Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Critical Care
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1484893

Fluid Deresuscitation in Critically Ill Children: Comparing Perspectives of Intensivists and Nephrologists

Provisionally accepted
Chloe Braun Chloe Braun *David Askenazi David Askenazi Javier Neyra Javier Neyra Priya Prabhakaran Priya Prabhakaran Fazlur Rahman Fazlur Rahman Tennille Webb Tennille Webb James Odum James Odum
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Fluid accumulation, presently defined as a pathologic state of overhydration/volume overload associated with clinical impact, is common and associated with worse outcomes. At times, deresuscitation, the active removal of fluid via diuretics or ultrafiltration, is necessary. There is no consensus regarding deresuscitation in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Little is known regarding perceptions and practices among pediatric intensivists and nephrologists regarding fluid provision and deresuscitation. Methods: Cross-sectional electronic survey of pediatric nephrologists and intensivists from academic societies in the United States designed to better understand fluid management between disciplines. A clinical vignette was used to characterize the perceptions of optimal timing and method of deresuscitation initiation at four timepoints that correspond to different stages of shock. Results: In total, 179 respondents (140 intensivists, 39 nephrologists) completed the survey. Most 75.4% (135/179) providers believe discussing fluid balance and initiating fluid deresuscitation in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients is “very important”. The first clinical vignette time point (corresponding to resuscitation phase of early shock) had the most dissimilarity between intensivists and nephrologists (p=0.01) with regards to initiation of deresuscitation. However, providers demonstrated increasing agreement in their responses to initiate deresuscitation as the clinical vignette progressed. Compared to intensivists, nephrologists were more likely to choose “dialysis or ultrafiltration” as a deresuscitation method during the optimization (10.3 vs 2.9% [p=0.07]), stabilization (18.0% vs. 3.6% [p<0.01]), and evacuation (48.7% vs. 23.6% [p<0.01]) phases of shock. Conversely, intensivists were more likely to utilize scheduled diuretics than nephrologists (47.1% vs 28.2% [p=0.04]) later on in the patient course. Discussion: Most physicians believe that discussing fluid balance and deresuscitation is important. Nevertheless, when to initiate deresuscitation and how to accomplish it differed between nephrologist and intensivists. Widely understood and operationalizable definitions, further research, and eventually evidence-based guidelines are needed to help guide care.

    Keywords: Fluid accumulation, Deresuscitation, Critical Care, Nephrology, CRRT - continuous renal replacement therapy

    Received: 22 Aug 2024; Accepted: 09 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Braun, Askenazi, Neyra, Prabhakaran, Rahman, Webb and Odum. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Chloe Braun, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.