Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol., 26 May 2020
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
This article is part of the Research Topic Evidence-Based Advance and Management of Drug Treatment of Infectious Diseases View all 16 articles

Available Evidence and Ongoing Clinical Trials of Remdesivir: Could It Be a Promising Therapeutic Option for COVID-19?

  • Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia

The novel coronavirus strain, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, the causative agent of COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and is skyrocketing throughout the globe and become a global public health emergency. Despite promising preventive measures being taken, there is no vaccine or drug therapy officially approved to prevent or treat the infection. Everybody is waiting the findings of ongoing clinical trials in various chemical and biological products. This review is specifically aimed to summarize the available evidence and ongoing clinical trials of remdesivir as a potential therapeutic option for COVID-19. Remdesivir is an investigational drug having broad spectrum antiviral activity with its target RNA dependent RNA polymerase. It has not yet been officially approved for Ebola and Coronaviruses. Several studies showed that remdesivir had promising in vitro and in vivo antiviral activities against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV strains. On the top of this, it exhibited a promising in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 strains though there are no published studies that substantiate its activity in vivo until the time of this review. There are few phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo controlled trials on the way to investigate the safety and efficacy of remdesivir. Of which, one completed double blind, placebo controlled trial showed that remdesivir showed faster time to clinical improvement in severe COVID-19 patients compared to placebo though not found statistically significant. In addition, two phase 3 randomized open label clinical trials coordinated by Gilead Sciences are being conducted. In addition, WHO Solidarity trial and INSERM DisCoVeRy trials (randomized open labels) were launched recently.

Background

Coronaviruses, belonging to the family Coronaviridae, are positive-sense enveloped RNA viruses that cause infections in humans (Weiss and Leibowitz, 2011; Lim et al., 2016). The family includes four genera (Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Deltacoronavirus, and Gammacoronavirus). The genus Betacoronavirus includes severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Historically, these coronaviruses had got great clinical importance in infecting humans (Kuiken et al., 2003). At present, the novel coronavirus strain, the SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 (Zhu et al., 2020). Since then, the number of cases and deaths related to this virus have been skyrocketing throughout the world.

As per the World Health Organization (WHO) report, the total number of cases and deaths outside China has overtaken the total number of cases in China (WHO, 2020). WHO has declared COVID-19 worldwide pandemic and global public health emergency with Europe and lately Unites States of America became new epicenters. WHO has recommended several preventive measures including laboratory tests for any suspected cases, quarantining suspects, applying physical distancing, frequent hand washing, and using hand and surface sanitizers to help contain further spread of the pandemic (WHO, 2020). Despite such preventive strategies, there is no vaccine or drug therapy officially approved for prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19. At present, there are several classes of drugs undergoing clinical trials including RNA polymerase inhibitors (remdesivir and favipiravir), protease inhibitors (lopinavir/ritonavir), aminoquinolines (chloroquine and its hydroxyl derivative), anti-inflammatory agents (corticosteroids, and xiyanping injection), angiotensin converting enzyme type 2 blockers, convalescent plasma, viral RNA antisense technologies, monoclonal antibodies, and Chinese traditional medicines (http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx and https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home).

Overview of Other Frontline Antiviral Agents Under Extensive Clinical Investigation

Among the above-mentioned classes of antiviral counterparts, aminoquinolines (chloroquine and its hydroxyl derivative) and protease inhibitors (primarily lopinavir/ritonavir) have taken the largest share of clinical trials since the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. However, their clinical benefit has become full of controversies according to the various research findings.

