Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 01 November 2024
Sec. Neonatology

A bibliometric study on clinical research in neonatal encephalopathy

\r\nShujun Tan,,,,&#x;Shujun Tan1,2,3,4,†Gulizuohere Alimujiang,,,Gulizuohere Alimujiang1,2,3,4Nuerya Rejiafu,,
&#x;\r\nNuerya Rejiafu1,2,3*
  • 1Neonatal Center, Children's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
  • 2Neonatal Center, Xinjiang Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
  • 3Neonatal Center, The Seventh People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
  • 4Graduate School, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China

This research presents a comprehensive review of studies on neonatal encephalopathy conducted between 2005 and 2024, utilizing knowledge graph analysis through CiteSpace and VOSviewer software. A search of the Web of Science core database identified 893 articles, with the United States emerging as a prominent contributor in terms of publication volume. Key co-occurrence keywords identified include “Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy”, “Neonatal encephalopathy”, and “Therapeutic hypothermia”. Notable contributors, such as Seetha Shankaran and Floris Groenendaal, have significantly advanced research in this area. Leading institutions in this field include the University of Washington, while the journal Pediatrics is recognized as a leading publication in the domain of neonatal encephalopathy. These findings provide a solid foundation for guiding future research endeavors.

1 Introduction

The neonatal mortality rate serves as a vital metric for evaluating the health and medical standards of a country or region (1). Estimates indicate that roughly 2.5 million neonatal deaths transpire worldwide annually (2). Neonatal encephalopathy (NE), which impacts infants born after 35 weeks of gestation, disrupts neurological function (3). The main sign is an altered consciousness level or quality, alongside potential indicators such as seizures, problems with the heart and lungs, or abnormal reflex actions (35). NE affects between 2 and 8 out of every 1,000 livebirths, posing a considerable risk of death or severe impairment (6). It significantly contributes to global mortality and morbidity, affecting about 1.4 million infants each year and standing as the third most common cause of death among children under 5 years old (7). NE also substantially influences long-term neurological morbidity globally, contributing to a 35% surge in childhood disabilities over the past two decades, owing to better survival rates (8). NE survivors may endure lasting impacts such as cerebral palsy (CP), overall developmental delays (GDD), impairments in vision and hearing, and seizure disorders (9).

Therapeutic hypothermia, commonly referred to as HT, is widely acknowledged as the most successful method for protecting the infant brain in cases of encephalopathy (10, 11). This procedure involves decreasing the body temperature of high-risk newborns to 33.5°C for a period of 72 h. Despite a 25% decrease in the relative risk of mortality, almost half (46%) of the infants displayed unfavorable results in scientific inquiries (1113). In recent times, there has been an increasing focus on the use of hypothermia treatment (HT) in intensive care environments to enhance newborn brain health. Nonetheless, there has been minimal progress in improving outcomes (12).

NE significantly impacts the physical and cognitive development of infants (14). It is crucial for the medical community to prioritize research efforts to enhance treatment methods for this condition. Increased research endeavors will result in better medical resources and a broader range of treatment options, ultimately enhancing the overall quality of life for the population. Moreover, advancements in healthcare will decrease the occurrence of complications and alleviate the financial burden on families due to illness. This bibliometric study concentrates on NE to provide further insights into this significant research field.

The origins of bibliometrics can be traced back to the early 20th century. In 1917, Cole and Eales conducted a groundbreaking study that introduced the concept of bibliometrics by analyzing scientific activity patterns in the field of anatomy (15). Building upon this research, Lotka's work in 1926 further explored scientific productivity, ultimately leading to the formulation of Lotka's productivity law (16). This law emphasized that a small group of authors were responsible for the majority of published articles, while the majority of authors only contributed a few articles. These initial studies laid a solid foundation for the development of bibliometrics.

