Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 18 February 2021
Sec. Predictive Toxicology

The Widely Used Antihelmintic Drug Albendazole is a Potent Inducer of Loss of Heterozygosity

Luiza S. E. P. Will Castro,&#x;Luiza S. E. P. Will Castro1,2Wietske Pieters&#x;Wietske Pieters1Mir Farshid Alemdehy&#x;Mir Farshid Alemdehy1Muhammad A. Aslam,Muhammad A. Aslam1,3Olimpia Alessandra BuoninfanteOlimpia Alessandra Buoninfante1Jonne A. RaaijmakersJonne A. Raaijmakers4Bas PilzeckerBas Pilzecker1Paul C. M. van den BerkPaul C. M. van den Berk1Hein te RieleHein te Riele1Ren H. MedemaRené H. Medema4Rozangela C. PedrosaRozangela C. Pedrosa2Heinz Jacobs
Heinz Jacobs1*
  • 1Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
  • 3Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
  • 4Division of Cell Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

The antihelmintic drug ABZ and its metabolites belong to the chemical family of benzimidazoles (BZM) that act as potent tubulin polymerization inhibitors, suggesting a potential re-direction of BZMs for cancer therapy. Applying UV-Vis spectrometry we here demonstrate ABZ as a DNA intercalator. This insight led us to determine the primary mode of ABZ action in mammalian cells. As revealed by RNA sequencing, ABZ did neither grossly affect replication as analyzed by survival and replication stress signaling, nor the transcriptome. Actually, unbiased transcriptome analysis revealed a marked cell cycle signature in ABZ exposed cells. Indeed, short-term exposure to ABZ arrested mammalian cells in G2/M cell cycle stages associated with frequent gains and losses of chromatin. Cellular analyses revealed ABZ as a potent mammalian spindle poison for normal and malignant cells, explaining the serious chromosome segregation defects. Since chromosomal aberrations promote both cancer development and cell death, we determined if besides its general cytotoxicity, ABZ could predispose to tumor development. As measured by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in vitro and in vivo ABZ was found as a potent inducer of LOH and accelerator of chromosomal missegregation.

Introduction

In 1982 the United States. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Albendazole (ABZ) for the treatment of helminthiasis in humans (Dayan, 2003). Since then, ABZ developed as an affordable drug that is currently manufactured by 385 companies and distributed under at least 626 brand names listed in the Medindia’s database (Medindia, 2017). These large numbers reflect the necessity of affordable drugs in treating soil transmitted helminth (STH) as well as lymphatic filariasis infections. Pullan et al. provided a global estimation of STH infections for the year 2010, where around 439 million people were infected with hookworm, 819 million with Ascaris lumbricoides and 465 million with Trichuris trichiura (Pullan et al., 2014). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 947 million people in 54 countries worldwide are threatened by lymphatic filariasis (World Health Organization, 2020a) and approximately 1.5 billion people are infected with STH worldwide (World Health Organization, 2020b). Other WHO data report preventive chemotherapy of (pre)school-aged children with ABZ as a monotherapy or in combination with another drug, in many areas of the world. Altogether these data highlight the global challenge of STH to mankind, the current importance of ABZ chemotherapy in fighting STH infections in humans, and its extensive global use (Supplementary Figure S1) (for more information we like to refer readers of this study to the WHO website (World Health Organization, 2020c).

The pharmacokinetics, dynamics, and mode of action of ABZ are well described (Dayan, 2003). ABZ is a low aqueous solubility drug and therefore poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with an absorption rate in humans less than 5% (Rigter et al., 2004). Nevertheless, administration with enhancers like fatty meals and grapefruit has been reported to increase its solubility and bioavailability (Rigter et al., 2004). ABZ and its metabolites belong to the chemical family of benzimidazoles (BZM) that act as potent tubulin polymerization inhibitors (Ramírez et al., 2007). BZM based compounds inhibit microtubule dynamics, an essential process in the formation of a functional spindle apparatus and in the proper distribution of the sister chromatids during mitosis. This marked cytotoxic feature classifies BZM as effective spindle poisons (Ramírez et al., 2007). These activities suggest a potential re-direction of BZMs for cancer therapy. We and others previously reported on the potential use of ABZ as an anti-cancer drug (Pourgholami et al., 2010; Hanušová et al., 2015; Castro et al., 2016). While spindle poisons are effective in cancer treatment, ABZs action on the mammalian spindle apparatus is poorly understood (Manchado et al., 2012). Therefore, we here followed an unbiased approach to characterize the mode of action of ABZ in transformed as well as non-transformed mammalian systems.

To ensure that during mitosis the duplicated genome is equally distributed over the daughter cells, several checkpoints are operative. Defects in the spindle apparatus predispose to checkpoint activation, chromosome segregation errors, and apoptosis. These processes form the molecular basis of cancer therapy with spindle poisons. Physiologically, these checkpoints critically contribute to genome maintenance. Inhibition of mitotic proteins like polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), Aurora kinase A (AURKA) and Aurora kinase B (AURKB) leads to chromosome segregation errors, aneuploidy, polyploidy and micronuclei formation (Lens et al., 2010). Under conditions of spindle poisoning or checkpoint inhibition, whole chromosomes can easily be gained or lost. In healthy individuals, these gain and losses usually provide a selective growth disadvantage to the daughter cells, explaining why oncogenic site effects have not been found experimentally in ABZ treated rats nor in ABZ treated patients (Dayan, 2003; Sheltzer et al., 2017). In contrast, patients suffering from heterozygous inactivating mutations of tumor suppressor genes, such as Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-FAP (APC), Seckel Syndrome (ATR), Blooms Syndrome (BLM), Familial Breast or Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (BRCA1/BRCA2), Lynch Syndrome (MLH1/MSH2), Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), Familial Retinoblastoma (RB), and Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (TRP53) are expected to be at particular risk. Loss of the corresponding wild type allele by loss of the entire or part of a chromosome can trigger tumor development. As such, spindle poisons are expected to accelerate loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of tumor suppressors and hence cancer development, particularly in this predisposed patient group.

