Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr., 19 May 2022
Sec. Pediatric Pulmonology

Prevalence of Sensitization to Aeroallergens in Greater Beijing Region Children With Respiratory Allergy

\nKai Guan,,&#x;Kai Guan1,2,3Wenjing Zhu&#x;Wenjing Zhu4Li Sha
Li Sha4*Chuanhe LiuChuanhe Liu4Jing ZhaoJing Zhao4Jia Yin,,
Jia Yin1,2,3*Yuzhi ChenYuzhi Chen4
  • 1Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Disease, Beijing, China
  • 3National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China
  • 4Department of Allergy, Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and distribution of sensitization to aeroallergens in children with atopic diseases.

Methods: We conducted skin prick test on 9,527 pediatric patients (aged 0–17 years) with atopic diseases in allergy department of Children's Hospital affiliated with the Capital Institute of Pediatrics. Positive rates of aeroallergens were compared among the different groups.

Results: Boys (69.5%) had a higher positive rate in SPT results than girls (59.8%; χ2 = 91.7, P < 0.01), and the prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens increased from 56.1% in the 0–5 year group, to 73.0% in patients above 12 years. Japanese hop (36.2%) and D. farinae (28.1%) were the most common outdoor and indoor aeroallergens, respectively. From low to high age groups, the positive detection rates of D. farinae were 20.3, 30.6, and 33.5%, respectively, followed by D. pteronyssinus (15.7, 24.8, and 30.0%) and cat dander (8.6, 19.8, and 27.9%, respectively), while dog dander and cockroach showed the same trend. The top three positive detection rates of outdoor aeroallergens were Alternaria (30.9%), Japanese Hop (26.7%), and Artemisia (23.7%) in the preschool age group. With regard to patients aged 6 to 11 years, the three most common were Japanese hop (39.2%), Alternaria (36.4%), and Fraxinus pollen (34.4%). Japanese hop (43.8%), Sabina (41.1%), and birch pollen (39.6%) became increasingly common allergens among adolescents. There were more patients with strongly positive reactions to Alternaria in AS (χ2 = 10.2, P < 0.01) and AS with AR groups (χ2 =9.7, P < 0.01) than those in the AR group. Asthmatic patients had significantly higher multiple positive reactions than those with AR (P < 0.01). Asthmatic patients had a much higher prevalence of HDM, animal dander, and Alternaria than those with allergic rhinitis (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens increased with age in children with atopic diseases in Greater Beijing Region. Alternaria was the predominant allergen before 5 years of age, and tree pollen had delayed sensitization in adolescents. Sensitization to perennial allergens such as HDM, cats, and Alternaria was more strongly associated with asthma risk. Sensitization to more than one allergen significantly affected asthmatic patients.

Introduction

Allergy is on the rise worldwide, affecting approximately 25% of the world's population. Due to its long-term chronic recurrence, it has become a serious problem threatening social and public health (1). Sensitization to aeroallergens is an important pathogenic and risk factor in the development of airway allergic diseases in children (2, 3). Geographical and seasonal variations in aeroallergen sensitization have been observed in China and sensitization patterns also change significantly over time (4). It is essential to identify allergens for diagnosis, allergen-specific immunotherapy, and prevention of these diseases. To fill the knowledge gap due to the lack of recent large sample size studies of aeroallergen sensitization of respiratory allergy in children, we described variation in the prevalence of positive skin prick test (SPT) to common aeroallergens among children under 18 years of age.

Methods

Study Design and Population

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with atopic diseases who visited the Allergy Department of Children's Hospital affiliated with the Capital Institute of Pediatrics within a 2-year period (2018–2020). The patients were mainly from Greater Beijing region (Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province). Allergic rhinitis and asthma were diagnosed by allergists via history taking, clinical examination, and spirometry, in accordance to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. This study was approved by the ethical committee of our hospital (SHERLL2021011).