In recent times, there has been a significant rise in the amount of literature concerning NE. Nonetheless, there is still a notable absence of thorough analysis when it comes to publication trends in this area. Bibliometrics, a multidisciplinary field that includes mathematics, statistics, linguistics, and other related fields, is commonly used to assess pertinent literature within specific medical domains (1720). Several bibliometric studies have proven its efficacy (2123). Through careful analysis and the organization of information in a systematic way, bibliometrics allows for the evaluation of research quality, the identification of crucial research subjects, and the recognition of emerging patterns (24). Moreover, it has the capability to establish relationships between studies, predict future research trends, offer new perspectives to researchers, and enhance the effectiveness of scientific inquiries (2527). High-quality bibliometric studies form a strong basis for advancing the field in innovative and influential methods. These types of research provide scholars with a comprehensive grasp of the topic, help pinpoint areas where information is lacking, and stimulate fresh research concepts. Additionally, bibliometric assessment acts as a valuable aid for conducting literature reviews (28).

The online database Web of Science (WOS) provides valuable data for conducting bibliometric analysis and can be utilized in conjunction with tools like VOSviewer and Citespace for in-depth examination. This research focuses on conducting a comprehensive analysis of numerous studies concerning neonatal asphyxia from a broad perspective using bibliometric techniques. By understanding the fundamentals of bibliometric analysis, this study aims to suggest potential research pathways that align with associated research fields. The research examines the following inquiries: Q1. Which authors exhibit the highest productivity in this area? Q2. What keywords and co-occurrence networks are trending, highlighting the current research topics?

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Data source and search strategy

This study utilizes the Web of Science Core Collection as its primary data source, a reputable digital database highly regarded for bibliometric analysis (29, 30). Data collection for the study was conducted on June 6, 2024, referencing Figure 1 and Table 1 to search for both articles and review articles on NE. This search also included meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Employing search terms such as “neonatal encephalopathy”, “asphyxia neonatorum”, “birth asphyxia”, “perinatal asphyxia”, and “hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy” within the advanced search interface, we targeted English articles and reviews published between January 1, 2005, and May 31, 2024. The search specifically focused on articles and reviews within the field of pediatrics. Initially, 3,361 potentially relevant articles were identified. However, the compilation of literature may include content that appears pertinent but is actually unrelated. Therefore, to ensure that the literature examined closely aligns with the research topic, a manual screening process is often necessary following the initial search. During this initial phase, materials deemed irrelevant are excluded based on their titles and abstracts, necessitating the involvement of two members of the research team. Subsequently, a detailed review of the complete texts is conducted to accurately identify the essential literature for the study. To execute the second stage of manual screening systematically and impartially, any disagreements among the researchers are resolved through discussion. After a thorough screening process and the elimination of irrelevant literature, a total of 893 documents were identified as suitable for further exploration in relevant fields.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flowchart of study enrollment.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of data source and selection.

2.2 Data analysis and study design

CiteSpace, a software tool renowned for visualizing knowledge graphs and analyzing data, provides researchers with insights into network patterns, subject area growth, and citation prominence, thereby elucidating trends in academic research. Meanwhile, VOSviewer, extensively used in library and information sciences, facilitates the visual analysis of literature across various fields. Its subject neutrality and user-friendly interface, combined with a suite of functionalities and advanced visualization features, make it a preferred tool for scholars. VOSviewer (version 1.6.20) enables data manipulation and analysis through label view, density view, cluster density view, and scatter view. In this study, we employed VOSviewer and CiteSpace (version 6.2.R4) to import publications for analysis, examining elements such as titles, keywords, authors, institutions, countries, journals, publication years, citations, average citations, and cited references. The bibliometric data were subsequently exported to Microsoft Excel 2016 to identify publication patterns, document type distribution, and to assess the impact of primary contributors, including authors, institutions, countries, and journals. VOSviewer generated visual representations of connections among these entities, highlighting their scientific influence. Additionally, VOSviewer was used to map co-occurring author keywords, while CiteSpace charted key cited terms, revealing the evolution of knowledge, emerging themes, and potential research frontiers. In the visual map generated by VOSviewer, node colors denote groupings, sizes indicate publication or keyword frequency, links signify collaboration or co-occurrence, and link widths represent strength.

3 Results

3.1 Trend and annual counts

The study examined 893 papers authored by 3,651 individuals affiliated with 1,178 institutions across 68 countries. These papers were published in 67 journals and referenced a total of 15,553 sources from 3,257 distinct journals. The publication period spanned from 2005 to 2024, as illustrated in Figure 2. The dataset comprised 754 articles and 139 reviews, all sourced from public databases and free of any medical ethics concerns.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Distribution of publications from 2005 to 2024.

