Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Pediatric Hematology and Hematological Malignancies

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1530457

Caregiver and provider perspectives on developmental services for children with sickle cell disease: A mixed methods analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Psychology and Biobehavioral Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
  • 2 Institute for Implementation Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • 3 Departments of Occupational Therapy, Neurology, and Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • 4 Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a monogenic blood disorder characterized by neurodevelopmental delays. Most children with SCD do not receive developmental services due in part to disparities in care access. To inform the design of an equitable developmental intervention for children with SCD, we evaluated factors that influence access to developmental services.Methods: Interview data were collected from educational and medical providers (n=15) and caregivers (n=15) of children aged 4-6 years with SCD at a single center and the surrounding area. Caregivers completed questionnaires about their child's background/medical history, caregiver depression (PROMIS SF v1.0-8a), and caregiver knowledge of early development (Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory). A convergent design was used to integrate the qualitative and quantitative data.We identified three themes as factors that influence caregivers' access to developmental services: quality of medical and educational experiences, caregiver knowledge and beliefs about SCD and development, and caregiver preferences for developmental services. Most caregivers denied barriers to obtaining developmental services for their child, whereas providers acknowledged numerous barriers for families. Caregivers and providers shared that a positive caregiver-provider relationship facilitates access. Caregivers reported that there was limited attention to SCD within the hospital system and broader society. Caregivers displayed limited knowledge of early development, and providers identified these knowledge gaps as a barrier to utilizing developmental services. Caregivers expressed a strong interest in SCD education and community building.Our mixed method analysis identified barriers and facilitators to developmental services for children with SCD.

    Keywords: sickle cell, health equity, mixed-methods, intervention, Developmental, Caregivers

    Received: 18 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Tamboli, MacArthur, Collins, Kang, Fernandez, Porter, Conklin, King, Hankins and Heitzer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Andrew Heitzer, Psychology and Biobehavioral Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more