Data Collection

Within the designated time period of 24 months, patient charts were used as the primary source of information regarding outpatient visits in Allergy Department of Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics. The collected data included age, sex, clinical history, SPT results and diagnosis of diseases. After excluding missing data, a total of 9,527 patients aged 0–17 years were enrolled in this study. The children were divided into three groups according to age: preschool (0–5 years), early school age (6–11 years) and adolescents (12–17 years). Those who had a clear diagnosis were classified into different disease groups: allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma (AS) and asthma with allergic rhinitis (AS with AR).

Skin Prick Test (SPT)

Allergen extracts (produced by the Allergen Products Research and Development Center, Peking Union Medical College's Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China) of Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cockroach, cat dander, dog dander, tree pollen, weed pollen and molds used to perform allergy test on all patients, and the procedure followed a practical guide (5). Histamine (10 mg/ml) and physiological saline solution were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Drugs which may have an impact on SPT were withdrawn before the test. Skin response was measured 15 min after pricking. Positive skin prick test was defined as a wheal diameter greater than 3 mm in the presence of a negative saline control. SPT reactivity was graded as the allergen histamine wheal ratio (AHWR) (6). If the grade was +++ or ++++, it was considered a strongly positive reaction. Multiple sensitizations were defined as positive reactions to two or more allergens, including house dust mite (HDM), animal dander, molds, tree pollen and weed pollen.

Statistics

All data were analyzed using SPSS (SPSS Statistics version 23.0, IBM). Descriptive analyses (mean, standard deviation, range, median, and percentages) were performed. The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare groups that failed to meet the normal distribution. A Chi-squared test was used to qualitatively analyze categorical independent variables. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Participant Characteristics

A total of 9,527 patients aged 0–17 years (mean age 7.5 ± 5.8 years) completed the SPT examination and entered the study. Overall, 6,071 (63.7%) were boys (mean age 7.5± 2.5 years) and 3,456 (36.3%) were girls (mean age 7.4 ± 2.7years). A total of 5,100 patients (53.5%) had AR, 1,771 patients (18.6%) had AS, 1,864 patients (19.6%) had AS with AR, and 792 (8.3%) were diagnosed with non-respiratory allergic diseases. Boys (69.5%, 4,218/6,071) had a higher positive rate in SPT results than girls (59.8%, 2,067/3,456; χ2 = 91.7, P < 0.01). Demographic data are reported in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of cases with received SPT.

Prevalence of Sensitization to Aeroallergens in Different Groups

The top five aeroallergens in terms of positive rates were Japanese Hop (36.2%), Alternaria (34.6%), Artemisia (31.5%), Fraxinus (30.64%) and D. farina (28.1%; Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Prevalence of different kinds of aeroallergens.

The prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens was 56.1% (1,442/2,570) in the 0–5 year-old group, 69.2% (4,274/6,178) in the 6–11 year-old group, and 73.0% (569/779) in the 12–17 year-old group. Significant differences were found among the three groups (P < 0.01).

The prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens was 64.6% (3,297/5,100) in the AR group, 69.6% (1,233/1,771) in the AS group and 70.1% (1,307/1,864) in the AS with AR group, respectively. There were no significant differences between AS and AS with AR groups (P > 0.05), but patients in these two groups had significantly higher positive reactions than those with AR (P < 0.01).

Prevalence of Sensitization to Indoor Aeroallergens

From low to high age groups, the positive detection rates of D. farinae were 20.3, 30.6 and 33.5%, respectively, followed by D. pteronyssinus (15.7, 24.8 and 30.0%) and cat dander (8.6, 19.8, and 27.9%, respectively), while dog dander and cockroach showed the same trend. Almost all of the groups showed significant differences, except for D. farinae between 6–11 and 12–17 years groups (χ2 = 2.7, P > 0.05; Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Comparison of prevalence of indoor aeroallergens in different age groups (**P < 0.01).