3.2 Analysis of authors

Locat's theorem suggests that around half of the papers in a given field are authored by a highly productive group of individuals (16). This group typically consists of a number of authors equal to approximately the square root of the total number of authors in the field. To determine the minimum number of publications for a core author, one can calculate the square root of the most prolific author's publications and multiply it by 0.749. In this particular field, core authors are expected to have a minimum of 4 publications, with a total of 208 core authors identified. The top five authors, who collectively contributed to 141 papers, represent roughly 15.78% of all publications in the field. Figure 3 illustrates a network visualization depicting collaborative connections among authors. The thickness of the lines signifies the strength of these connections, while the size of the circles denotes the number of articles published by each author. The nodes’ sizes correspond to the number of citations received, and the connecting lines not only link the nodes but also indicate shared reference relationships. The proximity of nodes in the visualization indicates the level of association among authors, often resulting in the formation of distinct clusters. This visualization technique is crucial for aiding researchers in comprehending collaboration and citation relationships, thereby enhancing understanding of academic interactions and partnerships within the scholarly community. Additionally, it offers a unique and user-friendly approach to analyzing intricate relationships within academia. Table 2 highlights the top 5 most influential authors.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Analysis of authors.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Top 5 most influential authors.

Seetha Shankaran has published 41 articles, which have garnered a total of 2,008 citations. Her most cited paper, “Childhood Outcomes After Hypothermia for Neonatal Encephalopathy” (2012), has received 307 citations and examines the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (31). Additionally, her research explores various topics, including brain injury assessment and the long-term outcomes of neonatal encephalopathy (3133). The majority of her work focuses on the treatment and prognosis of NE, particularly through the application of therapeutic hypothermia (3436).

Floris Groenendaal is the author of 26 articles, which have collectively received a total of 974 citations. His research emphasizes the importance of imaging assessments in the context of perinatal asphyxia, along with the treatments associated with this condition (37, 38). One notable paper, titled “MR Imaging and Outcome of Term Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia: Value of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging and 1H MR Spectroscopy” (2011), has been cited 51 times. This study investigates the relationship between MR imaging and the outcomes of term neonates affected by perinatal asphyxia (39).

Linda S. de Vries has authored 25 articles that have collectively garnered a total of 1,561 citations. Her most cited paper, “Origin and Timing of Brain Lesions in Term Infants with Neonatal Encephalopathy”, has received 144 citations and investigates the causes of neonatal encephalopathy (40). Her research primarily focuses on the assessment of hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy, the application of imaging techniques in this context, and the perinatal risk factors associated with NE (4143). Pia Wintermark's research focuses on the incidence and outcomes of neonatal acute kidney injury, the analysis of placental pathology in asphyxiated newborns who are candidates for therapeutic hypothermia, and the utilization of MRI in asphyxiated newborns receiving hypothermia treatment (4446). One of her prominent works is titled “Placental Pathology in Asphyxiated Newborns Meeting the Criteria for Therapeutic Hypothermia” (2010), which has been cited 42 times (45).

Marianne Thoresen, a distinguished researcher in neonatal medicine, has authored 23 articles that have collectively garnered 1,441 citations. Among her contributions, the study titled “Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: multicentre randomised trial” stands out, with 656 citations (47). This research investigates the efficacy of head cooling in conjunction with mild systemic hypothermia as a treatment for neonatal encephalopathy, illuminating its potential as an intervention for this condition (47). Additionally, Thoresen's work explores the application of moderate hypothermia in managing perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy, providing valuable insights into the therapeutic options available for this disorder (41, 48, 49). Overall, her studies significantly enhance our understanding of the impact of hypothermia on outcomes in cases of NE and perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy, underscoring her expertise in this crucial area of neonatal healthcare (50, 51).

3.3 Analysis of country

The analysis indicates that research in this field has received contributions from 68 countries, with the United States being the most prolific in terms of publications. The United Kingdom, Canada, the Netherlands, and the Republic of Ireland closely follow in publication numbers. Figure 4 visually represents the collaborative network among these nations, highlighting the top five most influential countries as detailed in Table 3.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Country collaboration network.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Top 5 most influential countries.