A PubMed search on genotoxic studies of ABZ in mammalian cells is limited to a few reports (Mantovani, 1992; Oztas et al., 2007; Tweats et al., 2016). While these reports suggest an overall genotoxicity of ABZ, conclusions drawn are quite divergent. For example, ABZ gave clear negative results in the Ames test (for review see (Dayan, 2003)) whereas other tests noted an activity of ABZ in inducing micronuclei, which often arise as a consequence of chromosomal aberrations and missegregation (Ramírez et al., 2007). Of note, ABZ was independently found to display strong teratogenicity in rats and sheep (Dayan, 2003). Clearly, as pointed out by Dayan in this retrospective evaluation of ‘old’ drugs (Dayan, 2003), the present experimental non-clinical data about activity, toxicity, and kinetics would be considered inadequate based on strict application of today’s professional and regulatory guidelines. Because ABZ is a relatively old, widely used drug with a potential anti-cancer activity, we decided to further analyze its drug safety by providing a systematic analysis on its potential genotoxicity. We here demonstrate ABZ as a potent inducer of chromosomal missegregation, the molecular basis of aneuploidy, a hallmark of cancer.

Materials and Methods

Ethics-Statement

All experiments were performed in accordance to Dutch and European guidelines. Protocols were approved by the local Animal Ethical Committee (IVD Instantie voor dierenwelzijn) at The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and the CCD (Centrale Commissie Dierproeven, the national central commission for animal experimentation) located in Den Haag, The Netherlands under 9.2.8175, where 9 is the CCD number, 2 the CCD subgroup number, and 8175 the IVD number.

Mice

Mice were housed at room temperature and a relative humidity of approximately 55% in disposable individually ventilated cages (dIVC, Innovive®). Mice were fed Transbreed (E) PL MIN (Special Diet Services) pellet nutrition and water (Aquavive®) ad libitum. Msh2+/− and Msh2+/+ (WT) male and female mice on the FVB background were identified by genotyping using allele specific PCR primers on DNA extracted from toe biopsies P1: 5′-CGG​CCT​TGA​GCT​AAG​TCT​ATT​ATA​AGG-3′, P2: 5′-GGT​GGG​ATT​AGA​TAA​TGC​CTG​CTC​T-3′, P3: 5′-CCA​AGA​TGA​CTG​GTC​GTA​CAT​AAG-3′ (De Wind et al., 1995).

ABZ powder was brought in suspension 0.5% Sodium Carboxy-methylcellulose + 1% Tween-80. Temozolomide (TMZ) was prepared as described previously (Wojciechowicz et al., 2014). Mice were exposed either to ABZ or vehicle alone by oral gavage in the morning followed by a subsequent oral treatment with TMZ in the afternoon on indicated days.

Immunohistochemistry

Two weeks after the last ABZ exposure, mice were sacrificed using CO2 and intestines were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin for tissue sectioning. After deparaffinization, tissue sections were treated with TRIS/EDTA pH 9.0 to allow antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidases were inactivated using 3% H2O2 in methanol. Slides were blocked with PBS containing 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 5% normal goat serum (NGS). Slides were incubated overnight with a MSH2-specific mouse monoclonal IgG antibody (Calbiochem; NA27) in PBS containing 1% BSA and 1.25% NGS. After washing, slides were incubated with a rabbit-anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a and IgG3 monoclonal antibody (Abcam; ab133469). MSH2 specific immune-complexes were visualized by Labeled Polymer-HRP Anti-Rabbit Envision (DakoCytomation; K4011) using DAB (Sigma; D-5905), and rinsed with demi water. Sections were then counterstained with haematoxylin, washed in tap water and mounted with Entallan (Sigma; 1.07960). All washing in between steps was performed using PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, unless otherwise indicated. Slides were scanned on the ScanScope® XT slide scanner (Aperio, Leica Biosystems) and analyzed using Aperio ImageScope software (Aperio, Leica Biosystems). The absolute number of MSH2 deficient crypts was counted along the entire length of the small intestine.

Interactions with Calf Thymic-DNA

CT-DNA binding was evaluated by UV-Vis spectrometry. Absorption scanning was done using CT-DNA (40 µM) and ABZ (10 µM). Spectra were obtained by reading the absorption from 230 to 320 nm (TECAN Infinity M200). Variations of absorption as well as the displacement of the wavelength of spectral maximum absorption were evaluated (Kubota et al., 1999).

CT-DNA intercalation was evaluated by fluorescence measurements at excitation/emission wavelengths of 492 nm and 620 nm. Compounds able to intercalate into DNA compete with ethidium bromide causing fluorescence reduction. CT-DNA (10 µM) was saturated with ethidium bromide (20 µM) in 50 mM phosphate buffer containing NaCl (0.1 M), pH 7.4 and ABZ was added at 10, 20, 30 and 40 µM (Da Silveira et al., 2011).

Survival

DNA damage tolerant (DDT) and DNA damage intolerant (DDinT) cells were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 8% of Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 100 U/ml Penicillin, 100 μg/ml Streptomycin, 50 µM 2-Mercaptoethanol, 200 μM L-arginine (Buoninfante et al., 2018). HeLa, U2OS and RPE-1 cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 8% FBS, 100 U/ml Penicillin, 100 μg/ml Streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. All cell lines were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of ABZ and after 24 h cells were harvested and resuspended in PBS/1% BSA/0.02 µM Sodium Azide buffer containing 1 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI) and measured using FACSArray (Becton Dickinson). The data were analyzed with FlowJo™ vX 0.7 software following the gating strategy as described (Wit et al., 2015). The complete procedure was repeated to generate three biological replicates. Comparison between the groups was performed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) comparing the groups with the control.

