bacteria, and chlamydia, as well as toxicity and hypersensitivity reactions may cause cardiac damage and lead to inflammation. Viruses (eg, enteroviruses such as coxsackievirus) are the most common infectious pathogens reported in acute myocarditis. Viral proliferation in cardiomyocytes can cause tissue damage, and viral entry through its receptor activates the immune signaling systems, which contributes to cytoskeletal remodeling of host cells. In addition, ongoing inflammation results in changes in cardiac structure and the decline in function, which leads to the development of dilated cardiomyopathy (Sagar et al., 2012). Currently, coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3)-induced acute myocarditis mice model is regarded as the primary animal model for myocarditis, which shows many similarities to clinical myocarditis (Huber, 2016). A recent study replicated CVB3 virus infection in human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells or primary cardiomyocyte models in vitro and demonstrated that BBR (100 μmol/L) inhibited the phosphorylation levels of JNK and p38 MAPK in cells, thereby inhibiting the replication of CVB3 in vitro (Dai et al., 2017). To explore the antiviral effects of BBR in vivo, mouse model of CVB3-induced myocarditis was established with intraperitoneal infection, and the results suggested that BBR (100 mg/kg, i.g., 7 days) might reduce cardiac injury and myocardial viral titer, and improve the survival rate and cardiac function as well. In addition, BBR treatment inhibited macrophage infiltration and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, CCL2, CCL5, and CXCL10 in mice of CVB3-induced myocarditis by inhibiting CVB3 replication. These results demonstrated the beneficial effects of BBR in alleviating CVB3-induced myocarditis in vivo (Dai et al., 2020b). Th17 and Th1 are important immune cells involved in the pathogenesis of myocarditis, producing pathogenic cytokines such as IL-17 and IFNg, respectively, which facilitate the development of such autoimmune disease (Tajiri et al., 2012). A recent study using purified porcine cardiac myosin-induced experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) model in Lewis rats indicated that BBR treatment (200 mg/kg/d, i.g., 3 weeks) inhibited Th17/Th1 cell subpopulation differentiation, significantly reduced left ventricular dysfunction and reversed disease progression in EAM rats. Moreover, BBR significantly inhibited the overexpression of phosphorylated (p)-STAT1, STAT3 and STAT4. Thus, BBR could improve EAM by differentially regulating the activities of p-STAT1, p-STAT3 and p-STAT4, which further inhibited the differentiation of Th17 and Th1 cells (Liu et al., 2016). Dilated cardiomyopathy is the most common form of cardiomyopathy induced by a variety of causes, ranging from myocarditis to alcohol and other toxins such as drugs, cardiotoxins and chemotherapeutic agents, to rheumatic, endocrine and metabolic diseases, all of which can lead to reduced left ventricular systolic function and left ventricular or biventricular dilatation (Hänselmann et al., 2020). The anthracycline anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) is an effective and commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of malignancies, and its main side effect is cardiotoxicity. The main mechanisms are increased oxidative stress, down-regulation of gene expression and induction of apoptosis (Chatterjee et al., 2010). Sirtuin 3 (Sirt3) is the major mitochondrial deacetylase, and to date, studies of Sirt3 have been limited to cell culture systems (Lombard et al., 2007). Sirt3 overexpression contributes to the reduction of DOX cytotoxicity in H9c2 cardiomyocytes. In a pretreated H9c2 cell model, BBR (1 and 10 μmol/L) increased Sirt3 protein levels in the presence of DOX and inhibited DOX-induced caspase 9 and 3-like activation (Coelho et al., 2017). In a recent study a rat model of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity was established. Compared with the DOX group, serum creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) and MDA levels were decreased and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) levels were increased in the BBR-treated group. BBR (10 mg/kg/d, i.g., 10 days) attenuated mitochondrial Ca2+ overload, and restored the DOX-induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. BBR showed a protective effect against DOX-induced free radical damage in cardiac tissue, possibly by inhibiting intracellular Ca2+ elevation and attenuating mitochondrial dysfunction (Xiong et al., 2018). Furthermore, a study, intervening in a DOX-induced cardiac injury rat model with BBR (20 mg/kg, i.g., 10 days) and in a DOX-induced H9c2 cell injury model with 1 μmol/L BBR, demonstrated BBR’s protective effect against DOX-induced cardiovascular injury, which might be associated with upregulation of SIRT1 and downregulation of p66shc expression, resulting in inhibition of ROS production, apoptosis and mitochondrial damage, thus improving cardiac dysfunction (Wu et al., 2019). Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a disease in which there is abnormal myocardial structure and function in the absence of other cardiac risk factors (Jia et al., 2018). In a high-sucrose and high-fat diet-fed and streptozotocin-induced rat model of DCM, BBR (10, 30 mg/kg/d, i.g., 16 weeks) significantly improved cardiac diastolic and systolic function, as well as preventing cardiac hypertrophy. BBR intervention partially reversed the metabolic disorders of biomarkers including phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine and sphingolipids (Dong et al., 2018). BBR treatment (100 mg/kg/d, i.g., 16 weeks) in diabetic rats partially improved cardiac function and attenuated the development of cardiac fibrosis in rats with DCM, probably by increasing cardiac AMPK and AKT activities and inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity, as confirmed in a palmitate-induced hypertrophy model of H9C2 cell. In addition, the hypertrophy of H9C2 cells was inhibited by upregulating the expression of α-myosin heavy chain and downregulating the expression of β-myosin heavy chain (Chang et al., 2015). In General, BBR may attenuate myocardial injury by regulating the activity of JNK-p38 MAPK, SIRT1-p66shc, AMPK-AKT, GSK3β, STAT1, STAT3, STAT4, Sirt3, and other proteins.
