AUTHOR=Bae Ji-Hwan , Baek Yeon-Hee , Lee Jeong-Eun , Song Inmyung , Lee Jee-Hyong , Shin Ju-Young
TITLE=Machine Learning for Detection of Safety Signals From Spontaneous Reporting System Data: Example of Nivolumab and Docetaxel
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pharmacology
VOLUME=11
YEAR=2021
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.602365
DOI=10.3389/fphar.2020.602365
ISSN=1663-9812
ABSTRACT=Introduction: Various methods have been implemented to detect adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals. However, the applicability of machine learning methods has not yet been fully evaluated.
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of machine learning algorithms in detecting ADR signals of nivolumab and docetaxel, new and old anticancer agents.
Methods: We conducted a safety surveillance study of nivolumab and docetaxel using the Korea national spontaneous reporting database from 2009 to 2018. We constructed a novel input dataset for each study drug comprised of known ADRs that were listed in the drug labels and unknown ADRs. Given the known ADRs, we trained machine learning algorithms and evaluated predictive performance in generating safety signals of machine learning algorithms (gradient boosting machine [GBM] and random forest [RF]) compared with traditional disproportionality analysis methods (reporting odds ratio [ROR] and information component [IC]) by using the area under the curve (AUC). Each method then was implemented to detect new safety signals from the unknown ADR datasets.
Results: Of all methods implemented, GBM achieved the best average predictive performance (AUC: 0.97 and 0.93 for nivolumab and docetaxel). The AUC achieved by each method was 0.95 and 0.92 (RF), 0.55 and 0.51 (ROR), and 0.49 and 0.48 (IC) for respective drug. GBM detected additional 24 and nine signals for nivolumab and 82 and 76 for docetaxel compared to ROR and IC, respectively, from the unknown ADR datasets.
Conclusion: Machine learning algorithm based on GBM performed better and detected more new ADR signals than traditional disproportionality analysis methods.