Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Surgery
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1501560
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Approaches in Pediatric Surgical Oncology Volume II View all 4 articles

A refined kidney tumor nephrometry system employed to screen pediatric patients who are eligible for nephron sparing surgery

Provisionally accepted
Mingchuan Huang Mingchuan Huang Yingchun Fei Yingchun Fei *Zhihai Zhong Zhihai Zhong *Hong Jiang Hong Jiang *Longshan Liu Longshan Liu Juncheng Liu Juncheng Liu *Huanxi Zhang Huanxi Zhang Jun Li Jun Li *Zhe Xu Zhe Xu *Pengfei Gao Pengfei Gao *Changxi Wang Changxi Wang
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Purpose: Comprehension of the anatomical characteristics of pediatric kidney tumors is crucial for making surgical decisions. Previous kidney tumor nephrometry systems failed to incorporate two significant factors: tumor thrombus and multifocality. We develop a refined nephrometry system based on a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics exhibited by pediatric kidney tumors.The TUMORS nephrometry scoring system comprises 6 indicators, including tumor (T)hrombus, (U)rinary collecting system involvement, (M)ultiple tumors, (O)utward property, (R)adius, and (S)ite relative to the polar lines. Each renal unit was assessed and scored independently. The complexity characteristics of kidney tumors were summarized, and the correlation was compared with RENAL nephrometry system. Furthermore, the complexity of kidney tumors was compared across different surgical procedures.Results: A total of 43 patients were enrolled, involving 70 kidney units. Radical nephrectomy (RN) was performed on 13 kidneys, while the remaining 57 kidneys underwent nephron sparing surgery. In the NSS group, tumors in 37 kidneys were resected in vivo, whereas 20 kidneys underwent tumor resection ex vivo followed by kidney autotransplantation. According to the TUMORS nephrometry scoring system, there were 13, 34 and 23 kidney units classified as low, moderate and high complexity, respectively.Tumors that underwent RN or ex vivo removal exhibited higher complexity. The complications and positive margins of NSS were not statistically significant in relation to tumor complexity.The TUMORS nephrometry scoring system holds significant guidance for the decision of surgical protocol and can be applied to the preoperative evaluation.

    Keywords: :Thrombus;nephron sparing surgery, radical nephrectomy, pediatric, Wilms tumor WT: Wilms tumor, RN: radical nephrectomy, NSS: nephron sparing surgery, BWT: bilateral Wilms tumor, WAGR: Wilms tumor, Aniridia, Genitourinary abnormalities, mental Retardation

    Received: 25 Sep 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Huang, Fei, Zhong, Jiang, Liu, Liu, Zhang, Li, Xu, Gao and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yingchun Fei, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Zhihai Zhong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Hong Jiang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Juncheng Liu, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Jun Li, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Zhe Xu, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Pengfei Gao, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.