Heart Failure
Heart failure (HF) is the end stage of multiple heart diseases. Ventricular remodeling is an important strategy for the treatment of HF (Konstam et al., 2011). As early as 1988, a clinical study reported the protective effect of BBR on 12 patients with refractory congestive heart failure. The study reported that intravenous infusion of BBR at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg per minute could reduce the end-diastolic pressure of the right atrium and left ventricle, increase the left ventricular ejection fraction, decrease the arteriovenous oxygen difference, and have a significant effect on hemodynamics (Marin-Neto et al., 1988). Moreover, oral administration of BBR is also proved effective for HF. A total of 156 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) were randomly divided into a treatment group and a placebo group. In the treatment group, BBR at a dose of 1.2 g/d was orally administered in addition to conventional treatment. Compared with the control group, the BBR group showed an increase in the 6 min walking distance and left ventricular ejection fraction, improvement of the dyspnea-fatigue index, a decrease in the frequency and complexity of ventricular premature contractions (VPCs), indicating that BBR might improve quality of life and reduce VPCs and mortality in CHF patients. (Zeng et al., 2003). In animal experiments, different doses of BBR have been used to treat diastolic heart failure in rats, and could reduce the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and decrease the Ca2+ levels in myocardial cells in a dose-dependent manner (Zhang et al., 2008). It has already been reported that the advanced progression of pathologic myocardial hypertrophy can lead to pressure overload-induced cardiac dysfunction or HF (Frey and Olson, 2003). Furthermore, the autophagic process that causes the degradation of organelles and proteins is closely related to the pathogenesis of HF, which can remove the damaged proteins and organelles, especially mitochondria and ER (Nakai et al., 2007; Gottlieb and Mentzer, 2010). Studies have shown that by inhibiting the activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and the phosphorylation of its upstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), BBR (10 mg/kg/d, p.o., 4 weeks) could enhance autophagy and inhibit ER stress, thus playing an important role in preventing pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy and apoptosis (Li et al., 2014; Hashemzaei et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020). Additionally, BBR also improved cardiac dysfunction and myocardial hypertrophy by upregulating putative kinase 1 (PINK1)/cytosolic E3 ubiquitin ligase (Parkin)-mediated mitochondrial autophagy and inhibited cardiomyocyte apoptosis and mitochondrial damage (Abudureyimu et al., 2020). It has also been reported that through the P21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1)-dependent signaling pathway, BBR (3 mg/kg/d) might suppress the upregulation of Smad3-mediated muscle-specific F-box protein (Fbxo32) in downstream promoter region and take part in the inhibition of myocardial hypertrophy (Tsui et al., 2015). In brief, BBR may improve cardiac function and prevent heart failure by regulating the mTOR pathway, the Pak1 pathway and Ca2+ concentration.
Safety
In 2015, a meta-analysis including 27 RCTs on BBR reported that no serious adverse effect was found during the treatment of type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension and the treatments with BBR in such trials were at a relatively low cost compared with other first-line medicines and treatments (Lan et al., 2015). However, human pharmacokinetic data show that BBR is poorly absorbed from the intestinal tract and rapidly metabolized in vivo, resulting in its low oral bioavailability. Whereas, increasing gastrointestinal reactions were found when treated with large dosages of BBR, which is possibly a major obstacle to the application of BBR (Wang et al., 2017). With regard this, a transdermal formulation of BBR and the BBR precursor dihydroberberine were developed (Buchanan et al., 2018). Transdermal administration of BBR increased circulating levels of BBR and avoided side effects on the gastrointestinal, kidney and liver. A nano-system BT1500M encapsulated with BBR in the latest studies can increase gut absorption and intracellular uptake of BBR which is thought to be promising in clinical applications (Ma et al., 2020).
Summary and Outlook
Previous experimental and clinical studies of BBR in the treatment of CVD were relatively comprehensively reviewed which indicated the therapeutic effects of BBR on various CVD, including arrhythmia, atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, myocarditis and cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Such effects are mediated via multiple targets, including pathway targets such as MAPK, JNK, NF-κB, AMPK, ERK, AKT, TRPV4, MyD88-TLR4, and so on (Figure 2, Table 1). A recent review summarizes the pharmacological properties and therapeutic applications of BBR in CVD and metabolic diseases, including cardiac hypertrophy, HF, AS, IR, stroke, arrhythmia, DM, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, through 2019. It provided multiple perspectives on the efficacies and mechanisms of BBR interventions in a wide range of diseases, giving a glimpse of the therapeutic potential of BBR (Feng et al., 2019). Furthermore, BBR also has advantages in cancer, digestive and neurological diseases therapy (Song et al., 2020). The present review summarized the main pharmacological effects of BBR on CVD and related mechanisms, including the up-to-date work on myocarditis and cardiomyopathy, which provided more reference for the future development of BBR drugs. In addition, the effects of BBR on protecting vascular endothelium, reducing the area of myocardial infarction and improving heart function undoubtedly confirm the clinical prospects of BBR for improving long-term cardiac prognosis. A recent review described that BBR exerts antioxidant, hepatoprotection, neuroprotection, nephroprotection, pulmonary protection, as well as immunomodulatory, antidiabetic and antitumor effects by activating the nuclear factor erythroid 2 - related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathway, which provides further insights into the treatment of BBR for CVD although more studies are still needed to demonstratae the modulatory effects of BBR (Ashrafizadeh et al., 2020). In general, BBR is a promising option for CVD. The main formulation of BBR in clinical application is its hydrochloride or sulfate (Jin et al., 2016; Lin and Zhang, 2018), which have low oral bioavailability. Modern oral formulations, BBR with different types of nanocarriers, overcome this shortcoming (Mirhadi et al., 2018), and reduce the frequency of administration as much as possible, which not only increases patient compliance, but also reduces potential side effects. However, since most of the mechanisms of actions are obtained from laboratory, it is necessary to get more conclusion from clinical trials to better evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BBR, and to further clarify its mechanisms.