RNA-Seq

Sample preparation: DDT lymphoma cells were plated (107 cells) in Petri dishes and treated with ABZ (400 nM), EtBr (400 nM) or mock treated for 12 h. Hereafter, the cells were lysed in Trizol and frozen for subsequent processing. The complete procedure was repeated to generate three biological replicates for each treatment. Quality and quantity of the total RNA was assessed by the 2,100 Bioanalyzer using a Nano chip (Agilent). Only RNA samples having an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) > 8 were subjected to library generation.

Library preparation: Strand-specific cDNA libraries were generated using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA sample preparation kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The libraries were analyzed for size and quantity of cDNAs on a 2,100 Bioanalyzer using a DNA 7500 chip (Agilent), diluted and pooled in multiplex sequencing pools. The libraries were sequenced as 65 base single reads on a HiSeq2500 (Illumina).

Pre-processing: Strand-specific RNA reads (11–33 million reads per sample), 65 bp single-end, were aligned against the mouse reference genome (Ensembl build 38) using Tophat (version 2.1, bowtie version 1.1). Tophat was supplied with a Gene Transfer File (GTF, Ensembl version 77) and was supplied with the following parameters: “--prefilter-multihits–no-coverage-search–bowtie1–library-type fr-firststrand.” In order to count the number of reads per gene, a custom script which is based on the same ideas as HTSeq-count has been used. A list of the total number of uniquely mapped reads for each gene that is present in the provided Gene Transfer Format (GTF) file was generated.

Analysis: For checking the data quality and performing statistical analysis, we used different packages including limma, edgeR and GoSeq (Robinson et al., 2009; Young et al., 2010). All the analyses were performed in R language (version 3.5.1). Only relevant samples were used for the differential gene expression analysis using edgeR package under default arguments with the design set to either of the two conditions form control, ABZ and EtBr treatments. Genes were considered to be differentially expressed when the False discovery rate (FDR) was below 0.001 after the Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction. Sets of differentially expressed genes in indicated conditions were called ‘gene signatures. MA plots were generated after differential gene expression analysis carried by edgeR package (Robinson et al., 2009; McCarthy et al., 2012).

Cell Cycle

DDT lymphoma cells were exposed to different concentrations of ABZ treated for 24 h, fixed in 70% ethanol, and stored at −20°C. On day of analysis, cells were re-suspended in PBS and treated with RNAse-A (100 μg/ml) for 20 min and subsequently re-suspended in PBS containing 5 μg/ml PI and measured using FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson). The data were analyzed using the FlowJo™ vX 0.7 software (Wit et al., 2015).

Cell Imaging to Detect Microtubule Dynamics

HeLa (7.5 × 104/well) cells were plated in 48 well-plates and after adherence were treated with ABZ (400, 800 and 1,600 nM), Paclitaxel (1 µM), Nocodazole (825 nM) or Noscapine (25 µM) for 12 h. The cells were fixed for 20 min (formaldehyde 4%, Triton X 0.5% in PBS). Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies against α-tubulin (Sigma, 1:10,000) and crest (Cortex Biochem, 1:5,000) followed by 2 h of incubation with secondary antibody (Molecular probes, 1:500) and DAPI at room temperature. All antibodies were diluted in PBS/Tween 0.2%. The images were acquired using a Deltavision deconvolution microscope (Applied Precision) with a 60x (NA 1.42) oil objective (Olympus). Softworx (Applied Precision), ImageJ, Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator CS6 were used to process acquired images.

Loss of Heterozygosity in Vitro

LOH analyses were performed using mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) with a heterozygous deletion of the MLH1 allele (MLH1wt/−) and cultured as previously described (te Riele, 2009; Aarts and te Riele, 2010). The 6-thioguanine (6-TG, 400 nM) treatment is very toxic for mismatch repair (MMR) proficient- but not MMR-deficient cells, providing a simple measure for LOH (De Wind et al., 1995). For each condition 106 mESC cells were plated in 10 cm Petri dishes. After 24 h, cells were exposed to 100 nM and 200 nM ABZ or 200 nM reversine, a potent inhibitor of Monopolar Spindle 1 (MPS1) for 24 h. Mock treated cells were used as negative control. After 3 days of treatment with ABZ or Reversine, the 6-TG (400 nM) treatment was started. New medium containing fresh stock of 6-TG was refreshed after every 4th day. Colony formation was photographed after 15 days.

Results

ABZ Interacts with DNA and Competes with EtBr

The pharmacological features of ABZ have been widely studied. While ABZ acts as a tubulin polymerization inhibitor in helminth, its effect in mammalian cells is poorly understood. Given the small planar molecular structure of ABZ we considered that ABZ might actually intercalate into DNA (Kubota et al., 1999; Kubota et al., 2002). To test this possibility, we first used hypochromism as a read out for ABZ DNA binding properties and its potential intercalating activity. Hypochromism is generally consistent with the forces of interaction by intercalation, as this connection involves stacking interactions between an aromatic chromophore and DNA base pairs. As shown in Figure 1A, ABZ reduced the absorbance of purified DNA at defined wavelength. This hypochromic effect suggested that ABZ may in fact intercalate with DNA. To verify intercalation as potential type of DNA interaction we took advantage of the fact that intercalating DNA compounds usually induce hypochromism and bathochromic displacement (Shahabadi and Moghadam, 2012). If ABZ is a DNA intercalator, one predicts that ABZ competes with the DNA intercalator ethidium bromide (EtBr), a widely applied fluorescent dye to visualize and measure DNA. Indeed, ABZ was found to compete efficiently with EtBr and thereby decreased EtBr specific fluorescence (Figure 1B). This bathochromic displacement effect further indicated ABZ as a DNA intercalator, a finding in accordance with its small planar molecular structure.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Albendazole interacts with DNA and competes with the DNA-intercalator EtBr. (A) Evaluation of ABZ (10 μM) binding to purified DNA (40 μM) by UV-Vis spectrometry (reading the absorption from 230 to 320 nm). (B) The fluorescence intensity of CT-DNA (10 μM) stained with EtBr (20 μM) is reduced by ABZ (10, 20, 30 and 40 μM). Fluorescence intensity was measured at excitation/emission wavelengths of 492 nm and 620 nm (n = 2).