With regard to the aminoquinolines and their role in COVID-19 therapy, in an open-label non-randomized clinical trial, Gautret et al. reported 100% viral clearance in nasopharyngeal swabs with combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, 57.1% in hydroxychloroquine group, and 12.5% in standard of care group in cohort of 6 patients after 5 to 6 days follow-up (Gautret et al., 2020). In addition, in study conducted in 62 patients in China, the use of hydroxychloroquine could significantly shorten the time to clinical recovery and promote the absorption of pneumonia in randomized open label clinical trial (Chen Z. et al., 2020). In contrary to this, a recent study from China in individuals with COVID-19 found no difference in the rate of virologic clearance at 7 days with or without 5 days of hydroxychloroquine, and no difference in clinical outcomes (Chen J. et al., 2020) indicating the absence of evidence of a strong antiviral activity (rapid viral clearance) or clinical benefit of this combination for severe COVID-19 patients. Another randomized open label clinical trial posted on MedRxiv (preprint) reported that the overall 28-day negative conversion rate and symptoms alleviation rate in hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care group was not different from standard of care group (Tang et al., 2020). Apart from this, the safety issues of aminoquinolines should also be emphasized. The cardiovascular and retinal toxicities may also limit the usefulness of these agents if there is hope from ongoing randomized, blinded and placebo controlled trials. For example, the hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have shown to prolong QT-interval resulting torsades de pointes (a form of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia) and sudden cardiac death (Chorin et al., 2020).

A randomized, open label clinical trial conducted on protease inhibitors (lopinavir/ritonavir) indicated that treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir did not show statistically significant difference in the time to clinical improvement and mortality censored at day 28 though a secondary outcomes measures were found promising in lopinavir/ritonavir group (Cao et al., 2020). This trial was initiated in severe COVID-19 patients lately and lacks blinding and well established placebo.

Remdesivir is one of the frontline medications being used as expanded access and is under extensive clinical investigation. Hereafter, this review aims to address the viral polymerase inhibitor remdesivir as a potential therapeutic option for COVID-19.

Remdesivir: Chemistry and Mechanism of Action

Remdesivir (GS-5734™) is a phosphoramidate prodrug of a Pyrrolo[2,1-f][triazin-4-amino] adenine C-nucleoside having broad spectrum antiviral activity (Figure 1). Remdesivir is metabolized into its active form, GS-441524, that interferes with viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) enzyme thereby it evades proofreading by viral exonuclease, and arrests RNA synthesis. This drug has shown potent inhibitory activity against RdRp with intact proof reading and with low level of resistance to target mutations (Agostini et al., 2018). It is supported in the study conducted by Gordon et al. who demonstrated RdRp is, indeed, the target of remdesivir in MERS-CoV strains (Gordon et al., 2020). Studies based on the molecular dynamics simulation and free energy perturbation methods clearly indicated SARS-CoV-2 RdRp as a target of remdesivir (Zhang and Zhou, 2020). Though, it has not been officially approved for Ebola and Coronaviruses yet (Siegel et al., 2017), Gilead Sciences is working closely with organizations and health authorities to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak through synthesizing and providing this investigational drug (Gilead sciences, 2020a).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Structure and metabolic conversion of remdesivir.

Evidence on Its in Vitro Activity

Agostini et al. demonstrated that remdesivir can potently inhibit coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV in vitro (Agostini et al., 2018). Remdesivir can inhibit SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV replication in several in vitro systems, including primary human airway epithelial cell cultures (Sheahan et al., 2017). In research conducted by Sheahan et al, remdesivir showed superior antiviral activity to lopinavir/ritonavir against MERS-COV in vitro (Sheahan et al., 2020). In MERS-COV nonstructural proteins (nsp5, nsp7, nsp8, and nsp12) of insect cell lines, remdesivir showed potent inhibitory activity against nsp12(RdRp) in vitro (Gordon et al., 2020). Yethindra et al. demonstrated that remdesivir showed strong inhibition against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV in human air way epithelial cells, at early stages in replication process via inhibiting viral RNA synthesis (Yethindra, 2020). On the top of these, remdesivir has shown promising results in clinical control of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in-vitro in human liver cancer cell lines (Wang M. et al., 2020). Beyond Beta-CoVs, remdesivir has shown potent inhibition of human endemic and zoonotic Delta-CoVs with highly divergent RdRp in human hematoma (huh7) cell lines (Brown et al., 2019).

Evidence on in Vivo Antiviral Activity

In a mouse model of SARS-CoV-1, prophylactic and therapeutic (at early stage) administration of remdesivir significantly reduced pulmonary viral load and improved respiratory function and other clinical signs of the disease (Sheahan et al., 2017). Likewise, both prophylactic and therapeutic remdesivir has shown improvement on the pulmonary function and reduced lung viral loads and severe lung pathology in MERS-COV strains in mice model (Sheahan et al., 2020). In the rhesus macaque model of MERS-CoV infection, remdesivir reduced virus replication, the severity of the disease, and lung damage when administered in animals infected with MERS-CoV (de Wit et al., 2020). Despite having an in-vitro antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2, there are no published studies justifying the activity of remdesivir in animal models of SARS-CoV-2 in vivo until the time of this review.

