Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 02 December 2022
Sec. Pediatric Rheumatology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Relationship Between Puberty and Immune-Driven Disease View all 5 articles

Effect of puberty on the immune system: Relevance to multiple sclerosis

  • 1Department of Immunology, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 2Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 3Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Puberty is a dynamic period marked by changing levels of sex hormones, the development of secondary sexual characteristics and reproductive maturity. This period has profound effects on various organ systems, including the immune system. The critical changes that occur in the immune system during pubertal onset have been shown to have implications for autoimmune conditions, including Multiple Sclerosis (MS). MS is rare prior to puberty but can manifest in children after puberty. This disease also has a clear female preponderance that only arises following pubertal onset, highlighting a potential role for sex hormones in autoimmunity. Early onset of puberty has also been shown to be a risk factor for MS. The purpose of this review is to overview the evidence that puberty regulates MS susceptibility and disease activity. Given that there is a paucity of studies that directly evaluate the effects of puberty on the immune system, we also discuss how the immune system is different in children and mice of pre- vs. post-pubertal ages and describe how gonadal hormones may regulate these immune mechanisms. We present evidence that puberty enhances the expression of co-stimulatory molecules and cytokine production by type 2 dendritic cells (DC2s) and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), increases T helper 1 (Th1), Th17, and T follicular helper immunity, and promotes immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody production. Overall, this review highlights how the immune system undergoes a functional maturation during puberty, which has the potential to explain the higher prevalence of MS and other autoimmune diseases seen in adolescence.

Introduction

Puberty is a physiological stage of life when a child becomes capable of sexual reproduction (1). Puberty is initiated by an increase in the pulsatile release of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) from neurons in the hypothalamus, which triggers gonadotropin secretion from the pituitary and the subsequent maturation of the gonads (1). Outwardly, puberty manifests as the development of secondary sex characteristics including pubarche (growth of pubic and axillary hair), voice lowering and facial hair growth in males, and breast development and hip widening in females. However, the rise in gonadal hormones initiates physiological changes in other organ systems, including the immune system (1). In this regard, puberty serves as a point of inflection for increased development of T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases, which includes multiple sclerosis (MS) (2, 3).

MS is an autoimmune disease that targets central nervous system (CNS) myelin (4). MS is rare prior to puberty and the incidence of this disease increases drastically in children of post-pubertal ages, particularly in females (5, 6). There is emerging evidence that the environmental factors that contribute to MS, including the development of obesity, repeated concussion injury, and Epstein Barr infection regulate MS susceptibility in adolescence as opposed to childhood or adulthood. This further points to puberty as a time when the immune system is more prone to autoimmunity development (7). Experiencing early puberty is also a risk factor for the development of MS in women (8). How puberty modifies the immune system to stimulate autoimmune mechanisms in MS is not completely understood. Here, we overview the relationship between puberty, pubertal timing and MS risk. We also discuss how puberty enhances the development of CNS autoimmunity in MS and in the animal model of MS, experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE). Finally, we review how the immune landscape changes from pre- to post-pubertal ages to better understand how puberty enhances cellular and humoral immune mechanisms that are relevant to MS.

The hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis and hormonal changes with puberty

The hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis is the physiological cascade that triggers the onset of puberty and gonadal hormone production (9). The HPG axis is first activated prenatally in humans, becomes quiescent shortly after birth, and remains suppressed during childhood before resuming activity just prior to puberty (9). The onset of puberty is characterized by an increase in the pulsatile release of GnRH from neurons in the hypothalamus (9). GnRH is released into the portal circulation where it binds to GnRH receptors on gonadotropin cells in the anterior pituitary (9). GnRH signaling stimulates the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) from the pituitary, which stimulate gonadal maturation and the synthesis of gonadal hormones (9). Gonadal hormones also feedback on the HPG to regulate the release of GnRH; this negative feedback regulation forms the basis of the menstrual cycle in females (9). The maturing gonads secrete gonadal hormones including testosterone, estradiol (E2) and progesterone and these hormone levels gradually rise throughout puberty (9). All three of these hormones are present in males and females, however, there is a sex disparity in their levels, with adult males exhibiting higher levels of testosterone than females and females exhibiting higher levels of E2 and progesterone than males (10). It is the sex disparity in testosterone and E2 levels that is considered to be the major factor regulating sex differences in the immune system (11).

It is still unclear what initiates the pulsatile release of GnRH at the onset of puberty. It is thought that GnRH+ neurons undergo synaptic pruning and dendrite reorganization during puberty to help regulate inputs provided by both inhibitory (GABA-producing) and excitatory (glutamate- and Kisspeptin-producing) neurons (12). Kisspeptin is a neuropeptide that is crucial for the initiation of puberty and the expression increases in a population of neurons in the hypothalamus that also express neurokinin B and dynorphin (called KNDy neurons) just before pubertal onset (13). Kisspeptin is released from the nerve terminals of KNDy neurons and binds to its receptors on GnRH+ neurons to activate GnRH secretion [12]. What triggers the initial expression of Kiss1 in KNDy neurons just prior to puberty is also not well understood. One hypothesis is puberty occurs because of a decreased sensitivity of Kiss1 to negative regulation by gonadal hormones. KNDy neurons express both the estrogen receptor (ER)-α and the androgen receptor (AR) (13). Providing rodents an oophorectomy surgery prior to puberty increases GnRH secretion, even in pre-pubertal animals, indicating that the low levels of E2 present prior to puberty are sufficient to suppress the HPG axis (14). Furthermore, deletion of Esr1 (that encodes ER-α) from glutaminergic neurons, hastens puberty (15). Puberty is also accelerated by metabolic signals including leptin levels that rise in response to the increase in adiposity. Leptin positively regulates Kiss1 expression in KNDy neurons indirectly to regulate gonadotropin secretion in the pituitary (16). Overall, there is a very complex interplay between estrogen and metabolic inputs on GnRH+ and KNDy neurons during the pubertal period that regulates the onset of puberty, sexual maturation, and the increased production of gonadal hormones.

Effects of puberty and pubertal timing on MS incidence and disease activity

The prevalence of MS before and after puberty

The effect of puberty on MS can be appreciated by comparing the incidence of MS in male and female children of different ages or pubertal statuses. A large study of pediatric MS patients in the United States observed that a large majority (85%–89%) of pediatric MS cases have a post-pubertal onset (5, 6, 17). In this study, pubertal status was estimated by Tanner staging and by age at menarche, which is the age at which females experience first menses. Similar observations were seen in German (18) and a multi-national (6) studies of pediatric MS that examined the prevalence of MS in children of pre- and post-pubertal ages. A common observation in these studies is that the female to male ratio of MS emerges post-puberty, being 1 : 1 in children of pre-pubertal ages and 2–3 : 1 in children of post-pubertal ages (5, 6, 18, 19). One of these studies further reported that the peak age of onset of pediatric MS trailed menarche by 2 years (4), suggesting that changes in the immune system triggered by puberty can take years to manifest into the first MS clinical attack in humans. Together, these data suggest that puberty is a point of inflection of increased MS risk, particularly in female children.

Effect of pubertal timing on MS risk and progression: relationship to childhood obesity

A number of studies have observed a relationship between early menarche in females and increased MS risk. Particularly, each one-year increase in menarche is associated with an approximately 10% decrease in the risk of MS (5, 8, 17, 2129) (summarized in Table 1). This effect of pubertal timing on MS risk is not apparent in males (5, 8, 17). However, it is controversial whether the effect of early menarche on MS risk relates to pubertal timing or increased adiposity. Some studies that explored the relationship between age at menarche and MS risk also measured body mass index (BMI) or estimated body size at the time of puberty (5, 17, 27, 29) and found that increased BMI had a comparatively stronger effect than early menarche in predicting MS (5, 17, 29). However, since the age of puberty and adiposity are inextricably linked, it has been difficult to distinguish which of these two factors is the true enhancer of MS disease mechanisms. Recently, Mendelian randomization studies have been performed to sort out the role of these two factors in MS. These studies examined the effects of genetic polymorphisms that associate with early menarche or childhood obesity on MS development (17, 30). These studies concluded that genetically predicted age at puberty and BMI both associate with increased MS risk but when BMI is controlled for, the association between early menarche and MS disappears (17, 30). These results suggest that it is the increase of fat mass in girls who experienced early menarche that is the major driver of the increased MS risk. Indeed, there is evidence that increased adiposity can enhance the severity of the animal model of MS, called experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) (3135). Short-term (2–10 weeks) diet-induced obesity (DIO) enhances T helper cell-mediated inflammation in the CNS in EAE (31). This intervention also increases IL-6 and Th17 cytokine production in male mice (32, 33). This effect of DIO in enhancing Th17 cell response may relate to the upregulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 in the T cells, which is a regulator of Th17 cell differentiation (33). These studies in mice thus provide a potential mechanism for how increased adiposity in adolescence may accelerate the development of CNS autoimmunity.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary table of studies that examined the relationship between early menarche and MS risk. Studies including adult MS cases were limited to those who sampled age of puberty in at least 100 MS cases and controls. Pediatric studies that had smaller samples are included.

There is evidence that early menarche or accompanying increases in adiposity also enhance MS disease activity in children. In a Canadian prospective study that examined disease outcomes in female children who experienced an incident demyelinating event, it was found that each year increase in age at menarche associated with a 36% decrease in the probability of having a second demyelinating event and a diagnosis of MS (36). Children who were more susceptible to having a second attack also had higher BMI percentiles than the children who did not (36). By contrast, a large study of adult women who experienced an incident demyelinating event (termed Clinical Isolated Syndrome or CIS) reported that age-at-menarche had no predictive value for MS diagnosis (37); However, the difference in this study is that BMI at menarche was adjusted for, thereby removing the influence of BMI on disease activity. These findings reinforce the idea that increased adiposity may underlie the effect of pubertal timing on MS.

Studies by Waubant and colleagues who followed children with MS prospectively were able to directly study the effect of puberty on MS disease activity. They compared annualized relapse rates in their patients in the pre-, post-, or peri-pubertal periods, which were defined as the 6 months before, after, or spanning menarche onset in females. In the boys, these pubertal stages were estimated by landmark ages (20, 38). Though the number of children sampled was small, relapse rates were found to be significantly higher in the peri-pubertal period in both boys and girls (20, 38). Furthermore, BMI increased from the pre to the peri-pubertal period, but was not different between the peri- and post-pubertal periods (20). These findings suggest that the hormonal environment associated with puberty is driving enhanced autoimmune mechanisms. If autoimmunity is indeed initiated at the time of puberty, it would go further in explaining the positive correlation between age at menarche and age of MS onset observed in some studies (5, 23).

A few studies have also investigated the relationship between menarche onset and disability progression in MS. D'Hooghe and colleagues reported that while age at menarche did not alter the probability of MS patients reaching an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of 6 (a disability landmark when patients need a cane to ambulate), those with progressive-onset MS who experienced menarche after aged 13 years were 40% less likely to reach this disability landmark; BMI was not considered in this study (39). By contrast, in the study of CIS that adjusted for BMI, it was reported that age-at-menarche had no predictive value on time to reaching EDSS3 or EDSS6 (37). The underlying mechanisms for how a later age at menarche may slow the onset of progressive MS and its relationship to past or current BMI remain unknown.