ABZ Does not Induce Replication Stress

To determine if the non-covalent interaction of ABZ with DNA mimics DNA damage and blocks replication, we took advantage of a unique isogenic set of wild type, i.e. DNA damage tolerant (DDT) and PcnaK164R mutant, i.e. DNA damage intolerant (DDinT) thymic lymphoma cell lines established from a p53ko;PcnaK164R/loxP mutant mouse (Langerak et al., 2007; Buoninfante et al., 2018). DDT and DDinT lymphoma cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of ABZ. Both cell lines were found to be equal sensitive to ABZ, suggesting that ABZ does not grossly interfere with DNA replication, at least not in a manner that sensitizes DDinT cells (Figure 2A). We conclude that ABZ does not interfere at the level of replication. Most likely, as intercalators interact non-covalently with DNA, they are efficiently removed during DNA unwinding.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Albendazole affects cell survival but does not induce replication stress. (A) Evaluation of DDT and DDinT lymphoma cell lines survival upon treatment with different concentrations of ABZ. (B) Survival of HeLa, U2-OS and RPE-1 cell lines upon exposure to different concentration of ABZ. Data represent the mean of three independent experiments. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *, ** and *** denote statistical difference of ABZ treated cells compared to non-treated cells of the control when p < 0.1, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively. Comparison between these groups was performed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

To extend our studies to the human system, we determined the toxicity of ABZ on human transformed cell lines as well as non-transformed immortalized cell lines. Similar to murine lymphoma cells, both cell lines were found hypersensitive to ABZ. The slight differential sensitivity threshold of transformed HeLa cells (400 nM) as compared to immortalized RPE-1 cells and transformed U2-OS (800 nM) likely relates to differences in the rate of proliferation (Figure 2B). Apparently, the toxicity of ABZ on murine and human cells is quite similar.

Transcriptome of ABZ Exposed Cells

As ABZ and EtBr intercalate with DNA, we questioned whether and in which way EtBr and ABZ affected gene expression patterns. To approach this question in a genome-wide and an unbiased manner, we exposed the previously mentioned DDT lymphoma cell line to ABZ (400 nM), EtBr (400 nM), or to DMSO, as a vehicle control. After exposure, cells were harvested, total RNA was isolated and used for RNA-Seq analysis. Subsequently, specific or generic changes in the transcriptome pertaining to ABZ or EtBr alone were defined by comparing ABZ and EtBr dataset to the DMSO control. First, we determined the ABZ signature by defining specific transcripts that are either induced or suppressed by ABZ (Figure 3A, red and blue labeled respectively, and Supplementary Table S1. Remarkably, the majority of transcripts that were differentially expressed in the ABZ setting remained unaffected by EtBr, except for three genes: Idi1, Ccne2 and Aacs, which were found downregulated in both conditions. Likewise, the EtBr signature appeared entirely different from ABZ (Figure 3B). A closer analysis of the ABZ signatures (Figure 3C) revealed a marked decrease of genes directly linked to mitosis. This observation suggested that critical mitotic genes are expressed prior to chromosome condensation and the overrepresentation of mitotic arrested cells in the ABZ condition result in an underrepresentation of these transcripts.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Albendazole affects genes linked to mitosis. (A) MA-plot of lymphoma cell lines exposed to ABZ or a vehicle control. Differentially up- or down-regulated genes (FDR < 0.001) are shown in red and blue, respectively. (B) ABZ and EtBr differentially affect the transcriptome. MA-plot of lymphoma cell lines exposed to EtBr or a vehicle control showed that the genes up- or down-regulated by ABZ, are not affected by EtBr. (C) Exposure to ABZ affects transcription of cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases, DNA damage response, spindle, segregation, and tubulin genes (for a list of shown genes in each subgroup, see Supplementary Table S2).

ABZ Affects Cell Cycle Progression and Causes Chromosomal Missegregation

The pronounced underrepresentation of mitotic genes in the ABZ exposed samples led us to analyze the impact of ABZ on the cell cycle. Increasing doses of ABZ resulted in a gradual increase of cells arrested in the G2/M phase. This effect was associated with a dose dependent increase of viable aneuploid cells (Figure 4). Apart from subG1 cells, this aneuploidy was characterized by the frequent occurrence of surG2 cells, pointing to a critical role of ABZ in promoting chromosomal segregation errors. This phenomenon was not observed for EtBr.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Albendazole affects cell cycle progression and causes chromosomal aneuploidy. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle progression in the presence of ABZ or EtBr (concentrations are indicated). Data are representative of two experiments with two independent cell lines. (B) The relative cell cycle distribution of DDT lymphoma cells in the presence of ABZ or EtBr. The averages of DDT cell line are shown (Mean ± SD).

