Elizabeth Yen
Jonathan M. Davis- 1Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- 2Mother Infant Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- 3Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, United States
The opioid epidemic has adversely affected neonates and children, yet the mechanisms by which it impacts this population are not well understood. Not only does prenatal opioid exposure result in short-term consequences shortly after birth, it also creates long-term sequelae that may predispose these children to physical, emotional, psychiatric, cognitive, and socioeconomic problems in the future. This article provides a scoping overview of the long-term effects of antenatal opioid exposure on neonates and children as well as quality improvement and research efforts to understand and mitigate this major public health concern.
Introduction
Between 1999 and 2014, the number of pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD) increased from 1.5 to 6.5 cases per 1,000 hospital births (1). This led to a steep increase in the number of neonates with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) from 1.2 to 8.0 per 1,000 hospital births, with some areas reaching 20.0 per 1,000 hospital births (2, 3). A diagnosis of NAS is based on a variety of systems that evaluate the presence and severity of withdrawal (4–11). Non-pharmacologic approaches remain the primary focus of NAS management followed the initiation of pharmacotherapy if signs are still significant. This review will discuss the definition of NAS, pharmacotherapy of NAS, longer-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, and new initiatives to monitor and potentially mitigate longer-term complications.
The definition of NAS
With standardization of medication-assisted treatment (MAT), many pregnant women are receiving methadone, buprenorphine, and buprenorphine/naloxone. Consequently, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) is used to characterize signs of withdrawal result specifically from maternal opioid use. However, due to frequent polysubstance use during pregnancy, most clinicians continue to use the term NAS instead of NOWS.
While a diagnosis of NAS is made frequently, there is no consensus on the precise criteria. Some apply the diagnosis to: (1) all infants with a history of maternal OUD during pregnancy; (2) those with signs of withdrawal based on systems of assessment; and 3) the need for pharmacotherapy when non-pharmacologic measures are insufficient. Such variation in the definition of NAS can impact diagnostic coding, reimbursement, bedside management, research, and public health/policy (12).
To address this critical gap in terminology and the definition of NAS, a recent effort led by the US Department of Health and Human Services involved researchers, clinicians, and policy experts who proposed a simplified definition of NAS. The consensus recommendations included two key elements: (1) in utero exposure to opioids (with or without other substances), and (2) the presence of 2 of 5 of the most common clinical signs of NAS, i.e., high-pitched/excessive cry, poor sleep, hypertonia, tremors, and gastrointestinal issues. This clinical definition was intended to promote standardization of bedside management of these neonates, enhance research efforts, and promote public policy. The goal is to support the mother-infant dyad and provide services to help families impacted by the opioid epidemic. The authors acknowledged the unintended consequences of this enhanced definition and proposed foundational ethical principles while calling for the need to further validate the definition (12).
Effects of polysubstance use on the severity of NAS
Women with OUD experience other mental health issues and the need for psychotropic medications (13, 14). Infants exposed to maternal opioids were more likely to require pharmacotherapy when co-exposed to benzodiazepines (15), tobacco (16), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (16–18), gabapentin (19), marijuana (20), or cocaine (21). The use of psychotropic medications in addition to prescription opioids increased the severity of NAS by two-fold compared to the use of prescription opioids alone (22). The absolute risk for severe NAS (need for pharmacologic treatment) was highest in infants co-exposed to opioids and gabapentin. Conversely, some studies showed that the risk of NAS was not affected by other psychotropic medications (23–25). It is unclear if drug-drug interactions or other factors (e.g., socioeconomic, maternal stressors, other medical or psychiatric disorders) contribute to the severity of withdrawal in infants with polysubstance exposure. There is very limited long-term data regarding these multiple exposures and comprehensive studies (adjusting for multiple confounders) are urgently needed and are being evaluated in several National Institutes of Health (NIH) supported Helping End Addiction Long Term (HEAL) studies.
Presentation and management of NAS
Due to the continuous transplacental flow of opioids from the mother to the fetus, birth involves a sudden termination of supply and development of NAS. The μ-opioid receptors are ubiquitously present in the central nervous, peripheral nervous, and gastrointestinal systems. Opioid binding to these receptors inhibits adenyl cyclase, which further inhibits cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production and downstream release of neurotransmitters (26). Cessation of opioids activates adenyl cyclase and disrupts the central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous systems that ultimately results in NAS. The onset of NAS can occur 24 h to several days after birth, depending on the half-life of the maternal opioid and other concurrent substance use.
First-line management of NAS is non-pharmacologic measures. Neonatal morphine solution is the most common opioid-replacement agent used in the US followed by methadone and buprenorphine. Non-opioid or adjunct agents include phenobarbital, clonidine, and gabapentin. Pharmacotherapy alleviates signs of withdrawal and optimizes short term physical, physiologic, and psychological functioning. A comprehensive review on the pharmacotherapy of NAS was recently published (27).
