
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Critical Care
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1561044
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: This study aimed to examine the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with the development of chronic critical illness (CCI) in children with sepsis.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on children diagnosed with sepsis and admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children’s Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on clinical outcomes: CCI group, defined by an ICU stay ≥14 days with persistent organ dysfunction, and non-CCI group, including patients with rapid recovery or early death. Data on baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and diagnostic and therapeutic differences were collected and analyzed. Results: Among 1 326 children with sepsis, 244 were classified in the CCI group (135 males, 109 females) and 1 082 were classified in the non-CCI group (651 males, 431 females), including 163 cases in the early death group and 919 cases in the rapid recovery group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of sex, age distribution, or prevalence of septic shock. Respiratory and gastrointestinal infections were the predominant sources of infection in both groups. Compared to the non-CCI group, the CCI group exhibited significantly higher weights, pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA) scores, rates of underlying respiratory diseases, trauma, surgical interventions, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay, total hospital stay, and secondary infection rates. Multivariate logistic regression identified pSOFA score, underlying respiratory diseases, trauma, prolonged mechanical ventilation, surgical interventions, and secondary infections as independent risk factors for the development of CCI in children with sepsis. Based on ROC analysis, the AUC of the established CCI prediction model was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.873–0.928). Secondary infections were also a prominent clinical feature of CCI cases.Conclusions: CCI in pediatric sepsis is associated with underlying respiratory diseases, trauma, elevated pSOFA scores, surgical procedures, prolonged mechanical ventilation and secondary infections. These factors contribute to extended hospital stays, elevated secondary infection rates, and poor clinical outcomes. The persistence of pro-inflammatory mediators and subsequent immunosuppression may underlie the development of CCI in this population.
Keywords: Pediatric sepsis, Chronic critical illness (CCI), Clinical Characteristics, Risk factors, Immunosuppression
Received: 15 Jan 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, zang, Liu, pu, yang, Liu and tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Enmei Liu, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
liping tan, Department of Emergency, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.