ABZ Poisons the Mammalian Spindle Apparatus

To measure any direct effect of ABZ on the human spindle apparatus, we exposed HeLa cells to ABZ. As positive controls for spindle poisons we selected Paclitaxel as a typical microtubule stabilizer, Nocodazole as a microtubule polymerization inhibitor, and Noscapine as a spindle poison that affects microtubule dynamics (Figure 5). After 12 h cells were fixed and the spindle apparatus was revealed with α-tubulin specific antibodies (green), and centromeres with CREST specific antibodies (pink). DNA was revealed by DAPI staining (blue). As visualized by wide-field fluorescence microscopy (Figure 5), ABZ was found as a potent mammalian spindle poison, inducing misalignments. Mitotic figures most closely resembled those of Noscapine, with the marked notion that the ABZ effect was achieved at a molar concentration that was 60-fold lower as compared to Noscapine. These observations explain the high frequency of aneuploidy in cells treated with low doses of ABZ.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Albendazole induces spindle apparatus disruption. ABZ act as spindle poison for mammalian cells, disrupting the spindle apparatus. HeLa cells were exposed to the indicated drugs, fixed and stained with an anti-alpha tubulin antibody (green) and an anti-centromere antibody (crest, red). DAPI was used to stain the DNA. The images were acquired by wide-field fluorescence microscopy.

Taken together, ABZ acts as a strong spindle poison and potent inducer of aneuploidy, both in helminth as well as mammals, thereby inhibiting cell cycle progression in both systems. Transcriptional alterations induced by ABZ appeared largely indirect.

ABZ Strongly Stimulates Loss of Heterozygosity in vitro

The sum of these data implicated a high risk for ABZ in inducing chromosomal missegregation. As chromosomal missegregation is a hallmark of cancer, we questioned if ABZ could promote aneuploidies in general and especially in tumor-prone patients that display a haploinsufficiency for a specific tumor suppressor gene. If this is the case, one expects that ABZ exposure stimulates loss of heterozygosity (LOH). To address this critical issue, we took advantage of an in vitro approach enabling a direct measure of the LOH frequency (De Wind et al., 1995). Embryonic stem (ES) cells haploinsufficient for the mismatch repair gene Mlh1 were cultured in the presence and absence of ABZ for 24 h. Three days later, LOH cells were selected by exposure to 6-thioguanine (6-TG) over a time course of fifteen days. 6-TG specifically kills mismatch repair (MMR) proficient cells while MMR deficient cells can resist low doses of 6-TG. Hereafter, surviving mismatch repair deficient colonies, i.e. those that lost the remaining functional Mlh1 allele, were determined for different concentrations of ABZ. Remarkably, a low concentration of ABZ sufficed to induce LOH (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. Albendazole stimulates loss of heterozygosity in vitro. mES cells haploinsufficient for the mismatch repair (MMR) component Mlh1 (Mlh1wt/−) were plated (106 cells/dish) in the presence and absence of ABZ. After 24 h, ABZ was removed. The cells subsequently were exposed to 6-TG. Cells that lost MMR activity because of LOH events form 6-TG-resistant colonies. Reversine (200 nM, a potent inhibitor of MPS1) was used as positive control.

ABZ Is a Potent Stimulator of LOH in vivo

The fact that ABZ stimulates LOH in vitro, led us to address whether ABZ could also induce the same effect in vivo. To accomplish this goal, we took advantage of Msh2 heterozygous (Msh2+/−) mice, a model for Lynch Syndrome (LS), in which LOH could be addressed in vivo. In LS patients, MMR deficient crypt foci are commonly found in the intestinal tract, which have the potential to progress into tumors (De Wind et al., 1995; Kloor et al., 2012). As chromosome mis-segregation generally generates a cell cycle arrest and chromosome gains or losses of larger chromosomes commonly function as tumor suppressors (Duijf et al., 2013; Santaguida et al., 2017; Sheltzer et al., 2017), and in particular a loss of MSH2 does not confer a direct proliferative advantage to the cells, we provided MSH2-deficient cells a selective advantage by exposure to the methylating agent Temozolomide (TMZ). In short, mice were exposed daily to ABZ or carrier solution only, for 32 consecutive days, while every week this treatment was followed by subsequent TMZ administrations for three consecutive days (Figure 7A). Hereafter, we scored MSH2-deficient crypts from immunohistochemical staining covering the entire small intestine (Figure 7B). Quantification of the number of MSH2 deficient crypts along the entire length of the small intestinal tract showed a significant increase in the ABZ treated group, indicating that ABZ stimulates LOH in vivo (Figure 7C).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 7. Albendazole accelerates LOH in intestinal stem cells in vivo. (A)In vivo experimental set up. Msh2+/− mice were exposed to ABZ (400 mg/kg) (n = 7) or control solution (n = 8) by oral gavage for 32 consecutive days. Every 3–4 days this was followed by subsequent administration of TMZ (100 mg/kg) by oral gavage for three consecutive days. After a two-week rest period, mice were sacrificed and intestines were fixed. (B) Immunohistochemical staining of small intestine for MSH2. (C) Quantification of B. Individual MSH2-deficient crypts along the entire length of the small intestine were counted manually. WT mice exposed to ABZ were used as negative control (n = 8). Plotted are the mean and SD, asterisk indicates p value <0.05 (One way ANOVA).

Discussion

Since the FDA approval of ABZ in 1982 for the treatment of helminthiasis in humans, ABZ developed as an affordable drug that is currently manufactured and distributed by 385 companies, reflecting the necessity of affordable drugs in treating STH as well as lymphatic filariasis infections (Dayan, 2003). Although teratogenicity of ABZ has been reported in sheep and rats (Dayan, 2003), the precise molecular impact of ABZ on mammalian, and in particular humans remains unclear. Given this uncertainty, pregnant woman are advised not to use ABZ. However, as patients may be unaware of a pregnancy, a potential teratogenic risk of ABZ usage might occur. Strikingly, recent reports suggest a re-direction of ABZ in cancer treatment (Hanušová et al., 2015; Castro et al., 2016; Ghasemi et al., 2017; Varbanov et al., 2017; Priotti et al., 2018). These new insights prompted us to investigate the molecular impact of ABZ on mammalian cells. Despite the fact that ABZ interacts with DNA and competes with EtBr, ABZ appeared to have no direct impact on replication and transcription. Yet, the remarkable sensitivity of human and murine transformed and non-transformed cells to ABZ led us to study potential alterations in the transcriptome of ABZ exposed cells.