FIGURE 2. The summarization of effects and main signal pathways regulated by berberine in its organ-and tissue-protective effects from both in vivo and in vitri studies. (↑: increase; ↓: decrease).
TABLE 1. Summary of the mechanisms of action of berberine in the treatment of CVD.
Author Contributions
YC and QX carried out the concepts and wrote the original draft. JL and YM participated the literature screening. KC proposed the topic and polished the manuscript. WC and QL reviewed and proofread the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81874458) and the Authorized Project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (ZZ13–036–4).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
All the authors critically reviewed the literature and contributed to drafting the manuscript.
Glossary
AF atrial fibrillation
AMPK AMP-activated protein kinase
AP-1 activator protein-1
Apo−/−E apolipoprotein E gene knockout
AS atherosclerosis
BBR berberine
CaM calmodulin
CHF chronic heart failure
COX-2 cyclooxygenase-2
CVB3 coxsackievirus B3
CVD cardiovascular diseases
CXCR4 CXC chemokine receptor 4
DCM diabetic cardiomyopathy
DOX doxorubicin
EAM experimental autoimmune myocarditis
ECM extracellular matrix
EMMPRIN extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer
ERK extracellular signal-regulated kinases
ERS endoplasmic reticulum stress
HF heart failure
HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
HIIT high-intensity interval training
HNF-4α hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α
HUVECs human umbilical vein endothelial cells
IHD ischemic heart disease
IL interleukin
IR ischemia-reperfusion
JAK-2 janus kinase-2
JNK jun n- terminal kinases
LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol
LDLR LDL receptor
LOX1 lipoprotein receptor-1
LPS endotoxin
MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase
MDA malondialdehyde
MI myocardial infarction
MI/R myocardial ischemia/reperfusion
MLC myosin light chain
MMP matrix metalloproteinase
mTOR mammalian target of rapamycin
MyD88 myeloid differentiation factor 88
NF-κB nuclear factor-κB
NH neointimal hyperplasia
NO nitric oxide
OLZ olanzapine
ox-LDL oxidized low-density lipoprotein
PA palmitate
PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension
Pak1 p21-activated kinase 1
PCI percutaneous coronary intervention
PCSK9 proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin9 type
PDI protein disulfide bond isomerase
PINK1 putative kinase 1
ROS reactive oxygen species
SHR spontaneously hypertensive rats
SIRT1 silent information regulator 1
Sirt3 sirtuin 3
SREBP sterol regulatory element binding protein
STAT signal transducer and activator of transcription
TC total cholesterol
TG triglyceride
TLR4 toll-like receptor 4
TNF-α tumor necrosis factor α
TRPV4 transient receptor potential vanilloid 4
Trx thioredoxin
u-PA urokinase-type plasminogen activator
VPCs ventricular premature contractions
VSMC vascular smooth muscle cells
VT ventricular tachycardia
References
Abudureyimu, M., Yu, W., Cao, R. Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., and Zheng, H. (2020). Berberine promotes cardiac function by upregulating PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy in heart failure. Front. Physiol. 11, 565751. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.565751
Affuso, F., Ruvolo, A., Micillo, F., Saccà, L., and Fazio, S. (2010). Effects of a nutraceutical combination (berberine, red yeast rice and policosanols) on lipid levels and endothelial function randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 20, 656–661. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2009.05.017
Ashrafizadeh, M., Fekri, H. S., Ahmadi, Z., Farkhondeh, T., and Samarghandian, S. (2020). Therapeutic and biological activities of berberine: the involvement of Nrf2 signaling pathway. J. Cell Biochem. 121, 1575–1585. doi:10.1002/jcb.29392
Banaei, P., Nazem, F., Nazari, A., and Arjomand, A. (2020). Preconditioning effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and berberine supplementation on the gene expression of angiogenesis regulators and caspase-3 protein in the rats with myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 4104965. doi:10.1155/2020/4104965
Blessberger, H., Kammler, J., Domanovits, H., Schlager, O., Wildner, B., Azar, D., et al. (2018). Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3, CD004476. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004476.pub2
Buchanan, B., Meng, Q., Poulin, M.-M., Zuccolo, J., Azike, C. G., Gabriele, J., et al. (2018). Comparative pharmacokinetics and safety assessment of transdermal berberine and dihydroberberine. PLoS One 13, e0194979. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194979
Cao, J. X., Fu, L., Dong, Y. H., and Dong, Y. L. (2012). The effect of berberine on arrhythmia caused by stretch of isolated myocardial infarcted hearts in rats. Heart 98, E1–E319. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302920a.220
Chang, W., Zhang, M., Li, J., Meng, Z., Xiao, D., Wei, S., et al. (2012). Berberine attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury via regulation of adenosine-5ʹ-monophosphate kinase activity in both non-ischemic and ischemic areas of the rat heart. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 26, 467–478. doi:10.1007/s10557-012-6422-0
Chang, W., Zhang, M., Meng, Z., Yu, Y., Yao, F., Hatch, G. M., et al. (2015). Berberine treatment prevents cardiac dysfunction and remodeling through activation of 5ʹ-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase in type 2 diabetic rats and in palmitate-induced hypertrophic H9c2 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 769, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.10.043
