Bardet-Biedl syndrome caused by compound heterozygosity in BBS12 gene: a case report of one family with three affected members

Introduction: Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a rare genetic syndrome caused by a mutation in one of 26 different genes responsible for normal structure and/or function of primary cilia. The syndrome is characterized by multiorgan involvement with gradual onset of occurrence of clinical signs and symptoms resulting in great phenotypic variability and what is more important, often difficulties with establishing the timely diagnosis.

Case report: We report a case of a one family with three members with BBS caused by a very rare mutation, a compound heterozygosity in BB12 gene. Even though all three patients have the same type of mutation, they express a significant diversity in clinical expression as well as renal impairment.

Conclusion: This is a case report of a rare clinical syndrome caused by a very rare genetic mutation and it emphasizes the importance of genetic analysis in the timely diagnosis of oligosymptomatic patients with BBS, in order to possibly prevent long-term complications.

Introduction

Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a rare autosomal recessive ciliopathy that can be caused by a mutation in at least 26 different genes. Clinical presentation varies from signs present at birth such as polydactyly, syndactyly, and brachydactyly to the development of obesity, metabolic syndrome, retinopathy, as well as renal, cardiac, gastrointestinal, neural, and genitourinary abnormalities that develop over time (1). Although at least four major criteria (or three major and two minor) must be met for a clinical diagnosis, the gradual development of individual clinical signs during childhood combined with variations in the genotype-phenotype correlation indicate an increasing number of “genetically positive” BBS patients who do not meet the mentioned criteria, which is also confirmed by recent meta-analyses (2, 3). Major features include cone-rod dystrophy, central (truncal) obesity, postaxial polydactyly, cognitive impairment, hypogonadism, genitourinary malformations and kidney disease while minor features include neurodevelopmental abnormalities, dysmorphic craniofacial features, anosmia, orodental abnormalities, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and endocrine abnormalities. The genetic background of BBS is an autosomal recessive inherited mutation in one of the 26 detected genes associated with this disorder that results in biallelic loss of function (1, 2). We report a rare case of a family with three members with BBS. Our patients were a male newborn, his brother and his sister. Genetic analysis revealed that they are compound heterozygotes for the BBS12 gene. It is interesting to point out that mutations in BBS12 gene are responsible for approximately 8% of all cases of Bardet Biedl syndrome reported in the literature (4). Furthermore, this case report represents a very rare genetic substrate underlying this syndrome – compound heterozygosity, which implies two different mutations in each allele of BBS12 gene with distinctive clinical expression. Even though there is a certain level of genotype to phenotype correlation in BBS, our patients do not have a complete overlap of the clinical presentation (3). The question arises whether the detection of a certain genotype can also be a predictor of the development of a particular phenotype over time and to what extent. The above is not negligible considering that certain components of this clinical syndrome determine the quality of life and bear significant morbidity and mortality of patients with BBS (5).

Results

Our patients include the proband, his brother and his sister. The proband is a male newborn, born in the 38th gestational week, with Apgar score 10/10, birth weight of 3,200 g and birth length of 49 cm. Fetal ultrasound made during pregnancy revealed renal pelvis dilatation, enlarged and hyperechoic kidneys with a large number of macrocysts, hexadactyly of the right hand and both feet, and syndactyly of 2nd and 3rd fingers. Based on these findings, autosomal recessive cystic kidney disease was suspected. His older brother, who was 18 months old at the moment of the proband's disease presentation, also had polycystic kidneys with the same type of hexadactyly and syndactyly (Figures 1A–C), while their older sister (5 years old) additionally presented with hydrometrocolpos and hydronephrosis at birth. We suspected that proband and his siblings have clinical phenotypes of overlapping symptoms of BBS and McKusick Kauffman syndrome. They were tested with a gene panel for 102 different ciliopathic genes. Two pathogenic missense variants, c.1277G > A (p.Cys426Tyr) and c.940A > G (p.Arg314Gly), were identified in BBS12 in each patient. These variants are on opposite chromosomes which supported the diagnosis of autosomal recessive BBS12 (BBS 12, MIM 615989). Both variants have been observed in patients with clinical features of Bardet-Biedl syndrome and classified as pathogenic (Variation ID: 347502 and 1337071).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. (A), hexadactyly of the right hand; (B), hexadactyly of the right foot; (C), hexadactyly of the left foot; (D,E), longitudinal ultrasound section through the left and right kidney.

