Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Neurology
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1466688

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SURGICAL AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES FOR PEDIATRIC IDIOPATHIC INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION

Provisionally accepted
Sofia Friso Sofia Friso 1Vittoria Giacobbo Vittoria Giacobbo 1Luca Mattia Toscano Luca Mattia Toscano 1Chiara Guariento Chiara Guariento 1Fabrizio Lacarra Fabrizio Lacarra 1Jacopo N. Pin Jacopo N. Pin 2Claudio Ancona Claudio Ancona 1Stefano Sartori Stefano Sartori 1Francesco Causin Francesco Causin 3Irene Toldo Irene Toldo 1*
  • 1 Department of Women's and Children's Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Pediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Padua, Italy
  • 2 Division of Neuropediatrics, Institute of Pediatrics of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • 3 Department of Integrated Diagnostic Services, Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is defined as elevated intracranial pressure and consequent symptoms (mainly headache and visual deterioration) occurring in the absence of secondary causes. Surgical and interventional radiology procedures should be considered for refractory IIH and mainly include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion techniques, optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF), and venous sinus stenting (VSS). Our study aims to review the current literature on the application of these techniques in clinical practice.Methods: A systematic literature review on the surgical and interventional radiology treatment of IIH was conducted, focusing on ONSF, VSS and CSF diversion techniques. According to PRISMA guidelines, all reports published in PubMed in the last 30 years were considered, and among 722 papers, 48 were included in the present study, resulting in a total study population of 454 children or adolescents (11 months-17 years old).Results: 193/454 patients underwent an invasive approach, divided into CSF diversion (115/193), ONSF (65/193), VSS (11/193), cranial subtemporal decompression (8/193) and internal cranial expansion (9/193). 16/193 patients (8%) required reintervention due to relapsing symptoms or surgical complications, particularly those who underwent CSF diversion. Furthermore, 9/115 required shunt revision due to shunt obstruction or malfunction. We extracted data on the outcome of each procedure: 71/193 patients experienced a positive outcome with symptoms resolution or improvement, while 27/193 demonstrated a negative outcome.Discussion and conclusions: Severe and refractory cases of IIH are eligible for invasive treatments. CSF diversion is the most frequently used technique, despite its high failure risk and need for reintervention. ONSF has shown good results in terms of outcome and safety, particularly in children with visual symptoms. VSS is the most recent approach, indicated in children with stenosis of the venous sinus. In our study population, VSS demonstrated good results in terms of symptom resolution and need for reintervention, but its use remains limited to a few centers.

    Keywords: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension, CSF shunting, ONSF, VSS, review, Children and adolescents

    Received: 18 Jul 2024; Accepted: 17 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Friso, Giacobbo, Toscano, Guariento, Lacarra, Pin, Ancona, Sartori, Causin and Toldo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Irene Toldo, Department of Women's and Children's Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Pediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Padua, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.