Chatterjee, K., Zhang, J., Honbo, N., and Karliner, J. S. (2010). Doxorubicin cardiomyopathy. Cardiology 115, 155–162. doi:10.1159/000265166
Chen, K., Li, G., Geng, F., Zhang, Z., Li, J., Yang, M., et al. (2014). Berberine reduces ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial apoptosis via activating AMPK and PI3K-Akt signaling in diabetic rats. Apoptosis 19, 946–957. doi:10.1007/s10495-014-0977-0
Chen, X., Jiang, X., Cheng, C., Chen, J., Huang, S., Xu, M., et al. (2020). Berberine attenuates cardiac hypertrophy through inhibition of mTOR signaling pathway. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 34, 463–473. doi:10.1007/s10557-020-06977-z
Chen, X. W., Di, Y. M., Zhang, J., Zhou, Z. W., Li, C. G., and Zhou, S. F. (2012). Interaction of herbal compounds with biological targets: a case study with berberine. Sci.World J. 2012, 708292. doi:10.1100/2012/708292
Chi, L., Peng, L., Hu, X., Pan, N., and Zhang, Y. (2014). Berberine combined with atorvastatin downregulates LOX-1 expression through the ET-1 receptor in monocyte/macrophages. Int. J. Mol. Med. 34, 283–290. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2014.1748
Cho, B. J., Im, E. K., Kwon, J. H., Lee, K. H., Shin, H. J., Oh, J., et al. (2005). Berberine inhibits the production of lysophosphatidylcholine-induced reactive oxygen species and the ERK1/2 pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol. Cells 20, 429–434.
Chung, N. A., Beevers, D. G., and Lip, G. (2004). Effects of losartan versus hydrochlorothiazide on indices of endothelial damage/dysfunction, angiogenesis and tissue factor in essential hypertension. Blood Press. 13. 183–189. doi:10.1080/08037050410033312
Cicero, A. F., Rovati, L. C., and Setnikar, I. (2007). Eulipidemic effects of berberine administered alone or in combination with other natural cholesterol-lowering agents. a single-blind clinical investigation. Arzneimittelforschung 57, 26–30. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1296582
Coelho, A. R., Martins, T. R., Couto, R., Deus, C., Pereira, C. V., Simões, R. F., et al. (2017). Berberine-induced cardioprotection and Sirt3 modulation in doxorubicin-treated H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 2904–2923. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.07.030
Cui, Y.-J., Yang, P., Dai, D.-Z., Gao, L., Xiao, D.-W., and Wang, Y.-Q. (2003). CPU 86017 suppresses tachyarrhythmias induced by ouabain and myocardial infarction: concentrations in plasma and different areas of the heart in dogs. Drug Dev. Res. 58, 131–137. doi:10.1002/ddr.10142
Dai, P., Wang, J., Lin, L., Zhang, Y., and Wang, Z. (2015). Renoprotective effects of berberine as adjuvant therapy for hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: evaluation via biochemical markers and color Doppler ultrasonography. Exp. Ther. Med. 10, 869–876. doi:10.3892/etm.2015.2585
Dai, Q., Zhang, D., Yu, H., Xie, W., Xin, R., Wang, L., et al. (2017). Berberine restricts coxsackievirus b type 3 replication via inhibition of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPK activation in vitro. Med. Sci. Monit. 23, 1448–1455. doi:10.12659/msm.899804
Dai, H., Much, A. A., Maor, E., Asher, E., Younis, A., Xu, Y., et al. (2020a). Global, regional, and national burden of ischaemic heart disease and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes 76. doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa076
Dai, Q., He, X., Yu, H., Bai, Y., Jiang, L., Sheng, H., et al. (2020b). Berberine impairs coxsackievirus B3‐induced myocarditis through the inhibition of virus replication and host pro‐inflammatory response. J. Med. Virol. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1002/jmv.26747
Di Bisceglie, A. M., Watts, G. F., Lavin, P., Yu, M., Bai, R., and Liu, L. (2020). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of HTD1801 (berberine ursodeoxycholate, BUDCA) in patients with hyperlipidemia. Lipids Health Dis. 19, 239. doi:10.1186/s12944-020-01406-4
Dong, S., Zhang, S., Chen, Z., Zhang, R., Tian, L., Cheng, L., et al. (2018). Berberine could ameliorate cardiac dysfunction via interfering myocardial lipidomic profiles in the rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Front. Physiol. 9, 1042. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01042
Feng, X., Sureda, A., Jafari, S., Memariani, Z., Tewari, D., Annunziata, G., et al. (2019). Berberine in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Theranostics 9, 1923–1951. doi:10.7150/thno.30787
Frey, N., and Olson, E. N. (2003). Cardiac hypertrophy: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65, 45–79. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142243
Gottlieb, R. A., and Mentzer, R. M. (2010). Autophagy during cardiac stress: joys and frustrations of autophagy. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 72, 45–59. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135757
Hänselmann, A., Veltmann, C., Bauersachs, J., and Berliner, D. (2020). Dilated cardiomyopathies and non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Herz 45, 212–220. doi:10.1007/s00059-020-04903-5
Hashemzaei, M., Entezari Heravi, R., Rezaee, R., Roohbakhsh, A., and Karimi, G. (2017). Regulation of autophagy by some natural products as a potential therapeutic strategy for cardiovascular disorders. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 802, 44–51. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.02.038
Hashmi, S., and Al-Salam, S. (2015). Acute myocardial infarction and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a comparison. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8, 8786–8796.
