
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
METHODS article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Surgery
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1470092
This article is part of the Research TopicPediatric Wounds And Tissue Engineering/RegenerationView all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an adjunctive treatment for penile hypospadias repair in children, and to explore its independent role in reducing postoperative complications.: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 103 pediatric patients undergoing penile hypospadias repair between December 2019 and December 2021 at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University. All patients received standard penile straightening and tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty. Patients in the study group (n=53) additionally received intraoperative autologous PRP injections, whereas the control group (n=50) did not. Outcomes analyzed included operation time, postoperative ambulation time, pain scores, length of hospital stay, incision infection rates at postoperative day 7, surgical success rates, and incidence of complications within two years postoperatively. Statistical analyses incorporated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), effect sizes (Cohen's d and relative risk, RR), and multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders such as patient age and hypospadias severity.Results: No significant differences were observed between groups regarding operation time, postoperative ambulation time, or length of hospital stay (p>0.05). Patients in the PRP group experienced significantly reduced postoperative pain (mean difference -2.14; 95% CI:-2.46 to -1.81; p<0.001; Cohen's d=2.35) and notably lower incision infection rates on postoperative day 7 (RR=0.13; 95% CI:0.03 to 0.60; p=0.006). Surgical success rates were significantly higher in the PRP group compared to controls (94.3% vs. 72.0%; RR=1.31; 95% CI:1.09 to 1.58; p=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that PRP injection remained independently associated with a significant reduction in postoperative complications after adjusting for age and severity of hypospadias (adjusted OR=0.14; 95% CI:0.04 to 0.52; p=0.003).Adjunctive autologous PRP treatment in pediatric penile hypospadias repair effectively alleviates postoperative pain, enhances wound healing, significantly reduces short-term complications, and improves surgical success rates. Future randomized, multicenter trials with extended follow-up periods are required to further evaluate long-term outcomes and to compare PRP efficacy directly with other biomaterials used in urethroplasty.
Keywords: Platelet-Rich Plasma, Penile hypospadias, urethroplasty, Wound Healing, Postoperative Complications, Pediatric Surgery
Received: 25 Jul 2024; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shang, Zhang, Mao, Tang, Zhou, Mao, Li, Luo, Zhao, Wang and Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xianhui Shang, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.