Case Report

According to the paper published at the New England Journal of Medicine on 05 March, 2020, it had been suggested that remdesivir might be a potential therapeutic option for the therapy of COVID-19 patients. In the report, remdisivir intravenous infusion (compassionate use) was started on day 7 in COVID-19 patient. During the treatemnt, no adverse events were observed in association with the IV infusion. The patient's clinical condition improved. The bilateral lower-lobe rales apeared initially were no longer present. His appetite improved, became afebrile and asymptomatic except intermittent dry cough and rhinorrhea (Holshue et al., 2020). However, this is a single patient report and is too infant to conclude its efficacy and disentangle the true effect size of this drug because of the chance of recovery from this disease without treatment(s). Hence, it is imperative to have adequate, well controlled, randomized, and blinded clinical trials in large cohorts of patients to justify its clinical utility in real settings.

Ongoing Clinical Trials and Future Prospects

As summarized in Table 1, Gilead Sciences has initiated two phase 3 randomized, open label clinical trials comprising approximately 1,000 COVID-19 patients. In the first trial, 400 patients with severe COVID-19 cases were enrolled to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remdesivir on 5 (Arm 1) and 10 days (Arm 2) regimens with standard of care in both arms without comparator (Gilead-Sciences, 2020b). In the second trial, 600 patients with moderate COVID-19 cases were enrolled to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the same dosage regimen of remdesivir in addition to the standard of care and with standrad of care alone as active comparator (Gilead-Sciences, 2020c).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Ongoing clinical trials registered under United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials registry and addressing the safety and efficacy of remdesivir (GS-5734™) as a potential therapeutic option for COVID 19.

With the coordination of China-Japan Friendship Hospital, two phase 3 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trials were intiated in China to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remdesivir paralleled to palcebo therapy.The first phase 3 trial has already involved 308 hospitalized adult patients with mild to moderate cases of COVID-19 (Cao, 2020a). The patients were randomized to intervention arms of either remdesivir 10 days regimen or placebo that matched to remdesivir. The primary end point of this trial is set to determine the time to clinical recovery (TTCR) within 28 days. Another phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 10 days of remdesivir regimen in 453 hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 compared to placebo matched to remdesivir in dose and duration. The primary outcome measure in this trial is the time to clinical improvement (TTCI) censored at day 28 (Cao, 2020b) (Table 1). At the time of this revision, the finding of the second trial was published on Lancet. Though not statistically significant, patients receiving remdesivir had a numerically faster time to clinical improvement than those receiving placebo among patients with symptom duration of 10 days or less (Hazard ratio 1.52 [0.95–2.43]). In addition, remdesivir did not show statistically significant clinical benefits (Wang Y. et al., 2020). However, the numerical reduction in time to clinical improvement in those treated earlier requires confirmation in the larger cohort of patients and in the remaining trials

With the coordination of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Another phase 3 adaptive, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial enrolled 394 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to assess the safety and efficacy of remdesivir. In this trial, patients were randomized to either placebo or 10 days therapy with remdesivir (200 mg remdesivir IV loading dose for day 1 followed by 100 mg IV daily maintained for 9 days, total of 10 days therapy). The primary indicator in this trial is the percentage of patients reporting each severity rating on the 7-point ordinal scale within 15 days (NIAID, 2020) (Table 1).

With the sponsor and coordination of U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command (AMRDC), remdesivir is also provided as expanded access (compassionate use) (US-AMRDC, 2020) through emergency investigational new drug applications. The term expanded access (compassionate use) is a potential pathway in which a patient with an immediately life-threatening condition or disease gain access to an investigational medical product for treatment of patients outside of clinical trials when no comparable or satisfactory alternative therapy options are available (FDA, 2020). To this end, remdesivir synthesized and developed by Gilead Sciences is readily available for compassionate use for COVID-19 patients (Coppock, 2020) (Table 1). Latest observational study published on The New England Journal of Medicine revealed that severe Covid-19 patients treated with compassionate-use of remdesivir showed clinical improvement in 68% cases (Grein et al., 2020).