Hausenloy, D. J., and Yellon, D. M. (2013). Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 92–100. doi:10.1172/JCI62874
Hua, Z., and Wang, X. L. (1994). Inhibitory effect of berberine on potassium channels in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Yao Xue Xue Bao 29, 576–580. doi:10.1016/s0014-2999(96)00663-2
Huang, W. M., Wu, Z. D., and Gan, Y. Q. (1989). Effects of berberine on ischemic ventricular arrhythmia. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 17, 300–319.
Huang, Z., Han, Z., Ye, B., Dai, Z., Shan, P., Lu, Z., et al. (2015). Berberine alleviates cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting excessive autophagy in cardiomyocytes. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 762, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.05.028
Huang, Z., Meng, S., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Chen, T., and Wang, C. (2012). Suppression of oxLDL-induced MMP-9 and EMMPRIN expression by berberine via inhibition of NF-κB activation in human THP-1 macrophages. Anat. Rec. 295, 78–86. doi:10.1002/ar.21489
Huber, S. A. (2016). Viral myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: etiology and pathogenesis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 22, 408–426. doi:10.2174/1381612822666151222160500
Jia, G., Hill, M. A., and Sowers, J. R. (2018). Diabetic cardiomyopathy: an update of mechanisms contributing to this clinical entity. Circ. Res. 122, 624–638. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311586
Jin, Y., Khadka, D. B., and Cho, W. J. (2016). Pharmacological effects of berberine and its derivatives: a patent update. Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 26, 229–243. doi:10.1517/13543776.2016.1118060
Ju, J., Li, J., Lin, Q., and Xu, H. (2018). Efficacy and safety of berberine for dyslipidaemias: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Phytomedicine 50, 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2018.09.212
Ke, X., Huang, Y., Li, L., Xin, F., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). Berberine attenuates arterial plaque formation in atherosclerotic rats with damp-heat syndrome via regulating autophagy. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 14, 2449–2460. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S250524
Konstam, M. A., Kramer, D. G., Patel, A. R., Maron, M. S., and Udelson, J. E. (2011). Left ventricular remodeling in heart failure: current concepts in clinical significance and assessment. JACC. Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.10.008
Lan, J., Zhao, Y., Dong, F., Yan, Z., Zheng, W., Fan, J., et al. (2015). Meta-analysis of the effect and safety of berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipemia and hypertension. J. Ethnopharmacol. 161, 69–81. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2014.09.049
Lee, S., Lim, H. J., Park, H. Y., Lee, K. S., Park, J. H., and Jang, Y. (2006). Berberine inhibits rat vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and improves neointima formation after balloon injury in vivo. Berberine improves neointima formation in a rat model. Atherosclerosis 186, 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.06.048
Li, M. H., Zhang, Y. J., Yu, Y. H., Yang, S. H., Iqbal, J., Mi, Q. Y., et al. (2014). Berberine improves pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction through enhanced autophagy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 728, 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.01.061
Li, P., Kang, Y., and Wang, G. X. (1995). The study of the effects of berberine on reperfusion-induced arrhythmias and on modulating calcium in rat. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull. 11, 217–220.
