Jazmin Torres1†
Namdev Dhas
Mónica C. García- 1Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
- 2Department of Pharmaceutics, Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India
- 3Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
- 4Unidad de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnología Farmacéutica (UNITEFA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina
Cancer is one of the most common life-threatening illness and it is the world’s second largest cause of death. Chemotherapeutic anticancer drugs have many disadvantages, which led to the need to develop novel strategies to overcome these shortcomings. Moreover, tumors are heterogenous in nature and there are various biological barriers that assist in treatment reisistance. In this sense, nanotechnology has provided new strategies for delivery of anticancer therapeutics. Recently, delivery platforms for overcoming biological barriers raised by tumor cells and tumor-bearing hosts have been reported. Among them, amphiphilic block copolymers (ABC)-based self-assembled nanocarriers have attracted researchers worldwide owing to their unique properties. In this work, we addressed different biological barriers for effective cancer treatment along with several strategies to overcome them by using ABC‐based self-assembled nanostructures, with special emphasis in those that have the ability to act as responsive nanocarriers to internal or external environmental clues to trigger release of the payload. These nanocarriers have shown promising properties to revolutionize cancer treatment and diagnosis, but there are still challenges for their successful translation to clinical applications.
Introduction
Cancer is the world’s second largest cause of death, endangering tens of millions of people. Albeit the substantial development of significant drugs has advanced; their delivery is far from satisfactory (Zhou et al., 2020). Moreover, anticancer drugs have many disadvantages (undesirable biodistribution, low specificity, limited targeting, inefficient cellular uptake, produce side/toxic effects) (Yin et al., 2016; Avramović et al., 2020). These limitations have prompted the development of novel strategies to overcome these shortcomings. Advanced nanotechnology has provided new approaches for efficient delivery of anticancer therapeutics and supposed to be a promising tool against this illness (Chan, 2017). Nevertheless, considering the relatively few nanomedicine choices available in clinical trials, this promise has apparently fizzled (Huo et al., 2019). Some failures originate from safety issues respect to long term exposure to engineered materials despite the advancements made to understand their nanotoxicity (Yan et al., 2019). Also, tumor multifaceted nature clarifies why most nanomedicines have not prevailing in clinical trials (Kievit and Zhang, 2011; Ernsting et al., 2013). It has been proposed that tumors are heterogenous in nature, possessing various biological barriers that assist in treatment resistance. Recent observations into the tumor niche indicate that many obstacles still exist and insufficient attention is given to their biological consequences when novel nanomedicines are designed (Huo et al., 2019). As a result, in the last decade new delivery platforms to overcome biological barriers caused by tumor cells and tumor-bearing hosts have been evaluated.
Many delivery systems on nanoscale with significant achievements have been reported to date. Among them, amphiphilic block copolymers (ABC)-based self-assembled nanocarriers (SAN) for delivery of anticancer therapeutics have attracted researchers worldwide owing to their unique chemical and physical properties, improved biocompatibility, tunable compositions, extended blood circulation, and facile functionalization (Yin et al., 2016; García et al., 2018; García and Quiroz, 2018; García, 2019b). With the advancements in polymer chemistry, different ABC with preferred number and monomer type, each having different hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties have been synthetized (Yorulmaz Avsar et al., 2019). By tailoring monomer combinations, SAN with upgraded properties to overcome biological barriers can be obtained. ABC can self-assemble into distinctive nanostructural arrangements among which micelles and more recently polymer vesicles (also termed as polymersomes) are the most reported (Yin et al., 2016; García and Quiroz, 2018; García et al., 2018). Inspired by their promising properties, nanomedicines could be intended to successfully mimic, improve or interact with these cross-talks for improving cancer therapy.
In this review, we addressed different biological barriers for numerous anticancer therapeutic moieties for effective cancer treatment along with several strategies to overcome them by using ABC-based SAN, with special emphasis in those that have the ability to act as responsive nanocarriers to internal or external environmental clues, producing on-demand triggered release of the payload.
Biological Barriers and Strategies to Overcome Barriers for Effective Delivery of Anticancer Therapeutic
Cancer nanomedicine efficacy is measured primarily by how much drug can reach to the tumor-site. The properties of the biological barriers are diverse and represent both a challenge as well as an opportunity to develop tailor-made drug delivery system to effectively reach the target site. Distinct biological barriers and their peculiarities (Figure 1A), and strategies to overcome them are discussed in the following section.
FIGURE 1. (A) Main and sequential biological barriers (after intravenous administration) faced to therapeutic delivery nanocarriers for effective cancer therapy: a) they may undergo opsonization and uptake by macrophages of the mononuclear phagocytic system; b) nonspecific distribution that lead accumulation of nanocarriers in other healthy organs such as spleen, livers and lungs, and extravasation and renal clearance faced by nanocarriers smaller than 5–6 nm; c) flow in blood vessels and endothelial surfaces; d) cancer microenviroment, including interstitial fluid pressure (IFP); e) cellular internalization and endosomal escape; and f) upon entry into tumor cells, multidrug resistant (MDR) system, including drug efflux pumps that remove anticancer therapeutics from the tumor cell. (B) Schematic representation of tumor environment and summary of internal and external stimuli for triggered delivery of anticancer therapeutics from self-assembled nanocarriers.
Opsonization/Sequestration by the Mononuclear Phagocytic System
After intravenous administration, nanocarriers are exposed to a several sequential hurdles that must be overcome in order to efficiently reach therapeutic levels of drugs at disease sites, avoiding nonspecific uptake in healthy organs (Blanco et al., 2015; Chevalier et al., 2017). As per the literature, when nanocarriers are intravenously administered, they can interact with thousands of proteins. Biological media consists of numerous active biomolecules such as lipids, nucleic acids, proteins, and blood plasma contains roughly 3,700 identified proteins (Lazarovits et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2017). Protein corona effect i.e. due to the presence of charge on nanocarriers can result into interaction with oppositely charged serum protein. Thus, nanocarriers or the targeting moiety decorated over nanocarriers get buried in protein corona resulting into prevention of nanocarriers’s interaction with the targeted receptor in cancer cells (Tonigold et al., 2018). Opsonins are key proteins in the blood serum that promotes elimination of vulnerable nanocarriers by marking them off for an immune response. The major part of opsonized nanocarriers are cleared within seconds by a receptor-mediated mechanism because of the phagocytic cells in the liver, lymph nodes, and spleen of the mononuclear phagocyte system, contributing to nonspecific distribution of nanocarriers in healthy organs (Blanco et al., 2015; Chevalier et al., 2017).
One most established strategy to mitigate the effect of protein corona involves the nanocarrier functionalization with amphiphilic or hydrophilic polymers, such as poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) (Bros et al., 2018). PEG forms strong adhered hydration layer, which sterically avoid the interaction/adsorption of serum protein (Huo et al., 2019). PEG-decorated nanocarrriers reduce their recognition by the components of the mononuclear phagocytic system, increasing their blood circulation time (Xiong et al., 2009; Naeye et al., 2010). Zwitterionic ligands (i.e., sulfobetaine and carboxybetaine) have also been explored as antifouling agents (Kane et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004; Shao and Jiang, 2014; Li et al., 2018). These strategies are different since stacking of PEG chains is driven by Van der Waals forces and hydrophobic interactions, resulting into hard to form an ideal self-assembled monolayer; whereas zwitterionic ligands exhibit strong electrostatic interactions within their molecules, resulting into dense packing and minimizing protein adsorption on their surface. Additionally, charges on zwitterionic polymers can prompt strong hydration which retards protein adsorption (Huo et al., 2019).
Vascular Flow
Blood vessels at tumor site develop gaps between endothelial cells during angiogenesis process through which nanocarriers can easily pass for reaching tumors by EPR effect. However, this effect is now in dispute in clinical trials since nanocarriers have shown moderate therapeutic efficacy. It could have happened due to heterogeneity of EPR effect in humans. For instance, mouse xenograft models develop tumor very fast and endothelial cells in blood vessels tend to present many fenestrations. Aversely, tumors in humans develop very slowly and not all tumor vessels develop inter-endothelial gaps (Li J.-X. et al., 2020). Recently, Matsumoto et al. demonstrated that tumor blood vessels form transient opening and closing as they dynamically generate vascular bursts, resulting into eruption and vigorous fluid outflow into tumor interstitial space which ultimately lead to nanocarrier extravasation (Matsumoto et al., 2016). In contrast, Sindhwani et al. proposed that extravasation takes place via interconnected vesiculovacuolar organelles (trans-endothelial pathway), revealing that 97% of nanocarrier extravasation occurred through this pathway (Sindhwani et al., 2020).
Different strategies to overcome tumor vascular barrier and improve accumulation of nanocarriers at tumor site can be use. 1) Enhancing tumor vascular permeability: a) physical stimulation viz. hyperthermia (Liu et al., 2018), ultrasound (Ho et al., 2016) and radiation (Potchen et al., 1972) allow increasing the local vascular permeability through which nanocarriers can efficiently pass (Ding et al., 2019). b) Use of disruptive agents (i.e., nitric acid) (Qin and Gao, 2019). It has been demonstrated that nitric acid can dilate blood vessels, elevate blood flow and also open tight junctions between endothelial cells (Maeda et al., 2013). 2) Targeting tumor vasculature: tumor cells overexpress distinctive biomarkers compared to normal endothelial cells; thus, active targeting of nanocarriers to tumor endothelial cells can overcome this barrier (Li J.-X. et al., 2020).