In different disease groups, the strongly positive detection rates of D. farinae were 16.6% in the AR group, 26.1% in the asthma group and 22.9% in the AS with AR group, followed by D. pteronyssinus (14.3, 21.5, and 20.0%) and cat dander (7.6, 10.5, and 9.7%, respectively). The strongly positive detection rates of HDM and cat dander in asthmatic children and patients with AS and AR were significantly higher than those with AR (P < 0.05; Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Comparison of prevalence of indoor aeroallergens in different disease groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

Prevalence of Sensitization to Outdoor Aeroallergens

The prevalence of sensitization to outdoor allergens varied greatly among the different age groups. The top three allergens with regards to positive detection rates of outdoor aeroallergens were Alternaria (30.9%), Japanese Hop (26.7%) and Artemisia (23.7%) in the preschool age group. With regards to patients aged 6–11 years, the first three were Japanese Hop (39.2%), Alternaria (36.4%), and Fraxinus pollen (34.4%). Meanwhile, Japanese Hop (43.8%), Sabina (41.1%), and birch pollen (39.6%) became increasingly common among adolescents (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Comparison of prevalence of outdoor aeroallergens in different age groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

The prevalence of aeroallergens showed that the proportional increase was consistent with age, except for Alternaria (P < 0.01; Figure 3). Alternaria had the highest positive rate in early school age before 12 years (χ2 = 23.5, P < 0.01, compared to 0–5-year; χ2 = 3.9, P < 0.05, compared to the 12–17-year group). The adolescents had similar results to the early school age group, and they were both significantly higher than those of preschool patients (P < 0.01). In preschool and school-age patients, the important airborne pollens were mainly composed of weed pollen, including Japanese Hop and Artemisia, while in adolescents these were Japanese Hop and tree pollen (Sabina and Birch; Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Trend chart of strongly prevalence of outdoor aeroallergens in different age groups.

In the AR group, the top three strongly positive sensitization to aeroallergens were pollens: Japanese Hop (24.2%), Artemisia (21.9%), and Fraxinus (18.4%). Weed pollen, including Artemisia, Japanese Hop, and Alternaria, were the main sensitization allergens in patients with AS (25.86, 24.22, and 21.34%, respectively), as well as the AS with AR group (25.0, 23.6, and 21.2%, respectively; Figure 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Comparison of prevalence of outdoor aeroallergens in different disease groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

There were more patients with strongly positive reactions to Alternaria in AS (χ2 = 10.2, P < 0.01) and AS with AR groups (χ2 = 9.7, P < 0.01) than those in the AR group. Nearly no statistically significant differences were found in strongly positive sensitization to pollen among the three groups (P > 0.05), except that patients with rhinitis had a lower proportion of sensitization to Poplar, Chenopodium album, and Artemisia pollen than asthmatic children (χ2 = 11.5, P < 0.05; Figure 6).

Prevalence of Multiple Sensitizations to Aeroallergens

Multiple sensitizations with aeroallergens were 45.7% (1,175/2,570) in the preschool age group, 61.2% (3,781/6,178) in 6–11 years, and 66.1% (515/779) in adolescents, respectively. Statistical differences were found among the groups (P < 0.01; Figure 7).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Comparison of multiple sensitizations in different groups (**P < 0.01).

The prevalence of multiple sensitizations was 44.6% (2,273/5,100) in the AR group, 50.3% (890/1,771) in the AS group, and 49.5% (922/1,864) in the AS with AR group. No significant difference was found between asthmatic children with and without allergic rhinitis (P > 0.05), but asthmatic patients had significantly higher multiple positive reactions than those with AR (P < 0.01; Figure 7).

Asthmatic patients had a much higher prevalence of HDM, animal dander and Alternaria than those with allergic rhinitis (P < 0.05). No differences were found in the prevalence of tree pollen while AS with AR group had a higher prevalence of weed pollen than the other two groups (P < 0.05); (Figure 8).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Comparison of prevalence of aeroallergens in different disease groups (*P < 0.05, **P <0.01).