3.4 Analysis of institutions

According to Table 4, the University of Washington has the highest publication count on Neonatal Encephalopathy, with a total of 64 papers. Following closely are Wayne State University with 49 articles and Stanford University with 40 articles. Among the top 10 institutions, University of California, San Francisco leads in citation count, with 3,237 citations, followed by University of Washington, with 3,152 citations, and the University of Bristol with 2,464 citations.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Top 10 most influential countries.

3.5 Analysis of keywords

The underlying assumption of co-occurrence analysis is that words that frequently appear together possess thematic connections. VOSviewer visually represents strong relationships between terms by creating distance-based maps, where shorter distances indicate stronger connections. Lines on the map illustrate relationships between items, with more prominent items regarded as more significant within the studied context. Our analysis using VOSviewer concentrated on keywords, as depicted in Figure 5. The clusters, represented in different colors, signify groups of keywords, with node size reflecting their frequency of occurrence. The top ten keywords identified were “Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy”, “Neonatal encephalopathy”, “Therapeutic hypothermia”, “Perinatal asphyxia”, “Infants”, “Whole-body hypothermia”, “Hypothermia”, “Brain injury”, “Newborns” and “Outcomes”. Figure 6 presents the bibliographic coupling in an overlay view for articles published from 2005 to 2024, where item size corresponds to the number of citations. Figure 7 illustrates the density map of keywords.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Keywords collaboration network.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Bibliographic coupling.

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Density map of keywords.

3.6 Analysis of journals

Table 5 presents the top ten journals with the highest number of articles on neonatal encephalopathy, with Pediatric Research leading the list by publishing 70 articles. The impact factor serves as a numerical indicator for evaluating a journal's citation rate; notably, Pediatrics boasts the highest impact factor at 6.2, while both the Journal of Pediatrics and the Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition each have impact factors of 3.9. By examining co-cited works, researchers can establish a foundational knowledge base for a particular area of study. The forefront of research consists of a selection of referenced publications that contribute to these knowledge foundations. Figure 8 illustrates the connectivity of co-citation among various journals.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Top 10 most influential journals.

Figure 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Co-citation analysis network of journals.

4 Discussion

NE denotes a clinical condition marked by neurological dysfunction, which manifests through a diverse array of symptoms and differing levels of severity. These symptoms may vary from slight irritability and feeding challenges to critical issues such as seizures and coma (52), often emerging in the initial days of life. Additionally, these conditions frequently coincide with breathing difficulties, tone irregularities, and compromised developmental reflexes (53). The study of NE has attracted considerable global attention, underscoring an expanding body of research. An analysis of research papers on neonatal encephalopathy published between 2005 and 2024 indicates a consistent increase in studies over time, reflecting ongoing advancements in this field. Country network analysis revealed that the United States leads in the number of published papers, with all of the top five originating from developed countries. The USA has emerged as a central hub for global collaboration, demonstrating stronger cooperation compared to other nations. Moreover, the USA has outperformed other countries in total publications and citations, suggesting that future research will likely continue to be concentrated in these nations. Co-keyword network analysis identified key research areas within neonatal encephalopathy, emphasizing terms such as “Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy”, “Perinatal asphyxia”, and “Therapeutic hypothermia”. These keywords indicate that hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, often resulting from perinatal asphyxia, is the most prevalent type of neonatal encephalopathy. Currently, therapeutic hypothermia is considered the most effective treatment for neonatal encephalopathy (5456).

The University of Washington ranked first in total publications, while Wayne State University, Stanford University led in total citations among research institutions. An analysis of the author collaboration network identified Seetha Shankaran and Floris Groenendaal as the most prolific authors, highlighting their significant influence in the research domain. Pediatrics, which has the highest impact factor, is recognized as a leading journal specializing in neonatal encephalopathy among the top 10 most influential journals.

Extensive randomized clinical studies have consistently illustrated the therapeutic efficacy of hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy, with methodologies ranging from selective head cooling to the utilization of cooling caps (50, 5759). The data from clinical trials conducted in wealthier countries indicates that induced hypothermia may have the potential to reduce death or disability in cases of neonatal encephalopathy (11, 60, 61).