All three affected members of the family were routinely followed during a two-and-a-half-year period in four-month intervals. Blood and urine tests, ultrasound of the urinary system, ultrasound of the abdomen, ultrasound of the heart and electroencephalogram were regularly monitored. Multidisciplinary supervision was conducted, including pediatric nephrologist, endocrinologist, cardiologist, neurologist as well as ophthalmologist, otorhinolaryngologist and clinical psychologist. The presenting symptoms of our proband were polyuria and polydipsia, with fluid intake over 2 L/day and urine osmolality under 110 mOsm/kg at the age of 1.5 years. Screening for proteinuria as well as measurements of arterial pressure were performed at each examination as leading indicators of CKD progression. Proband had proteinuria but the same wasn't detected in his brother's urine tests. Their sister had normal blood and urine tests. They were all normotensive during the whole follow-up period (Table 1.). Furthermore, all three patients had an almost identical ultrasound finding of the urinary system, described as diffusely hyperechoic parenchyma of both kidneys, without corticomedullary differentiation with numerous small cysts (Figures 1D, E). The sister additionally presented as a newborn with a malformation of the genitourinary system (vaginal atresia and hydrometrocolpos), but with the exception of polycystic kidney disease and the limb malformations described above, none of the patients developed other clinical manifestations of BBS during the mentioned follow-up period. However, routine monitoring of proband's renal function parameters showed a gradual decline with the development of third-grade chronic kidney disease (CKD) at the age of two years (Table 1). The same was observed in his brother's results with the development of second-grade CKD at the age of three. Their sister, on the other hand, does not express the same clinical presentation of renal disease and has a normal kidney function. Apart from the surgical correction of the described polydactyly, our proband is treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril), sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate with vitamin D, and an iron supplementation as a part of the treatment of CKD. Up-to-date monitoring of possible CKD progression is foreseen and also a consideration of all available methods of replacement treatment if necessary. Although for now our patient, as well as his closest relatives, have not developed other possible clinical characteristics of BBS, further monitoring and follow-up are necessary.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Renal function parameters during the follow-up period.

Discussion

Bardet-Biedl syndrome belongs to the group of primary ciliopathies (6). It is a group of hereditary disorders, based on a genetic mutation characterized by impaired protein synthesis, which ultimately results in abnormal function and/or structure of primary cilia. Considering that primary cilia are microtubule-based organelles that extend from the apical surface of most mammalian cells, the possibility of multiorgan involvement is not surprising and therefore a great diversity in the clinical expression of the mentioned group of disorders (7). BBS is a „primary ciliopathy“, as opposed to secondary ciliopathies where the expression of the affected genes is not in the primary cilia and yet cysts are formed, probably due to cell proliferation and changing quality of environmental factors (6, 8).

Recent studies have identified at least 26 different genes whose mutation is associated with the development of BBS (BBS 1-21, CEP164, SCAPER, SCLT1) (3). Biallelic loss-of-function in previously mentioned genes is necessary in order for the disease to develop, which is the foundation of autosomal recessive inheritance. One of the eight genes encoding for the subunits of the octameric protein complex, BBSome (BBS1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 18) are most frequently affected by mutations in BBS patients. The second largest group of BBS patients have mutations in genes encoding chaperonins assisting the assembly of the BBSome (BBS6/MKKS, 10, 12) while the third most common group of patients has a mutation in BBS3/ARL6, a GTPase assisting the BBSome function (9–13).

In particular, all patients from our family are compound heterozygotes for the BBS12 gene with two different mutations in each allel. Research suggests that genotypic diversity underlies the phenotypic variability of patients with BBS (14).