On the top of this, WHO has initiated Solidarity trial at global level to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remdesivir in one of the interventional arms (Branswell, 2020). Likewise, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) of France has planned to initiate DisCoVeRy trial (INSERM, 2020). The trial protocol has already been registered on 20 March, 2020 and available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04315948. The recruiting of participants has not been started but estimated to enroll 3,200 patients in 4 arms in which remdesivir alone is to be provided in usual dosage regimen in one of the interventional arms.

Conclusion

Despite the promising effects of remdesivir against previous beta-coronaviruses as well as the current novel coronaviruses in vitro, there is no published in vivo study that substantiates the in vitro activities against this global public health threat. A case report and observational studies are not sufficient to generate evidenced-based medicine on the clinical use of remdesivir for this pandemic. A double blind, placebo controlled randomized clinical trial showed that remdesivir did not have statistically significant clinical benefit in reducing the time to clinical improvement in severe COVID-19 patients compared to placebo. Though remdesivir is readily available for compassionate use in many countries, it is imperative to wait the remaining ongoing clinical trials to justify its clinical utility on larger cohort of COVID-19 patients.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Agostini, M. L., Andres, E. L., Sims, A. C., Graham, R. L., Sheahan, T. P., Lu, X., et al. (2018). Coronavirus susceptibility to the antiviral remdesivir (GS-5734) is mediated by the viral polymerase and the proofreading exoribonuclease. MBio 9, e`1–00218. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00221-18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Branswell, H. (2020). WHO to launch multinational trial to jumpstart search for coronavirus drugs (World Health Organization). Available at: https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/18/who-to-launch-multinational-trial-to-jumpstart-search-for-coronavirus-drugs/. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Brown, A. J., Won, J. J., Graham, R. L., Dinnon III, K. H., Sims, A. C., Feng, J. Y., et al. (2019). Broad spectrum antiviral remdesivir inhibits human endemic and zoonotic deltacoronaviruses with a highly divergent RNA dependent RNA polymerase. Antiviral Res. 169, 104541. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.104541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, B., Wang, Y., Wen, D., Liu, W., Jingli, W., Fan, G., et al. (2020). A Trial of Lopinavir–Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19. New Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. 2020.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, B. (2020a). Mild/Moderate 2019-nCoV Remdesivir RCT, Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04252664 Accessed on 20, March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Cao, B. (2020b). Severe 2019-nCoV Remdesivir RCT, avaialble at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04257656. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Chen, J., Liu, D., Lui, L., Liu, P., Xu, Q., Xia, L., et al. (2020). A pilot study of hydroxychloroquine in treatment of patients with common coronavirus disease-19 COVID-19). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 49, 215–219. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.03.03

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Hu, J., Zhang, Z., Jiang, S., Han, S., Yan, D., et al. (2020). Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial. medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chorin, E., Dai, M., Shulman, E., Wadhwani, L., Bar-Cohen, R., Barbhaiya, C., et al. (2020). The QT interval in patients with COVID-19 treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Nat. Med. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0888-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coppock, K. (2020). FDA Announces Two Drugs Approved for ‘Compassionate Use' in Treating COVID-19. (Pharmacy Times). Available at: https://www.pharmacytimes.com/news/fda-announces-two-drugs-approved-for-compassionate-use-in-treating-covid-19. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

de Wit, E., Feldmann, F., Cronin, J., Jordan, R., Okumura, A., Thomas, T., et al. (2020). Prophylactic and therapeutic remdesivir (GS-5734) treatment in the rhesus macaque model of MERS-CoV infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 6771–6776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922083117 PNAS