Tumor Microenvironment
After crossing the vascular barrier, nanocarriers come across tumor microenvironment barrier composed by dense extracellular matrix (ECM), high interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and stromal cells (Ding et al., 2019). ECM is a complex molecular structure mainly consisting of collagen network, proteoglycan, glycosaminoglycan, microfiber elastin and other polysaccharides with distinct biochemical and physical properties (Koláčná et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2012). Nanocarriers cannot cross this barrier because of the following reasons: 1) densely packed gel-like structure of tumor ECM increased lysyloxidase levels and the presence of integrin receptors with high viscosity (Barua and Mitragotri, 2014); 2) ECM has pores with 40 nm in size; thus, nanocarriers larger than 60 nm exhibit difficulties to cross this barrier (Zhang et al., 2018); 3) cancer cell density compresses the ECM and increases the IFP (solid tumors = 5–40 mmHg, pancreatic tumor = 75–130 mmHg whereas normal IFP = 0–3 mmHg) (Miao et al., 2015). Moreover, stromal cells that consist of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) are mostly found in tumor microenvironment. CAF produce dense ECM, facilitate the tumor growth, and angiogenesis as they secrete cytokines viz. interleukin (IL)-6, hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor, which hinder delivery of nanocarriers to target site (Kalluri, 2016). Also, CAF may express receptors similar to tumor cells to which nanocarriers can be targeted, leading to off target distribution (Sherman et al., 2014; Miao et al., 2016).
For overcoming this barrier, physical methods, such as ultrasound, phototherapy and hyperthermia, can be used since they disrupt ECM. However, these methods can affect normal healthy nearby tissues (Eggen et al., 2014). Enzymes viz. hyaluronidase (Zhou et al., 2016) and collagenase (Kuhn et al., 2006) constitute another strategy. They can effectively degrade the hyaluronan in tumor ECM and reduce IFP, enhancing nanocarrier penetration. microenvironment, such as stimuli-responsive (García, 2019b) or size-switching (Cabral et al., 2011) delivery platforms, are other strategies for enhancing cancer therapy. Size-switching nanocarriers are those with large particle size in blood circulation, which when become in contact with tumor tissue switch their size to small to effectively extravasate, leading to deep penetration (Cabral et al., 2011). Because of the advancements in the development of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers, in Stimuli-Responsive Self-Assembled Nanocarriers Nanocarriers they are described.
Furthermore, it has to be addressed that an additional important feature of tumor microenvironment is the overall immunosuppressive microenvironment because of the presence of numerous immune cells viz. dendritic cells (DC), tumor associated macrophages (TAM, including M1-immunostimulatory and M2-immunosuppressive phenotypes), natural killer (NK) cells, B and T lymphocytes, which have complex and diverse roles (Zhou et al., 2020). M2 phenotype is primarily triggered in tumors in response to hypoxic condition and facilitate metastasis, angiogenesis and decrease in immune response of T cells. Targeting TAM and switching from M2 to M1 phenotype, which reverse the immune suppression, can be an efficient anticancer strategy for preventing tumor progression (Zhang B. et al., 2017). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T-cells are also responsible for immune suppression (Munn and Bronte, 2016). They generate large amount of IL-10, arginine-1 and NO; and IL-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, respectively, which directly suppresses T cell function and release granzyme and perforin to destroy effector T cells, resulting into immunosuppression (Talmadge and Gabrilovich, 2013). Additionally, prostaglandin E-2, programmed death-1 molecule, TGF-β and IL-10 could suppress the antigen cross presenting ability of DC. Tumor cells also downregulate NK cells to prevent exposure of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (Waldhauer and Steinle, 2008). Due to decrease trafficking in tumor sites (including downregulation of cluster of differentiation (CD) 62L on CD8+ T cells, the adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, and IL-12) and lack of activation caused by the aforementioned immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, the CD8+ T cells are not able to exhibit an inhibitory response against tumors (Buoncervello et al., 2019). Thus, targeting immune cells or immune related specific molecules could reshape the immune microenvironment and increase the treatment efficacy.
Cellular Membrane
This membrane not only supplies nutrients to cells but also acts as one of the barrier for cellular internalization of nanocarriers (Choudhury et al., 2019), which is mostly based on their physicochemical properties and the protein corona that coated them. Therapeutic moieties with low molecular weight and lipophilic nature cross the membrane lipid bilayer by passive diffusion while molecules with higher molecular weight require active transportation (Blanco et al., 2015). Furthermore, numerous factors of nanocarriers (particle size, shape, surface charge, and hydrophobicity) affect cellular internalization. The particle size determines the type of endocytosis through cell membrane. Shape structure other than sphere, viz. anisotropy and original orientation are critical for nanocarrier uptake through cellular membrane. Also, this parameter can have dramatic effects on targeting, circulation, internalization, immune cell association, and adhesion (Champion et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2010; Truong et al., 2015). Mechanical properties can also affect cell adhesion/penetration. Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is favored if nanocarriers exhibit good flexibility. Their elasticity increases their chances of penetration between endothelial cancer cells and also, in targeted drug release, nanocarriers’ flexibility is a key factor in the interaction with cellular receptor-mediated endocytosis (Anselmo et al., 2015).
Multidrug Resistant System
MDR is a state of resistance toward structurally and/or functionally different therapeutic moieties and grouped into five classes: 1) increase efflux of drugs, primarily via adenosine triphosphate-driven extrusion pumps of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette superfamily, such as breast cancer resistance proteins, MDR-associated protein 1, and P-glycoprotein, which form a unique defense system against anticancer drugs and exo- and endotoxins, significantly reducing intracellular concentration of drugs or endogenous toxins; 2) decrease influx of drugs; 3) DNA repair activation; 4) inactivation of apoptosis pathways with parallel activation of antiapoptotic cellular defensive compartments; 5) metabolic modification and detoxification.
MDR hinders to reach tumor-site by drug in the concentration and at the time required. Hence, only a fraction of dose remains into the cancer cells, while the remaining is removed by MDR (Choudhury et al., 2019; Huo et al., 2019).
Amphiphilic Block Copolymers and Self-Assembled Nanocarriers
Self-assembly process refers to the spontaneous association of ordered and well-organized systems, which occurs under kinetic and thermodynamic conditions, allowing local and specific molecular interactions to form stable and perfectly structured aggregates. Electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, π-π aromatic-stacking, and van der Waals forces contribute to keep the molecules organized, achieving the minimal energy in the nanocarriers (Yadav et al., 2020).
SAN are easy to prepare, flexible and low-cost materials that have gained popularity for biomedical application in cancer (Berbezier and De Crescenzi, 2015; García and Quiroz, 2018). Moreover, their preparation involves generally large-scale techniques. Top-down and bottom-up approaches can be employed. While the former involves the transformation of a block of matter into a structured and organized nanostructure, the later requires the assembly of basic units/monomers for arriving at the nanocarrier structures through non-covalent interactions. Regardless of being weaks, altogether these interactions become the main force of the assembly process. Even though it is important to consider the balance between attractive driving, repulsive and directional forces (Yadav et al., 2020), simple but effective bottom-up approach is the most employed method. By tailoring experimental parameters different types of nanocarriers with distinctive morphologies and high performance for therapeutic purposes can be readily and selectively produced (Fratoddi et al., 2016; García and Quiroz, 2018). SAN represent a promising tool for targeted drug delivery, especially in personalized cancer treatments. They allow a site-directed delivery of anticancer therapeutics, increasing treatment efficacy and safety by modifying their physicochemical characteristics (i.e., size, shape, solubility, permeability) (García, 2019b; Yadav et al., 2020).
Stimuli-Responsive Self-Assembled Nanocarriers
Even though passive and active targeting strategies contribute to intracellular accumulation of anticancer therapeutics, nanocarrier delivery performance can be improved by incorporating appropriate trigger responsiveness. Cutting-edge and emerging research focuses comprise the development of SAN since they can recognize some environmental clue, internal and/or external stimuli (Figure 1B), inducing physical/chemical changes and triggering cargo release in dose-, spatial-, and temporal-controlled manners (García, 2019b). Table 1 describes several examples of stimuli-responsive SAN and their application in cancer therapy.
TABLE 1. Amphiphilic block copolymers and stimuli-responsive self-assembly-based delivery systems for cancer therapy.
External Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers
As stated, different strategies to overcome biological barriers for delivery of anticancer therapeutics, such as hyperthermia (Liu et al., 2018), ultrasound (Ho et al., 2016) and radiation (Potchen et al., 1972) are used. Interestingly, they can be also explored in the design of SAN that can be remotely controlled for triggering cargo delivery.
