Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Neonatology
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1526603

External Negative Pressure Improves Lung Aeration in Near-Term Rabbit Kittens at Risk of Developing Respiratory Distress

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Victoria, Australia
  • 3 School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • 4 Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    As airway liquid is cleared into lung interstitial tissue after birth, the chest wall must expand to accommodate this liquid and the incoming air. We examined the effect of applying external positive and negative pressures to the chest wall on lung aeration in near-term rabbit kittens at risk of developing respiratory distress. Rabbit kittens (30 days; term ~31 days) were randomised into Control and Elevated Liquid (EL) groups. Lung liquid was drained in Control kittens to simulate expected volumes following vaginal delivery. EL kittens had lung liquid drained before 30 mL/kg was returned to simulate expected volumes after caesarean section. Kittens were delivered, placed in a water-filled plethysmograph and the external pressure was adjusted to -6 (negative), 0 (atmospheric), or +6 (positive) cmH2O. Kittens were ventilated with an 8 mL/kg tidal volume and PEEP of 0 cmH2O and lungs imaged using phase contrast X-ray imaging. Compared to external atmospheric pressures, external negative pressures expanded the chest (by 2100±43 vs 1805±59 mm2; Control kittens; P=0.028), directed tidal ventilation into lower lung regions and increased functional residual capacity (FRC) levels in both Control (26.7±2.0 vs 12.6±2.2 mL/kg; P<0.001) and EL (19.6±1.6 vs 10.0±2.9 mL/kg; P<0.01) kittens. External positive pressures reduced FRC levels in Control (6.3±0.8 vs 12.6±2.2 mL/kg; P<0.05), but not in EL kittens, and directed tidal ventilation into upper lung regions. External negative pressures increased lung aeration and resulted in a more distributed tidal ventilation immediately after birth in near-term rabbit kittens, whereas external positive pressures reduced lung aeration and compliance.

    Keywords: Negative pressure ventilation, Swaddling, chest wall, Lung liquid, Respiratory distress, Phase contrast X-ray

    Received: 12 Nov 2024; Accepted: 23 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Diedericks, Crossley, Jurkschat, Wallace, Davies, Riddington, te Pas, Kitchen and Hooper. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Cailin Diedericks, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia
    Stuart Brian Hooper, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.