The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Genetics of Common and Rare Diseases
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1504122
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Genetics of Common and Rare Diseases 2024 View all 6 articles
Prenatal ultrasound phenotype of fetuses with recurrent 1q21.1 deletion and duplication syndrome
Provisionally accepted- 1 People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
- 2 Department of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
- 3 Department of Ultrasound, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
Objective: Our study aimed to collect Ffetuses with recurrent 1q21.1 deletion or duplication syndrome were collected for systematic clinical phenotype analysis to further delineate further the intrauterine phenotype features of the two reciprocal syndromes. Methods: Prenatal samples, including amniotic fluid and chorionic villus samples, were obtained by amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling at our center, respectively. In total, 43 fetuses were diagnosed with recurrent 1q21.1 deletion or duplication syndrome via array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) or copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq). Prenatal clinical data, pregnancy outcomes, and individual conditions after birth were collected. Results: In total, 20 fetuses were diagnosed with 1q21.1 deletion syndrome, and 11 had abnormal ultrasound findings. The most common ultrasound features were renal anomalies, musculoskeletal abnormalities, and increased NT. Other less common ultrasound findings encompassed neurologic abnormalities, cardiovascular defects, absence of the gallbladder, intrauterine growth retardation, and cervical cystic hygroma. On the other hand, 23 fetuses had reciprocal 1q21.1 duplication syndrome, 11 of which had abnormal ultrasound findings, mainly nasal bone abnormalities, cardiovascular defects, increased NT, and neurologic abnormalities. Conclusions: Our case study suggested that the prenatal clinical phenotypes of the recurrent 1q21.1 deletion syndrome and reciprocal duplication syndrome fetuses were highly diverse with incomplete penetrance, with penetrance rates of approximately 55% and 43.5%, respectively. Additionally, a series of prenatal ultrasonic anomalies in our study were described for the first time, which might expand the intrauterine phenotype associated with the recurrent 1q21.1 region.our findings should expand the intrauterine phenotype associated with the recurrent 1q21.1 region by a series of prenatal ultrasonic anomalies in this work that were described for the first time, which might broaden knowledge of the genotype and phenotype correlation.
Keywords: 1q21.1 deletion syndrome, 1q21.1 duplication syndrome, prenatal ultrasound phenotype, Array CGH, CNV-seq
Received: 30 Sep 2024; Accepted: 27 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Peng, Lou, Ren and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Fengyang Wang, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan Province, China
Huijuan Peng, Department of Ultrasound, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
Yanxin Ren, Department of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
Shixiu Liao, Department of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.