The HELIX trial consortium, established in 2010 in partnership with Imperial College London, aimed to conduct comprehensive clinical research on neonatal encephalopathy across South Asia's tertiary neonatal units (62). This trial is distinguished as the largest neonatal cooling study to date, employing a systematic and prospective methodology, utilizing advanced 3 Tesla MRI biomarkers for in-depth analysis, and executed in units with state-of-the-art ventilation technology (63). The trial involved a specialized team of healthcare professionals (63).

The outcomes of the HELIX trial, which focused on hypothermia treatment in low- and middle-income countries, revealed unexpected results. Instead of the expected decrease in death or disability, therapeutic hypothermia was associated with higher mortality rates (63). These findings go against the 2015 guidelines from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, which recommend hypothermia as a standard treatment (64). Systematic reviews have shown mixed results, underscoring the urgent need for alternative treatments that could benefit infants with neonatal encephalopathy in these regions (65, 66). Studies suggest that melatonin may serve as a potential standalone therapy for NE in low- and middle-income countries in the future (67). Additionally, recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) has been shown to improve both histological and functional outcomes in studies involving neonatal encephalopathy (68). It is likely that future research focusing on melatonin and rEPO for the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy will emerge as a prominent area of study.

NE is primarily observed in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia (7). It is interesting to note that the top 5 countries leading research on NE are developed nations. This difference could be due to our search strategy being confined to databases like SCI-E, which predominantly feature English publications, potentially introducing bias. Including databases in other languages, such as Chinese or Korean, could yield different results given the large number of papers from East Asia. Bibliometrics, a multidisciplinary field that focuses on the quantitative analysis of scientific literature, can help predict the current status and future trends of NE. However, it may not be able to evaluate the effectiveness of methods using criteria like effect size as seen in meta-analysis. Moreover, bibliometric analysis heavily relies on abstracts, titles, keywords, and references, rather than a thorough examination of the full text, which could potentially impact the final outcomes.

5 Conclusion

This research provides a thorough examination and insightful evaluation of literature about neonatal encephalopathy from 2005 to 2024. Using tools such as VOSviewer and CiteSpace, the study explores the current status and changing patterns in this field from multiple perspectives, potentially offering useful perspectives for future research on neonatal encephalopathy.

Author contributions

ST: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. NR: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Xinjiang Medical University for providing free online access to the Web of Science Core Collection database.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2024.1403671/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Madanat-Harjuoja L-M, Lähteenmäki PM, Dyba T, Gissler M, Boice JD, Stillbirth MN. Early death and neonatal morbidity among offspring of female cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. (2013) 52(6):1152–9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.758870

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Moshiro R, Mdoe P, Perlman JM. A global view of neonatal asphyxia and resuscitation. Front Pediatr. (2019) 7:489. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00489

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Executive summary: neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition. Report of the American college of obstetricians and Gynecologists’ task force on neonatal encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol. (2014) 123(4):896–901. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000445580.65983.d2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. McIntyre S, Nelson KB, Mulkey SB, Lechpammer M, Molloy E, Badawi N. Neonatal encephalopathy: focus on epidemiology and underexplored aspects of etiology. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. (2021) 26(4):101265. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101265

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Keleş E, Kazan HH, Aral A, Bolay H. Microglial iron trafficking: new player in brain injury. Turk J Med Sci. (2022) 52(5):1415–24. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5481

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet. (2005) 365(9462):891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lee ACC, Kozuki N, Blencowe H, Vos T, Bahalim A, Darmstadt GL, et al. Intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy incidence and impairment at regional and global levels for 2010 with trends from 1990. Pediatr Res. (2013) 74 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):50–72. doi: 10.1038/pr.2013.206.