In conclusion, these findings suggest that the peri-pubertal hormone environment is more conducive to the initiation of MS, particularly in females, and that increased adiposity may be a factor in the effects of pubertal timing on MS disease activity.

Artificial enhancement of the HPG axis triggers relapses in MS

Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are used to overcome infertility in women (40). Usual procedures require suppression of the HPG axis, followed by hyper-stimulation of ovaries with gonadotropins to induce ovulation in a controlled manner. Progesterone support is also given during the luteal phase of the cycle, prior to fertilization (41). Suppression of the HPG axis is achieved by treatment with either agonists or antagonists for the GnRH receptor, which both have the same effect of suppressing GnRH receptor signaling. The major difference between these modes of HPG suppression is that GnRH agonists initially cause the secretion of gonadotropins and gonadal hormones prior to downregulation of GnRH receptor expression (42).

It has been reported that up to 14% of women diagnosed with MS undergo ART treatment (43). A number of studies have investigated the effects of ART on MS disease activity (4448). While these investigations were individually limited by small sample sizes, a meta-analysis of combined data concluded that ART increases relapse rates in the 3-month period following treatment (44). Interestingly, ART protocols that use GnRH receptor agonists and antagonists both increase relapse rates, suggesting a role for ovarian stimulation in this effect. Nonetheless, the protocols that used GnRH receptor agonists had an even more profound effect in increasing relapse rates (44). A Brazilian study reporting on ART using GnRH receptor agonists, found that ART induced a 7-fold increase in the relapse rate in the MS patients compared to baseline levels (45). This ART regimen induced a marked increase in the levels of ovarian hormones and an increase in the expression of the GnRH receptors on immune cells at 10–14 days post-treatment. Furthermore, when myelin-specific T cells were grown from the blood of MS patients collected before and after ART, it was found that cells isolated post-ART exhibited much higher proliferation and Th1 cytokine production following in vitro anti-CD3 stimulation. These results suggested that an increased number of pro-inflammatory T cells were present in the blood at 3 months post-ART (45). Post-ART MS patients also exhibited a higher frequency of MOG-specific IgG producing cells in the blood as detected by ELISPOT (45). Interestingly, GnRH was also found to be produced at higher levels by immune cells post-ART and this peptide had an effect of enhancing myelin-specific T cell responses and MOG-specific antibody production in vitro. These findings of ART in MS are striking and provide proof of concept that stimulation by GnRH enhances autoimmune mechanisms in MS. These findings of GnRH agonists on the immune system further raise the possibility that GnRH or gonadotropins, may be additional players in the enhanced CNS autoimmunity seen post-puberty.

Puberty alters the epigenetic landscape of human immune cells

In an effort to understand how the immune system changes with puberty, Thompson and colleagues studied whole genome DNA methylation patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of males and females before and after puberty (49). They found 445 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in the PBMCs of pre- and post-pubertal children with the majority (78%) being unique to girls, 11.2% being unique to boys and the remaining shared between the sexes. Network analysis on the genes near the DMRs identified pathways involved in both immune and reproductive function. Furthermore, the majority of genes located near the DMRs in females contained estrogen response elements (49), consistent with the idea that E2 was mediating some of these changes in methylation.

Similarly, a longitudinal study in Denmark that explored genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in 22 girls and 32 boys before and after puberty identified several CpG islands that closely tracked with pubertal transition in boys; none significantly tracked with puberty in girls (50). It was speculated that the lack of association in girls was related to the analysis being underpowered to detect differences. The most significant region for both sexes, when analyzed in boys and girls alone or together, was a region on chromosome 7 that contained the last exon and 3′ UTR of SLC12A9 and the promoter of TRIP6. Changes in methylation levels in this genomic region significantly associated with testosterone levels in boys and FSH and LH levels in both sexes. While the function of SLC12A9 has not been studied in the immune system, the function of TRIP6 has. This protein can associate with TRAF6 to induce its oligomerization and polyubiquitination, which triggers the activation of the Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling pathway (51). There is also evidence that the presence of TRAF6 can promote inflammation in murine models of colitis (51). Thus, the upregulation of TRIP6 could be one means by which the human immune system matures with puberty. Taken together, these studies suggest that puberty affects the epigenetic landscape of human immune cells; however, more studies are needed to understand how the immune system is functionally different before and after puberty.

Puberty alters autoimmune mechanisms in MS animal models

It is difficult to study how autoimmune mechanisms change with puberty to initiate MS, since blood samples are typically collected after puberty and after the disease has already started. Studies in animal models help to fill this knowledge gap. EAE is a murine model for CNS autoimmunity that shares many pathological features with MS including the CNS infiltration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-producing Th1 and Th17 cells, inflammatory monocytes, demyelination, and axon injury (5258). In contrast to the situation in MS where autoantigen is unknown, the autoantigen in EAE is controlled and is used to induce the disease. EAE is most commonly induced in susceptible strains of rodents by immunization with an emulsion containing myelin proteins or peptides and Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA), sometimes with co-administration of pertussis toxin (59). EAE can also be induced by transfer of myelin-specific T cells into naïve recipient mice: This mode of induction is called passive EAE or adoptive transfer EAE (60). In adoptive transfer EAE, draining lymph nodes and spleens containing myelin-reactive T cells are collected from mice pre-immunized with myelin antigens and CFA. These cells are reactivated ex vivo with antigen, and then transferred into naïve recipient mice. In addition, EAE can also occur spontaneously in mice that overexpress T cell receptors (TCRs) specific for myelin antigens (61)..

In the naïve state in both humans and mice, myelin-specific T helper cells develop in the thymus and seed the peripheral lymphoid organs; however, these T cells remain in a state of ignorance unless they encounter self-antigen major histocompatibility complex II (MHC II) (signal 1) in the context of co-stimulatory receptors (B7.1/B7.2) (signal 2) on the same DCs. In EAE, danger signals provided by the CFA activate toll-like receptors on DCs that trigger the upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules and production of IL-6 and IL-12 family cytokines by these cells (signal 3) (62). These changes license the DCs to activate myelin-specific T helper cells, which then proliferate and differentiate into Th1 and Th17 cells in the draining lymph nodes and spleen. These Th cells then circulate through the blood and lung before entering the CNS through blood-meningeal and blood brain barriers (63). At CNS barrier sites, myelin specific Th1 and Th17 effector cells encounter myelin peptides presented by local antigen presenting cells (APCs). These autoreactive T cells become re-activated and produce chemokines to recruit other leukocytes to the CNS, as well as effector cytokines, including interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-17, and GM-CSF, which can promote inflammation and lesion formation in the CNS white matter.

A number of studies have evaluated the effect of puberty on EAE (Section “Preventing puberty in female SJL mice increases resistance to EAE by keeping DCs in an immature state”) or have compared the development of EAE in mice of pre- and post-pubertal ages (Sections “Neonatal mice are resistant to EAE compared to adults” and “Mice that are transgenic for myelin specific TCRs are vulnerable to EAE in the weeks immediately following onset of puberty”), thereby providing insights into how puberty may enhance autoimmune mechanisms.

Preventing puberty in female SJL mice increases resistance to EAE by keeping DCs in an immature state

In a mouse, pubertal onset occurs between the age of 28 and 35 days as estimated by examining the age at vaginal opening in females (which is confirmed by first estrus) (64) or by determining the age of pre-putial separation in males (65) (Figure 1A). Accordingly, surgical removal of the gonads in mice between 3 and 4 weeks of age can suspend development in the pre-pubertal state. The effects of puberty can be studied by comparing the phenotype of pre-pubertally gonadectomized adult mice and age-matched mice that receive a sham surgery and proceed through puberty normally.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Mice are more prone to EAE post-puberty in induced and T cell receptor transgenic models. (A) Puberty can be estimated in female mice by measuring vaginal opening (first sign), which is confirmed by first estrus or in male mice by measuring the age at pre-putial separation (when the prepuce can be easily separated from the glans penis). Shown is the mean + SEM age of pre-putial separation in male (N = 36), and vaginal opening and first estrus in female (N = 28) C57BL6/J mice. (B) Incidence of EAE observed in female and male SJL/J mice induced at 8 weeks of age with PLP p139-151/CFA that had received a pre-pubertal gonadectomy or sham surgery at the age of 4 weeks. Data shown represents the disease-free survival in mice over 30 days of observation. N = 14 for pre-pubertal females (pre-pubertal oophorectomy), N = 15 for post-pubertal female (pre-pubertal sham surgery), N = 11 for pre-pubertal male (pre-pubertal castration), N = 12 for post-pubertal male (pre-pubertal sham surgery). *Significant by Log-rank test (P < 0.05). (C,D) The number of cases of spontaneous EAE (C), and the incidence of paralysis (D) in MOG TCR transgenic mice over a period of 2 years.

Using this approach, Ahn and colleagues (36) contrasted the effect of pre-pubertal gonadectomy or sham surgery on the development of proteolipid protein peptide (PLP p139–151)/CFA-induced EAE in eight-week-old SJL/J mice. They observed that post-pubertal female mice exhibited an increased incidence of both active and adoptive transfer EAE compared to age-matched pre-pubertal counterparts that had been oophorectomized prior to puberty. However, EAE incidence did not vary between the pre- and post-pubertal age-matched males (see Figures 1B,C). Further studies using the active EAE model in female mice demonstrated that post-pubertal animals exhibited a comparatively larger expansion of myelin-specific T cells in peripheral lymphoid organs than that seen in pre-pubertal mice. This was accompanied by enhanced production of PLP-specific IgG, but not IgM or IgA in the post-pubertal mice. This phenotype did not associate with an altered Th1/Th17/Th2 cytokine balance, differences in the intrinsic activation potential of CD4+ T cells, or alterations in the frequency or function of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells (Treg) (36). Instead, the enhanced EAE incidence seen post-puberty correlated with increased maturation of APC (36). Post-pubertal splenic CD11c+ cells had a higher expression of co-stimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, and CD40 in the steady state and produced higher IL-12p40 compared to pre-pubertal counterparts. Post-pubertal B cells also expressed higher levels of MHC II. Both of these APC populations were more efficient at priming PLP p139–151-reactive T cell receptor transgenic CD4+ T cells in vitro in the presence of added PLP peptide or whole PLP antigen. Importantly, in this model, the pubertal mice did not exhibit altered fat masses or body weights compared to pre-pubertal mice, suggesting that the differences in immune phenotype between pre- and post-pubertal females was due to differences in the sex hormone environment rather than differences in adiposity.