Discussion

Atopic diseases, including allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis and food allergy, are considered epidemic diseases in the 21st century, with increasing prevalence worldwide. The prevalence of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis in children has risen significantly in China (79). These diseases impose heavy medical burden on public health and families worldwide. Allergen sensitization is an important risk factor for the development, persistence, and severity of atopic diseases. At the early stage of allergic march, the identification of sensitization to specific allergens in children is important for environmental interventions and medical treatment. This study retrospectively analyzed the SPT results of 9527 patients to help clarify allergen profiles in children with respiratory allergies in Greater Beijing Region.

Gender disparity in asthma began early in childhood and influenced the development of asthma with a higher prevalence and more wheezing in boys than in girls. Our previous studies also showed that boys had a much higher prevalence of asthma and food allergies than girls in China (9, 10). Boys had increased atopy compared to girls prior to adolescence, as measured by specific IgE or SPT to common allergens (1113). The results of this survey suggest that boys with atopic diseases had a higher prevalence of aeroallergens. All these findings indicated that atopy and allergen sensitization were more common in boys than in girls, and may provide a rationale for increased gender disparity in asthma and other atopic diseases prevalence in children.

Similar to many other Asian countries, HDM was the most predominant sensitized allergen in the indoor environment in this study. Among the positive subjects, D. farinae, D. pteronyssinus and cat dander were the most common indoor inhaled allergens. Differences in aeroallergen sensitization with age were observed. The prevalence of sensitization to D. farinae was approximately 20.3% in children under 5 years of age, and increased with age to 33.5% in those older than 12 years. Similar trends were observed for D. pteronyssinus and cat dander. This pattern of increasing HDM sensitization with age has also been observed in other Asian children with asthma (14, 15). HDM sensitization is closely associated with wheezing and asthma in atopic children. A multicenter study showed that sensitization to aeroallergens was positively associated with asthma and an earlier onset of more severe allergic airway diseases in China (16). Sensitization to HDM was the main risk factor for the increased wheezing in 13–14 years old schoolchildren in Guangzhou (3). We also found the relationship between strongly positive sensitization to HDM and asthma was much closer.

In Western countries, animal dander is the most common aeroallergen in children. Within the past decade, the prevalence of sensitization to pet allergens in patients with AR increased at an annual rate of 1.3% in Guangzhou (17). Sensitization to pet allergens in asthmatic children was as high as 39.25% in this survey, which was much higher than that observed 10 years ago (18, 19). According to relevant reports, by 2019, there were 73.55 million pet owners in cities and towns in China. Cat dander was the second most sensitized indoor allergen in addition to HDM, which may be due to an increasing number of cat lovers. A cohort study showed that animal dander (particularly cat) sensitization during the first 6 years of life was independently associated with increased asthma and rhinitis risk, regardless of the respective exposure at birth (20). The prevalence of strongly positive sensitization to cat dander was much higher in asthmatic children regardless of whether they had rhinitis comorbidity. These findings indicate HDM and cats are important indoor allergens associated with an increased asthma risk in atopic children, and HDM and cats should be highly considered in the management of indoor inhaled allergens.

Age distribution seems to play an important role in outdoor aeroallergens. Sensitization rate to tree pollen and weed pollen were both increased with age. The overall prevalence of Alternaria sensitization in children was 34.6%, and predominant sensitization were in patients aged 6–11 years, which is in accordance with the prevalence and age trend reported (2123). An interesting finding was that Alternaria was the most common aeroallergens in preschool children, with a peak Japanese Hop sensitization in the other two groups. Additionally, the prevalence of sensitization to tree pollen (Sabina and Birch) was higher that of other species of pollens, and Sabina was second only to Japanese Hop in adolescents. Thus we concluded that weed pollen allergens were more important in the early stage of life in children with atopic diseases, and the peak age of sensitization to tree pollen was delayed in adolescents. The occurrence and development of pollen allergy mainly depends on the genetic susceptibility and exposed pollen concentration. Unlike the combined weed pollen, which typically has a much longer flowering season with more days of higher pollen concentrations, the individual tree pollen has peak times over short periods of 2–4 weeks with lower concentrations. In addition, tree pollen seasons can overlap significantly, and the release of pollen from some species is known to occur over a short time period, and may only reach high levels for a few days (24). Tree pollen accounted for 30% of the total annual pollen and while weed pollen nearly double that of amount in Beijing, and weed pollen had a stronger sensitized capability (25). We speculated that tree pollen had to take a relatively longer period of repeated exposure to achieve sensitization in childhood because of its shorter flowering time, lower concentration and sensitized capability.

