Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Pediatr., 04 November 2022
Sec. Pediatric Orthopedics
This article is part of the Research Topic Case Reports in Pediatric Orthopedics 2022 View all 14 articles

Case Report: Bilateral symmetrical primary kaposiform hemangioendothelioma of the femur

  • 1Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 2Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 3Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) is a rare borderline vascular tumor that usually presents as a mass of skin or deep soft tissue. We report a unique case of an 8-year-old KHE patient with bilateral symmetrical sites involving both femurs. The laboratory, radiographic, and pathological findings of the patient were minutely described. During the 6-month follow-up, the symptoms of pain and dysfunction of this patient were relieved. This study aimed to arouse clinicians’ concern about the symmetrical sites of KHE patients.

Introduction

Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) is a rare borderline tumor with locally invasive features, which are mostly seen in children and adolescents, with an incidence of 0.71/100,000 (1). Clinical manifestations are more involved in the skin of the purplish red hard mass, and the surrounding tissue clearance is not clear. Only 10% of KHE patients showed deep lesions without skin involvement, while primary bone lesions were rarer, and most of the lesions were single lesions (2, 3). We report a unique case of KHE symmetrically involving both femurs, accompanied by pain and claudication, who was misdiagnosed as synovitis at an early stage. We aimed to alert clinicians to the early identification of KHE patients at specific sites, which is important for the management and prognosis of KHE patients.

Case description

An 8-year-old female child was referred to our tertiary medical institution for pain and discomfort in both knees accompanied by claudication. Before admission to our hospital, she was treated for “joint synovitis” with anti-inflammatory treatment in a local hospital. The pain symptoms were relieved once, but the pain accompanied by claudication symptoms worsened 1 week after drug withdrawal. The patient showed local tenderness and percussion pain on both knees, but with no redness or palpable mass. Additionally, she showed no abnormal vital signs, such as fever and weight loss.

Laboratory tests, including white blood cell count of 12.56 × 109/L (reference value was 4.3 × 109/L–11.3 × 109/L), D-dimer of 0.90 mg/L FEU (reference value was lower than 0.55 mg/L FEU), and C-reactive protein of 8.24 mg/L (reference value was lower than 5.00 mg/L), were mildly abnormal. Other tests, such as blood count, coagulation function, biochemical electrolyte, various metabolic indicators (including thyroid hormone- and bone metabolism-related indicators), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, antigen indicators of parasites, and various immune antibody indicators, were negative.

Imaging examinations included bilateral knee x-rays, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whole-body bone imaging (Figures 13). Plain radiography and CT of both knee joints indicated uneven bone density in the bilateral femoral diaphysis, epiphysis, and proximal tibia, with multiple low-density sites and calcification. However, the joint space showed no obvious narrowing. MRI indicated that lump-shaped shadows with long T1 and T2 signals were observed in the bottom of the femurs and in the upper end of the tibias on both sides, and no abnormalities were observed in the shape and signal of the medial and lateral meniscus. No abnormalities were observed in the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments or the tibial and fibular collateral ligaments. There was no fluid accumulation in the joint cavity and no swelling in the soft tissue around the joint. Whole-body bone imaging showed increased radiation in the bone metabolism of bilateral lower femurs after intravenous 10 mCi of 99 mTc-MDP.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. X-ray of both knee joints indicated uneven bone density in bilateral femoral diaphysis, epiphysis, and proximal tibia, with multiple low-density sites and calcification.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) MRI images indicated that lump-shaped shadow with long T1 and T2 signal was observed in the bottom of the femurs and in the upper end of tibias on both sides, no abnormality was observed in the shape and signal of the medial and lateral meniscus. After 6 months follow-up, we could see that the lesion was smaller than before (C).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Whole-body bone imaging showed increased radiation in bone metabolism of bilateral lower femurs after intravenous 10 mCi of 99 mTc-MDP.