Light-Responsive Nanocarriers
Light irradiation, with variable intensity and wavelength, is an easy and low-cost exogenous stimulus. At a specific time and location, the disassembly of nanocarriers can be induced upon exposure to certain wavelengths, such as ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared (NIR) (Che and van Hest, 2016; Johnson and Preman, 2018; García, 2019b). Light-responsive SAN frequently incorporate ABC with photo-sensitive moieties viz. azobenzene (Blasco et al., 2013a; Blasco et al., 2013b; Blasco et al., 2014; Xia et al., 2014; Pearson et al., 2015; Bai et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2018), spiropyran (Wang B. et al., 2014; Wang X. et al., 2015; Kwangmettatam and Kudernac, 2018), o-nitrobenzyl (Jin et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Yamamoto et al., 2019), chromophores (Hribar et al., 2011; Song et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2011; He et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2013; Ding et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2020). They behave as light-cleavable linkers or induce light-sensitive degradation or conformational changes (García, 2019b). Drug release may be controlled by adjusting three main parameters: light intensity, wavelength, and exposure time. NIR-responsive SAN have been widely studied for non-invasive and on-demand drug delivery therapy (García, 2019b; Li F. et al., 2020) since tissue and skin exhibit minimum absorbance in the range 650–900 nm (Yin et al., 2016; Johnson and Preman, 2018; García, 2019b). Light-responsive SAN have also been studied for photothermal/photodynamic cancer therapy. The incorporation of gold-based nanostructures into SAN is useful for hyperthermia-based therapy (Liao et al., 2015).
Magnetic-Responsive Nanocarriers
Magnetic-responsive SAN have been evaluated in cancer therapy and/or diagnosis for magnetically triggered cargo release, magnetic resonance imaging, hyperthermia and magnetic guidance (Che and van Hest, 2016; Thambi et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2017; García, 2019b). High penetration, ease of control, noninvasive nature, and absence of energy dissipation are their main characteristics (García, 2019b). Commonly, ferromagnetic, paramagnetic or superparamagnetic (i.e., magnetite and maghemite) nanoparticles are incorporated into self-assemblies (Lecommandoux et al., 2005; Krack et al., 2008; Mart et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2010; Hickey et al., 2011; Meeuwissen et al., 2011; Sanson et al., 2011; Oliveira et al., 2013; Roger et al., 2014; Van Rhee et al., 2014; Liu Q. et al., 2015).
Temperature-Responsive Nanocarriers
Temperature is the most widespread stimulus to trigger the specific responsiveness of SAN for applications in cancer nanomedicine (Mu et al., 2019). Local temperature is slightly higher in solid tumors than in normal tissues; hence, nanocarriers may accumulate into the tumor by adjusting the thermo-responsiveness of ABC (phase transition temperature: upper or lower critical solution temperatures, UCST and LCST, respectively) (Ward and Georgiou, 2011) to be between body and tumor temperature (Onaca et al., 2009; Thambi et al., 2016; García, 2019b). Poly-N-isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAM) as block, with LCST = 32 °C (Che and van Hest, 2016), has been widely evaluated in ABC-based SAN (Qin et al., 2006; Onaca et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2009; Moughton and O’Reilly, 2010; Li G. et al., 2011; Li W. et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2013; Luo et al., 2014; Che and van Hest, 2016; Panja et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2017; García, 2019b). Magnetic nanocarriers that incorporated PNIPAM have also been reported, exhibiting dual responsiveness as well as usefulness for hyperthermia therapy (Bixner et al., 2016). Despite plenty PNIPAM-based nanocarriers have been described so far, their translation to clinical applications is still controversial, since preclinical studies indicated systemic toxicity (Johnson and Preman, 2018). Alternatively, poly(N-vinylcaprolactam)-containing ABC have been evaluated (Liu F. et al., 2015; Kozlovskaya et al., 2019). Moreover, the wide variety of polymers and possible conjugations for synthetizing thermo-sensitive ABC allow broad horizons in the development of temperature-responsive SAN for cancer therapy.
Ultrasound-Responsive Nanocarriers
Ultrasound is a promising stimulus due to its easy administration, low-cost, and deep tissue penetration by tuning the frequency, duty cycles and time of exposure. It has been used as adjuvant in cancer treatment, behaving as a sensitizer to improve chemotherapy and overcome drug resistance (Thambi et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2017; García, 2019b). Ultrasound induces bubbles and air-containing assemblies can trigger drug release and ultrasound-targeted cancer imaging (Zhou et al., 2006).
Electric Field-Responsive Nanocarriers
Electric field- or voltage-responsive SAN have shown interesting properties as well. This stimulus may produce changes in charge or polarity of ABC, affecting their chemical composition or structure, and evoking disassembly with the subsequent cargo release (Yan et al., 2010; Jang et al., 2014; García, 2019b; Li F. et al., 2020). Further studies are still needed to better understand their usefulness for cancer therapy.
Internal Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers
Endogenous stimuli-responsive SAN exploit the characteristics of tumor microenvironment, which are completely different from normal tissue physiology; thus, allowing cargo release in a programmed manner to specific intracellular stimuli viz. low pH, redox state, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and enzymes (García, 2019b).
pH-Responsive Nanocarriers
Extracellular pH of tumor is ∼6.5–7.2, whereas in normal tissues and other biological fluids is ∼7.4. pH is even lower in intracellular endosomes (5.5–5.0) and lysosomes (4.0–4.5). ABC with acid-cleavable bonds or ionizable groups are intended SAN to carry and control cargo release at the low pH in the tumor microenvironment (Rodríguez-Hernández and Lecommandoux, 2005; Zhan et al., 2011; Du et al., 2012; Li et al., 2012; Wang L. et al., 2015; García, 2019b). ABC based on hydrolysis-susceptible aliphatic polyesters, such as poly(lactic acid) or poly(e-caprolactone) as hydrophobic blocks, can be used for obtaining pH-sensitive SAN (Ahmed et al., 2006; Deng et al., 2014). Several acid-cleavable linkers (i.e., hydrazone, imine, ortho ester, and acetal) can also be used. ABC with weak acidic groups such as carboxylic or sulfonic acids (i.e., poly(acrylic acid), poly(methacrylic acid)) and/or weak basic groups such amines [i.e., poly (β-amino ester), poly(lysine), poly(histidine)] allow preparing pH-sensitive SAN, which can suffer alterations in conformation or solubility via ionization (Hu et al., 2017; ; García, 2019a; García, 2019b). These groups can be incorporated into the main or pendant chains of ABC providing to SAN with tunable degradation kinetics (Du and Armes, 2005; Zhu et al., 2012; Wang L. et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2015; Che and van Hest, 2016; Hu et al., 2017). Triblock-containing ABC have also reported in pH-responsive SAN for anticancer therapeutic delivery (Dan and Ghosh, 2013; Li et al., 2015). Moreover, polypeptide-based ABC that self-assemble into polymersomes, also called pepsomes, have been evaluated for cancer therapy (Chécot et al., 2002; Kukula et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Hernández and Lecommandoux, 2005; Sanson et al., 2009; Sanson et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2017). Oppositely charged ABC that contain a PEG block and an aniomer/catiomer block were reported as well (Anraku et al., 2010). Polymersomes based on them, termed as polyion complexes/PICsomes (Hu et al., 2017), have exhibited tunable membrane permeability and long blood circulation (Anraku et al., 2010).
Enzyme-Responsive Nanocarriers
Cancer can cause altered expressions of different enzymes (Thomas and Jeong, 2019). Specific enzymes viz. peptidases, elastase, thermolysin (Habraken et al., 2011), penicillin-G amidase (Harnoy et al., 2014), lysosomal esterase (Pramod et al., 2014; Pramod et al., 2015; Malhotra et al., 2016) have been evaluated for triggering anticancer drug release from enzyme-sensitive SAN (Che and van Hest, 2016; Hu et al., 2017). ABC based on GFLG and GPLGVRGDG peptide sequence have also been used for cancer therapy since they can be cleaved by cathepsin B (Lee et al., 2011; Zhang C. et al., 2017) and metalloproteinase enzyme (Yu et al., 2015; Ke et al., 2016), respectively. Despite significant advances in enzyme-responsive SAN for delivery of anticancer therapeutics, this is a relatively new area of research and remains to be evaluated (Thambi et al., 2016).
Reactive Oxygen Species- and Redox-Responsive Nanocarriers
ROS (i.e., H2O2, ONOO−, HO·, O2−, and 1O2) (Yin et al., 2016; García, 2019b) are associated with cancer cell growth. They reflect a disruption of redox homeostasis because of either higher ROS production or lower ROS-scavenging capacity in cancer cells than normal cells (Trachootham et al., 2009). Abnormal redox states in tumors and the distinctive characteristics from their surroundings encouraged site-specific delivery of anticancer therapeutics from ROS-responsive SAN (Napoli et al., 2004; Scott et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2017; García, 2019b). Boronic esters exhibit ROS responsiveness for H2O2-induced degradation (Song et al., 2013; Deng et al., 2016; Greten and Grivennikov, 2019; Jäger et al., 2020). Moreover, selenium-(Ma et al., 2010) and tellurium-containing (Wang et al., 2016) ABC are emergent materials for developing ROS-responsive SAN; however, their toxicity after degradation needs to be further studied (Cao et al., 2015). In addition, extracellular environments, such as body fluids and cell surface, have a lower glutathione (GSH) concentration (2–20 µM) than cytosol and nuclei (10 mM). Particularly, redox potential of cancer cells is 100- to 1,000-fold higher than other normal cells; hence, triggered intracellular delivery of anticancer therapeutics in this reductive environment can be achieved (Che and van Hest, 2016; García, 2019b). The incorporation of disulfide bonds in the middle/side chain of ABC or in a cross-linker provide redox responsiveness to SAN. Tumor-relevant GSH concentration cleavages these bonds, inducing nanocarrier disassembly and cargo release into cancer cells (Wen et al., 2011; Thambi et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2014; Wen and Li, 2014; Che and van Hest, 2016; Thambi et al., 2016; Zou et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2017; Bej et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2018; García, 2019b; Kumar et al., 2020; Wei Y. et al., 2020; Zhong et al., 2020).