The sensitization rate to pollens was almost universally low among all the Asian countries except for India and Japan, while atopic patients in Europe and the United States were more highly sensitized to pollens (26). Compared to previous studies, which showed atopic children mostly sensitized to HDM in 2001 and more sensitive to molds in 2010 (18, 19), we found pollen had replaced HDM as well as molds as the most predominant aeroallergen in this survey. Japanese hops (36.2%) and Fraxinus (30.64%) were the most common pollens in autumn and spring, respectively. Over the last few decades, climate change due to global warming, carbon dioxide emissions, and changing rainfall patterns have affected the global distribution of aeroallergens and their sensitization modes. The variation in sensitization to airborne pollens was mainly due to species and quantities of pollen had rapidly increased, and pollen abundance in the air of Beijing increased by 2.83 times within 15 years, which led to the incidence rate of pollinosis correspondingly increasing at the same time (27, 28). In addition, some other possible reasons for changes in aeroallergen sensitization patterns included rapid urbanization, air pollution, improved hygiene conditions, and more attention to children's lifestyle, such as increased outdoor activities.

The prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens as well as multiple sensitizations increased with age, which indicated that increasing age predicted allergic sensitization and multiple allergen sensitizations (29). When children with allergy and symptoms of asthma were studied, the frequencies of HDM, animal dander and molds sensitivity were higher than those with allergic rhinitis alone. Among the perennial allergens, HDM, cats and Alternaria were most closely related to asthma. Children are exposed to most indoor aeroallergens in early childhood and as perennial allergens, they have to be continuously exposed throughout the year, so these allergens are more closely related to asthma. Accordingly, pediatricians should advise avoidance of known allergens in children with high risk of respiratory allergy. To those with AR or AS who have identified allergens that correlate with clinical symptoms, environmental controls (i.e, bed covers and acaricides, removal of pets, the use of dehumidifier and air filtration systems, etc) should be recommended. Studied have shown multiple sensitization status at all single time-points associated with an increased risk of asthma at age 13 whereas monosensitization was inconsistently associated with asthma (30). We also found that the asthma group had more patients with multiple sensitizations to aeroallergens than the AR group, making the repetitive sensitization measurements essential when assessing the risk of developing asthma.

Limitations

This survey was a retrospective study conducted in a children's hospital in Greater Beijing Region. Patients in this study might not be representative. However, it is a large sample population covering almost all ages of children. We carried out a comprehensive and detailed aeroallergen SPT measurement and compared the results with those of our previous studies.

In conclusion, this study revealed that prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens increased with age in children with atopic diseases in Greater Beijing Region. Alternaria was the predominant allergen before 5 years, and tree pollen had a delayed sensitization in adolescents. Sensitization to perennial allergens such as HDM, cats and Alternaria was more strongly associated with asthma risk. Sensitization to more than one allergen significantly increased the prevalence of asthma. The identification of specific allergens makes them potential targets for intervention and prevention strategies.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Capital Institute of Pediatrics. Written informed consent from the participants' legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

LS and JY designed the study and revised the manuscript. KG drafted the manuscript. WZ analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. LS, CL, JZ, and YC enrolled patients and revised the manuscript. All authors had final approval of the version to be published.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2020-I2M-C&T-B-007), KG Project Leader; Beijing Hospital Administration Scientific Research Training Program (PX2021051), LS Project Leader. No funds received for open access publication fees from our institution, library, and other grants.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