Li, Y., Zhao, X., Feng, X., Liu, X., Deng, C., and Hu, C. H. (2016). Berberine alleviates olanzapine-induced adipogenesis via the AMPKα-SREBP pathway in 3T3-L1 cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1865. doi:10.3390/ijms17111865
Lin, X., and Zhang, N. (2018). Berberine: pathways to protect neurons. Phytother. Res. 32, 1501–1510. doi:10.1002/ptr.6107
Liu, L., Liu, J., Huang, Z., Yu, X., Zhang, X., Dou, D., et al. (2015). Berberine improves endothelial function by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress in the carotid arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 458, 796–801. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.028
Liu, S. J., Yin, C. X., Ding, M. C., Xia, S. Y., Shen, Q. M., and Wu, J. D. (2014). Berberine suppresses in vitro migration of human aortic smooth muscle cells through the inhibitions of MMP-2/9, u-PA, AP-1, and NF-κB. BMB. Rep. 47, 388–392. doi:10.5483/bmbrep.2014.47.7.186
Liu, X., Zhang, X., Ye, L., and Yuan, H. (2016). Protective mechanisms of berberine against experimental autoimmune myocarditis in a rat model. Biomed. Pharmacother. 79, 222–230. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2016.02.015
Lombard, D. B., Alt, F. W., Cheng, H. L., Bunkenborg, J., Streeper, R. S., Mostoslavsky, R., et al. (2007). Mammalian Sir2 homolog SIRT3 regulates global mitochondrial lysine acetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 8807–8814. doi:10.1128/MCB.01636-07
Ma, L., Zhang, L., Wang, B., Wei, J., Liu, J., and Zhang, L. (2015). Berberine inhibits Chlamydia pneumoniae infection-induced vascular smooth muscle cell migration through downregulating MMP3 and MMP9 via PI3K. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 755, 102–109. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.02.039
Ma, X., Zhang, T., Luo, Z., Li, X., Lin, M., Li, R., et al. (2020). Functional nano-vector boost anti-atherosclerosis efficacy of berberine in Apoe(−/−) mice. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10, 1769–1783. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2020.03.005
Marazzi, G., Cacciotti, L., Pelliccia, F., Iaia, L., Volterrani, M., Caminiti, G., et al. (2011). Long-term effects of nutraceuticals (berberine, red yeast rice, policosanol) in elderly hypercholesterolemic patients. Adv. Ther. 28, 1105–1113. doi:10.1007/s12325-011-0082-5
Marin-Neto, J. A., Maciel, B. C., Secches, A. L., and Gallo Júnior, L. (1988). Cardiovascular effects of berberine in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Clin. Cardiol. 11, 253–260. doi:10.1002/clc.4960110411
McMonagle, M. P. (2020). The quest for effective pharmacological suppression of neointimal hyperplasia. Curr. Probl. Surg. 57, 100807. doi:10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100807
Mirhadi, E., Rezaee, M., and Malaekeh-Nikouei, B. (2018). Nano strategies for berberine delivery, a natural alkaloid of berberis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 104, 465–473. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.067
Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., et al. (2015). Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation 131, e29–e322. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000152
Nakai, A., Yamaguchi, O., Takeda, T., Higuchi, Y., Hikoso, S., Taniike, M., et al. (2007). The role of autophagy in cardiomyocytes in the basal state and in response to hemodynamic stress. Nat. Med. 13, 619–624. doi:10.1038/nm1574
Pei, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Zhang, B., Fang, L., Liu, B., et al. (2019). Berberine alleviates oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced macrophage activation by downregulating galectin-3 via the NF-κB and AMPK signaling pathways. Phytother. Res. 33, 294–308. doi:10.1002/ptr.6217
Perricone, A. J., and Vander Heide, R. S. (2014). Novel therapeutic strategies for ischemic heart disease. Pharmacol. Res. 89, 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2014.08.004
Pirro, M., Mannarino, M. R., Bianconi, V., Simental-Mendía, L. E., Bagaglia, F., Mannarino, E., et al. (2016). The effects of a nutraceutical combination on plasma lipids and glucose: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol. Res. 110, 76–88. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2016.04.021
Qiu, H., Wu, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, C., Xue, L., Wang, H., et al. (2017). Effect of berberine on PPARα-NO signalling pathway in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation induced by angiotensin IV. Pharm. Biol. 55, 227–232. doi:10.1080/13880209.2016.1257642
Ratz, P. H., Berg, K. M., Urban, N. H., and Miner, A. S. (2005). Regulation of smooth muscle calcium sensitivity: KCl as a calcium-sensitizing stimulus. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 288, C769–C783. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00529.2004
Romero, C. D., Varma, T. K., Hobbs, J. B., Reyes, A., Driver, B., and Sherwood, E. R. (2011). The toll-like receptor 4 agonist monophosphoryl lipid a augments innate host resistance to systemic bacterial infection. Infect. Immun. 79, 3576–3587. doi:10.1128/IAI.00022-11
Sagar, S., Liu, P. P., and Cooper, L. T. (2012). Myocarditis. Lancet 379, 738–747. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60648-X
Sainz, J., and Sata, M. (2007). CXCR4, a key modulator of vascular progenitor cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27, 263–265. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000256727.34148.e2
Sarna, L. K., Wu, N., Hwang, S. Y., Siow, Y. L., and O, K. (2010). Berberine inhibits NADPH oxidase mediated superoxide anion production in macrophages. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 88, 369–378. doi:10.1139/Y09-136
Schröder, M., and Kaufman, R. J. (2005). The mammalian unfolded protein response. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 739–789. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074134
Shao, Y. J., Tao, J., Yu, B. B., Meng, D., Yang, X. L., Sun, J. P., et al. (2018). Berberine-promoted CXCR4 expression accelerates endothelial repair capacity of early endothelial progenitor cells in persons with prehypertension. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 24, 897–904. doi:10.1007/s11655-018-2568-3