Coinciding with these findings in EAE, pre-pubertal oophorectomy also protects against the development of type I diabetes (66, 67) and systemic lupus erythematosus (68) in murine models. The protective effect of oophorectomy against development of autoimmunity in these models was achieved only when the surgery was done prior to puberty, but not at seven-to-eight weeks of age (67, 68), suggesting that female gonadal hormones somehow imprint the immune system to be more prone to autoimmunity in the period post-puberty. In the murine lupus study, protection afforded by pre-pubertal oophorectomy coincided with a striking paucity of myeloid CD11c+CD11b+ cells (also known as type 2 dendritic cells or DC2 cells) in the spleen (68). DC2 cells are a DC subtype that is most efficient at presenting antigen via MHC Class II to T helper cells (69). Similar to these findings in mice, neonatal humans are reported to have reduced numbers of CD11b+CD11c+ in the circulation compared to that in adults (70). Human DCs from neonates are also reported to have a more immature phenotype compared to adult DCs with lowered expression of co-stimulatory molecules, a lower potential to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-6, IL-12p40, IL-1), and a reduced capacity to prime T helper cells [reviewed in Ref. (71)]. Thus, the maturation of the DC compartment with age and/or puberty is a conserved feature between humans and mice.

DCs are short-lived cells that are continuously being generated from progenitors in the bone marrow. There is strong evidence that the increase in CD11b+CD11c+ DCs seen with puberty in females is, in part, due to E2 effects on the bone marrow. When bone marrow pre-cursors are cultured in the presence of GM-CSF, treatment with E2 (and ER-α agonists, but not AR agonists) enhances the yield of CD11b+CD11c+ DCs [reviewed in Ref. (72)]. ER-α signaling appears to promote CD11b+ DC differentiation by increasing the expression of interferon regulatory factor 4 in DC precursors, which is a transcription factor that is crucial to myeloid DC development (73, 74). The importance of E2 in DC differentiation is exemplified by the findings that when mice were irradiated and re-constituted with a mix of ERα+/+ and ERα−/− bone marrow (75), newly differentiated CD11b+ DCs derived primarily from the ERα+/+ pre-cursors (75). DCs that are generated from bone-marrow precursors in the presence of E2 have been found to be also functionally more competent at priming T helper cells, which correlates with higher expression of MHC II and co-stimulatory molecules, and an enhanced potential of these cells to make IL-12p40 and other cytokines (7678). Therefore, there is strong evidence that E2 enhances myeloid DC development and maturation which heightens autoimmunity in animal models, providing one explanation for the increased incidence of MS seen in females post-puberty (see Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Puberty augments cellular and humoral immunity to enhance CNS autoimmunity. During puberty, DC2 cells become more mature and efficient at presenting antigen to T helper cells resulting in enhanced Th1 and Th17 immunity. This occurs, in part, through increases in the expression of co-stimulatory molecules, but also IL-12p40 (and IL-12 and IL-23) production by these cells. Adoptive transfer EAE studies in mice of pre- and post-pubertal ages have provided evidence that post-pubertal DCs in the CNS may have a higher potential to re-activate Th1/Th17 cells that have reached the CNS site, resulting in increased myelin tissue damage. Increases in E2 with puberty induce higher levels of type I interferon by pDCs which may further enhance Th1 responses. There is evidence that Th1 cells develop more in a female during the post-pubertal state because of the promoting effects of E2 and the inhibiting effects of androgens. T follicular cell responses also develop more efficiently post-puberty which helps promote B cell responses in the germinal center, resulting in higher IgG production. E2 has an effect in increasing the threshold for BCR activation, allowing potential autoreactive B cells to escape deletion in the periphery. The thymus undergoes dramatic changes with puberty resulting in reduced generation of naïve T cells, in particularly Tregs. This loss in thymic output of T cells may trigger the homeostatic proliferation of perinatal T cells that have a higher TCR responsiveness to self-antigen. With maturation, the BCR and TCR responsiveness to self-antigens becomes diminished, favoring the formation of long-lived memory B cell and CD8+ T cell memory cells instead of short-lived effectors. In addition, ILC2 cell numbers decline post-puberty, in part due to suppressive effects of androgens in the bone marrow. Post-pubertal male ILC2s are also more responsive to IL-33 stimulation. Androgens induce ILC2 cells to accumulate in the lymph nodes of male mice during EAE, limiting disease development in this sex through promotion of the Th2 response.

Neonatal mice are resistant to EAE compared to adults

It has been observed that mice of pre-pubertal ages are resistant to both adoptive transfer EAE and active EAE (7982). For example, when the same number of lymph node cells are obtained from EAE donor mice and transferred into SJL/J or C57BL6/J recipient female mice of different ages, mice of pre-pubertal ages (1.5–4 weeks) develop a milder and delayed course of EAE compared to mice of post-pubertal ages (79, 80, 83). For studies in SJL/J mice, males showed a greater resistance to EAE than females after, but not before puberty, suggesting that female susceptibility to EAE is mediated in part by events that occur downstream of T cell priming (80). In adoptive transfer EAE studies in C57BL6/J mice, EAE susceptibility could be restored in neonatal mice by transferring in adult T cell-depleted splenocytes, but not purified B cells (79, 83), suggesting that post-pubertal myeloid cells or DCs were required to reactivate myelin-specific T cells to mediate CNS lesion formation. These studies also reported that MHC II expression in the CNS and spleen compartment increases in the female mice starting at approximately five weeks of age, corresponding to the age of pubertal onset.

Pre-pubertal SJL mice are also resistant to active EAE induced by immunization with PLP p139–151 peptide and CFA compared to older post-pubertal mice and this resistance is apparent until five weeks of age (79, 82, 83). In a study by Hoffstetter and colleagues using the PLP p139–151-induced model of EAE in female SJL mice (82), it was found that while two-week-old SJL mice could mount a myelin-specific Th1 response, Th17 responses were severely compromised, correlating with a reduced ability of neonatal macrophages to produce IL-12p40 (82). Therefore, higher IL-12p40 (or IL-12p70/IL-23) production by myeloid cells is a likely contributor to the enhanced myelin-specific Th1/Th17 immunity seen in SJL mice post-puberty (see Figure 2).

Active EAE development has also been compared between neonatal and adult mice of the C57BL6/J strain. In this model, EAE is induced by immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide encoding amino acids 35–55 (MOG p35–55) and CFA (79, 83). Two-week old female mice are more resistant to EAE than adults, correlating with a reduced expansion of MOG p35–55-specific Th1 and Th17 cells in the periphery of these mice (79, 83). The defect in Th1/Th17 expansion did not relate to intrinsic defects in the T cells; In fact, the two-week-old T cells appeared to be hyper-responsive compared to the adult T cells (79). Instead, similar to the findings for pre-pubertal oophorectomy (68), DC2 cells were found to be under-represented in the spleens of two-week-old mice (79). Furthermore, DC2 cells from post-pubertal-aged adult mice exhibited higher MHC II and CD40 expression compared to pre-pubertal mice (79). Higher MHC II expression was also seen in B cells in the post-pubertal- compared to pre-pubertal-aged mice (79). Further, when neonatal splenocytes were stimulated with LPS, the neonatal cells produced lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-12p40, and higher IL-10 than adult cells, suggesting a skewing of the post-pubertal cells towards a less immunogenic and more anti-inflammatory phenotype.

To further delineate whether these differences in the APC compartment were driving reduced Th1/Th17 responses in the neonates, Hertzenberg et al. (79) co-cultured T cell-depleted splenocytes (mainly B cells) as APCs with MOGp35–55-specific TCR transgenic cells, sourcing splenocytes or T cells from two-week old or adult mice. They found that APCs from young mice were inefficient at promoting Th17 proliferation and cytokine production by the responding MOG p35–55-specific T cells, whereas Th1 responses were relatively intact. Interestingly, the young APCs could uniquely promote the development of anti-inflammatory Th2 cells and Treg when the responding T cells were also from young mice. This suggests that the anti-inflammatory properties of APCs coupled with the intrinsic characteristics of CD4+ T cells were contributing to resistance to autoimmunity in the two-week old mouse (see Sections “Pre-pubertal CD4+ T cells exhibit a higher reactivity to self-antigens that is balanced by increased Treg activity prior to puberty” and “Th2 responses dominate in neonates and gradually shift towards Th1 with age, with Th1 responses becoming more dominant in females post-puberty” for further discussion about how Th2 and Treg responses are enhanced in neonates).

Altogether, these findings in neonates phenocopy the observations in pre-pubertal oophorectomized mice and suggest that puberty may enhance EAE susceptibility by increasing the maturation of DC2 cells and B cells. This maturational shift gives post-pubertal APCs the cellular machinery to break T cell tolerance more easily in response to infection. A drawback of these studies is that the immune phenotype was only studied in female mice and the effect of puberty was not specifically examined.

Mice that are transgenic for myelin specific TCRs are vulnerable to EAE in the weeks immediately following onset of puberty

A number of lines of transgenic mice have been developed that express myelin-specific TCRs [reviewed in Ref. (61)]. In these mice, the large majority of the CD4+ T cell pool (upwards of 85%–90%) express a TCR that has a specific reactivity against a myelin antigen in the context of host MHC II. Each of these TCR transgenic lines can be used to study how one myelin-specific T helper cell clone can develop, be activated, or alternatively become tolerant within the host organism. Myelin-specific TCR transgenic mice bred on the C57BL6/J background exhibit a low incidence of EAE when housed under specific pathogen-free conditions [e.g., Refs. (84, 85)]. When EAE develops in these strains, it is due to cross-activation of the T cells by microbes present at mucosal sites (86, 87).

Of relevance to puberty, if myelin-specific TCR transgenic mice develop EAE, it occurs between five-to-ten weeks of age (87, 88). For example, in 2D2 MOG-specific TCR transgenic mice, EAE incidence peaks between five-to-seven weeks of age, with a slightly higher incidence of disease in the females (88) (Figures 1D,E). A similar age of onset of EAE has been reported for TCR transgenic mice that express the human HLA allele and a TCR specific for myelin basic protein (MBP) (87). A deeper exploration of the immune compartment in the latter mice revealed that post-puberty, MBP-specific TCR transgenic T cells had activities that were more skewed towards an effector phenotype. Isolated spleen cells from five-to-ten-week-old MBP TCR transgenic mice exhibited higher antigen-specific proliferation and IFN-γ, IL-17, and GM-CSF production in vitro compared to spleen cells of pre-pubertal counterparts. Five- to ten-week-old TCR transgenic mice also exhibited a reduced frequency of Treg in the spleen compared to pre-pubertal aged mice. The underlying reasons for the shift from Treg to T effector status with puberty is unclear but could relate to a decline in the thymic output of MBP TCR transgenic Treg or to the homeostatic proliferation of the MBP TCR transgenic cells that may occur post-puberty with thymic involution (see Figure 2 and Section “Puberty induces thymic involution and may shift the delicate balance between tolerance and autoimmunity” for a further discussion). Alternatively, it could relate to the developmental pattern of MBP expression, which increases in the murine thymus starting at four weeks of age; this could conceivably support increased positive selection of MBP TCR transgenic CD4+ T cells (90). Interestingly, beyond ten weeks, myelin specific TCR transgenic mice on the C57BL6/J background become resistant to EAE due to the T cells becoming anergic (87, 88). In conclusion, studies of myelin specific TCR transgenic mice have provided important insights into how the T cell compartment develops and how tolerance may be broken after puberty.

How else does the immune system change with puberty or from childhood to adolescence?