Concluding Remarks and Future Trends
Cancer treatment mainly relies on the use of anticancer drugs; however, their disadvantages negatively impact in therapeutic success. Besides, to reach the tumor-site they need overcome different biological barriers. However, these barriers can be overcome by developing well-designed nanocarriers. Several efforts have been made to comprehensively understand the ability of ABC to self-assemble into nanocarriers and disassemble depending on different environmental stimuli. Representative examples of ABC-based stimuli-responsive SAN were reviewed and their applications for delivery of anticancer therapeutics were highlighted. As stated, the incorporation of stimuli-triggered responsiveness allows them recognizing changes in external/internal environment, inducing on-demand release behavior in spatial-, temporal-, and dose-controlled fashions. Even though these nanocarriers have shown promising properties to revolutionize cancer therapy and diagnosis, there are still challenges for their successful translation to clinical applications. Their biocompatibility, long-term toxicity and immunogenicity need be more studied for establish their safety profile, and advanced in vivo studies are also required to better understand nanocarrier-organism interaction. Considering scalable/reproducible manufacturing process, significant efforts in design, synthesis, and optimization of ABC and their self-assemblies are needed.
Author Contributions
MG conceived and proposed the idea. MG compiled the manuscript with support from JT, ND, ML.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
ML and MG are members of CONICET scientific career. The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of the CONICET and the Universidad Nacional de Cordoba (UNC), both of which provided facilities for this work. JT is also thankful to UNC. ND thanks to Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work.
References
Ahmed, F., Pakunlu, R. I., Brannan, A., Bates, F., Minko, T., and Discher, D. E. (2006). Biodegradable polymersomes loaded with both paclitaxel and doxorubicin permeate and shrink tumors, inducing apoptosis in proportion to accumulated drug. J. Contr. Release 116 (2), 150–158. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.07.012
Aluri, R., and Jayakannan, M. (2017). Development of l-tyrosine-based enzyme-responsive amphiphilic poly(ester-urethane) nanocarriers for multiple drug delivery to cancer cells. Biomacromolecules 18 (1), 189–200. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01476
Anraku, Y., Kishimura, A., Oba, M., Yamasaki, Y., and Kataoka, K. (2010). Spontaneous formation of nanosized unilamellar polyion complex vesicles with tunable size and properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (5), 1631–1636. doi:10.1021/ja908350e
Anselmo, A. C., Zhang, M., Kumar, S., Vogus, D. R., Menegatti, S., Helgeson, M. E., et al. (2015). Elasticity of nanoparticles influences their blood circulation, phagocytosis, endocytosis, and targeting. ACS Nano 9 (3), 3169–3177. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b00147
Avramović, N., Mandić, B., Savić-Radojević, A., and Simić, T. (2020). Polymeric nanocarriers of drug delivery systems in cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics 12 (4), 298. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12040298
Bai, Y., Liu, C. P., Song, X., Zhuo, L., Bu, H., and Tian, W. (2018). Photo- and pH- dual-responsive β-cyclodextrin-based supramolecular prodrug complex self-assemblies for programmed drug delivery. Chem. Asian J. 13 (24), 3903–3911. doi:10.1002/asia.201801366
Barua, S., and Mitragotri, S. (2014). Challenges associated with penetration of nanoparticles across cell and tissue barriers: a review of current status and future prospects. Nano Today 9 (2), 223–243. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2014.04.008
Bej, R., Sarkar, J., Ray, D., Aswal, V. K., and Ghosh, S. (2018). Morphology regulation in redox destructible amphiphilic block copolymers and impact on intracellular drug delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 18 (7), 1800057. doi:10.1002/mabi.201800057
Berbezier, I., and De Crescenzi, M. (2015). Self-assembly of nanostructures and nanomaterials. Frankfurt, Germany: Beilstein-Institut.
Bixner, O., Kurzhals, S., Virk, M., and Reimhult, E. (2016). Triggered release from thermoresponsive polymersomes with superparamagnetic membranes. Materials 9 (1), 29. doi:10.3390/ma9010029
Blanco, E., Shen, H., and Ferrari, M. (2015). Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (9), 941–951. doi:10.1038/nbt.3330
Blasco, E., Barrio, J. D., Sánchez-Somolinos, C., Piñol, M., and Oriol, L. (2013a). Light induced molecular release from vesicles based on amphiphilic linear-dendritic block copolymers. Polym. Chem. 4 (7), 2246–2254. doi:10.1039/c2py21025h
Blasco, E., Piñol, M., and Oriol, L. (2014). Responsive linear-dendritic block copolymers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 35 (12), 1090–1115. doi:10.1002/marc.201400007
Blasco, E., Serrano, J. L., Piñol, M., and Oriol, L. (2013b). Light responsive vesicles based on linear-dendritic block copolymers using azobenzene-aliphatic codendrons. Macromolecules 46 (15), 5951–5960. doi:10.1021/ma4009725
Bros, M., Nuhn, L., Simon, J., Moll, L., Mailänder, V., Landfester, K., et al. (2018). The protein corona as a confounding variable of nanoparticle-mediated targeted vaccine delivery. Front. Immunol. 9, 1760. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01760
Buoncervello, M., Gabriele, L., and Toschi, E. (2019). The janus face of tumor microenvironment targeted by immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (17), 4320. doi:10.3390/ijms20174320
Cabral, H., Matsumoto, Y., Mizuno, K., Chen, Q., Murakami, M., Kimura, M., et al. (2011). Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 (12), 815–823. doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.166
Cao, W., Wang, L., and Xu, H. (2015). Selenium/tellurium containing polymer materials in nanobiotechnology. Nano Today 10 (6), 717–736. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2015.11.004
Champion, J. A., Katare, Y. K., and Mitragotri, S. (2007). Particle shape: a new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. J. Contr. Release 121 (1–2), 3–9. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.03.022
Chan, W. C. W. (2017). Nanomedicine 2.0. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 627–632. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00629
Che, H., and Van Hest, J. C. M. (2016). Stimuli-responsive polymersomes and nanoreactors. J. Mater. Chem. B 4 (27), 4632–4647. doi:10.1039/c6tb01163b
Chécot, F., Lecommandoux, S., Gnanou, Y., and Klok, H.-A. (2002). Water-soluble stimuli-responsive vesicles from peptide-based diblock copolymers. Angew. Chem. 114 (8), 1395–1399. doi:10.1002/1521-3757(20020415)114:8<1395::aid-ange1395>3.0.co;2-j
Chen, D., Ganesh, S., Wang, W., and Amiji, M. (2017). Plasma protein adsorption and biological identity of systemically administered nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 12 (17), 2113–2135. doi:10.2217/nnm-2017-0178
Chen, H., Li, B., Qiu, J., Li, J., Jin, J., Dai, S., et al. (2013). Thermal responsive micelles for dual tumor-targeting imaging and therapy. Nanoscale 5 (24), 12409–12424. doi:10.1039/c3nr04529c
Chevalier, M., García, M., and Alvarez, V. (2017). “Biopolymeric nanoparticles as drug carriers for intravenous administrations,” in Biopolymers and nanocomposites for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Editors E., Sharmin, and F., Zafar (New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.), 63–92.
Choudhury, H., Gorain, B., Pandey, M., Khurana, R. K., and Kesharwani, P. (2019). Strategizing biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles to cross the biological barriers for cancer targeting. Int. J. Pharm. 565, 509–522. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.05.042
Dan, K., and Ghosh, S. (2013). One-pot synthesis of an acid-labile amphiphilic triblock copolymer and its pH-responsive vesicular assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (28), 7300–7305. doi:10.1002/anie.201302722
Deng, H., Liu, J., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Xu, S., et al. (2014). PEG-b-PCL copolymer micelles with the ability of pH-controlled negative-to-positive charge reversal for intracellular delivery of doxorubicin. Biomacromolecules 15 (11), 4281–4292. doi:10.1021/bm501290t
Deng, Z., Qian, Y., Yu, Y., Liu, G., Hu, J., Zhang, G., et al. (2016). Engineering intracellular delivery nanocarriers and nanoreactors from oxidation-responsive polymersomes via synchronized bilayer cross-linking and permeabilizing inside live cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (33), 10452–10466. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b04115
Ding, H., Lv, Y., Ni, D., Wang, J., Tian, Z., Wei, W., et al. (2015). Erythrocyte membrane-coated NIR-triggered biomimetic nanovectors with programmed delivery for photodynamic therapy of cancer. Nanoscale 7 (21), 9806–9815. doi:10.1039/c5nr02470f
Ding, J., Chen, J., Gao, L., Jiang, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, M., et al. (2019). Engineered nanomedicines with enhanced tumor penetration. Nano Today 29, 100800. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100800
Du, J., and Armes, S. P. (2005). pH-responsive vesicles based on a hydrolytically self-cross-linkable copolymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (37), 12800–12801. doi:10.1021/ja054755n
Du, Y., Chen, W., Zheng, M., Meng, F., and Zhong, Z. (2012). pH-sensitive degradable chimaeric polymersomes for the intracellular release of doxorubicin hydrochloride. Biomaterials 33 (29), 7291–7299. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.034
Eggen, S., Fagerland, S.-M., Mørch, Ý., Hansen, R., Søvik, K., Berg, S., et al. (2014). Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery in prostate cancer xenografts by nanoparticles stabilizing microbubbles. J. Contr. Release 187, 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.020
Ernsting, M. J., Murakami, M., Roy, A., and Li, S.-D. (2013). Factors controlling the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and intratumoral penetration of nanoparticles. J. Contr. Release 172 (3), 782–794. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.013
Fratoddi, I., Bearzotti, A., Venditti, I., Cametti, C., and Russo, M. V. (2016). Role of nanostructured polymers on the improvement of electrical response-based relative humidity sensors. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 225, 96–108. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.11.001
García, M. C. (2019a). “Ionic-strength-responsive polymers for drug delivery applications,” in Stimuli responsive polymeric nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Editors A.S.H., Makhlouf, and N. Y., Abu-Thabit (Cambridge, UK: Elsevier), 393–409.