Bardet-Biedl syndrome is primarily characterized by retinal cone-rod dystrophy, obesity, postaxial polydactyly, cognitive impairment, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and/or genitourinary malformations, and renal malformations and/or renal parenchymal disease. Due to the potential multiorgan involvement, systematic multidisciplinary follow-up of almost all pediatric subspecialists is required which is the reason why our patients perform routine nephrological, endocrinological, neurological, cardiological and ophthalmological diagnostics on a monthly basis (1).

Since it is known that it takes years for certain clinical characteristics of the syndrome to develop, the importance of a high degree of suspicion in oligosymptomatic patients (e.g., altered renal ultrasound with hexadactyly) and also the importance of genetic analysis of these patients in order to establish a timely diagnosis, regularly monitor and potentially prevent long-term complications, is not surprising (14, 15).

Even though a certain level of genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with BBS is well known, it should be emphasized that although all three of our patients are from the same family and have the same type of mutation detected (missense), they do not show a complete overlapping of the clinical picture. For instance, only proband's sister manifested with genitourinary malformations while all three patients had limb malformation and polycystic kidney disease. The similar was observed by Cherian et al. who have studied the clinical spectrum of 11 Saudi Arabian patients from four consanguineous families. In one of the families, in which five patients were affected, variability was observed not only in the overall clinical phenotype but also in the type of renal disease (16). Furthermore, after reviewing the literature, it was observed that a mutation in the BBS12 gene can be presented with a different constellation of symptoms characteristic of BBS (17–19). According to the available literature, patients with this mutation can have higher cardiovascular risks than those with mutation in BBS1 gene, since patients with mutations in BBS1 gene show low frequency of renal anomalies (potential cause of arterial hypertension) and generally present with milder phenotype while patients with mutations in BBS12 often present with obesity (associated with hyperlipidemia and glucose intolerance) (3, 5).

Recent metanalyses suggest that the identity of the causative gene and the type of the mutation can partially predict the clinical outcome of the disease. But to what extent? It is known that mutations in BBS1, BBS2, and BBS10 gene are the most common ones among BBS population (making around 50% of all cases) and what is also shown is that patients with mutations in BBS2 or BBS10 gene have higher penetrance of renal anomalies and limb malformations (polydactyly) than patients with mutations in BBS1 (3). Given that renal anomalies are one of the main characteristics of BBS and that potential renal failure is a life-threatening complication, the clinical significance of the exact determination of the affected gene and the type of mutation is clear. The question arises whether the mentioned genotypic definition can also predict the outcome of renal impairment, or rather, the probability of developing CKD (20, 21)?

The renal phenotype of BBS varies from urinary concentration defects to structural anomalies such as horseshoe, ectopic, duplex, or absent kidneys; or polycystic kidney disease, hydronephrosis and vesicoureteral reflux (2, 5). Although all three of our patients have the same structural type of kidney disease, at the same time they do not express the same degree of renal function impairment. For example, our proband has developed 3rd grade CKD at the age of two years, his brother has developed 2nd grade CKD at the age of four, while their sister who is at the age of 5 years has a completely normal kidney function. Some of the previous studies managed to define genes that are associated with a higher risk of progression to CKD (22). A study by Forsyth and his associates identified an increased prevalence of severe kidney disease defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 ml/min/1.73 m² in individuals with BBS2, BBS10, and BBS12 compared to individuals with BBS1. Also, in the same study, homozygous and compound heterozygous individuals with truncating variants were more likely to be associated with severe kidney disease than those with two missense variants implicating that neither the type of mutation is prognostically negligible. The similar was observed in some recent studies indicating the importance of timely and up-to-date monitoring of renal function in all patients with BBS (20–23).

What is interesting to point out is that the meta-analyses that studied the genotype-phenotype correlation of other symptoms of BBS did not find such a strong association as is the case with renal anomalies. This is possibly attributed to the importance of the preservation of the core of the BBSome for the structure of the kidney, considering that the mutations in BBS2, BBS7, or BBS9 induced a very high incidence of renal anomalies and yet is known that those genes encode proteins fundamental for establishing the core of the BBSome (3).