It has been appreciated for some time that neonates have a more limited ability to develop T and B cell responses compared to adults in response to vaccination or pathogen challenge (9193). To understand this phenomenon, a number of studies have contrasted the immune system in humans and mice of different ages (including prior to and after puberty). These studies revealed that immune system matures in some respects before puberty, but that this maturation continues through the peri-pubertal period. In this section, we will overview these studies according to immune cell process, while simultaneously highlighting how gonadal hormones impact these immune cells to convey sex differences in adaptive immunity post-puberty.

The potential of pDCs to make IFN-α is increased post-puberty and regulated by E2

pDCs are a sub-population of DCs that are highly specialized for production of type I IFN. Increased IFN-α signaling by pDCs is a hallmark of systemic lupus erythematous (94) and signaling via the type I IFN-receptor is dysregulated in immune cells of MS patients (95). IFN-α has well known effects in promoting Th1 immunity by a variety of mechanisms during viral infection [reviewed in Ref. (96)]. It has been reported that pDCs from pre-pubertal female humans have higher potential to make IFN-α compared to pre-pubertal males in response to toll-like receptor (TLR7)/TLR8 stimulation (97). The potential of pDCs to produce IFN-α increases further in females after puberty, correlating with higher TLR7 expression by these cells (97). This sex difference in IFN-α production by pDCs prior to puberty may relate to X chromosome gene dosage (97), whereas the increase seen in females with puberty is likely due to estrogen actions on these cells. Studies by Seillet and colleagues showed that estrogen replacement in post-menopausal women enhanced IFN-α production by pDCs in response to TLR7 or TLR9 stimulation (74). Furthermore, mice that are deficient in ERα in the DC compartment, but have intact ovaries, have blunted pDC IFN-α production in response to TLR7 or TLR9 ligands (74). These in vivo effects of E2 are not recapitulated by transient in vitro treatment of pDCs with E2, which has led to the speculation that E2 changes the epigenome in pDCs in the bone marrow, which then specifies the descendent pDCs to be better IFN-α producers (74). Therefore, higher IFN-α levels post-puberty could be another contributing factor to the heightened myelin-specific Th1 immunity seen post-puberty (see Figure 2).

Pre-pubertal CD4+ T cells exhibit a higher reactivity to self-antigens that is balanced by increased Treg activity prior to puberty

A number of studies have contrasted the phenotype of neonatal vs. adult CD4+ T cells. In earlier studies, it was concluded that neonatal T cells are hypo-responsive. This notion was born out of observations that neonatal lymph node cells or total T cells proliferated less and produced lower levels of cytokines when activated in vitro, as compared with adult T cells upon stimulation (98). However, this difference in neonate and adult T cell responses is largely due to the adults having a higher proportion of memory T cells in the T cell pool. When recent thymic emigrant (RTE) naïve CD4+ T cells are isolated from neonatal or adult mice and characterized, neonatal and weaning-aged CD4+ T RTEs have a strikingly higher TCR reactivity to self-antigens compared to post-pubertal CD4+ T RTEs as evidenced by higher expression of CD5 and Nur77 (99). This suggests that the TCR responsiveness of CD4+ T cells goes down with puberty. It is speculated that hyper-responsiveness to TCR signals and IL-7 (100) is what enables the RTE CD4+ T cells to expand rapidly in the lymphogenic environment to quickly fill the empty T cell niches at a time when the newborn is being exposed to many new antigens in its environment (99, 101, 102).

If RTE CD4+ T cells in the neonate or perinate are hyper-responsive, why are young mice or children resistant to autoimmunity? This is likely because neonatal RTE CD4+ T cells are kept in check by neonatal Tregs which are not only more abundant, but also more suppressive compared to adult Tregs (98, 99). Neonatal murine Tregs also express higher levels of CD5, indicating that they also have a higher TCR reactivity to self-antigens (103). In experiments with mice, it was found that transferring adult-derived Tregs into newborn autoimmune prone (autoimmune regulator; AIRE−/−) mice had no impact in slowing autoimmunity, whereas transferring perinatally-generated Treg prevented the development of disease (104). In pediatric humans, Tregs also express higher levels of Foxp3 than adult Tregs (98). In experiments that cultured neonatal and adult human lymph nodes in the presence of Treg depleting antibodies, it was observed that depletion of Tregs unleashed a much higher level of T cell proliferation in neonatal compared to the adult cultures (98), further suggesting that neonatal human Tregs are more suppressive than adult Tregs. Tregs have been shown to comprise a much higher proportion of the CD4+ T cell pool in the neonate as compared to adults (98) and are preferentially localized at mucosal sites where newborn naïve CD4+ T cells are first encountering environmental antigens (98). Taken together, these findings suggest that neonatal Tregs have a stronger reactivity to self-antigens that helps them reign in hyperactive non-Treg T cells to prevent autoimmunity. However, more studies are required to understand how puberty changes Treg characteristics.

Puberty induces thymic involution and may shift the delicate balance between tolerance and autoimmunity

The thymus, the organ where new T cells are generated, reaches its maximal size just prior to puberty (105). At this time, the thymic output of new T cells and the frequencies of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the blood are equivalent between males and females [reviewed in Refs. (11, 106)]. After puberty, the thymus undergoes a drastic decrease in size, called thymic involution, that is characterized by a rapid deterioration of thymic stroma, a decline in thymopoiesis, and reduction in the output of RTE CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that continues into old age [reviewed in Refs. (105107)]. Studies in mice have shown that the involution occurs in response to suppressive effects of E2 and testosterone on thymic epithelium (108), but also because of suppressive effects of these hormones and LH on progenitors in the bone marrow [reviewed in Ref. (107)] (109). One possible consequence of this rapid decline in thymic output is that the existing T cell pool may undergo homeostatic proliferation in the lymphoid organs to compensate for the loss of incoming RTEs. Homeostatic regulation is associated with upregulation of memory markers on T cells and homeostatic proliferated cells respond more rapidly to antigen challenge due to a lower requirement for co-stimulation (110112). In conjunction with the increased homeostatic proliferation, in the weeks following puberty, the frequency of thymic-derived Treg undergoes a decline that is disproportionately steeper than that of non-Treg CD4+ T cells (113), which may explain the decline of MBP-specific Tregs is seen in humanized HLA MBP TCR transgenic mice post-puberty (87). Thus, homeostatic proliferation of neonatal and perinatally-generated CD4+ T cells coupled with the steep decline in thymic Tregs could create a window of increased susceptibility to autoimmunity post-puberty.

There is also evidence that thymic involution post-puberty is steeper in males than in females. This results in females having an overall higher percentage of RTEs and a higher ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T cells compared to males (105, 114116). While the decline in thymopoesis is steeper in males, AIRE+ medullary thymic epithelial cells, which mediate the negative selection of T cells bearing a high affinity for self-antigen, undergo a proportionally steeper decline in females than males with progression to middle age (114). AIRE expression is also enhanced in the thymus by androgens and repressed by E2 (117, 118). These findings point to possible sex differences in the efficiency of negative selection of T cells post-puberty, which could be an additional factor accounting for the increase in CNS autoimmunity seen in females post-puberty.

Th2 responses dominate in neonates and gradually shift towards Th1 with age, with Th1 responses becoming more dominant in females post-puberty

The balance between Th1 and Th2 immunity has been implicated to be important in the development of MS. Auto-reactive T cells from MS patients produce higher levels of IFN-γ and other pro-inflammatory cytokines (119), while production of the Th2 cytokine IL-4 is protective against the development of EAE (120). Though neonatal mice can mount Th1 responses when vaccinated with strong adjuvants such as in EAE, when vaccinated with weaker adjuvants or in the context of allogeneic responses, neonates are more prone develop Th2 immunity [reviewed in Refs. (91, 92)]. Thus, a proneness to develop Th2 responses could be an additional factor for why MS is rare prior to puberty.

Studies that examined the potential of human thymocytes or murine CD4+ T cells to produce cytokines in response to PHA at different ages concluded that the shift from Th2 towards Th1 is gradual and starts even prior to puberty (<five years of age in humans and less than one week in mice) (121). Part of the defective Th1 response in neonates relates to a reduced ability of Th1 cells to survive primary antigen challenge; while a mixed Th1/Th2 response is seen after primary immunization in neonatal mice, only Th2 cells are detected when the same mice are re-challenged with antigen (122). This occurs because of the increased susceptibility of neonatal Th1 cells to undergo IL-4 induced T cell apoptosis due to their unique expression of a heterodimer of IL-13Rα1 and IL-4Rα (122). With maturation, the increased IL-12 production by DCs inhibits IL-13Rα1 expression on T cells, thus interfering with this mechanism. In addition, neonatal CD4+ T cells also are epigenetically more poised for Th2 differentiation having decreased methylation at cis-acting sites in the Th2 cytokine locus and increased methylation in the Ifng promoter region (122).

Whether puberty further shifts the potential of Th cells to make Th1 cytokines is not known. What is known is that female CD4+ T cells produce higher levels of Th1 cytokines than male cells post-puberty [reviewed in Ref. (123)]. The enhanced Th1 response in females is in part related to increased IL-12p40 production by female APCs post-puberty. Indeed, in the case of murine peritoneal macrophages, it was shown that the sex difference in IL-12p40 production could be negated by castrating the male mice (124). In addition to these effects on IL-12p40, there is evidence that female Th cells are more poised to secrete IFN-γ compared to male T cells post-puberty (125127). This sex difference is due to direct effects of E2 on the Ifng promoter (128) and to effects of androgens in repressing Ifng expression through induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α expression in male T cells (125, 129). Although naïve CD4+ T cells do not express high levels of the IL-12 receptor, the expression of this protein is upregulated upon T cell activation and is important for Th1 lineage specification. In this regard, androgens repress and estrogens enhance IL-12-STAT4 signaling in T cells (130, 131). In addition, male SJL mice are more prone to develop type 2 innate lymphocyte (ILC2) responses that promote protective Th2 responses in EAE (discussed below in Section “ILC2 cells decrease in the blood and sex differences in these cells emerge post-puberty due to androgen regulation”) (132).

Thus, there is evidence that neonatal mice and young children have a Th2 biased immune response that is protective against autoimmunity and that females exhibit an increase in the Th1-immune response after puberty.

ILC2 cells decrease in the blood and sex differences in these cells emerge post-puberty due to androgen regulation

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are innate cells that develop from common lymphoid progenitors in the bone marrow and lack rearranged antigen receptors. These cells interact with their environment through a number of activating, inhibitory, and cytokine receptors (133). These interactions serve to amplify adaptive immune responses through cytokine production and cytotoxic killing of stressed cells, including tumors and virally infected cells (133). There are five known ILCs populations: natural killer (NK) cells, type I, 2, and 3 ILCs, and lymphoid tissue inducer cells (133). Of these subsets, there is strong evidence that type 2 ILCs (ILC2s), which express high levels of Th2 cytokines IL-5 and IL-13, are exquisitely sensitive to androgens, may undergo changes in numbers and phenotype with puberty, and contribute to the sex balance in Th1/Th2 inflammation seen post-puberty.