García, M. C. (2019b). “Stimuli-responsive polymersomes for drug delivery applications,” in Stimuli responsive polymeric nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Editors A.S.H., Makhlouf, and N.Y., Abu-Thabit (Cambridge, UK: Elsevier), 345–392.
García, M. C., Aloisio, C., Onnainty, R., and Ullio-Gamboa, G. (2018). “Self assembled nanomaterials,” in Nanobiomaterials: nanostructured materials for biomedical applications. 1st Edn, Editor R., Narayan (Cambridge, UK: Elsevier).
García, M. C., and Quiroz, F. (2018). “Nanostructured polymers,” in Nanobiomaterials: nanostructured materials for biomedical applications. Editor R., Narayan (Cambridge, UK: Elsevier), 339–356.
Greten, F. R., and Grivennikov, S. I. (2019). Inflammation and cancer: triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity 51, 27–41. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025
Habraken, G. J. M., Peeters, M., Thornton, P. D., Koning, C. E., and Heise, A. (2011). Selective enzymatic degradation of self-assembled particles from amphiphilic block copolymers obtained by the combination of N-carboxyanhydride and nitroxide-mediated polymerization. Biomacromolecules 12 (10), 3761–3769. doi:10.1021/bm2010033
Harnoy, A. J., Rosenbaum, I., Tirosh, E., Ebenstein, Y., Shaharabani, R., Beck, R., et al. (2014). Enzyme-responsive amphiphilic PEG-dendron hybrids and their assembly into smart micellar nanocarriers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (21), 7531–7534. doi:10.1021/ja413036q
He, J., Zhang, P., Babu, T., Liu, Y., Gong, J., and Nie, Z. (2013). Near-infrared light-responsive vesicles of Au nanoflowers. Chem. Commun. 49 (6), 576–578. doi:10.1039/c2cc37322j
Hickey, R. J., Haynes, A. S., Kikkawa, J. M., and Park, S.-J. (2011). Controlling the self-assembly structure of magnetic nanoparticles and amphiphilic block-copolymers: from micelles to vesicles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (5), 1517–1525. doi:10.1021/ja1090113
Ho, Y.-J., Chang, Y.-C., and Yeh, C.-K. (2016). Improving nanoparticle penetration in tumors by vascular disruption with acoustic droplet vaporization. Theranostics 6 (3), 392–403. doi:10.7150/thno.13727
Hribar, K. C., Lee, M. H., Lee, D., and Burdick, J. A. (2011). Enhanced release of small molecules from near-infrared light responsive Polymer−Nanorod composites. ACS Nano 5 (4), 2948–2956. doi:10.1021/nn103575a
Hruby, H. J., Thambi, T., Sivasubramanian, M., Byun, J. H., Ahn, J. Y., Chae, S. Y., et al. (2014). β-cyclodextrin-bearing glycol chitosan for long-acting formulation of an exenatide derivative. Macromol. Res. 22 (8), 816–819. doi:10.1007/s13233-014-2147-1
Hu, C., Ma, N., Li, F., Fang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, L., et al. (2018). Cucurbit[8]uril-Based giant supramolecular vesicles: highly stable, versatile carriers for photoresponsive and targeted drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (5), 4603–4613. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b00297
Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Xie, Z., Jing, X., Bellotti, A., and Gu, Z. (2017). Stimuli-responsive polymersomes for biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 18, 649–673. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01704
Huang, F., Cheng, R., Meng, F., Deng, C., and Zhong, Z. (2015). icelles based on acid degradable poly(acetal urethane): preparation, pH-sensitivity, and triggered intracellular drug release. Biomacromolecules 16 (7), 2228–2236. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00625
Huang, X., Hu, J., Tian, J., Ge, Z., Zhang, G., Luo, K., et al. (2013). Polyprodrug amphiphiles: hierarchical assemblies for shape-regulated cellular internalization, trafficking, and drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (46), 17617–17629. doi:10.1021/ja409686x
Huo, D., Jiang, X., and Hu, Y. (2019). Recent advances in nanostrategies capable of overcoming biological barriers for tumor management. Adv. Mater. 32, e1904337. doi:10.1002/adma.201904337,
Jäger, E., Sincari, V., Albuquerque, L. J. C., Jäger, A., Humajova, J., Kucka, J., et al. (2020). Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive polymersomes with site-specific chemotherapeutic delivery into tumors via spacer design chemistry. Biomacromolecules 21 (4), 1437–1449. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01748
Jia, L., Cui, D., Bignon, J., Di Cicco, A., Wdzieczak-Bakala, J., Liu, J., et al. (2014). Reduction-responsive cholesterol-based block copolymer vesicles for drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 15 (6), 2206–2217. doi:10.1021/bm5003569
Jin, Q., Cai, T., Wang, Y., Wang, H., and Ji, J. (2014). Light-responsive polyion complex micelles with switchable surface charge for efficient protein delivery. ACS Macro Lett. 3 (7), 679–683. doi:10.1021/mz500290s
Johnson, R. P., and Preman, N. K. (2018). “Responsive block copolymers for drug delivery applications. Part 1: endogenous stimuli-responsive drug-release systems,” in Stimuli responsive polymeric nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Editors A.S.H., Makhlouf, and N.Y., Abu-Thabit (Cambridge, UK: Elsevier), Vol. 1, 171–220.
Kalluri, R. (2016). The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16 (9), 582–598. doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.73
Kane, R. S., Deschatelets, P., and Whitesides, G. M. (2003). Kosmotropes form the basis of protein-resistant surfaces. Langmuir 19 (6), 2388–2391. doi:10.1021/la020737x
Ke, W., Li, J., Zhao, K., Zha, Z., Han, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2016). Modular design and facile synthesis of enzyme-responsive peptide-linked block copolymers for efficient delivery of doxorubicin. Biomacromolecules 17 (10), 3268–3276. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00997
Kievit, F. M., and Zhang, M. (2011). Cancer therapy: cancer nanotheranostics: improving imaging and therapy by targeted delivery across biological barriers (adv. Mater. 36/2011). Adv. Mater. 23 (36), H209. doi:10.1002/adma.201102313
Kim, K. T., Zhu, J., Meeuwissen, S. A., Cornelissen, J. J. L. M., Pochan, D. J., Nolte, R. J. M., et al. (2010). Polymersome stomatocytes: controlled shape transformation in polymer vesicles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (36), 12522–12524. doi:10.1021/ja104154t
Koláčná, L., Bakešová, J., Varga, F., Košťáková Kuželova, E., Plánka, L., Nečas, A., et al. (2007). Biochemical and biophysical aspects of collagen nanostructure in the extracellular matrix. Physiol. Res. 56, S51–S60.