Similar to EtBr, the effects of ABZ on the transcriptome appeared indirect. While our results and those of others (Piechota et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2008) revealed that EtBr poisons mitochondrial genes, the transcriptional profile of ABZ pointed to a marked increase of cells arrested in G2/M. These observations led us to determine the effect of ABZ on cell cycle progression. In line with the ABZ specific transcriptome profile, cells exposed to ABZ arrested in a dose dependent manner at G2/M, which is consistent with previous findings in various cancer cell lines (Ghasemi et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017). Furthermore, the ABZ induced cell cycle arrest was associated with a marked dose dependent increase in the frequency of viable cells with chromosomal aneuploidy, which is likely caused by the potent inhibitory activity of ABZ on tubulin polymerization, an essential process during mitosis (Dawson et al., 1984; Chu et al., 2009). These results question the preferential targeting of helminth tubulin by ABZ (Lacey, 1988; Hanušová et al., 2015). In fact, our study indicates that ABZ toxicity in helminths and mammalian cells follows the same molecular principle, as has been reported by others (Chu et al., 2009; Ghasemi et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017).

To determine the impact of ABZ on tubulin polymerization, de-polymerization and spindle dynamics, we here set out to determine the toxicity of ABZ on the mammalian spindle apparatus in independent human cell lines. ABZ acted as a strong spindle poison, which resulted in the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase in the cell cycle, explaining not only the typical ABZ transcriptome signature but also the effective and rapid induction of aneuploidy in vitro. While tissue specific patterns of aneuploidy can prohibit or initiate cancer development (Albertson et al., 2003; Fröhling and Döhner, 2008; Stratton et al., 2009; Sack et al., 2018), our observations led us to perform LOH studies in the presence of ABZ. Again, consistent with the high frequency of aneuploid cells upon ABZ exposure, ABZ was found to be remarkably efficient in inducing LOH in mouse embryonic stem cells. Only 100 nM of ABZ sufficed to effectively induce LOH. Interestingly, these observations made in vitro also applied to in vivo settings, where ABZ accelerated the formation of MSH2 deficient intestinal crypts in Msh2 heterozygous mice. Though we appreciate that the dose of ABZ used in our in vivo experiments is higher than the dose that is given to humans, the poor solubility of ABZ might give rise to high local concentrations in the gut. Nevertheless, future studies should address whether our observations also apply to conditions where lower doses of ABZ are continuously administered. The fact that the tumor incidence did not rise abruptly in the general population of human ABZ users, supports the concept that a chromosomal aneuploidy is detrimental to a cell, and not oncogenic (Sheltzer et al., 2017). However, our data suggests this may be different in the context of tumor suppressor gene haploinsufficiency. To examine the putative tumor promoting properties of ABZ in a predisposed genetic background, future studies may take advantage of the Apc+/min mouse model (Yamada and Mori, 2007).

Our results argue against prophylactic anti-helminth treatment of haploinsufficient carriers of tumor suppressor genes. These include patients suffering from Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-FAP (APC), Seckel Syndrome (ATR), Blooms Syndrome (BLM), Familial Breast or Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (BRCA1/BRCA2), Lynch Syndrome (MLH1/MSH2), Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), Familial Retinoblastoma (RB), and Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (TRP53). The observations made in this study are likely to apply to other tubulin poisons used to treat helminthiasis, such as Ivermectin (IVM), Praziquantel (PZQ), and Metronidazole (MNZ) (Fennell et al., 2008). Of note, these drugs have recently been reconfirmed and categorized by the WHO as important, most essential medicines in the treatment of helminthiasis and specific bacteria.

The sum of these insights indicates that ABZ should be prescribed with caution to haploinsufficient carriers of tumor suppressor genes. Furthermore, it highlights the need for developing more selective drugs in treating helminthiasis.

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-Seq reported in this article have been deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information under the accession number GSE163419 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE163419).

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethical Committee (IVD Instantie voor Dierenwelzijn) at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and the CCD (Centrale Commissie Dierproeven, the national central commission for animal experimentation) located in Den Haag, the Netherlands, under 9.2.8175, where 9 is the CCD number, 2 the CCD subgroup number, and 8175 the IVD number.

Author Contributions

LW, MFA, JR, and PB performed in vitro experiments and analyzed data. WP performed and analyzed the in vivo experiments. MFA. and MAA provided bioinformatical analyses. OB and BP provided DDT and DDinT system, HR and RM provided input and reagents, RP and HJ supervised the study. HJ, LW and MFA wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Funding

This project was executed at the NKI-AVL. LW Castro was supported by research grants from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES-DS, Brazil) and Programa de Doutorado Sanduíche no Exterior (PDSE 99999.000252/2015-08 by CAPES Foundation). RP (Proc. 302404/2011-2) and DWF (Proc. 303234/2015-6) are recipient of research grants from the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq, Brazil). This project greatly profited from reagents that became available due to the generous support from the Dutch cancer foundation (KWF, grant NKI-2012-5243) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ZonMW Top grant 91213018) to HJ and NKI/AVL facilities.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors like to acknowledge Hellen Houlleberghs for help and suggestions with the LOH assay and the superb staff members off the outstanding scientific support facilities at the Netherlands Cancer Institute.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.596535/full#supplementary-material.