References

1. Haahtela T, von Hertzen L, Mäkelä M, Hannuksela M, Allergy Programme Working Group. Finnish allergy programme 2008-2018–time to act and change the course. Allergy. (2008) 63:634–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01712.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wahn U, Lau S, Bergmann R, Kulig M, Forster J, Bergmann K, et al. Indoor allergen exposure is a risk factor for sensitization during the first three years of life. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (1997) 99:763–9. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(97)80009-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Li J, Wang H, Chen Y, Zheng J, Wong GWK, Zhong N. HDM sensitization is the main risk factor for the increase in prevalence of wheeze in 13- to 14-year-old schoolchildren in Guangzhou city, China. Clin Exp Allergy. (2013) 43:1171–9. doi: 10.1111/cea.12157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Guan K, Liu B, Wang M, Li Z, Chang C, Cui L, et al. Principles of allergen immunotherapy and its clinical application in China: contrasts and comparisons with the USA. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2019) 57:128. doi: 10.1007/s12016-019-08751-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bousquet J, Heinzerling L, Bachert C, Papadopoulos NG, Bousquet PJ, Burney PG, et al. Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens. Allergy. (2012) 67:18–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02728.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bousquet J, Lockey R, Malling H J. Allergen immunotherapy: therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases. A WHO position paper. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (1998) 102:558–62. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70271-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Guo Y, Li P, Tang J, Han X, Zou X, Xu G, et al. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Chinese children aged 1-7 ys. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:29751. doi: 10.1038/srep29751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wang XD, Zheng M, Lou HF, Wang CS, Zhang Y, Bo MY, et al. An increased prevalence of self-reported allergic rhinitis in major Chinese cities from 2005 to 2011. Allergy. (2016) 71:1170–80. doi: 10.1111/all.12874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Sha L, Shao M, Liu C, Li S, Li Z, Luo Y, et al. The prevalence of asthma in children: a comparison between the year of 2010 and 2000 in urban China. Chin J Tubercul Resp Dis. (2015) 38:664–8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2015.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sha L, Shao M, Liu C, Wu Y, Chen Y. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of food allergies among children younger than ages 14 years in a Beijing urban region. Allergy Asthma Proc. (2019) 40:e1–7. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wijga A, Tabak C, Postma DS, Kerkhof M, Wieringa MH, Hoekstra MO, et al. Sex differences in asthma during the first 8 years of life: the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy (PIAMA) birth cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2011) 127:275–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sheehan W J, Rangsithienchai PA, Baxi SN, Gardynski A, Bharmanee A, Israel E, et al. Age-specific prevalence of outdoor and indoor aeroallergen sensitization in Boston. Clin Pediatr. (2010) 49:579–85. doi: 10.1177/0009922809354326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mohammad HR, Belgrave D, Harding KK, Murray CS, Simpson A, Custovic A, et al. Age, sex and the association between skin test responses and IgE titres with asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. (2016) 27:313–9. doi: 10.1111/pai.12534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Shin JW, Sue JH, Song TW, Kim KW, Kim ES, Sohn MH, et al. Atopy and house dust mite sensitization as risk factors for asthma in children. Yonsei Med J. (2005) 46:629–34. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yadav A, Naidu R. Clinical manifestation and sensitization of allergic children from Malaysia. Asia Pac Allergy. (2015) 5:78–83. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2015.5.2.78

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Li J, Sun B, Huang Y, Lin X, Zhao D, Tan G, et al. A multicentre study assessing the prevalence of sensitizations in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis in China. Allergy. (2009) 64:1083–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01967.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wang W, Huang X, Chen Z, Zheng R, Chen Y, Zhang G, et al. Prevalence and trends of sensitisation to aeroallergens in patients with allergic rhinitis in Guangzhou, China: a 10-year retrospective study. BMJ Open. (2016) 6:e011085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Zhao J, Ma Y, Chen Y, Han Z. Prevalence of allergic respiratory disorders and skin prick testing in Beijing urban and suburban children: a comparative study. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2003) 83:1879–81.