ILC2s strongly express the AR, but not ER-α and ER-β (134). The frequency of these cells in the peripheral blood of humans undergoes a steep decline between pre- to post-pubertal ages (135). The decline in ILC2 levels with puberty is likely due to the suppressive effect of androgens on ILC2 development in the bone marrow (136, 137). There also exists a sex difference in ILC2 frequencies in the blood of humans with females having higher numbers compared to males after the age of 10 (135). In mice, ILC2s become more abundant in the lung and visceral adipose tissue post-puberty, particularly in the females (137). While part of the increase in ILC2s in the lung has been shown to be age-dependent (136), there is also a striking sex difference in the number and phenotype of ILC2 that manifests after puberty (136). Post-pubertal female ILC2 cells have a slightly higher potential than male ILC2s to produce type 2 cytokines (IL-5 and IL-13) in response to PMA/Ionomycin, in part related to a higher predominance of the killer-cell lectin like receptor (KLRG1) negative ILCs (136). KLRG1 may limit ILC2 responses through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif signaling in response to interactions with E-cadherin on endothelial cells (136). In addition to having lower KLRG1, female ILC2s in the lung also exhibit higher expression of activation and proliferation markers, CD25 and Ki67, suggesting these cells proliferate more extensively in the female tissues. In contrast, male ILCs express higher levels of the IL-33 receptor and therefore may be more responsive to IL-33 (136), which is an alarmin that is released during tissue damage and activates ILCs.

While the higher numbers of ILC2s seen in lungs of post-pubertal females is thought to be driving the female prevalence of type 2 allergic inflammation in this organ post-puberty (137), a higher abundance of ILC2 cells in the draining lymph nodes of males is thought to protect this sex from development of EAE through promotion of Th2 responses (132, 138). Androgens also stimulate ILC2 activity through induction of IL-33 production (132). Given the large influence of ILC2s on Th2 immunity, the sex difference in the abundance and maturation of these cells at mucosal sites and their responsiveness to IL-33 makes these cells candidate regulators of the sex difference in CNS autoimmunity seen post-puberty (see Figure 2).

In contrast to these findings for ILC2 cells, there is no strong evidence that NK cell numbers change with puberty (139, 140). Though these cells express high levels of ER-α, it is controversial whether E2 enhances or inhibits their activity (140). Furthermore, the frequencies of ILC1 and ILC3 cells do not change drastically in the blood of children from pre- to post-pubertal ages (135) and these cells express only low levels of hormone receptors (140).

Neonatal CD8+ T cells exhibit higher TCR responsiveness and preferentially mature into short-term effectors instead of long-lived memory CD8+ T cells.

Though CD4+ T cells have been the focus of most MS immunological studies, pathological studies in MS have revealed that CD8+ T cells outnumber CD4+ T cells in the brain white matter (141). These cells appear to have a tissue resident memory phenotype (141), are clonally expanded (142), and persist at perivascular cuffs at the rim of the chronic-active lesions juxtaposed to activated microglia (141). It is speculated that the CNS residency of memory CD8+ T cells and lingering microglia activation may spur neuronal damage and disease progression in MS (141).

In this regard, adult naïve CD8+ T cells are better at forming CD8+ T cell memory cells compared to neonatal counterparts [reviewed in (143)]. In a study that co-transferred neonatal and adult CD8+ T cells into the same recipient mice, it was found that upon pathogen challenge neonatal CD8+ T cells were skewed towards a short-lived effector fate, whereas adult T cells differentiated into both effector and memory CD8+ T cell subsets (144). Upon pathogen re-challenge, the immune response was dominated by the adult CD8+ T cells (145). This lower potential of neonatal CD8+ T cells to form long-lived memory T cells relates to their higher TCR responsiveness, which is set by the differential expression of a number of microRNAs that regulate genes involved in TCR signaling, T cell proliferation, and cytokine production [reviewed in Ref. (143)]. In contrast to the situation of CD4+ T cells, where the TCR responsiveness declines between pre- and post-pubertal ages, CD8+ T cell TCR responsiveness declines gradually throughout the perinatal and pubertal period suggesting it is more of an age-dependent process (99). Nonetheless, the reduced ability of autoreactive CD8+ T cells to develop into long-lived memory cells prior to puberty could be an additional reason why young children are more resistant to MS (see Figure 2).

Pre-pubertal mice develop less efficient humoral immune responses due to deficiencies in T cell help and intrinsic differences in the B cell compartment

B cell depletion with CD20 antibodies is a highly effective therapy in MS. It isn't entirely clear how these therapies inhibit MS disease activity, but the B cell pool that returns post-depletion is known to have a less mature phenotype with an increase in the frequency of naïve and transitional B cells and a decrease in memory B cells (146). The B cell pool in neonates resembles this state, as it is comprised mainly of naïve B cells and transitional B cells (147, 148). This difference in the proportion of B cell subsets between the neonate and the adult is speculated to be the reason why the neonatal B cells are also less efficient at presenting antigens to T helper cells (147, 148). Although a number of studies have reported finding higher levels of co-stimulatory molecule expression on B cells in adults vs. neonates, this is not the case when expressions on individual B cell subsets are directly compared between these groups (147, 148).

There is also evidence that humoral immune responses are compromised in neonates compared to adults [reviewed in Ref. (149)]. Vaccination of young children with T cell-dependent antigens results in only short-lived protection from pathogens, with reduced IgG titers that quickly wane and B cells that fail to form B cell memory (150). This is in part due to reduced T cell help provided by T follicular helper (Tfh) cells (151), a CD4+ T cell subset that interacts with B cells in secondary lymphoid organs and is crucial for promoting germinal center formation. When one-to-three-week-old mice are immunized with a T cell-dependent antigen, Tfh cells increase in numbers, but the magnitude of this response is severely compromised. Tfh cells fail to appropriately migrate into germinal centers (GCs), which appears to be due to intrinsic defects in the young Tfh cells (151). A comparison of Tfh cells, and GC and plasma B cells in immunized one week- (neonates), three week- (weaning age, pre-pubertal), and six-to-eight week- (post-pubertal) old mice showed that while the number of Tfh and GC cells generated by immunization increase between one- and three-weeks of ages, plasma cell numbers and Tfh percentages jumped from weaning age to the young adult (151), strongly implicating a role for puberty in Tfh development and the maturation of the GC B cell response (see Figure 2).

There is also evidence that in addition to Tfh cells, intrinsic differences in the B cells contribute to defective humoral immunity in neonates. Neonatal B cells like their T cell counterparts are hyper-responsive to BCR stimulation due to enhanced proximal BCR signaling (147). This may be due in part to the higher density of surface IgM (149), but also to a higher propensity of activated neonatal B cells to downregulate CD22; which is a negative modulator of BCR signaling (152). As a result of this altered BCR signaling, neonatal B cells proliferate more rapidly than adult B cells, but are also more prone to undergoing apoptosis and are inefficient at forming B cell memory (147, 148, 152). Neonatal B cells though able to produce IgM and IgA, are less efficient at antibody class-switching to IgG (147, 148) (Figure 2), thereby also explaining why pre-pubertal mice develop defective myelin-specific IgG responses during EAE (36).

Similar to the situation for the Tfh cells, the shift from a neonatal to adult B cell phenotype is in part age-dependent, gradually increasing from the neonate to four weeks of age (153). Though there is a paucity of studies that examined the effect of puberty on B cells, there is strong evidence that humoral immunity increases after puberty, particularly in females. Females exhibit higher IgG antibody levels in the steady state and upon infection or vaccination exhibit higher IgG titers and numbers of memory and plasma B cells than males (11, 154, 155). Though this sex difference is in part likely due to effects of E2 on T cell help (156), seminal studies done in a murine DNA-specific BCR transgenic model have demonstrated that E2 has direct effects in breaking B cell tolerance [reviewed in Ref. (157)]. These BCR transgenic mice have an abundance of B cells that recognize double-stranded DNA, but do not cause autoimmunity because of efficient negative selection of B cells that have the highest affinity for antigen (157). E2 treatment promotes the survival of these high-affinity B cells resulting in increased anti-DNA IgG levels in the blood and the development of lupus-like pathology in the kidneys of these mice (158). E2 mediated this effect by promoting the expression of molecules (Shp1 and CD22) that increase the threshold required for antigen-mediated B cell deletion (159). In addition to regulating the threshold of B cell activation, E2 also directly activates the transcription of activation-induced cytosine deaminase, an enzyme that is critical in regulating class-switch recombination and somatic hypermutation in B cells (160). Thus, the rise in E2 that occurs with puberty may hasten MS autoimmune mechanisms by not only enhancing the antigen presenting capacity of B cells, but also by promoting antibody-dependent mechanisms of tissue damage, a process that occurs in about half of MS lesions (161).

Conclusion

In conclusion, puberty serves as a point of inflection in autoimmune susceptibility in MS and EAE, particularly in females. There is evidence that disease activity in MS may increase in the peri-pubertal period. The increase in CNS autoimmunity relates to a plethora of immune changes that occur with the transition from childhood to adolescence including an increase in antigen presentation and cytokine production by DC and pDCs, increased Th1, Th17, and Tfh responses, and a higher propensity of B cells and CD8+ T cells to form long-lived memory (summarized in Figure 2). There is strong evidence that the effect of puberty on DC2 cells, pDCs, and B cells in females is mediated by E2, whereas both androgens and estrogens regulate the sex difference in the Th1 immune response seen post-puberty. There is also a paucity of studies that have directly compared the phenotype of immune cells in both males and females before and after puberty. Furthermore, the role of gonadotropins in regulating pubertal changes in the immune system is underappreciated and needs to be further studied.

Author contributions

CCU and SED conceived, researched, and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work is funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Sex and Gender Science Chair (GS7-171367) and a CIHR operating grant (427572) (awarded to SED). Carmen Ucciferri is supported by a CIHR Master's Award.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Brendan Cordeiro for his critical review of the manuscript. Figure 2 was created with Biorender.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wood CL, Lane LC, Cheetham T. Puberty: normal physiology (brief overview). Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2019) 33:101265. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Chitnis T. Role of puberty in multiple sclerosis risk and course. Clin Immunol. (2013) 149:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.03.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Desai MK, Brinton RD. Autoimmune disease in women: endocrine transition and risk across the lifespan. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2019) 10:265. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calbresi PA. Multiple Sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. (2018) 378:169–180. doi:10.1056/NEJMra140148329320652

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

5. Chitnis T, Graves J, Weinstock-Guttman B, Belman A, Olsen C, Misra M, et al. Distinct effects of obesity and puberty on risk and age at onset of pediatric MS. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. (2016) 3:897–907. doi: 10.1002/acn3.365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Banwell B, Ghezzi A, Bar-Or A, Mikaeloff Y, Tardieu M. Multiple sclerosis in children: clinical diagnosis, therapeutic strategies, and future directions. Lancet Neurol. (2007) 6:887–902. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70242-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Alfredsson L, Olsson T. Lifestyle and environmental factors in multiple sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2019) 9:a028944. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ramagopalan SV, Valdar W, Criscuoli M, DeLuca GC, Dyment DA, Orton SM, et al. Age of puberty and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a population based study. Eur J Neurol. (2009) 16:342–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02431.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Howard SR. Interpretation of reproductive hormones before, during, and after pubertal transition—identifying health and disordered puberty. Clin Endocrinol. (2021) 95:702–15. doi: 10.1111/cen.14578

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hammes SR, Levin ER. Impact of estrogens in males and androgens in females. J Clin Invest. (2019) 129:1818–26. doi: 10.1172/JCI125755

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. (2016) 16:626–38. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Naule L, Maione L, Kaiser UB. Puberty, a sensitive window of hypothalamic development and plasticity. Endocrinology. (2021) 162:bqaa209. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Marques P, Skorupskaite K, Rozario KS, Anderson RA, George JT. Physiology of GnRH and gonadotropin secretion. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com (2000).