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Newton CR. Global burden of pediatric neurological disorders. Semin Pediatr Neurol. (2018) 27:10–5. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2018.03.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, Newton CRJC. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet. (2012) 379(9814):445–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61577-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Pavel AM, Rennie JM, de Vries LS, Mathieson SR, Livingstone V, Finder M, et al. Temporal evolution of electrographic seizures in newborn infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy requiring therapeutic hypothermia: a secondary analysis of the anser studies. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2024) 8(3):214–24. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00296-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Jacobs SE, Berg M, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Inder TE, Davis PG. Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2013) 2013(1):CD003311. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub3.23440789

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Pappas A, McDonald SA, Das A, Tyson JE, et al. Effect of depth and duration of cooling on death or disability at age 18 months among neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2017) 318(1):57–67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Jary S, Smit E, Liu X, Cowan FM, Thoresen M. Less severe cerebral palsy outcomes in infants treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992). (2015) 104(12):1241–7. doi: 10.1111/apa.13146

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Molloy EJ, Branagan A, Hurley T, Quirke F, Devane D, Taneri PE, et al. Neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: moving from controversy to consensus definitions and subclassification. Pediatr Res. (2023) 94(6):1860–3. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02775-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cole FJ, Eales NB. The history of comparative anatomy: part I.—a statistical analysis of the literature. Sci Prog. (1917) 11(44):578–96.

Google Scholar

16. Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Wash Acad Sci. (1926) 16(12):317–23. doi: 10.1016/S0016-0032(26)91166-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Chen C, Dubin R, Kim MC. Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000–2014). Expert Opin Biol Ther. (2014) 14(9):1295–317. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2014.920813

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Leefmann J, Levallois C, Hildt E. Neuroethics 1995–2012. A bibliometric analysis of the guiding themes of an emerging research field. Front Hum Neurosci. (2016) 10:336. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00336

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chen D, Liu Z, Luo Z, Webber M, Chen J. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of emergy research. Ecol Eng. (2016) 90:285–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.026

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Demir E, Yaşar E, Özkoçak V, Yıldırım E. The evolution of the field of legal medicine: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. (2020) 69:101885. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101885

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Weightman AL, Butler CC. Using bibliometrics to define the quality of primary care research. BMJ. (2011) 342:d1083. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1083

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Larivière V, Ni C, Gingras Y, Cronin B, Sugimoto CR. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature. (2013) 504(7479):211–3. doi: 10.1038/504211a

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rubio C, Luna R, Zenteno M, Bowles B, Lee Á. Dementia research and bibliometrics in Latin America: an example from Mexico. Asian J Psychiatr. (2021) 67:102949. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102949

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Dong X, Tan Y, Zhuang D, Hu T, Zhao M. Global characteristics and trends in research on ferroptosis: a data-driven bibliometric study. Oxid Med Cell Longevity. (2022) 2022(1):8661864.

Google Scholar

25. Gu C, Wang Z, Pan Y, Zhu S, Gu Z. Tungsten-based nanomaterials in the biomedical field: a bibliometric analysis of research progress and prospects. Adv Mater. (2023) 35(1):2204397. doi: 10.1002/adma.202204397

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Chen G, Jin S, Xia Q, Wang Z, Shi Z, Chen G, et al. Insight into the history and trends of surgical simulation training in education: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg. (2023) 109(8):2204–13. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000468

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Jiang S, Liu Y, Zheng H, Zhang L, Zhao H, Sang X, et al. Evolutionary patterns and research frontiers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg. (2023) 109(9):2774–83. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000492

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. (2021) 133:285–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ding X, Yang Z. Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using vosviewer and citespace. Electronic Commerce Research. (2022) 22(3):787–809. doi: 10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chen J, Liu Y, Dai J, Wang C. Development and Status of moral education research: visual analysis based on knowledge graph. Front Psychol. (2023) 13:1079955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1079955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shankaran S, Pappas A, McDonald SA, Vohr BR, Hintz SR, Yolton K, et al. Childhood outcomes after hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. (2012) 366(22):2085–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112066

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lally PJ, Montaldo P, Oliveira V, Soe A, Swamy R, Bassett P, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of brain injury after moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18(1):35–45. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30325-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Laptook AR, McDonald SA, Shankaran S, Stephens BE, Vohr BR, Guillet R, et al. Elevated temperature and 6- to 7-year outcome of neonatal encephalopathy. Ann Neurol. (2013) 73(4):520–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.23843

