AUTHOR=Zahradniková Petra , Babala Jozef , Pechanová Rebeka , Smrek Martin , Vitovič Pavol , Laurovičová Miroslava , Bernát Tomáš , Nedomová Barbora TITLE=Inanimate 3D printed model for thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pediatrics VOLUME=11 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1286946 DOI=10.3389/fped.2023.1286946 ISSN=2296-2360 ABSTRACT=Background

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) poses significant technical challenges. This study aimed to develop an inexpensive, reusable, high-fidelity synthetic tissue model for simulating EA/TEF repairs and to assess the validity of the simulator.

Methods

By using 3D printing and silicone casting, we designed an inexpensive and reusable inanimate model for training in thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair. The objective was to validate the model using a 5-point Likert scale and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) to evaluate participants' surgical proficiency.

Results

A total of 18 participants (7 medical students, 4 pediatric surgery trainees, and 7 experienced surgeons), after being instructed and trained, were asked to perform TEF ligation, dissection, as well as esophageal anastomosis using six sliding knots on the EA/TEF simulator. All participants in the expert group completed the task within the 120-minute time limit, however only 4 (57%) participants from the novice/intermediate completed the task within the time limit. There was a statistically significant difference in OSATS scores for the “flow of task” (p = 0.018) and scores for the “overall MIS skills” (p = 0.010) task distinguishing between novice and intermediates and experts. The simulator demonstrated strong suitability as a training tool, indicated by a mean score of 4.66. The mean scores for the model's realism and the working environment were 4.25 and 4.5, respectively. Overall, the face validity was scored significantly lower in the expert group compared to the novice/intermediate groups (p = 0.0002).

Conclusions

Our study established good face and content validity of the simulator. Due to its reusability, and suitability for individual participants, our model holds promise as a training tool for thoracoscopic procedures among surgeons. However, novices and trainees struggled with advanced minimally invasive surgical procedures. Therefore, a structured and focused training curriculum in pediatric MIS is needed for optimal utilization of the available training hours.