Google Scholar

19. Sha L, Shao MJ, Lu X, Cui H, Ma H, Zhu W, et al. Comparative study on the allergic characteristics and trigger factors of rural and urban children asthma in Beijing. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr. (2017) 32:63–6.

Google Scholar

20. Stoltz DJ, Jackson DJ, Evans MD, Gangnon RE, Tisler CJ, Gern JE, et al. Specific patterns of allergic sensitization in early childhood and asthma & rhinitis risk. Clin Exp Allergy. (2013) 43:233–41. doi: 10.1111/cea.12050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Calabria CW, Dice JP, Hagan LL. Prevalence of positive skin test responses to 53 allergens in patients with rhinitis symptoms. Allergy Asthma Proc. (2007) 28:442–8. doi: 10.2500/aap.2007.28.3016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Eggleston PA, Rosenstreich D, Lynn H, Gergen P, Baker D, Kattan M, et al. Relationship of indoor allergen exposure to skin test sensitivity in inner-city children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (1998) 102:563–70. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70272-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Nolles G, Hoekstra M, Schouten J, Gerritsen J, Kauffman H. Prevalence of immunoglobulin E for fungi in atopic children. Clin Exp Allergy. (2001) 31:1564–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01186.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Osborne NJ, Alcock I, Wheeler BW, Hajat S, Sarran C, Clewlow Y, et al. Pollen exposure and hospitalization due to asthma exacerbations: daily time series in a European city. Int J Biometeorol. (2017) 61:1837–48. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1369-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Meng L, Wang X, Ouyang Z, Ren Y, Wang Q. Seasonal dynamics of airborne pollen in Beijing Urban Area. Acta Ecologica Sinica. (2013) 33:2381–7. doi: 10.5846/stxb201204100502

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Tham EH, Lee AJ, Bever HV. Aeroallergen sensitization and allergic disease phenotypes in Asia. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. (2016) 34:181–9. doi: 10.12932/AP0770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhi LI, Hai-Juan HE, Sun GQ, Tang R, Jian-Qing GU, Sun JL. Allergy-related airborne pollen in urban area of Beijing. Basic Clin Med. (2015) 35:734–8.

Google Scholar

28. Hai-Juan HE, Liang-Lu W, Hong-Yu Z. Analysis of airborne pollens in Beijing urban area. Chin J Allergy Clin Immunol.2008;2:179−183. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8705.2008.03.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Nagarajan S, Ahmad S, Quinn M, Agrawal S, Manilich E, Concepcion E, et al. Allergic sensitization and clinical outcomes in urban children with asthma, 2013-2016. Allergy Asthma Proc. (2018) 39:281–8. doi: 10.2500/aap.2018.39.4147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Schoos AM, Jelding-Dannemand E, Stokholm J, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H, Chawes BL, et al. Single and multiple time-point allergic sensitization during childhood and risk of asthma by age 13. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. (2019) 30:716–23. doi: 10.1111/pai.13109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: aeroallergens, respiratory allergy, atopy, skin prick test, children

Citation: Guan K, Zhu W, Sha L, Liu C, Zhao J, Yin J and Chen Y (2022) Prevalence of Sensitization to Aeroallergens in Greater Beijing Region Children With Respiratory Allergy. Front. Pediatr. 10:848357. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.848357

Received: 04 January 2022; Accepted: 29 April 2022;
Published: 19 May 2022.

Edited by:

Ting Fan Leung, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Reviewed by:

Pattraporn Satitsuksanoa, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Wenwei Zhong, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Copyright © 2022 Guan, Zhu, Sha, Liu, Zhao, Yin and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Li Sha, c2hhbGlfemgmI3gwMDA0MDtzaW5hLmNvbQ==; Jia Yin, ZG9jdG9yeWluamlhJiN4MDAwNDA7MTYzLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.