Song, D., Hao, J., and Fan, D. (2020). Biological properties and clinical applications of berberine. Front. Med. 14, 564–582. doi:10.1007/s11684-019-0724-6
Spence, J. D. (2016). Recent advances in pathogenesis, assessment, and treatment of atherosclerosis. F1000Res 5, 1880. doi:10.12688/f1000research.8459.1
Squizzato, A., Keller, T., Romualdi, E., Middeldorp, S., and Donadini, M. P. (2017). Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 12, CD005158. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005158.pub410.1002/14651858.CD005158.pub3
Tajiri, K., Imanaka-Yoshida, K., Matsubara, A., Tsujimura, Y., Hiroe, M., Naka, T., et al. (2012). Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 DNA administration inhibits inflammatory and pathogenic responses in autoimmune myocarditis. J. Immunol. 189, 2043–2053. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1103610
Tan, W., Wang, Y., Wang, K., Wang, S., Liu, J., Qin, X., et al. (2020). Improvement of endothelial dysfunction of berberine in atherosclerotic mice and mechanism exploring through TMT-based proteomics. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 8683404. doi:10.1155/2020/8683404
Timmis, A., Townsend, N., Gale, C., Grobbee, R., Maniadakis, N., Flather, M., et al. (2018). European society of cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2017. Eur. Heart J. 39, 508–579. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628
Tsui, H., Zi, M., Wang, S., Chowdhury, S. K., Prehar, S., Liang, Q., et al. (2015). Smad3 couples pak1 with the antihypertrophic pathway through the E3 ubiquitin ligase, fbxo32. Hypertension 66, 1176–1183. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06068
Ueda, T., Shikano, M., Kamiya, T., Joh, T., and Ugawa, S. (2011). The TRPV4 channel is a novel regulator of intracellular Ca2+ in human esophageal epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 301, G138–G147. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00511.2010
Van der Laan, A. M., Piek, J. J., and Van Royen, N. (2009). Targeting angiogenesis to restore the microcirculation after reperfused MI. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 6, 515–523. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.103
Ventura, H. O., and Lavie, C. J. (2019). Editorial: epidemiology and managing aspects of hypertension. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 34, 329–330. doi:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000631
Virani, S. S., Alonso, A., Benjamin, E. J., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., et al. (2020). Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation 141, e139–e596. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757
Wan, Q., Liu, Z., Yang, Y., and Cui, X. (2018). Suppressive effects of berberine on atherosclerosis via downregulating visfatin expression and attenuating visfatin-induced endothelial dysfunction. Int. J. Mol. Med. 41, 1939–1948. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2018.3440
Wande, Y., Jie, L., Aikai, Z., Yaguo, Z., Linlin, Z., Yue, G., et al. (2020). Berberine alleviates pulmonary hypertension through Trx1 and β-catenin signaling pathways in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 390, 111910. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111910
Wang, L. H., Yu, C. H., Fu, Y., Li, Q., and Sun, Y. Q. (2011). Berberine elicits anti-arrhythmic effects via IK1/Kir2.1 in the rat type 2 diabetic myocardial infarction model. Phytother. Res. 25, 33–37. doi:10.1002/ptr.3097
Wang, J., Guo, T., Peng, Q. S., Yue, S. W., and Wang, S. X. (2015a). Berberine via suppression of transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 channel improves vascular stiffness in mice. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 19, 2607–2616. doi:10.1111/jcmm.12645
Wang, Y., Liu, J., Ma, A., and Chen, Y. (2015b). Cardioprotective effect of berberine against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via attenuating mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8, 14513–14519.
Wang, K., Feng, X., Chai, L., Cao, S., and Qiu, F. (2017). The metabolism of berberine and its contribution to the pharmacological effects. Drug Metab. Rev. 49, 139–157. doi:10.1080/03602532.2017.1306544
Wang, L., Deng, L., Lin, N., Shi, Y., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., et al. (2020). Berberine inhibits proliferation and apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by mechanical stretch via the PDI/ERS and MAPK pathways. Life Sci. 259, 118253. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118253
Wang, Y., and Ding, Y. (2015). Berberine protects vascular endothelial cells in hypertensive rats. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8, 14896–14905.
Wang, Y., and Zidichouski, JA. (2018). Update on the benefits and mechanisms of action of the bioactive vegetal alkaloid berberine on lipid metabolism and homeostasis. Cholesterol 2018, 7173920. doi:10.1155/2018/7173920
Wei, S., Zhang, M., Yu, Y., Lan, X., Yao, F., Yan, X., et al. (2016). Berberine attenuates development of the hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism disorder in type 2 diabetic mice and in palmitate-incubated HepG2 cells through suppression of the HNF-4α miR122 pathway. Plos One 11, e0152097. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152097
Wei, X., Wang, C., Hao, S., Song, H., and Yang, L. (2016). The therapeutic effect of berberine in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Evid. Based. Complement. Alternat. Med. 2016, 3593951. doi:10.1155/2016/3593951
Weng, T. C., Yang, Y. H., Lin, S. J., and Tai, S. H. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the therapeutic equivalence of statins. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 35, 139–151. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01085.x
Wu, M., Yang, S., Wang, S., Cao, Y., Zhao, R., Li, X., et al. (2020). Effect of berberine on atherosclerosis and gut microbiota modulation and their correlation in high-fat diet-fed ApoE−/− mice. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 223. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00223
