data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Neonatology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1483522
This article is part of the Research Topic Methods In Pediatric Infectious Diseases 2024 View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The purpose of this study is to investigate the early diagnostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS), as well as to evaluate the combined diagnostic utility of these markers for the early detection of neonatal LOS.The late-onset sepsis of newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of our hospital were retrospectively collected. 142 children with Late-Onset Sepsis (LOS) were selected as the LOS group, 50 neonates with systemic infection were selected as the systemic infection group, 50 neonates who underwent physical examination were selected as the non-systemic infection group. The differences of NLR, PLR,platelet-to-neutrophil ratio(PNR),and C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin among the three groups were compared.The levels of NLR and PLR in LOS group were significantly higher than those in systemic infection group and non-systemic infection group.The Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC) curve result revealed that the area under ROC(AUC,Area Under Curve) of NLR for the diagnosis of LOS was 0.903. When the optimal cut-off value was 1.30, the sensitivity and specificity were 89.4% and 81.0%. The AUC of PLR for the diagnosis of LOS was 0.833.When the optimal truncation value was 57.86, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% and 68.0%. The AUC of CRP for the diagnosis of LOS was 0.876, and the sensitivity and specificity were 76.8% and 87.0% when the optimal cut-off value was 10.21mg/dl. When NLR, PLR, and CRP were combined to diagnosis LOS, The AUC was 0.942, the sensitivity and specificity were 90.8% and 86.0%.The levels of NLR and PLR in the LOS were higher, which have certain value in the early diagnosis of LOS, and combined with CRP can improve the diagnostic efficiency.
Keywords: neonatal, diagnostic, los, NLR, PLR
Received: 20 Aug 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yin, Yin, SHen, Zhou and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Qi-Gai Yin, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou, Liaoning Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.