References

Aarts, M., and te Riele, H. (2010). Parameters of oligonucleotide-mediated gene modification in mouse ES cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 14, 1657–1667. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00847.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Albertson, D. G., Collins, C., McCormick, F., and Gray, J. W. (2003). Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nat. Genet. 34, 369–376. doi:10.1038/ng1215

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buoninfante, O. A., Pilzecker, B., Aslam, M. A., Zavrakidis, I., van der Wiel, R., van de Ven, M., et al. (2018). Precision cancer therapy: profiting from tumor specific defects in the DNA damage tolerance system. Oncotarget 9, 18832–18843. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castro, L. S. E. P. W., Kviecinski, M. R., Ourique, F., Parisotto, E. B., Grinevicius, V. M. A. S., Correia, J. F. G., et al. (2016). Albendazole as a promising molecule for tumor control. Redox Biol. 10, 90–99. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2016.09.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chu, S. W. L., Badar, S., Morris, D. L., and Pourgholami, M. H. (2009). Potent inhibition of tubulin polymerisation and proliferation of paclitaxel-resistant 1A9PTX22 human ovarian cancer cells by albendazole. Anticancer Res. 29, 3791–3796. .

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Da Silveira, V. C., Benezra, H., Luz, J. S., Georg, R. C., Oliveira, C. C., and Ferreira, A. M. (2011). Binding of oxindole-Schiff base copper(II) complexes to DNA and its modulation by the ligand. J. Inorg. Biochem. 105, 1692–1703. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.09.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dawson, P. J., Gutteridge, W. E., and Gull, K. (1984). A comparison of the interaction of anthelmintic benzimidazoles with tubulin isolated from mammalian tissue and the parasitic nematode Ascaridia galli. Biochem. Pharmacol. 33, 1069–1074. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(84)90515-X

Dayan, A. D. (2003). Albendazole, mebendazole and praziquantel. Review of non-clinical toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Acta Trop. 86, 141–159. doi:10.1016/S0001-706X(03)00031-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Wind, N., Dekker, M., Berns, A., Radman, M., and te Riele, H. (1995). Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell 82, 321–330. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90319-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duijf, P. H., Schultz, N., and Benezra, R. (2013). Cancer cells preferentially lose small chromosomes. Int. J. Canc. 132, 2316–2326. doi:10.1002/ijc.27924

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fennell, B., Naughton, J., Barlow, J., Brennan, G., Fairweather, I., Hoey, E., et al. (2008). Microtubules as antiparasitic drug targets. Expet Opin. Drug Discov. 3, 501–518. doi:10.1517/17460441.3.5.501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fröhling, S., and Döhner, H. (2008). Chromosomal abnormalities in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 722–734. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0803109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghasemi, F., Black, M., Vizeacoumar, F., Pinto, N., Ruicci, K. M., Le, C. C. S. H., et al. (2017). Repurposing Albendazole: new potential as a chemotherapeutic agent with preferential activity against HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell cancer. Oncotarget 8, 71512–71519. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hanušová, V., Skálová, L., Králová, V., and Matoušková, P. (2015). Potential anti-cancer drugs commonly used for other indications. Ccdt 15, 35–52. doi:10.2174/1568009615666141229152812

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kloor, M., Huth, C., Voigt, A. Y., Benner, A., Schirmacher, P., von Knebel Doeberitz, M., et al. (2012). Prevalence of mismatch repair-deficient crypt foci in Lynch syndrome: a pathological study. Lancet Oncol. 13, 598–606. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70109-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kubota, Y., Tani, S., and Nakamura, J. (2002). The interaction of 2-phenylbenzimidazole compounds with DNA: the influence of terminal substituents. Nucleic Acids Res. Suppl. 3, 193–194. doi:10.1093/nass/2.1.193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kubota, Y., Iwamoto, T., and Seki, T. (1999). The interaction of benzimidazole compounds with DNA: intercalation and groove binding modes. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 42, 53–54. doi:10.1093/nass/42.1.53

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lacey, E. (1988). The role of the cytoskeletal protein, tubulin, in the mode of action and mechanism of drug resistance to benzimidazoles. Int. J. Parasitol. 18, 885–936. doi:10.1016/0020-7519(88)90175-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langerak, P., Nygren, A. O., Krijger, P. H., Van Den Berk, P. C., and Jacobs, H. (2007). A/T mutagenesis in hypermutated immunoglobulin genes strongly depends on PCNAK164 modification. J. Exp. Med. 204, 1989–1998. doi:10.1084/jem.20070902

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, W., Choi, H. I., Kim, M. J., and Park, S. Y. (2008). Depletion of mitochondrial DNA up-regulates the expression of MDR1 gene via an increase in mRNA stability. Exp. Mol. Med. 40, 109–117. doi:10.3858/emm.2008.40.1.109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lens, S. M., Voest, E. E., and Medema, R. H. (2010). Shared and separate functions of polo-like kinases and aurora kinases in cancer. Nat. Rev. Canc. 10, 825–841. doi:10.1038/nrc2964

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manchado, E., Guillamot, M., and Malumbres, M. (2012). Killing cells by targeting mitosis. Cell Death Differ. 19, 369–377. doi:10.1038/cdd.2011.197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mantovani, A. (1992). The role of multigeneration studies in safety assessment of residues of veterinary drugs and additives. Ann. Ist. Super Sanita 28, 429–435. .

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y., and Smyth, G. K. (2012). Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288–4297. doi:10.1093/nar/gks042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medindia (2017). ABZ price of 626 brands. Available at: https://www.medindia.net/drug-price/albendazole.htm (Accessed December 9, 2020).