Kozlovskaya, V., Liu, F., Yang, Y., Ingle, K., Qian, S., Halade, G. V., et al. (2019). Temperature-responsive polymersomes of poly(3-methyl-N-vinylcaprolactam)-block-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) to decrease doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Biomacromolecules 20 (10), 3989–4000. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01026
Krack, M., Hohenberg, H., Kornowski, A., Lindner, P., Weller, H., and Förster, S. (2008). Nanoparticle-loaded magnetophoretic vesicles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (23), 7315–7320. doi:10.1021/ja077398k
Kuhn, S. J., Finch, S. K., Hallahan, D. E., and Giorgio, T. D. (2006). Proteolytic surface functionalization enhancesin VitroMagnetic nanoparticle mobility through extracellular matrix. Nano Lett. 6 (2), 306–312. doi:10.1021/nl052241g
Kukula, H., Schlaad, H., Antonietti, M., and Förster, S. (2002). The formation of polymer vesicles or “peptosomes” by polybutadiene-block-poly(l-glutamate)s in dilute aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (8), 1658–1663. doi:10.1021/ja012091l
Kumar, B., Priyadarshi, R., Deeba, F., Kulshreshtha, A., Kumar, A., Agrawal, G., et al. (2020). Redox responsive xylan-SS-curcumin prodrug nanoparticles for dual drug delivery in cancer therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 107, 110356. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110356
Kwangmettatam, S., and Kudernac, T. (2018). Light-fuelled reversible expansion of spiropyran-based vesicles in water. Chem. Commun. 54 (42), 5311–5314. doi:10.1039/c8cc01780h
Lazarovits, J., Chen, Y. Y., Sykes, E. A., and Chan, W. C. W. (2015). Nanoparticle-blood interactions: the implications on solid tumour targeting. Chem. Commun. 51, 2756–2767. doi:10.1039/c4cc07644c
Lecommandoux, S., Sandre, O., Chécot, F., Rodriguez-Hernandez, J., and Perzynski, R. (2005). Magnetic nanocomposite micelles and vesicles. Adv. Mater. 17 (6), 712–718. doi:10.1002/adma.200400599
Lee, J. S., Groothuis, T., Cusan, C., Mink, D., and Feijen, J. (2011). Lysosomally cleavable peptide-containing polymersomes modified with anti-EGFR antibody for systemic cancer chemotherapy. Biomaterials 32 (34), 9144–9153. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.036
Li, B., Yuan, Z., Hung, H. C., Ma, J., Jain, P., Tsao, C., et al. (2018). Revealing the immunogenic risk of polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (42), 13873–13876. doi:10.1002/anie.201808615
Li, D., Su, T., Ma, L., Yin, F., Xu, W., Ding, J., et al. (2020). Dual-acidity-labile polysaccharide-di-drugs conjugate for targeted cancer chemotherapy. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 199, 112367. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112367
Li, F., Qin, Y., Lee, J., Liao, H., Wang, N., Davis, T. P., et al. (2020). Stimuli-responsive nano-assemblies for remotely controlled drug delivery. J. Contr. Release 322, 566–592. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.051
Li, G., Guo, L., Meng, Y., and Zhang, T. (2011). Self-assembled nanoparticles from thermo-sensitive polyion complex micelles for controlled drug release. Chem. Eng. J. 174 (1), 199–205. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.079
Li, J.-X., Huang, Q.-Y., Zhang, J.-Y., and Du, J.-Z. (2020). Engineering nanoparticles to tackle tumor barriers. J. Mater. Chem. B 8 (31), 6686–6696. doi:10.1039/d0tb00967a
Li, S., Meng, F., Wang, Z., Zhong, Y., Zheng, M., Liu, H., et al. (2012). Biodegradable polymersomes with an ionizable membrane: facile preparation, superior protein loading, and endosomal pH-responsive protein release. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 82 (1), 103–111. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.05.009
Li, W., Li, J., Gao, J., Li, B., Xia, Y., Meng, Y., et al. (2011). The fine-tuning of thermosensitive and degradable polymer micelles for enhancing intracellular uptake and drug release in tumors. Biomaterials 32 (15), 3832–3844. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.075
Li, X., Yang, W., Zou, Y., Meng, F., Deng, C., and Zhong, Z. (2015). Efficacious delivery of protein drugs to prostate cancer cells by PSMA-targeted pH-responsive chimaeric polymersomes. J. Contr. Release 220, 704–714. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.058
Li, Y., Lei, X., Dong, H., and Ren, T. (2014). Sheddable, degradable, cationic micelles enabling drug and gene delivery. RSC Adv. 4 (16), 8165–8176. doi:10.1039/c3ra46756b
Liao, J., Li, W., Peng, J., Yang, Q., Li, H., Wei, Y., et al. (2015). Combined cancer photothermal-chemotherapy based on doxorubicin/gold nanorod-loaded polymersomes. Theranostics 5 (4), 345–356. doi:10.7150/thno.10731
Lin, J., Wang, S., Huang, P., Wang, Z., Chen, S., Niu, G., et al. (2013). Photosensitizer-loaded gold vesicles with strong plasmonic coupling effect for imaging-guided photothermal/photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano 7 (6), 5320–5329. doi:10.1021/nn4011686
Liu, F., Kozlovskaya, V., Medipelli, S., Xue, B., Ahmad, F., Saeed, M., et al. (2015). Temperature-sensitive polymersomes for controlled delivery of anticancer drugs. Chem. Mater. 27 (23), 7945–7956. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03048
Liu, F.-H., Cong, Y., Qi, G.-B., Ji, L., Qiao, Z.-Y., and Wang, H. (2018). Near-infrared laser-driven in situ self-assembly as a general strategy for deep tumor therapy. Nano Lett. 18 (10), 6577–6584. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03174
Liu, G., Wang, X., Hu, J., Zhang, G., and Liu, S. (2014). Self-immolative polymersomes for high-efficiency triggered release and programmed enzymatic reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (20), 7492–7497. doi:10.1021/ja5030832
Liu, Q., Chen, S., Chen, J., and Du, J. (2015). An asymmetrical polymer vesicle strategy for significantly improving T1 MRI sensitivity and cancer-targeted drug delivery. Macromolecules 48 (3), 739–749. doi:10.1021/ma502255s
Lu, P., Weaver, V. M., and Werb, Z. (2012). The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 196 (4), 395–406. doi:10.1083/jcb.201102147
Luo, Y.-L., Yang, X.-L., Xu, F., Chen, Y.-S., and Zhang, B. (2014). Thermosensitive PNIPAM-b-HTPB block copolymer micelles: molecular architectures and camptothecin drug release. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 114, 150–157. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.09.043
Ma, N., Li, Y., Xu, H., Wang, Z., and Zhang, X. (2010). Dual redox responsive assemblies formed from diselenide block copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2), 442–443. doi:10.1021/ja908124g
Maeda, H., Nakamura, H., and Fang, J. (2013). The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65 (1), 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.002
Malhotra, M., Surnar, B., and Jayakannan, M. (2016). Polymer topology driven enzymatic biodegradation in polycaprolactone block and random copolymer architectures for drug delivery to cancer cells. Macromolecules 49 (21), 8098–8112. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01793
Mart, R. J., Liem, K. P., and Webb, S. J. (2009). Magnetically-controlled release from hydrogel-supported vesicle assemblies. Chem. Commun. (17), 2287–2289. doi:10.1039/b901472a
Matsumoto, Y., Nichols, J. W., Toh, K., Nomoto, T., Cabral, H., Miura, Y., et al. (2016). Vascular bursts enhance permeability of tumour blood vessels and improve nanoparticle delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 (6), 533–538. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.342
Meeuwissen, S. A., Kim, K. T., Chen, Y., Pochan, D. J., and van Hest, J. C. M. (2011). Controlled shape transformation of polymersome stomatocytes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (31), 7070–7073. doi:10.1002/anie.201102167
Miao, L., Lin, C. M., and Huang, L. (2015). Stromal barriers and strategies for the delivery of nanomedicine to desmoplastic tumors. J. Contr. Release 219, 192–204. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.017
Miao, L., Newby, J. M., Lin, C. M., Zhang, L., Xu, F., Kim, W. Y., et al. (2016). The binding site barrier elicited by tumor-associated fibroblasts interferes disposition of nanoparticles in stroma-vessel type tumors. ACS Nano 10 (10), 9243–9258. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b02776