The question arises as to what factors influence the diversity of clinical expression in patients with BBS, especially in those who have the same genetic defect caused by the same type of mutation. What underlies intrafamilial phenotypic variability as has been observed in our case report? Penetrance variability, epistasis phenomenon as well as environmental factors need to be taken into consideration (22, 24)? The mechanisms underlying clinical heterogeneity are complex and can possibly be explained by multiple loci, ubiquitous gene expression as well as multiple interaction of proteins encoded by genes involved in BBS (25). Considering that the exitance of the genes necessary for the normal function and structure the primary cilia is known and yet they are not causally related to BBS, perhaps their research would provide a clearer insight into the many of the possible disease phenotypes. The clinical application of these molecular processes remains to be elucidated (6, 7).

Conclusion

We report a very rare case of a family with three members with Bardet-Biedl syndrome. All three patients have the same type of mutation, they are all compound heterozygotes for BBS12 gene. However, they express a mild variety in clinical symptoms but at the same time a great variety in kidney function. We believe that the presentation of this case will further contribute to the understanding of the connection between genotype and phenotype in patients with this rare syndrome, especially those with rare genetic mutations within the same family. The importance of genetic analysis lies within the possibility of establishing timely diagnosis, even in oligosymptomatic patients who have not yet fully developed the whole spectrum of clinical expression, which sometimes takes years (obesity, hypogonadism, intellectual disabilities, etc.). Considering that CKD is one of the main determinants of morbidity and mortality in these patients and that it's onset is insidious and possible within the first year of life, we emphasize the importance of a high degree of suspicion and up-to-date follow-up of all patients with abnormal ultrasound findings, especially those with hyperechoic and polycystic kidneys (20, 22, 23). However, a diagnostic test that would predict the degree of kidney impairment even after a clearly established genotype does not exist for now, and further research in this area will be necessary. Long-term follow-up of these patients will provide insight into the progression of kidney disease as well as the development of other features of BBS over time, and can serve as a basis for subsequent retrospective and prospective research.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

AS: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, supervision, validation. DT: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, and writing—original draft. AA and MB: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, and writing—original draft. MS: formal analysis, supervision, and writing—original draft. MP, MT: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft. BL: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, and writing—original draft. MS: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, writing—original draft. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Forsyth R, Gunay-Aygun M. Bardet-Biedl syndrome overview. In: Adam MP, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Gripp KW, Amemiya A, editors. Genereviews®. Seattle: University of Washington (1993–2023). p. 2–13.

2. Forsythe E, Beales PL. Bardet–Biedl syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. (2013) 21(1):8–13. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Niederlova V, Modrak M, Tsyklauri O, Huranova M, Stepanek O. Meta-analysis of genotype-phenotype associations in Bardet-Biedl syndrome uncovers differences among causative genes. Hum Mutat. (2019) 40(11):2068–87. doi: 10.1002/humu.23862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Focșa IO, Budișteanu M, Burloiu C, Khan S, Sadeghpour A, Bohîlțea LC, et al. A case of bardet-biedl syndrome caused by a recurrent variant in BBS12: a case report. Biomed Rep. (2021) 15(6):103. doi: 10.3892/br.2021.1479