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Montaldo P, Cirillo M, Burgod C, Caredda E, Ascione S, Carpentieri M, et al. Whole-body hypothermia vs targeted normothermia for neonates with mild encephalopathy: a multicenter pilot randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. (2024) 7(5):e249119. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Pappas A, McDonald SA, Das A, Tyson JE, et al. Effect of depth and duration of cooling on deaths in the nicu among neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2014) 312(24):2629–39. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16058

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Thayyil S, Montaldo P, Krishnan V, Ivain P, Pant S, Lally PJ, et al. Whole-body hypothermia, cerebral magnetic resonance biomarkers, and outcomes in neonates with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy born at tertiary care centers vs other facilities: a nested study within a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6(5):e2312152. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12152

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Parmentier CEJ, Lequin MH, Alderliesten T, Swanenburg de Veye HFN, van der Aa NE, Dudink J, et al. Additional value of 3-month cranial magnetic resonance imaging in infants with neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia. J Pediatr. (2023) 258:113402. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Albrecht M, Zitta K, Groenendaal F, van Bel F, Peeters-Scholte C. Neuroprotective strategies following perinatal hypoxia-ischemia: taking aim at nos. Free Radic Biol Med. (2019) 142:123–31. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.02.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Alderliesten T, de Vries LS, Benders MJNL, Koopman C, Groenendaal F. MR imaging and outcome of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology. (2011) 261(1):235–42. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110213

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Cowan F, Rutherford M, Groenendaal F, Eken P, Mercuri E, Bydder GM, et al. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet. (2003) 361(9359):736–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12658-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Rutherford M, Ramenghi LA, Edwards AD, Brocklehurst P, Halliday H, Levene M, et al. Assessment of brain tissue injury after moderate hypothermia in neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a nested substudy of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. (2010) 9(1):39–45. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70295-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Thoresen M, Jary S, Walløe L, Karlsson M, Martinez-Biarge M, Chakkarapani E, et al. MRI combined with early clinical variables are excellent outcome predictors for newborn infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia after perinatal asphyxia. EClinicalMedicine. (2021) 36:100885. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100885

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bednarek N, Mathur A, Inder T, Wilkinson J, Neil J, Shimony J. Impact of therapeutic hypothermia on MRI diffusion changes in neonatal encephalopathy. Neurology. (2012) 78(18):1420–7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318253d589

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Jetton JG, Boohaker LJ, Sethi SK, Wazir S, Rohatgi S, Soranno DE, et al. Incidence and outcomes of neonatal acute kidney injury (awaken): a multicentre, multinational, observational cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2017) 1(3):184–94. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30069-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wintermark P, Boyd T, Gregas MC, Labrecque M, Hansen A. Placental pathology in asphyxiated newborns meeting the criteria for therapeutic hypothermia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2010) 203(6):579.e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Wintermark P, Hansen A, Soul J, Labrecque M, Robertson RL, Warfield SK. Early versus late MRI in asphyxiated newborns treated with hypothermia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2011) 96(1):F36–44. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.184291

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, Ballard R, Edwards AD, Ferriero DM, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. (2005) 365(9460):663–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17946-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Azzopardi D, Strohm B, Marlow N, Brocklehurst P, Deierl A, Eddama O, et al. Effects of hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia on childhood outcomes. N Engl J Med. (2014) 371(2):140–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315788

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Edwards AD, Brocklehurst P, Gunn AJ, Halliday H, Juszczak E, Levene M, et al. Neurological outcomes at 18 months of age after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: synthesis and meta-analysis of trial data. BMJ. (2010) 340:c363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c363

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Rutherford MA, Azzopardi D, Whitelaw A, Cowan F, Renowden S, Edwards AD, et al. Mild hypothermia and the distribution of cerebral lesions in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. (2005) 116(4):1001–6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0328

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wu YW, Mathur AM, Chang T, McKinstry RC, Mulkey SB, Mayock DE, et al. High-dose erythropoietin and hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a phase II trial. Pediatrics. (2016) 137(6):e20160191. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Russ JB, Simmons R, Glass HC. Neonatal encephalopathy: beyond hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Neoreviews. (2021) 22(3):e148–62. doi: 10.1542/neo.22-3-e148

