Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Cardiology
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1443924
This article is part of the Research Topic Management of Congenital Heart Disease: Challenges, Implications, Innovations and Pitfalls View all 8 articles

Development of Right Ventricular Electromechanical Dyssynchrony Following Surgical Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot in Infants

Provisionally accepted
Andrew McCrary Andrew McCrary 1*Sydney Collins Sydney Collins 1Zebulon Z Spector Zebulon Z Spector 1Paulette Andrea Kropf Paulette Andrea Kropf 2Piers Barker Piers Barker 1Joseph Kisslo Joseph Kisslo 3Daniel E Forsha Daniel E Forsha 4
  • 1 Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, United States
  • 2 Department of Paediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, United States
  • 3 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, United States
  • 4 Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In adolescents and adults with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), right ventricle (RV) electromechanical dyssynchrony (EMD) due to right bundle branch block (RBBB) is associated with reduced exercise capacity and RV dysfunction. While the development of RBBB following surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is a frequent sequela, it is not known whether EMD is present in every patient immediately following rTOF. The specific timing of the onset of RBBB following rTOF therefore provides an opportunity to assess whether acute RBBB is associated with the simultaneous acquisition of EMD.Methods: Transthoracic echocardiography with speckle tracking analysis for RV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and 12-lead ECG were performed prospectively on 20 infants following rTOF. Three apical RV views were obtained using analogous imaging planes to the standard LV views to provide a comprehensive evaluation. Regional RV GLS patterns were categorized as synchronous, EMD, or indeterminate. EMD was defined as an early-terminated septal contraction opposed by early stretch and post-systolic peak contraction in the activation delayed RV free wall. An indeterminate pattern was defined as a lack of fully synchronous contraction of all segments but not meeting criteria for EMD. Pre-rTOF echocardiograms and ECGs were analyzed to confirm the presence of synchronous contraction and a normal QRS pattern and duration prior to surgery.Results: Twenty TOF infants (median age 87 days; 8 days from surgery to post-rTOF evaluation) demonstrated QRSd prolongation following rTOF (pre-rTOF 58 ± 9 ms; post-rTOF 97 ± 14 ms; p<0.001) with new RBBB morphology in all but one patient. All pre-rTOF RV strain patterns were synchronous. Post-rTOF RV strain analysis showed EMD in 25% (5/20) and an indeterminate pattern in 40% (8/20) with the remaining 35% (7/20) maintaining a synchronous pattern, including the patient without RBBB. The EMD group had the lowest RV GLS following repair (p=0.006).Discussion: Acquisition of acute QRS prolongation in a RBBB pattern is near-universal following rTOF but without matched or identical patterns of dyssynchrony, suggesting that variations in the time from electrical to electromechanical dyssynchrony potentially caused by differences in right bundle branch anatomy and injury may be relevant to electromechanical outcomes.

    Keywords: Tetralogy of Fallot, right bundle branch block, Electromechanical dyssynchrony, Strain Echocardiography, dyssynchrony

    Received: 04 Jun 2024; Accepted: 23 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 McCrary, Collins, Spector, Kropf, Barker, Kisslo and Forsha. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Andrew McCrary, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.