To further clarify the patient's diagnosis, a biopsy operation opening the window of the left femur distal lesions and plaster external fixation were conducted after improving the preoperative examination. During the operation, we could see that the left side of the distal femoral bone cortex was changing slightly, and the surrounding tissue was not swollen. There was no obvious mass or edema around the periosteum, and yellow fat-like tissue could be seen in cancellous bone after opening the bone cortex window. Postoperative pathology results showed positivity for CD31, SMA, Ki-67, CD34, FA-8, ERG, and D2-40, and negativity for NSE (Figure 4). The above immunohistochemical and histological morphology results all supported the diagnosis of KHE.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The left side of the distal femoral bone cortex was changing slightly rough in the operation (A), and the postoperative pathology results were showed (B: HE, ×200; C: positive D2-40, ×100).

After surgery, the patient was given oral sirolimus (0.8 mg/m2) monotherapy daily, and the blood concentration of sirolimus was maintained in the range of 3–8 ng/ml during the follow-up. Fortunately, the symptoms of claudication disappeared, and the hematological results completely returned to normal after a period of 6 months.

Discussion

KHE can be divided into superficial, mixed, and deep types, and the most common one is the mixed type (4, 5). Nearly 70% of KHE cases can be accompanied by the Kasabach–Merritt phenomenon (KMP) of severe thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy (1). Although 62.8% of KHE patients were reported to have musculoskeletal diseases, most of the KHE lesions were deep soft tissue that invaded bones. Lesions primarily originating from bone and limited inside bone are very rare (6). Among a series of 31 KHE patients, Kuo et al. reported that there were six primary bone KHE cases involving the unilateral limb bones, spine, sacrum, scapula, and sternum (3). To the best of our knowledge, the KHE case involving bilateral femur symmetry reported in this study is the first to be reported in the literature world.

Among the 107 KHE patients reported by Croteau et al., only 3 cases were confined to bone without KMP (1). Additionally, in our case report, blood coagulation function was approximately normal, and KMP did not appear. This might be because the lesions are confined to the bone, and the soft tissue around the lower femurs on both sides was not involved. There was no periosteal reaction, and the lesions may be physically limited by the cortical bone, which could not be further invaded. The risk of KMP was smaller than that of skin and muscle lesions.

The most common lesions of KHE occur in limbs (7). However, in current studies on KHE, there were no cases with symmetric limbs involved and confined to the bone. Bilateral intraosseous lesions can be easily misattributed to osteomyelitis, fibrous dysplasia, and so on, which are caused by trauma, infection, or abnormal growth in clinical practice. The diagnosis of KHE depended on the comprehensive evaluation of clinical manifestations, hematology, imaging, and pathological results. The diagnosis of KHE can often be ignored and delayed for such rare symmetrical lesions, resulting in significant disability and mortality rates. Therefore, definite diagnosis through biopsy is particularly important for treatment direction, which can reduce the long-term complications of KHE.

Extensive resection of the lesion was not recommended for the KHE patient we reported to have bilateral femur lesions, which might lead to long-term complications and disability. Sirolimus is currently the first-line treatment for KHE (810). In our previous study, it was found that patients receiving sirolimus plus prednisolone therapy had fewer blood transfusions and a lower overall incidence of disease sequelae than those receiving sirolimus monotherapy. Sirolimus plus prednisolone is considered to be an effective treatment for KHE with KMP (2). We usually used sirolimus plus prednisolone to treat KHE patients with KMP, but for bone KHE patients without KMP, monotherapy with the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus acting on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway through inhibition of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis can effectively control and reduce mass and complications (11, 12).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we should also be alert to the possibility of KHE of symmetry osteopathy in the clinic. Biopsy is the gold standard for clear diagnosis of this challenging disease. Early and timely diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of complications such as pain and dysfunction and the quality of life of children.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee on Medical Research of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.