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. El-Dib M, Abend NS, Austin T, Boylan G, Chock V, Cilio MR, et al. Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part I: neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures. Pediatr Res. (2023) 94(1):64–73. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02393-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Davidson JO, Gonzalez F, Gressens P, Gunn AJ. Update on mechanisms of the pathophysiology of neonatal encephalopathy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. (2021) 26(5):101267. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101267

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Wisnowski JL, Wintermark P, Bonifacio SL, Smyser CD, Barkovich AJ, Edwards AD, et al. Neuroimaging in the term newborn with neonatal encephalopathy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. (2021) 26(5):101304. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101304

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Sarnat HB, Flores-Sarnat L, Fajardo C, Leijser LM, Wusthoff C, Mohammad K. Sarnat grading scale for neonatal encephalopathy after 45 years: an update proposal. Pediatr Neurol. (2020) 113:75–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.08.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Bello SO. Selective head cooling after neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet. (2005) 365(9471):1619–20.15885291

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

58. Gray J, Geva A, Zheng Z, Zupancic JAF. Coolsim: using industrial modeling techniques to examine the impact of selective head cooling in a model of perinatal regionalization. Pediatrics. (2008) 121(1):28–36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0633

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Gressens P, Dingley J, Plaisant F, Porter H, Schwendimann L, Verney C, et al. Analysis of neuronal, glial, endothelial, axonal and apoptotic markers following moderate therapeutic hypothermia and anesthesia in the developing piglet brain. Brain Pathol. (2008) 18(1):10–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00095.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, Tyson JE, McDonald SA, Donovan EF, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. (2005) 353(15):1574–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcps050929

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards AD, Dyet L, Halliday HL, Juszczak E, et al. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. (2009) 361(14):1349–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900854. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. (2010) 362(11):1056.19797281

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Krishnan V, Kumar V, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Rise and fall of therapeutic hypothermia in low-resource settings: lessons from the Helix trial. Indian J Pediatr. (2021):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12098-021-03861-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Thayyil S, Pant S, Montaldo P, Shukla D, Oliveira V, Ivain P, et al. Hypothermia for moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries (Helix): a randomised controlled trial in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. Lancet Glob Health. (2021) 9(9):e1273–85. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00264-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Guinsburg R, et al. Part 7: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. (2015) 132(16_suppl_1):S204–41. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000276

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Pauliah SS, Shankaran S, Wade A, Cady EB, Thayyil S. Therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. (2013) 8(3):e58834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058834

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Abate BB, Bimerew M, Gebremichael B, Mengesha Kassie A, Kassaw M, Gebremeskel T, et al. Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. PLoS One. (2021) 16(2):e0247229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247229

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Pang R, Meehan C, Maple G, Norris G, Campbell E, Tucker K, et al. Melatonin reduces brain injury following inflammation-amplified hypoxia-ischemia in a translational newborn piglet study of neonatal encephalopathy. J Pineal Res. (2024) 76(4):e12962. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12962

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. McDouall A, Wassink G, Bennet L, Gunn AJ, Davidson JO. Challenges in developing therapeutic strategies for mild neonatal encephalopathy. Neural Regen Res. (2022) 17(2):277–82. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.317963

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neonatal encephalopathy, bibliometric, visualization, research trends, neonatal

Citation: Tan S, Alimujiang G and Rejiafu N (2024) A bibliometric study on clinical research in neonatal encephalopathy. Front. Pediatr. 12:1403671. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1403671

Received: 19 March 2024; Accepted: 21 October 2024;
Published: 1 November 2024.

Edited by:

Fernando Cabañas, Quironsalud Madrid University Hospital, Spain

Reviewed by:

Maurizio Elia, IRCCS Oasi Maria SS, Italy
Elif Keles, Northwestern Medicine, United States

Copyright: © 2024 Tan, Alimujiang and Rejiafu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nuerya Rejiafu, 3092329669@qq.com

ORCID:
Shujun Tan
orcid.org/0009-0000-4018-8878
Nuerya Rejiafu
orcid.org/0009-0003-4624-502X

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.