Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Neonatology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1569513

Birth Injuries in Late Preterm and Term Neonates After Instrumental Delivery: A Prospective Study on Short-Term and Developmental Outcomes

Provisionally accepted
Fawzia Mohamed Elgharbawy Fawzia Mohamed Elgharbawy Sarfrazul Abedin Sarfrazul Abedin Rajai Albedaywi Rajai Albedaywi Hoda Rahoma Hoda Rahoma Hakam Khatib Hakam Khatib Abdelkhalk Khedr Abdelkhalk Khedr Hakeem Nazdaf Hakeem Nazdaf Abdulla Asa'd Alshami Abdulla Asa'd Alshami Lina Habboub Lina Habboub Mohammad A. A. Bayoumi Mohammad A. A. Bayoumi *Einas Elmalik Einas Elmalik Ashraf Gad Ashraf Gad
  • Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Instrumental vaginal delivery is a common obstetric procedure with potential neonatal complications. This study evaluated birth injuries and neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates born at ≥35 weeks' gestation following instrumental vaginal delivery.Methods: A prospective observational cohort conducted over 2 years (2021–2022) at Al Wakra Hospital, Qatar to assess birth injuries, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months in neonates born via instrumental delivery.Results: The study included 390 neonates born via instrumental delivery, with 84 birth injuries occurring in 80 neonates (20.5%). Cephalohematoma was the most common injury (43/84, 51.2%), followed by subgaleal haemorrhage and bone fractures (9/84, 10.7%) and intracranial haemorrhage (2/84, 2.38%). Birth injuries were more frequent with the combined use of vacuum and forceps (aOR 4.1, p <0.001), labour induction (aOR 2.2, p = 0.010), and showed a trend toward increased risk with >3 instrument applications (aOR 2.2, p = 0.067). NICU admission occurred in 25.3% of neonates, with significantly higher rates in those delivered using both vacuum and forceps (18.2% vs. 5.8%, p <0.001). Neurodevelopmental assessment was performed on 289 infants, of whom 28 (9.68%) had abnormal outcomes. The communication domain was most affected (67.8%, 19/28), followed by personal-social (28.6%, 8/28), fine motor (21.4%, 6/28), problem-solving (17.9%, 5/28), and gross motor skills (10.7%, 3/28). The combined use of vacuum and forceps was an independent risk factor for abnormal neurodevelopmental outcomes (aOR 3.87, p = 0.019).Conclusion: Instrumental vaginal delivery carries risks of birth injuries and neurodevelopmental challenges. Simulation-based training, skilled application, careful assessment of indications, and long-term follow-up are essential to minimize complications and ensure optimal outcomes.

    Keywords: Operative vaginal delivery, Birth injury, neonates, neurodevelopmental outcome, Forceps delivery, Vacuum delivery, Birth trauma, neonatal intensive care unit

    Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 13 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Elgharbawy, Abedin, Albedaywi, Rahoma, Khatib, Khedr, Nazdaf, Alshami, Habboub, Bayoumi, Elmalik and Gad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Mohammad A. A. Bayoumi, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more