
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
STUDY PROTOCOL article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Oncology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1567053
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: An open dialogue between parents of children with cancer and medical staff about the benefits, risks, and interactions of complementary medicine used during cancer treatment is essential to enhance treatment safety and efficacy. However, both parents and medical staff often lack sufficient knowledge and willingness to engage in such discussions. To address this, bedside counseling for patients and families is proposed, provided directly by an external team comprising experienced specialists in complementary and conventional medicine. This approach aims to facilitate communication, improve understanding, and mitigate risks associated with complementary medicine during pediatric cancer care.Methods: This study will be conducted in five pediatric cancer centers in Germany. Physicians specializing in complementary medicine and pediatric oncology will provide bedside counseling to patients, parents, and local medical staff. Feasibility and change measures will be evaluated by comparing cohorts of parents who received complementary medicine counseling with those who did not, as well as medical staff before and after training sessions. Semi-structured interviews with parents and medical staff will further explore barriers to complementary medicine counseling and identify strategies to enhance its implementation. Quantitative data will be analyzed to assess the feasibility of the intervention, while qualitative data will provide in-depth insights into the perspectives and experiences of stakeholders.Results: The results will highlight predictors for effective, use-oriented counseling tailored to different target groups. This prototype support care model will serve as a framework for implementing complementary medicine counseling both within and beyond inpatient pediatric oncology settings. By integrating these findings, we aim to develop a replicable approach to complementary medicine counseling that addresses the unique needs of pediatric cancer patients, their families, and medical professionals.Discussion: Previous initiatives have primarily focused on training individual physicians within each center to address complementary medicine. In contrast, this novel strategy emphasizes direct bedside counseling for pediatric patients and families while providing ongoing support to local staff. This approach seeks to enhance treatment safety by reducing unintended interactions between complementary medicine and conventional cancer therapies, ultimately improving care quality and patient outcomes.
Keywords: pediatric cancer, integrative cancer treatment, Complementary medicine, Safety, Study protocol Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), ID: DRKS00030478. Registered 22
Received: 26 Jan 2025; Accepted: 26 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nowak, Reis, Büttner, Schwermer, Bals, Martin, Ostermann, Längler, Haller and Zuzak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lara Nowak, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Herdecke, Herdecke, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.