AUTHOR=Sota Jurgen , Rigante Donato , Ruscitti Piero , Insalaco Antonella , Sfriso Paolo , de Vita Salvatore , Cimaz Rolando , Lopalco Giuseppe , Emmi Giacomo , La Torre Francesco , Fabiani Claudia , Olivieri Alma Nunzia , Cattalini Marco , Cammelli Daniele , Gallizzi Romina , Alessio Maria , Manna Raffaele , Viapiana Ombretta , Frassi Micol , Pardeo Manuela , Maier Armin , Salvarani Carlo , Talarico Rosaria , Mosca Marta , Colafrancesco Serena , Priori Roberta , Maggio Maria Cristina , Gaggiano Carla , Grosso Salvatore , De Benedetti Fabrizio , Vitale Antonio , Giacomelli Roberto , Cantarini Luca 

TITLE=Anakinra Drug Retention Rate and Predictive Factors of Long-Term Response in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult Onset Still Disease

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pharmacology

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2019

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.00918

DOI=10.3389/fphar.2019.00918

ISSN=1663-9812

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background and Objective:</bold> Only a few studies have reported long-term efficacy of interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). Herein we report on the effectiveness of anakinra (ANA), expressed in terms of drug retention rate (DRR), and evaluate the predictive factors of drug survival in a cohort of patients with sJIA and AOSD.</p><p><bold>Patients and Methods:</bold> This is a multicenter study reviewing retrospectively the medical records from 61 patients with sJIA and 76 with AOSD, all treated with ANA in 25 Italian tertiary referral centers.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> The cumulative retention rate of ANA at 12-, 24-, 48-, and 60-month of follow-up was 74.3%, 62.9%, 49.4%, and 49.4%, respectively, without any significant differences between sJIA and AOSD patients (<italic>p</italic> = 0.164), and between patients treated in monotherapy compared with the subgroup coadministered with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) (<italic>p</italic> = 0.473). On the other hand, a significant difference in DRR was found between biologic-naïve patients and those previously treated with biotechnologic drugs (<italic>p</italic> = 0.009), which persisted even after adjustment for pathology (<italic>p</italic> = 0.013). In the regression analysis, patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) {hazards ratio (HR) = 3.029 [confidence interval (CI) 1.750–5.242], <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001} and those previously treated with other biologic agents [HR = 1.818 (CI 1.007–3.282), <italic>p</italic> = 0.047] were associated with a higher HR of ANA discontinuation. The median treatment delay was significantly higher among patients discontinuing ANA (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001). Significant corticosteroid-sparing (<italic>p</italic> = 0.033) and cDMARD-sparing effects (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001) were also recorded. Less than one-third of our cohort developed AEs, and 85% were deemed mild in nature, with 70% of them involving the skin.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> Our findings display an overall excellent DRR of ANA on the long run for both sJIA and AOSD, that may be further optimized by closely monitoring patient’s safety issues and employing this IL-1 inhibitor as a first-line biologic as early as possible. Moreover, ANA allowed a significant drug-sparing effect and showed an overall good safety profile.</p>