Moughton, A. O., and O’Reilly, R. K. (2010). Thermally induced micelle to vesicle morphology transition for a charged chain end diblock copolymer. Chem. Commun. 46 (7), 1091–1093. doi:10.1039/b922289h
Mu, X., Gan, S., Wang, Y., Li, H., and Zhou, G. (2019). Stimulus-responsive vesicular polymer nano-integrators for drug and gene delivery. IJN 14, 5415–5434. doi:10.2147/ijn.s203555
Munn, D. H., and Bronte, V. (2016). Immune suppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 39, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2015.10.009
Naeye, B., Raemdonck, K., Remaut, K., Sproat, B., Demeester, J., and De Smedt, S. C. (2010). PEGylation of biodegradable dextran nanogels for siRNA delivery. Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 40 (4), 342–351. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2010.04.010
Napoli, A., Valentini, M., Tirelli, N., Müller, M., and Hubbell, J. A. (2004). Oxidation-responsive polymeric vesicles. Nat. Mater. 3 (3), 183. doi:10.1038/nmat1081
Oliveira, H., Pérez-Andrés, E., Thevenot, J., Sandre, O., Berra, E., and Lecommandoux, S. (2013). Magnetic field triggered drug release from polymersomes for cancer therapeutics. J. Contr. Release 169 (3), 165–170. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.01.013
Onaca, O., Enea, R., Hughes, D. W., and Meier, W. (2009). Stimuli-responsive polymersomes as nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 9 (2), 129–139. doi:10.1002/mabi.200800248
Panja, S., Dey, G., Bharti, R., Kumari, K., Maiti, T. K., Mandal, M., et al. (2016). Tailor-made temperature-sensitive micelle for targeted and on-demand release of anticancer drugs. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (19), 12063–12074. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b03820
Pearson, S., Vitucci, D., Khine, Y. Y., Dag, A., Lu, H., Save, M., et al. (2015). Light-responsive azobenzene-based glycopolymer micelles for targeted drug delivery to melanoma cells. Eur. Polym. J. 69, 616–627. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.001
Potchen, E. J., Kinzie, J., Curtis, C., Siegel, B. A., and Studer, R. K. (1972). Effect of irradiation on tumor microvascular permeability to macromolecules. Cancer 30 (3), 639–642. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197209)30:3<639::aid-cncr2820300308>3.0.co;2-3
Pourjavadi, A., Mazaheri Tehrani, Z., and Dastanpour, L. (2019). Smart magnetic self-assembled micelle: an effective nanocarrier for thermo-triggered paclitaxel delivery. Int. J. Polymer. Materials Polymer. Biomaterials 68 (12), 741–749. doi:10.1080/00914037.2018.1493687
Pramod, P. S., Shah, R., Chaphekar, S., Balasubramanian, N., and Jayakannan, M. (2014). Polysaccharide nano-vesicular multidrug carriers for synergistic killing of cancer cells. Nanoscale 6 (20), 11841–11855. doi:10.1039/c4nr03514c
Pramod, P. S., Shah, R., and Jayakannan, M. (2015). Dual stimuli polysaccharide nanovesicles for conjugated and physically loaded doxorubicin delivery in breast cancer cells. Nanoscale 7 (15), 6636–6652. doi:10.1039/c5nr00799b
Pramod, P. S., Takamura, K., Chaphekar, S., Balasubramanian, N., and Jayakannan, M. (2012). Dextran vesicular carriers for dual encapsulation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules and delivery into cells. Biomacromolecules 13 (11), 3627–3640. doi:10.1021/bm301583s
Qin, L., and Gao, H. (2019). The application of nitric oxide delivery in nanoparticle-based tumor targeting drug delivery and treatment. Asian J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 14 (14), 380–390. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2018.10.005
Qin, S., Geng, Y., Discher, D. E., and Yang, S. (2006). Temperature-controlled assembly and release from polymer vesicles of poly(ethylene oxide)-block- poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Adv. Mater. 18 (21), 2905–2909. doi:10.1002/adma.200601019
Qin, Y., Zhang, Z., Huang, C., Fan, F., Liu, L., Lu, L., et al. Folate-targeted redox-responsive polymersomes loaded with chemotherapeutic drugs and tariquidar to overcome drug resistance. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 14 (10), 1705–1718. doi:10.1166/jbn.2018.2623
Rodríguez-Hernández, J., and Lecommandoux, S. (2005). Reversible Inside−out micellization of pH-responsive and water-soluble vesicles based on polypeptide diblock copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (7), 2026–2027. doi:10.1021/ja043920g
Roger, S., Harmen, H., Roeland, J., Ávan Hest, J. C., and Peter, C. (2014). Probing morphological changes in polymersomes with magnetic birefringence. Chem. Commun. 50 (40), 5394–5396. doi:10.1039/c3cc47483f
Sanson, C., Diou, O., Thévenot, J., Ibarboure, E., Soum, A., Brûlet, A., et al. (2011). Doxorubicin loaded magnetic polymersomes: theranostic nanocarriers for MR imaging and magneto-chemotherapy. ACS Nano 5 (2), 1122–1140. doi:10.1021/nn102762f
Sanson, C., Schatz, C., Le Meins, J.-F. O., BrûLet, A., Soum, A., and Lecommandoux, S. B. (2009). Biocompatible and biodegradable poly (trimethylene carbonate)-b-poly (L-glutamic acid) polymersomes: size control and stability. Langmuir 26 (4), 2751–2760. doi:10.1021/la902786t
Sanson, C., Schatz, C., Le Meins, J.-F., Soum, A., Thévenot, J., Garanger, E., et al. (2010). A simple method to achieve high doxorubicin loading in biodegradable polymersomes. J. Contr. Release 147 (3), 428–435. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.123
Scott, E. A., Stano, A., Gillard, M., Maio-Liu, A. C., Swartz, M. A., and Hubbell, J. A. (2012). Dendritic cell activation and T cell priming with adjuvant- and antigen-loaded oxidation-sensitive polymersomes. Biomaterials 33 (26), 6211–6219. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.060
Shao, Q., and Jiang, S. (2014). Molecular understanding and design of zwitterionic materials. Adv. Mater. 27 (1), 15–26. doi:10.1002/adma.201404059
Sharma, G., Valenta, D. T., Altman, Y., Harvey, S., Xie, H., Mitragotri, S., et al. (2010). Polymer particle shape independently influences binding and internalization by macrophages. J. Contr. Release 147 (3), 408–412. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.116
Sherman, M. H., Yu, R. T., Engle, D. D., Ding, N., Atkins, A. R., Tiriac, H., et al. (2014). Vitamin D receptor-mediated stromal reprogramming suppresses pancreatitis and enhances pancreatic cancer therapy. Cell 159 (1), 80–93. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.007
Sindhwani, S., Syed, A. M., Ngai, J., Kingston, B. R., Maiorino, L., Rothschild, J., et al. (2020). The entry of nanoparticles into solid tumours. Nat. Mater. 19, 566–575. doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0566-2
Song, C.-C., Ji, R., Du, F.-S., Liang, D.-H., and Li, Z.-C. (2013). Oxidation-accelerated hydrolysis of the ortho ester-containing acid-labile polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2 (3), 273–277. doi:10.1021/mz4000392
Song, J., Cheng, L., Liu, A., Yin, J., Kuang, M., and Duan, H. (2011). Plasmonic vesicles of amphiphilic gold nanocrystals: self-assembly and external-stimuli-triggered destruction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (28), 10760–10763. doi:10.1021/ja204387w
Sun, H., Meng, F., Cheng, R., Deng, C., and Zhong, Z. (2014). Reduction and pH dual-bioresponsive crosslinked polymersomes for efficient intracellular delivery of proteins and potent induction of cancer cell apoptosis. Acta Biomaterialia 10 (5), 2159–2168. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.010
Talmadge, J. E., and Gabrilovich, D. I. (2013). History of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Nat. Rev. Canc. 13, 739–752. doi:10.1038/nrc3581
Tang, Q., Hu, P., Peng, H., Zhang, N., Zheng, Q., and He, Y. (2020). Near-infrared laser-triggered, self-immolative smart polymersomes for in vivo cancer therapy. Int. J.Nanomed. 15, 137. doi:10.2147/ijn.s224502
Thambi, T., Deepagan, V. G., Ko, H., Lee, D. S., and Park, J. H. (2012). Bioreducible polymersomes for intracellular dual-drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. 22 (41), 22028–22036. doi:10.1039/c2jm34546c
Thambi, T., Park, J. H., and Lee, D. S. (2016). Stimuli-responsive polymersomes for cancer therapy. Biomater. Sci. 4 (1), 55–69. doi:10.1039/c5bm00268k
Thomas, R. G., and Jeong, Y. Y. (2019). “Stimuli-responsive nano drug delivery systems for anticancer therapy,” in Biomimetic nanoengineered materials for advanced drug delivery. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier), 125–148.