14. Uenoyama Y, Inoue N, Nakamura S, Tsukamura H. Central mechanism controlling pubertal onset in mammals: a triggering role of kisspeptin. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2019) 10:312. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cheong RY, Czieselsky K, Porteous R, Herbison AE. Expression of ESR1 in glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons is essential for normal puberty onset, estrogen feedback, and fertility in female mice. J Neurosci. (2015) 35:14533–43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1776-15.2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sanchez-Garrido MA, Tena-Sempere M. Metabolic control of puberty: roles of leptin and kisspeptins. Horm Behav. (2013) 64:187–94. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.01.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Belbasis L, Bellou V, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E. Early-life factors and risk of multiple sclerosis: an MR-EWAS. Neuroepidemiology. (2020) 54:433–45. doi: 10.1159/000508229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Pohl D, Hennemuth I, von Kries R, Hanefeld F. Paediatric multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in Germany: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Pediatr. (2007) 166:405–12. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0249-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Belman AL, Krupp LB, Olsen CS, Rose JW, Aaen G, Benson L, et al. Characteristics of children and adolescents with multiple sclerosis. Pediatrics. (2016) 138:e20160120. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lulu S, Graves J, Waubant E. Menarche increases relapse risk in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. (2016) 22:193–200. doi: 10.1177/1352458515581873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Operskalski EA, Visscher BR, Malmgren RM, Detels R. A case-control study of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. (1989) 39:825–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.39.6.825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gustavsen MW, Page CM, Moen SM, Bjolgerud A, Berg-Hansen P, Nygaard GO, et al. Environmental exposures and the risk of multiple sclerosis investigated in a Norwegian case-control study. BMC Neurol. (2014) 14:196. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0196-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Bove R, Chua AS, Xia Z, Chibnik L, De Jager PL, Chitnis T. Complex relation of HLA-DRB1*1501, age at menarche, and age at multiple sclerosis onset. Neurol Genet. (2016) 2:e88. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Rejali M, Hosseini SM, Kazemi Tabaee MS, Etemadifar M. Assessing the risk factors for multiple sclerosis in women of reproductive age suffering the disease in isfahan province. Int J Prev Med. (2016) 7:58. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.178532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Salehi F, Abdollahpour I, Nedjat S, Sahraian MA, Memari AH, Rahnama M, et al. Uncovering the link between reproductive factors and multiple sclerosis: a case-control study on Iranian females. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2018) 20:164–8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.01.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Nielsen NM, Harpsoe M, Simonsen J, Stenager E, Magyari M, Koch-Henriksen N, et al. Age at menarche and risk of multiple sclerosis: a prospective cohort study based on the danish national birth cohort. Am J Epidemiol. (2017) 185:712–9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Mirmosayyeb O, Badihian S, Manouchehri N, Basiri AK, Barzegar M, Esmaeil N, et al. The interplay of multiple sclerosis and menstrual cycle: which one affects the other one? Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2018) 21:46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.01.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zeydan B, Atkinson EJ, Weis DM, Smith CY, Gazzuola Rocca L, Rocca WA, et al. Reproductive history and progressive multiple sclerosis risk in women. Brain Commun. (2020) 2:fcaa185. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Jacobs BM, Noyce AJ, Bestwick J, Belete D, Giovannoni G, Dobson R. Gene-Environment interactions in multiple sclerosis: a UK biobank study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. (2021) 8:e1007. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Harroud A, Morris JA, Forgetta V, Mitchell R, Smith GD, Sawcer SJ, et al. Effect of age at puberty on risk of multiple sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study. Neurology. (2019) 92:e1803–10. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Timmermans S, Bogie JF, Vanmierlo T, Lutjohann D, Stinissen P, Hellings N, et al. High fat diet exacerbates neuroinflammation in an animal model of multiple sclerosis by activation of the renin angiotensin system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. (2014) 9:209–17. doi: 10.1007/s11481-013-9502-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Winer S, Paltser G, Chan Y, Tsui H, Engleman E, Winer D, et al. Obesity predisposes to Th17 bias. Eur J Immunol. (2009) 39:2629–35. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Endo Y, Asou HK, Matsugae N, Hirahara K, Shinoda K, Tumes DJ, et al. Obesity drives Th17 cell differentiation by inducing the lipid metabolic kinase, ACC1. Cell Rep. (2015) 12:1042–55. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hasan M, Seo JE, Rahaman KA, Min H, Kim KH, Park JH, et al. Novel genes in brain tissues of EAE-induced Normal and obese mice: upregulation of metal ion-binding protein genes in obese-EAE mice. Neuroscience. (2017) 343:322–36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ji Z, Wu S, Xu Y, Qi J, Su X, Shen L. Obesity promotes EAE through IL-6 and CCL-2-mediated T cells infiltration. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1881. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01881

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ahn JJ, O'Mahony J, Moshkova M, Hanwell ME, Singh H, Zhang MA, et al. Puberty in females enhances the risk of an outcome of multiple sclerosis in children and the development of central nervous system autoimmunity in mice. Mult. Scler. (2015) 21:735–48. doi: 10.1177/1352458514551453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zuluaga MI, Otero-Romero S, Rovira A, Perez-Hoyos S, Arrambide G, Negrotto L, et al. Menarche, pregnancies, and breastfeeding do not modify long-term prognosis in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. (2019) 92:e1507–16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Young B, Waubant E, Lulu S, Graves J. Puberty onset and pediatric multiple sclerosis activity in boys. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2019) 27:184–7. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. D'Hooghe B, Haentjens M,P, Nagels G, D'Hooghe T, De Keyser J. Menarche, oral contraceptives, pregnancy and progression of disability in relapsing onset and progressive onset multiple sclerosis. J Neurol (2011) 259:855–61. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6267-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. De Geyter C. Assisted reproductive technology: impact on society and need for surveillance. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2019) 33:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Hrometz SL, Gates VA. Review of available infertility treatments. Drugs Today (Barc). (2009) 45:275–91. doi: 10.1358/dot.2009.45.4.1360985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Bosch E, Alviggi C, Lispi M, Conforti A, Hanyaloglu AC, Chuderland D, et al. Reduced FSH and LH action: implications for medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. (2021) 36:1469–80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Cuello JP, Martinez Gines ML, Martin Barriga ML, de Andres C. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy: a single-centre prospective comparative study. Neurologia. (2017) 32:92–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Bove R, Rankin K, Lin C, Zhao C, Correale J, Hellwig K, et al. Effect of assisted reproductive technology on multiple sclerosis relapses: case series and meta-analysis. Mult Scler. (2020) 26:1410–9. doi: 10.1177/1352458519865118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Correale J, Farez MF, Ysrraelit MC. Increase in multiple sclerosis activity after assisted reproduction technology. Ann Neurol. (2012) 72:682–94. doi: 10.1002/ana.23745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Laplaud DA, Leray E, Barriere P, Wiertlewski S, Moreau T. Increase in multiple sclerosis relapse rate following in vitro fertilization. Neurology. (2006) 66:1280–1. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000208521.10685.a6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Michel L, Foucher Y, Vukusic S, Confavreux C, de Seze J, Brassat D, et al. Increased risk of multiple sclerosis relapse after in vitro fertilisation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2012) 83:796–802. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302235

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Hellwig K, Schimrigk S, Beste C, Muller T, Gold R. Increase in relapse rate during assisted reproduction technique in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol. (2009) 61:65–8. doi: 10.1159/000177937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Thompson EE, Nicodemus-Johnson J, Kim KW, Gern JE, Jackson DJ, Lemanske RF, et al. Global DNA methylation changes spanning puberty are near predicted estrogen-responsive genes and enriched for genes involved in endocrine and immune processes. Clin Epigenetics. (2018) 10:62. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0491-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Almstrup K, Lindhardt Johansen M, Busch AS, Hagen CP, Nielsen JE, Petersen JH, et al. Pubertal development in healthy children is mirrored by DNA methylation patterns in peripheral blood. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:28657. doi: 10.1038/srep28657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Yang Y, Li XM, Wang JR, Li Y, Ye WL, Wang Y, et al. TRIP6 Promotes inflammatory damage via the activation of TRAF6 signaling in a murine model of DSS-induced colitis. J Inflamm (Lond). (2022) 19:1. doi: 10.1186/s12950-021-00298-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Rangachari M, Kuchroo VK. Using EAE to better understand principles of immune function and autoimmune pathology. J Autoimmun. (2013) 45:31–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Becher B, Tugues S, Greter M. GM-CSF: from growth factor to central mediator of tissue inflammation. Immunity. (2016) 45:963–73. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.10.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Codarri L, Gyulveszi G, Tosevski V, Hesske L, Fontana A, Magnenat L, et al. RORgammat drives production of the cytokine GM-CSF in helper T cells, which is essential for the effector phase of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Nat Immunol. (2011) 12:560–7. doi: 10.1038/ni.2027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. El-Behi M, Ciric B, Dai H, Yan Y, Cullimore M, Safavi F, et al. The encephalitogenicity of T(H)17 cells is dependent on IL-1- and IL-23-induced production of the cytokine GM-CSF. Nat Immunol (2011) 12:568–75. doi: 10.1038/ni.2031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Rasouli J, Ciric B, Imitola J, Gonnella P, Hwang D, Mahajan K, et al. Expression of GM-CSF in T cells is increased in multiple sclerosis and suppressed by IFN-beta therapy. J Immunol. (2015) 194:5085–93. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zrzavy T, Hametner S, Wimmer I, Butovsky O, Weiner HL, Lassmann H. Loss of “homeostatic” microglia and patterns of their activation in active multiple sclerosis. Brain. (2017) 140:1900–13. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Lassmann H. Pathology and disease mechanisms in different stages of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. (2013) 333:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Robinson AP, Harp CT, Noronha A, Miller SD. The experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS: utility for understanding disease pathophysiology and treatment. Handb Clin Neurol. (2014) 122:173–89. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52001-2.00008-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Stromnes IM, Goverman JM. Passive induction of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Nat Protoc. (2006) 1:1952–60. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Krishnamoorthy G, Wekerle H. EAE: an immunologist's Magic eye. Eur J Immunol. (2009) 39:2031–5. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Racke MK, Drew PD. Toll-like receptors in multiple sclerosis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. (2009) 336:155–68. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00549-7_9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Odoardi F, Sie C, Streyl K, Ulaganathan VK, Schlager C, Lodygin D, et al. T cells become licensed in the lung to enter the central nervous system. Nature (2012) 488:675–9. doi: 10.1038/nature11337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Byers SL, Wiles MV, Dunn SL, Taft RA. Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images. PLoS One. (2012) 7:e35538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Korenbrot CC, Huhtaniemi IT, Weiner RI. Preputial separation as an external sign of pubertal development in the male rat. Biol Reprod. (1977) 17:298–303. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod17.2.298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Hawkins T, Gala RR, Dunbar JC. The effect of neonatal sex hormone manipulation on the incidence of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (1993) 2: 201–205. doi: 10.3181/00379727-202-43527