Wu, Y. Z., Zhang, L., Wu, Z. X., Shan, T. T., and Xiong, C. (2019). Berberine ameliorates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity via a SIRT1/p66Shc-mediated pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2150394. doi:10.1155/2019/2150394
Xiao, H. B., Sun, Z. L., Zhang, H. B., and Zhang, D. S. (2012). Berberine inhibits dyslipidemia in C57BL/6 mice with lipopolysaccharide induced inflammation. Pharmacol. Rep. 64, 889–895. doi:10.1016/S1734-1140(12)70883-6
Xiong, C., Wu, Y. Z., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z. X., Chen, X. Y., Jiang, P., et al. (2018). Protective effect of berberine on acute cardiomyopathy associated with doxorubicin treatment. Oncol. Lett. 15, 5721–5729. doi:10.3892/ol.2018.8020
Xu, S., Pelisek, J., and Jin, Z. G. (2018a). Atherosclerosis is an epigenetic disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 29, 739–742. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2018.04.007
Xu, S., Xu, Y., Yin, M., Zhang, S., Liu, P., Koroleva, M., et al. (2018b). Flow-dependent epigenetic regulation of IGFBP5 expression by H3K27me3 contributes to endothelial anti-inflammatory effects. Theranostics 8, 3007–3021. doi:10.7150/thno.21966
Yao, W., Wang, X., and Xiao, K. (2018). Protective effect of berberine against cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting apoptosis through the activation of Smad7. Mol. Cell. Probes 38, 38–44. doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2017.12.002
Ye, M., Fu, S., Pi, R., and He, F. (2009). Neuropharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of berberine: a review of recent research. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 61, 831–837. doi:10.1211/jpp/61.07.000110.1211/jpp/61.07.0001
Yu, L., Li, F., Zhao, G., Yang, Y., Jin, Z., Zhai, M., et al. (2015). Protective effect of berberine against myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury: role of Notch1/Hes1-PTEN/Akt signaling. Apoptosis 20, 796–810. doi:10.1007/s10495-015-1122-4
Yu, L., Li, Q., Yu, B., Yang, Y., Jin, Z., Duan, W., et al. (2016). Berberine attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation response: role of silent information regulator 1. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 1689602. doi:10.1155/2016/1689602
Zeng, X. H., Zeng, X. J., and Li, Y. Y. (2003). Efficacy and safety of berberine for congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 92, 173–176. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00533-2
Zhang, G., Lin, X., Shao, Y., Su, C., Tao, J., and Liu, X. (2020). Berberine reduces endothelial injury and arterial stiffness in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 42, 257–265. doi:10.1080/10641963.2019.1632339
Zhang, H., Niu, H., Yuan, X., Chang, J., and Wang, X. (2018). Trimetazidine combined with berberine on endothelial function of patients with coronary heart disease combined with primary hypertension. Exp. Ther. Med. 16, 1318–1322. doi:10.3892/etm.2018.6278
Zhang, J., Bao, L. H., Dong, X. C., Yang, B. F., He, S. Z., and Li, W. H. (1997). Protective effect of dihydroberberine on acute ischemia and arrhythmia. J. Harbin Med. Univ. 31, 121–123.
Zhang, X. D., Ren, H. M., and Liu, L. (2008). Effects of different dose berberine on hemodynamic parameters and [Ca2+]i of cardiac myocytes of diastolic heart failure rat model. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 33, 818–821.
Zhao, G. L., Yu, L. M., Gao, W. L., Duan, W. X., Jiang, B., Liu, X. D., et al. (2016). Berberine protects rat heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury via activating JAK2/STAT3 signaling and attenuating endoplasmic reticulum stress. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 37, 354–367. doi:10.1038/aps.2015.136
Zhao, M., Klipstein-Grobusch, K., Wang, X., Reitsma, J. B., Zhao, D., Grobbee, D. E., et al. (2017). Prevalence of cardiovascular medication on secondary prevention after myocardial infarction in China between 1995-2015: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12, e0175947. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.017594710.1371/journal.pone.0175947
Zheng, H., Zhu, F., Miao, P., Mao, Z., Redfearn, D. P., and Cao, R. Y. (2017). Antimicrobial natural product berberine is efficacious for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 1. doi:10.1155/2017/3146791
Zhou, Z. W., Zheng, H. C., Zhao, L. F., Li, W., Hou, J. W., Yu, Y., et al. (2015). Effect of berberine on acetylcholine-induced atrial fibrillation in rabbit. Am. J. Transl. Res. 7, 1450–1457.
Zhu, M. L., Yin, Y. L., Ping, S., Yu, H. Y., Wan, G. R., Jian, X., et al. (2017). Berberine promotes ischemia-induced angiogenesis in mice heart via upregulation of microRNA-29b. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 39, 672–679. doi:10.1080/10641963.2017.1313853
Zhu, N., Li, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Du, Q., and Hao, P. (2020). Berberine protects against simulated ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced H9C2 cardiomyocytes apoptosis in vitro and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis in vivo by regulating the mitophagy-mediated HIF-1α/BNIP3 pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 367. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00367
Keywords: berberine, cardiovascular diseases, natural product, therapeutic effects, safety
Citation: Cai Y, Xin Q, Lu J, Miao Y, Lin Q, Cong W and Chen K (2021) A New Therapeutic Candidate for Cardiovascular Diseases: Berberine. Front. Pharmacol. 12:631100. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.631100
Received: 19 November 2020; Accepted: 08 February 2021;
Published: 17 March 2021.
Edited by:
Konrad Urbanek, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, ItalyReviewed by:
Hermann Toplak, Medical University of Graz, Graz, ST, AustriaSuowen Xu, University of Science and Technology of China, China
Copyright © 2021 Cai, Xin, Lu, Miao, Lin, Cong and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Qian Lin, linqian62@126.com; Weihong Cong, congcao@188.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work