Author contributions

TQ, YL, and YJ contributed to the conception and design. All authors contributed to the collection and assembly of data. TQ and YL contributed to the manuscript preparation. SC and TQ contributed to the manuscript editing. YJ contributed to the manuscript revision/review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Project in the Science & Technology Program of Sichuan Province (grant numbers 2022YFS0233, 2022YFS0225, and 2019YFS0322), the Project of “0 to 1” of Sichuan University (grant number 2022SCUH0033), Med-X Center for Informatics Funding Project (YGJC004), and the 1·3·5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital of Sichuan University (grant numbers ZYJC21060, 2020HXFH048, and 2019HXFH056).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Croteau SE, Liang MG, Kozakewich HP, Alomari AI, Fishman SJ, Mulliken JB, et al. Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: atypical features and risks of Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon in 107 referrals. J Pediatr. (2013) 162(1):142–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ji Y, Chen S, Zhou J, Yang K, Zhang X, Xiang B, et al. Sirolimus plus prednisolone vs sirolimus monotherapy for kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: a randomized clinical trial. Blood. (2022) 139(11):1619–30. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kuo C, Warren M, Malvar J, Miller JM, Shah R, Navid F, et al. Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma of the bone in children and adolescents. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2022) 69(1):e29392. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ji Y, Chen S, Xiang B, Li K, Xu Z, Yao W, et al. Sirolimus for the treatment of progressive kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: a multicenter retrospective study. Int J Cancer. (2017) 141(4):848–55. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30775

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ji Y, Yang K, Peng S, Chen S, Xiang B, Xu Z, et al. Kaposiform haemangioendothelioma: clinical features, complications and risk factors for Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon. Br J Dermatol. (2018) 179(2):457–63. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16601

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Boccara O, Dangien A, Fitoussi F, Ducou Le Pointe H, Coulomb L'Hermine A, Fraitag S, et al. Bone kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: a rare entity dramatically improved by sirolimus. J Paediatr Child Health. (2022) 58(9):1676–9. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15897

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zhou J, Yang K, Dai S, Qiu T, Zhang X, Gong X, et al. Clinical features and management of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma: similarities and differences. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2022) 87(1):172–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Blatt J, Stavas J, Moats-Staats B, Woosley J, Morrell DS. Treatment of childhood kaposiform hemangioendothelioma with sirolimus. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2010) 55(7):1396–8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Oza VS, Mamlouk MD, Hess CP, Mathes EF, Frieden IJ. Role of sirolimus in advanced kaposiform hemangioendothelioma. Pediatr Dermatol. (2016) 33(2):e88–92. doi: 10.1111/pde.12787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wang Z, Li K, Dong K, Xiao X, Zheng S. Successful treatment of Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon arising from Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma by sirolimus. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2015) 37(1):72–3. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Qiu T, Yang K, Dai S, Chen S, Ji Y. Case report: kaposiform hemangioendothelioma with spinal involvement. Front Pediatr. (2021) 9:600115. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.600115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ji Y, Chen S, Yang K, Xia C, Li L. Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: current knowledge and future perspectives. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2020) 15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-1320-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, bone, case report, Kasabach–Merritt phenomenon, pediatric

Citation: Qiu T, Lan Y, Zhou J, Yang K, Gong X, Zhang Z, Chen S and Ji Y (2022) Case Report: Bilateral symmetrical primary kaposiform hemangioendothelioma of the femur. Front. Pediatr. 10:995340. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.995340

Received: 15 July 2022; Accepted: 7 October 2022;
Published: 4 November 2022.

Edited by:

Angelo Gabriele Aulisa, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Italy

Reviewed by:

Wang Zuopeng, Fudan University, China
Ramya Uppuluri, Apollo Speciality Hospitals, India

© 2022 Qiu, Lan, Zhou, Yang, Gong, Zhang, Chen and Ji. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yi Ji jijiyuanyuan@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Pediatric Orthopedics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.