Google Scholar

FDA. (2020). United States Food and Drug Administration, Expanded Access. (U.S. FDA). Available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/expanded-access. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Gautret, P., Lagier, J. C., Parola, P., Hoang, V. T., Meddeb, L., Mailhe, M., et al. (2020). Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as atreatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomised clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilead sciences. (2020a). Gilead Sciences Update On The Company"s Ongoing Response To COVID-19. (GILEAD). Available at: https://www.gilead.com/purpose/advancing-global-health/covid-19. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Gilead-Sciences. (2020b). Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) in Participants With Severe Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04292899. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Gilead-Sciences. (2020c). Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) in Participants With Moderate Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Compared to Standard of Care Treatment, Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04292730 Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Gordon, C. J., Tchesnokov, E. P., Feng, J. Y., Porter, D. P., Gotte, M. (2020). The antiviral compound remdesivir potently inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Biol. Chem. AC120. 013056. doi: 10.1074/jbc.AC120.013056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grein, J., Ohmagari, N., Shin, D., Diaz, G., Asperges, E., Castagna, A., et al. (2020). Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients with Severe Covid-19. New Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holshue, M. L., DeBolt, C., Lindquist, S., Lofy, K. H., Wiesman, J., Bruce, H., et al. (2020). First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. New Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

INSERM. (2020). Trial of Treatments for COVID-19 in Hospitalized Adults (DisCoVeRy), Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04315948. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Kuiken, T., Fouchier, R. A., Schutten, M., Rimmelzwaan, G. F., Van Amerongen, G., van Riel, D., et al. (2003). Newly discovered coronavirus as the primary cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 362, 263–270. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13967-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, Y. X., Ng, Y. L., Tam, J. P., Liu, D. X. (2016). Human coronaviruses: a review of virus host interactions. Diseases 4, 26. doi: 10.3390/diseases4030026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

NIAID. (2020). Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial, Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04280705. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Sheahan, T. P., Sims, A. C., Graham, R. L., Menachery, V. D., Gralinski, L. E., Case, J. B., et al. (2017). Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci. Trans. Med. 9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3653

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheahan, T. P., Sims, A. C., Leist, S. R., Schafer, A., Won, J., Brown, A. J., et al. (2020). Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13940-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siegel, D., Hui, H. C., Doerffler, E., Clarke, M. O., Chun, K., Zhang, L., et al. (2017). Discovery and Synthesis of a Phosphoramidate Prodrug of a Pyrrolo [2, 1-f][triazin-4-amino] Adenine C-Nucleoside (GS-5734) for the Treatment of Ebola and Emerging Viruses. J. Med. Chem. 60, 1648–1661. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, W., Cao, Z., Han, M., Wang, Z., Chen, J., Sun, W., et al. (2020). Hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

US-AMRDC. (2020). Expanded Access Remdesivir (RDV; GS-5734™)>, available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04302766. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Wang, M., Cao, R., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Liu, J., Xu, M., et al. (2020). Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus, (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 30, 269–271. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Du, G., Du, R., Zhao, J., Jin, Y., et al. (2020). Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised,double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weiss, S. R., Leibowitz, J. L. (2011). Coronavirus pathogenesis Adv. Virus Res. 81, 85–164. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385885-6.00009-2.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

WHO. (2020). WHO. World Health Organization situation report. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200316-sitrep-56-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=9fda7db2_2. Accessed on 20 March, 2020.

Google Scholar

Yethindra, V. (2020). Role of GS-5734 (Remdesivir) in inhibiting SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV: The expected role of GS-5734 (Remdesivir) in COVID-19 (2019-nCoV)-VYTR hypothesis. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 11, 1–6. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v11iSPL1.1973

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Zhou, R. (2020). Binding Mechanism of Remdesivir to SARS-CoV-2 RNA Dependent RNA Polymerase. Preprints. 202003026. doi: 10.20944/preprints202003.0267.v1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., et al. (2020). A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China 2019. New Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, remdesivir, RdRp, GS-5734

Citation: Sisay M (2020) Available Evidence and Ongoing Clinical Trials of Remdesivir: Could It Be a Promising Therapeutic Option for COVID-19? Front. Pharmacol. 11:791. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00791

Received: 02 April 2020; Accepted: 13 May 2020;
Published: 26 May 2020.

Edited by:

Min Yang, Anhui Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Rachel Graham, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Joao Massud, Independent Researcher, São Paulo, Brazil

Copyright © 2020 Sisay. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mekonnen Sisay, mekonnensisay27@yahoo.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.