Google Scholar

Oztas, S., Salman, A. B., Tatar, A., Yigiter, M., Yazgi, H., Ertek, M., et al. (2007). Genotoxic effect of albendazole in pediatric patients with hepatic hydatid disease. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 11, 446–449. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2007.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piechota, J., Szczęsny, R., Wolanin, K., Chlebowski, A., and Bartnik, E. (2006). Nuclear and mitochondrial genome responses in HeLa cells treated with inhibitors of mitochondrial DNA expression. Acta Biochim. Pol. 53, 485–495. doi:10.18388/abp.2006_3319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pourgholami, M. H., Szwajcer, M., Chin, M., Liauw, W., Seef, J., Galettis, P., et al. (2010). Phase i clinical trial to determine maximum tolerated dose of oral albendazole in patients with advanced cancer. Canc. Chemother. Pharmacol. 65, 597–605. doi:10.1007/s00280-009-1157-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Priotti, J., Baglioni, M. V., García, A., Rico, M. J., Leonardi, D., Lamas, M. C., et al. (2018). Repositioning of anti-parasitic drugs in cyclodextrin inclusion complexes for treatment of triple-negative Breast cancer. AAPS Pharm Sci. Tech. 19, 3734–3741. doi:10.1208/s12249-018-1169-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pullan, R. L., Smith, J. L., Jasrasaria, R., and Brooker, S. J. (2014). Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasites Vectors 7, 37–19. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-7-37

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramírez, T., Eastmond, D. A., and Herrera, L. A. (2007). Non-disjunction events induced by albendazole in human cells. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen 626, 191–195. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rigter, I. M., Schipper, H. G., Koopmans, R. P., Van Kan, H. J. M., Frijlink, H. W., Kager, P. A., et al. (2004). Relative bioavailability of three newly developed albendazole formulations: a randomized crossover study with healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 1051–1054. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.3.1051-1054.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., and Smyth, G. K. (2009). edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sack, L. M., Davoli, T., Li, M. Z., Li, Y., Xu, Q., Naxerova, K., et al. (2018). Profound tissue specificity in proliferation control underlies cancer drivers and aneuploidy patterns. Cell 173, 499–e23. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santaguida, S., Richardson, A., Iyer, D. R., M’Saad, O., Zasadil, L., Knouse, K. A., et al. (2017). Chromosome mis-segregation generates cell-cycle-arrested cells with complex karyotypes that are eliminated by the immune system. Dev. Cell 41, 638. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shahabadi, N., and Moghadam, N. H. (2012). Determining the mode of interaction of calf thymus DNA with the drug sumatriptan using voltammetric and spectroscopic techniques. Spectrochim. Acta Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 99, 18–22. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2012.09.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheltzer, J. M., Ko, J. H., Replogle, J. M., Habibe Burgos, N. C., Chung, E. S., Meehl, C. M., et al. (2017). Single-chromosome gains commonly function as tumor suppressors. Canc. Cell 31, 240–255. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stratton, M. R., Campbell, P. J., and Futreal, P. A. (2009). The cancer genome. Nature 458, 719–724. doi:10.1038/nature07943

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

te Riele, H. (2009). Recreating stem cells: a novel entrance to the fountain of youth. Cell Stem Cell 4, 279–280. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tweats, D. J., Johnson, G. E., Scandale, I., Whitwell, J., and Evans, D. B. (2016). Genotoxicity of flubendazole and its metabolites in vitro and the impact of a new formulation on in vivo aneugenicity. Mutagenesis 31, 309–321. doi:10.1093/mutage/gev070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varbanov, H. P., Kuttler, F., Banfi, D., Turcatti, G., and Dyson, P. J. (2017). Repositioning approved drugs for the treatment of problematic cancers using a screening approach. PloS One 12, e0171052. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wit, N., Buoninfante, O. A., Van Den Berk, P. C., Jansen, J. G., Hogenbirk, M. A., De Wind, N., et al. (2015). Roles of PCNA ubiquitination and TLS polymerases κ and η in the bypass of methyl methanesulfonate-induced DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 282–294. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wojciechowicz, K., Cantelli, E., Van Gerwen, B., Plug, M., Van Der Wal, A., Delzenne-Goette, E., et al. (2014). Temozolomide increases the number of mismatch repair-deficient intestinal crypts and accelerates tumorigenesis in a mouse model of Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology 147, 1064. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2020a). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lymphatic-filariasis (Accessed August 13, 2020).

Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2020b). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections (Accessed August 13, 2020).

Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2020c). Available at: https://apps.who.int/gho/cabinet/pc.jsp (Accessed August 13, 2020).

Google Scholar

Yamada, Y., and Mori, H. (2007). Multistep carcinogenesis of the colon in Apc(Min/+) mouse. Canc. Sci. 98, 6–10. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00348.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K., and Oshlack, A. (2010). Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Gao, X., Pei, D., and Gao, C. (2017). Anthelmintic drug albendazole arrests human gastric cancer cells at the mitotic phase and induces apoptosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 13, 595–603. doi:10.3892/etm.2016.3992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: albendazole, aneuploidy, helminth, spindle poison, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), cancer predisposition

Citation: Will Castro LSEP, Pieters W, Alemdehy MF, Aslam MA, Buoninfante OA, Raaijmakers JA, Pilzecker B, van den Berk PCM, te Riele H, Medema RH, Pedrosa RC and Jacobs H (2021) The Widely Used Antihelmintic Drug Albendazole is a Potent Inducer of Loss of Heterozygosity. Front. Pharmacol. 12:596535. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.596535

Received: 19 August 2020; Accepted: 11 January 2021;
Published: 18 February 2021.

Edited by:

Elias Georges, McGill University, Canada

Reviewed by:

Thavy Long, McGill University, Canada
Jan Willem Van Der Laan, Medicines Evaluation Board, Netherlands

Copyright © 2021 Will Castro, Pieters, Alemdehy, Aslam, Buoninfante, Raaijmakers, Pilzecker, van den Berk, te Riele, Medema, Pedrosa and Jacobs. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Heinz Jacobs, aC5qYWNvYnNAbmtpLm5s

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.