Tonigold, M., Simon, J., Estupiñán, D., Kokkinopoulou, M., Reinholz, J., Kintzel, U., et al. (2018). Pre-adsorption of antibodies enables targeting of nanocarriers despite a biomolecular corona. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 (9), 862–869. doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0171-6
Trachootham, D., Alexandre, J., and Huang, P. (2009). Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: a radical therapeutic approach?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 8 (7), 579–591. doi:10.1038/nrd2803
Truong, N. P., Whittaker, M. R., Mak, C. W., and Davis, T. P. (2015). The importance of nanoparticle shape in cancer drug delivery. Expet Opin. Drug Deliv. 12 (1), 129–142. doi:10.1517/17425247.2014.950564
Tsai, W.-B., Shi, Q., Grunkemeier, J. M., Mcfarland, C., and Horbett, T. A. (2004). Platelet adhesion to radiofrequency glow-discharge-deposited fluorocarbon polymers preadsorbed with selectively depleted plasmas show the primary role of fibrinogen. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 15 (7), 817–840. doi:10.1163/1568562041271093
Van Rhee, P., Rikken, R., Abdelmohsen, L., Maan, J., Nolte, R., Van Hest, J., et al. (2014). Polymersome magneto-valves for reversible capture and release of nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 5 (1), 5010. doi:10.1038/ncomms6010
Waldhauer, I., and Steinle, A. (2008). NK cells and cancer immunosurveillance. Oncogene 27 (45), 5932–5943. doi:10.1038/onc.2008.267
Wang, B., Chen, K., Yang, R., Yang, F., and Liu, J. (2014). Stimulus-responsive polymeric micelles for the light-triggered release of drugs. Carbohydr. Polym. 103, 510–519. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.062
Wang, L., Cao, W., and Xu, H. (2016). Tellurium-containing polymers: towards biomaterials and optoelectronic materials. ChemNanoMat 2 (6), 479–488. doi:10.1002/cnma.201600076
Wang, L., Liu, G., Wang, X., Hu, J., Zhang, G., and Liu, S. (2015). Acid-disintegratable polymersomes of pH-responsive amphiphilic diblock copolymers for intracellular drug delivery. Macromolecules 48 (19), 7262–7272. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01709
Wang, Q.-M., Gao, Z., Liu, S., Fan, B., Kang, L., Huang, W., et al. (2014). Hybrid polymeric micelles based on bioactive polypeptides as pH-responsive delivery systems against melanoma. Biomaterials 35 (25), 7008–7021. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.117
Wang, X., Hu, J., Liu, G., Tian, J., Wang, H., Gong, M., et al. (2015). Reversibly switching bilayer permeability and release modules of photochromic polymersomes stabilized by cooperative noncovalent interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (48), 15262–15275. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b10127
Wang, Y.-C., Wang, F., Sun, T.-M., and Wang, J. (2011). Redox-responsive nanoparticles from the single disulfide bond-bridged block copolymer as drug carriers for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer cells. Bioconjugate Chem. 22 (10), 1939–1945. doi:10.1021/bc200139n
Ward, M. A., and Georgiou, T. K. (2011). Thermoresponsive polymers for biomedical applications. Polymers 3 (3), 1215–1242. doi:10.3390/polym3031215
Wei, P., Sun, M., Yang, B., Xiao, J., and Du, J. (2020). Ultrasound-responsive polymersomes capable of endosomal escape for efficient cancer therapy. J. Contr. Release 322, 81–94. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.013
Wei, Y., Gu, X., Sun, Y., Meng, F., Storm, G., and Zhong, Z. (2020). Transferrin-binding peptide functionalized polymersomes mediate targeted doxorubicin delivery to colorectal cancer in vivo. J. Contr. Release 319, 407–415. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.01.012
Wen, H.-Y., Dong, H.-Q., Xie, W.-J., Li, Y.-Y., Wang, K., Pauletti, G. M., et al. (2011). Rapidly disassembling nanomicelles with disulfide-linked PEG shells for glutathione-mediated intracellular drug delivery. Chem. Commun. 47 (12), 3550–3552. doi:10.1039/c0cc04983b
Wen, H., and Li, Y. (2014). Redox sensitive nanoparticles with disulfide bond linked sheddable shell for intracellular drug delivery. Med. Chem. 4 (11), 748–755. doi:10.4172/2161-0444.1000225
Wu, P., Jia, Y., Qu, F., Sun, Y., Wang, P., Zhang, K., et al. (2017). Ultrasound-responsive polymeric micelles for sonoporation-assisted site-specific therapeutic action. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (31), 25706–25716. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b05469
Xia, D., Yu, G., Li, J., and Huang, F. (2014). Photo-responsive self-assembly based on a water-soluble pillar[6]arene and an azobenzene-containing amphiphile in water. Chem. Commun. 50 (27), 3606–3608. doi:10.1039/c3cc49686d
Xiong, M.-H., Wu, J., Wang, Y.-C., Li, L.-S., Liu, X.-B., Zhang, G.-Z., et al. (2009). Synthesis of PEG-armed and polyphosphoester core-cross-linked nanogel by one-step ring-opening polymerization. Macromolecules 42 (4), 893–896. doi:10.1021/ma802688y
Xu, H., Meng, F., and Zhong, Z. (2009). Reversibly crosslinked temperature-responsive nano-sized polymersomes: synthesis and triggered drug release. J. Mater. Chem. 19 (24), 4183–4190. doi:10.1039/b901141b
Yadav, S., Sharma, A. K., and Kumar, P. (2020). Nanoscale self-assembly for therapeutic delivery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 127. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00127
Yamamoto, S., Yamada, T., Kubo, G., Sakurai, K., Yamaguchi, K., and Nakanishi, J. (2019). Preparation of a series of photoresponsive polymersomes bearing photocleavable a 2-nitrobenzyl group at the hydrophobic/hydrophilic interfaces and their payload releasing behaviors. Polymers 11 (8), 1254. doi:10.3390/polym11081254
Yan, B., Boyer, J.-C., Branda, N. R., and Zhao, Y. (2011). Near-infrared light-triggered dissociation of block copolymer micelles using upconverting nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (49), 19714–19717. doi:10.1021/ja209793b
Yan, L., Zhao, F., Wang, J., Zu, Y., Gu, Z., and Zhao, Y. (2019). A safe-by-design strategy towards safer nanomaterials in nanomedicines. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805391. doi:10.1002/adma.201805391
Yan, Q., Yuan, J., Cai, Z., Xin, Y., Kang, Y., and Yin, Y. (2010). Voltage-responsive vesicles based on orthogonal assembly of two homopolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (27), 9268–9270. doi:10.1021/ja1027502
Yang, X., Grailer, J. J., Rowland, I. J., Javadi, A., Hurley, S. A., Steeber, D. A., et al. (2010). Multifunctional SPIO/DOX-loaded wormlike polymer vesicles for cancer therapy and MR imaging. Biomaterials 31 (34), 9065–9073. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.039
Yin, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.-H., and Han, X. (2016). Stimuli-responsive block copolymer-based assemblies for cargo delivery and theranostic applications. Polymers 8 (7), 268. doi:10.3390/polym8070268
Yorulmaz Avsar, S., Kyropoulou, M., Di Leone, S., Schoenenberger, C.-A., Meier, W. P., and Palivan, C. G. (2019). Biomolecules turn self-assembling amphiphilic block Co-polymer platforms into biomimetic interfaces. Front. Chem. 6, 645. doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00645
Yu, H., Chen, J., Liu, S., Lu, Q., He, J., Zhou, Z., et al. (2015). Enzyme sensitive, surface engineered nanoparticles for enhanced delivery of camptothecin. J. Contr. Release 216, 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.021
Zhan, F., Chen, W., Wang, Z., Lu, W., Cheng, R., Deng, C., et al. (2011). Acid-activatable prodrug nanogels for efficient intracellular doxorubicin release. Biomacromolecules 12 (10), 3612–3620. doi:10.1021/bm200876x
Zhang, B., Hu, Y., and Pang, Z. (2017). Modulating the tumor microenvironment to enhance tumor nanomedicine delivery. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 952. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00952
Zhang, C., Pan, D., Li, J., Hu, J., Bains, A., Guys, N., et al. (2017). Enzyme-responsive peptide dendrimer-gemcitabine conjugate as a controlled-release drug delivery vehicle with enhanced antitumor efficacy. Acta Biomater. 55, 153–162. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.047
Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Li, X., et al. (2019). Biodegradable micelles for NIR/GSH-Triggered chemophototherapy of cancer. Nanomaterials 9 (1), 91. doi:10.3390/nano9010091
Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Tan, T., Li, J., Wang, Z., and Li, Y. (2018). Rational design of nanoparticles with deep tumor penetration for effective treatment of tumor metastasis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 (40), 1801840. doi:10.1002/adfm.201801840
Zhao, D., Wu, J., Li, C., Zhang, H., Li, Z., and Luan, Y. (2017). Precise ratiometric loading of PTX and DOX based on redox-sensitive mixed micelles for cancer therapy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 155, 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.03.056
Zheng, P., Liu, Y., Chen, J., Xu, W., Li, G., and Ding, J. (2020). Targeted pH-responsive polyion complex micelle for controlled intracellular drug delivery. Chin. Chem. Lett. 31, 1178–1182. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2019.12.001
Zhong, Y., Meng, F., Zhang, W., Li, B., Van Hest, J. C. M., and Zhong, Z. (2020). CD44-targeted vesicles encapsulating granzyme B as artificial killer cells for potent inhibition of human multiple myeloma in mice. J. Contr. Release 320, 421–430. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.004
Zhou, H., Fan, Z., Deng, J., Lemons, P. K., Arhontoulis, D. C., Bowne, W. B., et al. (2016). Hyaluronidase embedded in nanocarrier PEG shell for enhanced tumor penetration and highly efficient antitumor efficacy. Nano Lett. 16 (5), 3268–3277. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00820
Zhou, W., Meng, F., Engbers, G. H. M., and Feijen, J. (2006). Biodegradable polymersomes for targeted ultrasound imaging. J. Contr. Release 116 (2), e62–e64. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.09.051
Zhou, Y., Chen, X., Cao, J., and Gao, H. (2020). Overcoming the biological barriers in the tumor microenvironment for improving drug delivery and efficacy. J. Mater. Chem. B 8 (31), 6765–6781. doi:10.1039/d0tb00649a
Zhu, L., Zhao, L., Qu, X., and Yang, Z. (2012). pH-sensitive polymeric vesicles from coassembly of amphiphilic cholate grafted poly(l-lysine) and acid-cleavable polymer-drug conjugate. Langmuir 28 (33), 11988–11996. doi:10.1021/la3015767
Keywords: amphiphilic block copolymers, cell uptake, intracellular trafficking, stimuli-responsive nanocarriers, drug delivery, nanomedicine, tumor microenvironment barriers
Citation: Torres J, Dhas N, Longhi M and García MC (2020) Overcoming Biological Barriers With Block Copolymers-Based Self-Assembled Nanocarriers. Recent Advances in Delivery of Anticancer Therapeutics. Front. Pharmacol. 11:593197. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.593197
Received: 10 August 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020;
Published: 30 November 2020.
Edited by:
Donato Cosco, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia”, ItalyReviewed by:
Wujin Sun, University of California, Los Angeles, United StatesJianxun Ding, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Copyright © 2020 Torres, Dhas, Longhi and Garcia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mónica C. García, bWdhcmNpYUB1bmMuZWR1LmFy
†These authors have contributed equally to this work