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Makino S, Kunimoto K, Muraoka Y, Katagiri K. Effect of castration on the appearance of diabetes in NOD mouse. Jikken Dobutsu. (1981) 30:137–40. doi: 10.1538/expanim1978.30.2_137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Cunningham MA, Wirth JR, Scott JL, Eudaly J, Collins EL, Gilkeson GS. Early ovariectomy results in reduced numbers of CD11c+/CD11b+ spleen cells and impacts disease expression in murine lupus. Front Immunol. (2016) 7:31. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Dudziak D, Kamphorst AO, Heidkamp GF, Buchholz VR, Trumpfheller C, Yamazaki S, et al. Differential antigen processing by dendritic cell subsets in vivo. Science. (2007) 315:107–11. doi: 10.1126/science.1136080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Upham JW, Rate A, Rowe J, Kusel M, Sly PD, Holt PG. Dendritic cell immaturity during infancy restricts the capacity to express vaccine-specific T-cell memory. Infect Immun. (2006) 74:1106–12. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1106-1112.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Velilla PA, Rugeles MT, Chougnet CA. Defective antigen-presenting cell function in human neonates. Clin Immunol. (2006) 121:251–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2006.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Kovats S. Estrogen receptors regulate an inflammatory pathway of dendritic cell differentiation: mechanisms and implications for immunity. Horm Behav. (2012) 62:254–62. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Suzuki S, Honma K, Matsuyama T, Suzuki K, Toriyama K, Akitoyo I, et al. Critical roles of interferon regulatory factor 4 in CD11bhighCD8alpha- dendritic cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2004) 101:8981–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402139101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Seillet C, Laffont S, Tremollieres F, Rouquie N, Ribot C, Arnal JF, et al. The TLR-mediated response of plasmacytoid dendritic cells is positively regulated by estradiol in vivo through cell-intrinsic estrogen receptor alpha signaling. Blood. (2012) 119:454–64. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-371831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Carreras E, Turner S, Frank MB, Knowlton N, Osban J, Centola M, et al. Estrogen receptor signaling promotes dendritic cell differentiation by increasing expression of the transcription factor IRF4. Blood. (2010) 115:238–46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-236935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Paharkova-Vatchkova V, Maldonado R, Kovats S. Estrogen preferentially promotes the differentiation of CD11c+ CD11b(intermediate) dendritic cells from bone marrow precursors. J Immunol. (2004) 172:1426–36. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Douin-Echinard V, Laffont S, Seillet C, Delpy L, Krust A, Chambon P, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha, but not beta, is required for optimal dendritic cell differentiation and [corrected] CD40-induced cytokine production. J Immunol. (2008) 180:3661–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.3661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Siracusa MC, Overstreet MG, Housseau F, Scott AL, Klein SL. 17beta-estradiol Alters the activity of conventional and IFN-producing killer dendritic cells. J Immunol. (2008) 180:1423–31. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Hertzenberg D, Lehmann-Horn K, Kinzel S, Husterer V, Cravens PD, Kieseier BC, et al. Developmental maturation of innate immune cell function correlates with susceptibility to central nervous system autoimmunity. Eur J Immunol. (2013) 43:2078–88. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Smith ME, Eller NL, McFarland HF, Racke MK, Raine CS. Age dependence of clinical and pathological manifestations of autoimmune demyelination. Implications for multiple sclerosis. Am J Pathol. (1999) 155:1147–61. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65218-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Cravens PD, Hussain RZ, Zacharias TE, Ben LH, Herndon E, Vinnakota R, et al. Lymph node-derived donor encephalitogenic CD4+ T cells in C57BL/6 mice adoptive transfer experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis highly express GM-CSF and T-bet. J Neuroinflammation. (2011) 8:73. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-73

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Hofstetter HH, Kovalovsky A, Shive CL, Lehmann PV, Forsthuber TG. Neonatal induction of myelin-specific Th1/Th17 immunity does not result in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and can protect against the disease in adulthood. J Neuroimmunol. (2007) 187:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Cravens PD, Kieseier BC, Hussain R, Herndon E, Arellano B, Ben LH, et al. The neonatal CNS is not conducive for encephalitogenic Th1 T cells and B cells during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroinflammation. (2013) 10:67. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-67

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Bettelli E, Pagany M, Weiner HL, Linington C, Sobel RA, Kuchroo VK. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-specific T cell receptor transgenic mice develop spontaneous autoimmune optic neuritis. J Exp Med. (2003) 197:1073–81. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Madsen LS, Andersson EC, Jansson L, krogsgaard M, Andersen CB, Engberg J, et al. A humanized model for multiple sclerosis using HLA-DR2 and a human T-cell receptor. Nat Genet. (1999) 23:343–7. doi: 10.1038/15525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Berer K, Mues M, Koutrolos M, Rasbi ZA, Boziki M, Johner C, et al. Commensal microbiota and myelin autoantigen cooperate to trigger autoimmune demyelination. Nature. (2011) 479:538–41. doi: 10.1038/nature10554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Yadav SK, Boppana S, Ito N, Mindur JE, Mathay MT, Patel A, et al. Gut dysbiosis breaks immunological tolerance toward the central nervous system during young adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2017) 114:E9318–27. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615715114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Cahill LS, Zhang MA, Ramaglia V, Whetstone H, Pahlevan Sabbaugh M, Yi TJ, et al. Aged hind-limb clasping experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models aspects of the neurodegenerative process seen in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2019) 116:22710–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915141116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Pollinger B, Krishnamoorthy G, Berer K, Lassmann H, Bosl MR, Dunn R, et al. Spontaneous relapsing-remitting EAE in the SJL/J mouse: MOG-reactive transgenic T cells recruit endogenous MOG-specific B cells. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:1303–16. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090299

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Huseby ES, Sather B, Huseby PG, Goverman J. Age-dependent T cell tolerance and autoimmunity to myelin basic protein. Immunity. (2001) 14:471–81. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00127-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Siegrist CA. Vaccination in the neonatal period and early infancy. Int Rev Immunol. (2000) 19:195–219. doi: 10.3109/08830180009088505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Adkins B, Leclerc C, Marshall-Clarke S. Neonatal adaptive immunity comes of age. Nat Rev Immunol. (2004) 4:553–64. doi: 10.1038/nri1394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Kollmann TR, Marchant A, Way SS. Vaccination strategies to enhance immunity in neonates. Science. (2020) 368:612–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz9447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Obermoser G, Pascual V. The interferon-alpha signature of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. (2010) 19:1012–9. doi: 10.1177/0961203310371161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Canto E, Isobe N, Didonna A, Group M-ES, Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR. Aberrant STAT phosphorylation signaling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroinflammation. (2018) 15:72. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1105-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Wang BX, Fish EN. Global virus outbreaks: interferons as 1st responders. Semin Immunol. (2019) 43:101300. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2019.101300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Webb K, Peckham H, Radziszewska A, Menon M, Oliveri P, Simpson F, et al. Sex and pubertal differences in the type 1 interferon pathway associate with both X chromosome number and serum sex hormone concentration. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:3167. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Thome JJ, Bickham KL, Ohmura Y, Kubota M, Matsuoka N, Gordon C, et al. Early-life compartmentalization of human T cell differentiation and regulatory function in mucosal and lymphoid tissues. Nat Med. (2016) 22:72–7. doi: 10.1038/nm.4008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Dong M, Artusa P, Kelly SA, Fournier M, Baldwin TA, Mandl JN, et al. Alterations in the thymic selection threshold skew the self-reactivity of the TCR repertoire in neonates. J Immunol. (2017) 199:965–73. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Opiela SJ, Koru-Sengul T, Adkins B. Murine neonatal recent thymic emigrants are phenotypically and functionally distinct from adult recent thymic emigrants. Blood. (2009) 113:5635–43. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-173658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Srinivasan J, Lancaster JN, Singarapu N, Hale LP, Ehrlich LIR, Richie ER. Age-related changes in thymic central tolerance. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:676236. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.676236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Opiela SJ, Levy RB, Adkins B. Murine neonates develop vigorous in vivo cytotoxic and Th1/Th2 responses upon exposure to low doses of NIMA-like alloantigens. Blood. (2008) 112:1530–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-106500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Henderson JG, Opejin A, Jones A, Gross C, Hawiger D. CD5 Instructs extrathymic regulatory T cell development in response to self and tolerizing antigens. Immunity. (2015) 42:471–83. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Yang S, Fujikado N, Kolodin D, Benoist C, Mathis D. Immune tolerance. Regulatory T cells generated early in life play a distinct role in maintaining self-tolerance. Science. (2015) 348:589–94. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa7017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Gui J, Mustachio LM, Su DM, Craig RW. Thymus size and age-related thymic involution: early programming, sexual dimorphism, progenitors and stroma. Aging Dis. (2012) 3:280–90.22724086

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

106. Calder AE, Hince MN, Dudakov JA, Chidgey AP, Boyd RL. Thymic involution: where endocrinology meets immunology. Neuroimmunomodulation. (2011) 18:281–9. doi: 10.1159/000329496

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Dunn SE. Effect of sex on cellular immunity. In: Ratcliffe MJH, editor. Encyclopedia of Immunobiology. Oxford: Elsevier (2016).

108. Rijhsinghani AG, Thompson K, Bhatia SK, Waldschmidt TJ. Estrogen blocks early T cell development in the thymus. Am J Reprod Immunol. (1996) 36:269–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00176.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Peng YJ, Yu H, Hao X, Dong W, Yin X, Lin M, et al. Luteinizing hormone signaling restricts hematopoietic stem cell expansion during puberty. EMBO J. (2018) 37:e98984. doi: 10.15252/embj.201898984

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Gudmundsdottir H, Turka LA. A closer look at homeostatic proliferation of CD4+ T cells: costimulatory requirements and role in memory formation. J Immunol. (2001) 167:3699–707. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.7.3699

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R. Cutting edge: naive T cells masquerading as memory cells. J Immunol. (2000) 165:1733–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.4.1733