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Putoux A, Attie-Bitach T, Martinovic J, Gubler MC. Phenotypic variability of Bardet-Biedl syndrome: focusing on the kidney. Pediatr Nephrol. (2012) 27(1):7–15. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1751-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zaghloul NA, Katsanis N. Mechanistic insights into Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a model ciliopathy. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119(3):428–37. doi: 10.1172/JCI37041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Baker K, Beales PL. Making sense of cilia in disease: the human ciliopathies. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. (2009) 151C(4):281–95. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Saraga M, Vukojević K, Krželj V, Puretić Z, Bočina I, Durdov MG, et al. Mechanism of cystogenesis in nephrotic kidneys: a histopathological study. BMC Nephrol. (2014) 15:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Harville HM, Held S, Diaz-Font A, Davis EE, Diplas BH, Lewis RA, et al. Identification of 11 novel mutations in eight BBS genes by high-resolution homozygosity mapping. J Med Genet. (2010) 47(4):262–7. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.071365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Berbari NF, Lewis JS, Bishop GA, Askwith CC, Mykytyn K. Bardet–Biedl syndrome proteins are required for the localization of G protein-coupled receptors to primary cilia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2008) 105(11):4242–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711027105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Seo S, Baye LM, Schulz NP, Beck JS, Zhang Q, Slusarski DC, et al. BBS6, BBS10, and BBS12 form a complex with CCT/TRiC family chaperonins and mediate BBSome assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2010) 107(4):1488–93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910268107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Billingsley G, Bin J, Fieggen KJ, Duncan JL, Gerth C, Ogata K, et al. Mutations in chaperonin-like BBS genes are a major contributor to disease development in a multiethnic Bardet-Biedl syndrome patient population. J Med Genet. (2010) 47(7):453–63. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.073205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Nachury MV, Loktev AV, Zhang Q, Westlake CJ, Peränen J, Merdes A, et al. A core Complex of BBS proteins cooperates with the GTPase Rab8 to promote ciliary membrane biogenesis. Cell. (2007) 129(6):1201–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Castro-Sánchez S, Álvarez-Satta M, Cortón M, Guillén E, Ayuso C, Valverde D. Exploring genotype-phenotype relationships in bardet-biedl syndrome families. J Med Genet. (2015) 52(8):503–13. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103099

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Melluso A, Secondulfo F, Capolongo G, Capasso G, Zacchia M. Bardet-Biedl syndrome: current perspectives and clinical outlook. Ther Clin Risk Manag. (2023) 19:115–32. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S338653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cherian MP, Al-Sanna’a NA. Clinical spectrum of Bardet–Biedl syndrome among four Saudi Arabian families. Clin Dysmorphol. (2009) 18(4):188–94. doi: 10.1097/MCD.0b013e32832e4657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Morohashi T, Hayashi T, Mizobuchi K, Nakano T, Morioka I. Bardet–Biedl syndrome associated with novel compound heterozygous variants in BBS12 gene. Doc Ophthalmol. (2022) 146(2):165–71. doi: 10.1007/s10633-022-09915-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Shen YT, Ling Y, Lu ZQ, Li XM, Bian H, Yan HM, et al. Diagnosis and genetic analysis of a case with Bardet-Biedl syndrome caused by compound heterozygous mutations in the BBS12 gene. Yi Chuan. (2022) 44(10):975–82. doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.22-182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pawlik B, Mir A, Iqbal H, Li Y, Nürnberg G, Becker C, et al. A novel familial BBS12 mutation associated with a mild phenotype: implications for clinical and molecular diagnostic strategies. Mol Syndromol. (2010) 1(1):27–34. doi: 10.1159/000276763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Meyer JR, Krentz AD, Berg RL, Richardson JG, Pomeroy J, Hebbring SJ, et al. Kidney failure in Bardet–Biedl syndrome. Clin Genet. (2022) 101(4):429–41. doi: 10.1111/cge.14119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Forsythe E, Kenny J, Bacchelli C, Beales PL. Managing Bardet-Biedl syndrome-now and in the future. Front Pediatr. (2018) 6:23. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Forsythe E, Sparks K, Best S, Borrows S, Hoskins B, Sabir A, et al. Risk factors for severe renal disease in Bardet–Biedl syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2017) 28(3):963–70. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015091029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Marchese E, Ruoppolo M, Perna A, Capasso G, Zacchia M. Exploring key challenges of understanding the pathogenesis of kidney disease in Bardet–Biedl syndrome. Kidney Int Rep. (2020) 5(9):1403–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.06.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. González-Del Pozo M, Méndez-Vidal C, Santoyo-Lopez J, Vela-Boza A, Bravo-Gil N, Rueda A, et al. Deciphering intrafamilial phenotypic variability by exome sequencing in a Bardet-Biedl family. Mol Genet Genomic Med. (2014) 2(2):124–33. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.50

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Florea L, Caba L, Gorduza EV. Bardet-Biedl syndrome-multiple kaleidoscope images: insight into mechanisms of genotype-phenotype correlations. Genes (Basel). (2021) 12:9. doi: 10.3390/genes12091353

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar