data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Children and Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1496225
This article is part of the Research Topic Children's Health and Screen Time View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
With the increasing integration of digital screen devices into our everyday life, there has been increased attention regarding the risk of “problematic” use or pathological use. Because children start using screen devices in the first few years of life, early identification of those at risk for future problematic use could inform early prevention efforts. Children’s attraction to screen devices in early childhood may identify those at risk for future problematic use; however currently, there are no measures of toddlers’ attraction or affinity to screen devices. The objective of this study was to develop survey measures of toddler affinity to screen media, inclusive of televisions, smartphones, and tablets. Measures were developed using an exploratory sequential mixed methods (qualitative -> quantitative) approach. Participants were Mexican American mothers of toddlers 15-26 months old. Findings from semi-structured interviews were used to develop items reflecting parental reports of child affinity to screen devices. Items were administered by phone to 384 mothers. Analyses included evaluation of the factor structure and psychometric properties of Affinity-TV (10 items) and Affinity-Mobile (12 items), and evaluations of correlations between each scale with social emotional outcomes and demographic characteristics. Factor analysis supported a one-factor solution for each scale. Reliabilities were acceptable for both scales (Cronbach’s alpha >.75). There was a significant positive correlation between Affinity-TV and Affinity-Mobile (rs=0.44, p<0.001). Affinity-TV was significantly positively correlated with toddler average daily minutes of TV use (rs = 0.27, p <0.001) and average daily minutes of mobile use (rs=0.10, p < 0.05). Affinity-Mobile was significantly positively correlated with toddler average daily minutes of mobile use (rs=0.31, p <0.001), but not with average daily minutes of TV (rs = -0.04, NS). Each scale was correlated with social emotional developmental outcomes. The Affinity-TV and Affinity-Mobile scales have good initial reliability and adequate predictive validity. These findings support the use of Affinity-TV and Affinity-Mobile in toddlers as measures of children’s attraction to screen devices. These measures may help to identify early risk for problematic use, and they offer a novel way to evaluate a child’s behavioral reaction to screen devices in early childhood.
Keywords: Digital Media, infants, toddlers, behavioral response, Screen device, problematic screen use, Latino (Hispanic)
Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 14 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Thompson, Kaizer, Schmiege, Cabrera, Clark, Ringwood, Miramontes and Tschann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Darcy Thompson, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.