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Cho BK, Rao VP, Ge Q, Eisen HN, Chen J. Homeostasis-stimulated proliferation drives naive T cells to differentiate directly into memory T cells. J Exp Med. (2000) 192:549–56. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.4.549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Thiault N, Darrigues J, Adoue V, Gros M, Binet B, Perals C, et al. Peripheral regulatory T lymphocytes recirculating to the thymus suppress the development of their precursors. Nat Immunol. (2015) 16:628–34. doi: 10.1038/ni.3150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Hun ML, Wong K, Gunawan JR, Alsharif A, Quinn K, Chidgey AP. Gender disparity impacts on thymus aging and LHRH receptor antagonist-induced thymic reconstitution following chemotherapeutic damage. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:302. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Just HL, Deleuran M, Vestergaard C, Deleuran B, Thestrup-Pedersen K. T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subpopulations in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis show major differences in the emission of recent thymic emigrants. (2008) Acta. Derm. Venereol. 88:566–72. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Pido-Lopez J, Imami N, Aspinall R. Both age and gender affect thymic output: more recent thymic migrants in females than males as they age. Clin Exp Immunol. (2001) 125:409–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01640.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Zhu ML, Bakhru P, Conley B, Nelson JS, Free M, Martin A, et al. Sex bias in CNS autoimmune disease mediated by androgen control of autoimmune regulator. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:11350. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Dragin N, Bismuth J, Cizeron-Clairac G, Biferi MG, Berthault C, Serraf A, et al. Estrogen-mediated downregulation of AIRE influences sexual dimorphism in autoimmune diseases. J Clin Invest. (2016) 126:1525–37. doi: 10.1172/JCI81894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Jelcic I, Al Nimer F, Wang J, Lentsch V, Planas R, Jelcic I, et al. Memory B cells activate brain-homing, autoreactive CD4(+) T cells in multiple sclerosis. Cell. (2018) 175:85–100 e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Bettelli E, Das MP, Howard ED, Weiner HL, Sobel RA, Kuchroo VK. IL-10 is critical in the regulation of autoimmune encephalomyelitis as demonstrated by studies of IL-10- and IL-4-deficient and transgenic mice. J Immunol. (1998) 161:3299–306.9759845

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

121. Tulic MK, Andrews D, Crook ML, Charles A, Tourigny MR, Moqbel R, et al. Changes in thymic regulatory T-cell maturation from birth to puberty: differences in atopic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2012) 129:199–206.e1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.10.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Zaghouani H, Hoeman CM, Adkins B. Neonatal immunity: faulty T-helpers and the shortcomings of dendritic cells. Trends Immunol. (2009) 30:585–91. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Alvarez-Sanchez N, Dunn SE. Immune cell contributors to the female sex bias in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. (2022) doi: 10.1007/7854_2022_324. [Epub ahead of print].35467295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Wilcoxen SC, Kirkman E, Dowdell KC, Stohlman SA. Gender-dependent IL-12 secretion by APC is regulated by IL-10. J Immunol. (2000) 164:6237–43. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Zhang MA, Rego D, Moshkova M, Kebir H, Chruscinski A, Nguyen H, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha and -gamma regulate IFNgamma and IL-17A production by human T cells in a sex-specific way. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2012) 109:9505–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118458109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Hewagama A, Patel D, Yarlagadda S, Strickland FM, Richardson BC. Stronger inflammatory/cytotoxic T-cell response in women identified by microarray analysis. Genes Immun. (2009) 10:509–16. doi: 10.1038/gene.2009.12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Dunn SE, Ousman SS, Sobel RA, Zuniga L, Baranzini SE, Yousef SS, et al. Peroxisome proliferated-activator receptor (PPAR)α expression in T cells mediates gender differences in development of T cell-mediated autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. (2007) 204: 321–30. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Fox HS, Bond BL, Parslow TG. Estrogen regulates the IFN-gamma promoter. J Immunol. (1991) 146:4362–7.1904081

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

129. Guan X, Polesso F, Wang C, Sehrawat A, Hawkins RM, Murray SE, Thomas GV, Caruso B, Thompson RF, Wood MA, Hipfinger C, Hammond SA, Graff JN, Xia Z, Moran AE. Androgen receptor activity in T cells limits checkpoint blockade efficiency. Nature (2022) 606:791–96. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04522-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Bao M, Yang Y, Jun HS, Yoon JW. Molecular mechanisms for gender differences in susceptibility to T cell-mediated autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. J Immunol. (2002) 168:5369–75. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.10.5369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Kissick HT, Sanda MG, Dunn LK, Pellegrini KL, On ST, Noel JK, et al. Androgens alter T-cell immunity by inhibiting T-helper 1 differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2014) 111:9887–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402468111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Russi AE, Ebel ME, Yang Y, Brown MA. Male-specific IL-33 expression regulates sex-dimorphic EAE susceptibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2018) 115:E1520–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710401115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Klose CS, Artis D. Innate lymphoid cells as regulators of immunity, inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Nat Immunol. (2016) 17:765–74. doi: 10.1038/ni.3489

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Robinette ML, Fuchs A, Cortez VS, Lee JS, Wang Y, Durum SK, et al. Transcriptional programs define molecular characteristics of innate lymphoid cell classes and subsets. Nat Immunol. (2015) 16:306–17. doi: 10.1038/ni.3094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Darboe A, Nielsen CM, Wolf AS, Wildfire J, Danso E, Sonko B, et al. Age-related dynamics of circulating innate lymphoid cells in an african population. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:594107. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.594107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Kadel S, Ainsua-Enrich E, Hatipoglu I, Turner S, Singh S, Khan S, et al. A major population of functional KLRG1(−) ILC2s in female lungs contributes to a sex bias in ILC2 numbers. Immunohorizons. (2018) 2:74–86. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.1800008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Laffont S, Blanquart E, Savignac M, Cenac C, Laverny G, Metzger D, et al. Androgen signaling negatively controls group 2 innate lymphoid cells. J Exp Med. (2017) 214:1581–92. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Russi AE, Walker-Caulfield ME, Ebel ME, Brown MA. Cutting edge: c-kit signaling differentially regulates type 2 innate lymphoid cell accumulation and susceptibility to central nervous system demyelination in male and female SJL mice. J Immunol. (2015) 194:5609–13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Vely F, Barlogis V, Vallentin B, Neven B, Piperoglou C, Ebbo M, et al. Evidence of innate lymphoid cell redundancy in humans. Nat Immunol. (2016) 17:1291–9. doi: 10.1038/ni.3553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Blanquart E, Laffont S, Guery JC. Sex hormone regulation of innate lymphoid cells. Biomed J. (2021) 44:144–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Fransen NL, Hsiao CC, van der Poel M, Engelenburg HJ, Verdaasdonk K, Vincenten MCJ, et al. Tissue-resident memory T cells invade the brain parenchyma in multiple sclerosis white matter lesions. Brain. (2020) 143:1714–30. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Babbe H, Roers A, Waisman A, Lassmann H, Goebels N, Hohlfeld R, et al. Clonal expansions of CD8(+) T cells dominate the T cell infiltrate in active multiple sclerosis lesions as shown by micromanipulation and single cell polymerase chain reaction. J Exp Med. (2000) 192:393–404. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.3.393

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Rudd BD. Neonatal T cells: a reinterpretation. Annu Rev Immunol. (2020) 38:229–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-091319-083608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Smith NL, Wissink E, Wang J, Pinello JF, Davenport MP, Grimson A, et al. Rapid proliferation and differentiation impairs the development of memory CD8+ T cells in early life. J Immunol. (2014) 193:177–84. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Wang J, Wissink EM, Watson NB, Smith NL, Grimson A, Rudd BD. Fetal and adult progenitors give rise to unique populations of CD8+ T cells. Blood. (2016) 128:3073–82. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-06-725366

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Nissimov N, Hajiyeva Z, Torke S, Grondey K, Bruck W, Hausser-Kinzel S, et al. B cells reappear less mature and more activated after their anti-CD20-mediated depletion in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2020) 117:25690–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012249117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Glaesener S, Jaenke C, Habener A, Geffers R, Hagendorff P, Witzlau K, et al. Decreased production of class-switched antibodies in neonatal B cells is associated with increased expression of miR-181b. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0192230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Budeus B, Kibler A, Brauser M, Homp E, Bronischewski K, Ross JA, et al. Human cord blood B cells differ from the adult counterpart by conserved Ig repertoires and accelerated response dynamics. J Immunol. (2021) 206:2839–51. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Basha S, Surendran N, Pichichero M. Immune responses in neonates. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (2014) 10:1171–84. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2014.942288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Pollard AJ, Perrett KP, Beverley PC. Maintaining protection against invasive bacteria with protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines. Nat Rev Immunol. (2009) 9:213–20. doi: 10.1038/nri2494

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Mastelic B, Kamath AT, Fontannaz P, Tougne C, Rochat AF, Belnoue E, et al. Environmental and T cell-intrinsic factors limit the expansion of neonatal follicular T helper cells but may be circumvented by specific adjuvants. J Immunol. (2012) 189:5764–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Viemann D, Schlenke P, Hammers HJ, Kirchner H, Kruse A. Differential expression of the B cell-restricted molecule CD22 on neonatal B lymphocytes depending upon antigen stimulation. Eur J Immunol. (2000) 30:550–9. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200002)30:2%3C550::AID-IMMU550%3E3.0.CO;2-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Muthukkumar S, Goldstein J, Stein KE. The ability of B cells and dendritic cells to present antigen increases during ontogeny. J Immunol. (2000) 165:4803–13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.9.4803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Lorenzo ME, Hodgson A, Robinson DP, Kaplan JB, Pekosz A, Klein SL. Antibody responses and cross protection against lethal influenza A viruses differ between the sexes in C57BL/6 mice. Vaccine. (2011) 29:9246–55. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Eidinger D, Garrett TJ. Studies of the regulatory effects of the sex hormones on antibody formation and stem cell differentiation. J Exp Med. (1972) 136:1098–116. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.1098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Monteiro C, Kasahara T, Sacramento PM, Dias A, Leite S, Silva VG, et al. Human pregnancy levels of estrogen and progesterone contribute to humoral immunity by activating TFH/B cell axis. Eur J Immunol. (2021) 51:167–79. doi: 10.1002/eji.202048658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Cohen-Solal JF, Jeganathan V, Hill L, Kawabata D, Rodriguez-Pinto D, Grimaldi C, et al. Hormonal regulation of B-cell function and systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. (2008) 17:528–32. doi: 10.1177/0961203308089402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Bynoe MS, Grimaldi CM, Diamond B. Estrogen up-regulates Bcl-2 and blocks tolerance induction of naive B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2000) 97:2703–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040577497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Grimaldi CM, Cleary J, Dagtas AS, Moussai D, Diamond B. Estrogen alters thresholds for B cell apoptosis and activation. J Clin Invest. (2002) 109:1625–33. doi: 10.1172/JCI0214873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Pauklin S, Sernandez IV, Bachmann G, Ramiro AR, Petersen-Mahrt SK. Estrogen directly activates AID transcription and function. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:99–111. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Lucchinetti C, Bruck W, Parisi J, Scheithauer B, Rodriguez M, Lassmann H. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann Neurol. (2000) 47:707–17. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200006)47:6%3C707::AID-ANA3%3E3.0.CO;2-Q

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: puberty, autoimmunity, T helper cells (Th cells), antigen presenting cell (APC), gonadal hormone, multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE)

Citation: Ucciferri CC and Dunn SE (2022) Effect of puberty on the immune system: Relevance to multiple sclerosis. Front. Pediatr. 10:1059083. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1059083

Received: 30 September 2022; Accepted: 3 November 2022;
Published: 2 December 2022.

Edited by:

Jonatan Leffler, Telethon Kids Institute, Australia

Reviewed by:

Yun Liang, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Pamela Ann McCombe, The University of Queensland, Australia

© 2022 Ucciferri and Dunn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shannon E. Dunn U2hhbm5vbi5EdW5uQHVuaXR5aGVhbHRoLnRv

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Pediatric Rheumatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.