
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Orthopedics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1559762
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Purpose: This single-centre randomised clinical trial assessed the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction of 3D-printed splints optimised via finite element analysis (FEA) for paediatric distal radius fractures.Methods: This retrospective study included 56 children diagnosed with forearm fractures at our hospital between August 2023 and August 2024. Those who underwent traditional U-shaped forearm plaster immobilisation were compared with those who received a customised 3D-printed splint. FEA was conducted based on the biomechanical characteristics of the forearm; the splint structure was optimised based on the analysis results and created via 3D printing. Outcomes were evaluated using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale–Revised. Forearm function was evaluated using the Mayo Wrist Score and radiological outcomes. A power calculation was not performed due to the exploratory scope and resource limitations of this preliminary study.Results: The treatment costs significantly differed between the two groups (p=0.001). In the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, the hot and sweaty item showed no significant difference (p=0.089), whereas the last week’s comfort (p=0.001), first applied comfort (p=0.004), weight (p=0.001), itchiness (p=0.015), smell (p=0.003), and overall satisfaction items significantly differed between the two groups (p=0.004). A comparison of the Mayo Wrist Score showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups after external fixation removal (p=0.044). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the palmar tilt angle (p=0.196), ulnar deviation angle (p=0.460), or height of the radial styloid (p=0.111).Conclusion: Both 3D-printed splint and plaster cast fixation methods can effectively treat distal radial fractures in children, but the 3D-printed splint showed superior patient acceptance.
Keywords: forearm fractures, Paediatric orthopaedics, Biomechanics, 3D printing, Finite Element Analysis, Personalised medicine
Received: 13 Jan 2025; Accepted: 14 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Wang, Zhang, Li and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kuang Li, Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.