Ongoing management and long-term effects of NAS
Breastfeeding and use of breastmilk
Research demonstrates the benefits of breastfeeding in mother-infant dyads, especially pregnant mothers receiving MAT and not using illicit drugs (28–30). Although limited by small sample sizes, breastmilk analyses have shown that the concentrations of buprenorphine and methadone are low and pose minimal risks to neonates (31, 32). There are clear benefits of breastfeeding including less severe withdrawal, less need for pharmacotherapy, and shorter length of hospital stay (33, 34). The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has recommended breastfeeding based on long-term benefits such as lower risk of type II diabetes, hypertension, and cancer in mothers and lower respiratory tract infections, diarrhea, otitis media, sudden infant death syndrome, asthma, and obesity in infants and children (28).
Physical therapy
In response to the opioid epidemic, the American Physical Therapy Association has advocated for safer alternatives to pharmacologic management of pain (35). The Association promoted a non-pharmacologic approach to alleviate pain and treat NAS through its “#ChoosePT” campaign (36). Neonatal physical therapists can recognize different clinical manifestations of withdrawal from various pharmacologic agents. Such early recognition is crucial in allowing the physical therapist to help alleviate the signs of withdrawal. Physical therapists develop and personalize care plans based on the Synactive Theory of Development, focusing on an infant's interaction with the environment, particularly on four behavioral subsystems, i.e., 1) autonomic control, 2) muscle tone and motor control, 3) sleep-wake cycle and attention state control, and 4) sensory processing/modulation (37–39). Good communication between bedside clinical staff and physical therapists is essential in providing infants with the best care plan. Ideally infants should be calm, especially at the beginning of their waking time so that physical therapists can observe the natural sleep-wake transitions and the infant's regulation skills.
Using various standardized motor assessments such as the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale/NNNS (40) and Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (41), physical therapists can optimize a neonate's sensory-motor environment. Such interventions may include tactile stimulation, positioning aids to create supportive boundaries, vertical rocking, pacifier usage, and other calming strategies. Environmental controls that benefit opioid-exposed neonates include low-stimulation environments, e.g., minimal noise, dim lights, and the use of white noise. Additionally, sensory-motor integration may benefit from infant massage (41), swaddling, hydrotherapy (42), antigravity postural positioning, and slow and steady movements (43). All these interventions aim to integrate auditory, tactile, visual, and vestibular management to improve behavioral state regulation in opioid-exposed neonates.
Nutrition and growth
Infants with prenatal opioid exposure are at risk for premature birth, lower birth weight, and a smaller head circumference (44–46). These likely result from the influence of maternal opioid/drug use on placental function and nutritional transport, which in turn may lead to fetal growth restriction (47). These neonates often experience postnatal growth issues, believed to result from a withdrawal-induced hypermetabolic state, feeding difficulties, and/or gastrointestinal disturbances (48, 49). A recent study demonstrated the molecular impact of prenatal opioid exposure on the hypothalamic and reward genes that regulate feeding behavior, indicating that in utero opioids can affect feeding regulation resulting in subsequent feeding difficulties and growth failure (50).
Because of the smaller size and postnatal growth failure, studies examined whether higher caloric intake could provide better nutritional support for opioid-exposed neonates. Infants randomized to 24 kilocalories per ounce (kcal/oz) formula had greater weight gain compared to those receiving standard 20 kcal/oz formula indicating that more calories are needed to provide ideal nutritional support in NAS (48). Another study showed that the high-caloric formulas were associated with less treatment failure, less weight loss, and shorter LOS compared to lower caloric formula (51). Although low-lactose formulas are perceived to alleviate gastrointestinal issues during the withdrawal period (51), several studies showed that low-lactose formula did not improve NAS outcomes (30, 52, 53).
Although opioid-exposed neonates are born smaller and may have early weight loss, these infants may develop hyperphagia as a compensatory mechanism (54, 55). The growth trajectory of these infants can involve excessive catch-up growth in the first year of life with body composition analysis showing more rapid gain in fat compared to fat-free mass (56, 57). A longitudinal study of cocaine-exposed neonates demonstrated that those born small for gestational age (SGA) developed rapid catch-up growth with a four-fold risk of obesity at nine years of age (58). While this study focused on prenatal cocaine exposure, it would be interesting to examine if opioid-exposed neonates have a similar risk profile. Could the smaller size at birth and abnormal feeding regulation and growth patterns be followed by increased adiposity in childhood and obesity/metabolic syndrome in adulthood? Opioid-exposed neonates may undergo fetal reprogramming (i.e., epigenetic changes) that may contribute to metabolic syndrome, abnormal lipid profiles, and cardiovascular disease in adults with opioid use disorder (59, 60). These studies suggest that opioid-exposed neonates may be at increased risk for nutritional and growth challenges that may persist into adulthood. While physicians are increasingly aware of the need for higher calories and nutritional evaluation for opioid-exposed neonates, there is a great need to advocate for long-term follow-up of infant growth (48, 51).
Abnormal brain development
Emerging data demonstrate the adverse effects of prenatal opioid exposure on the developing brain at the macrostructural, microstructural, neurophysiological, and/or functional levels. In utero opioid exposure results in a smaller head circumference (e.g., altered brain growth), although this effect may be mediated by co-exposure to maternal tobacco or other psychoactive medications (44, 61–64). Early studies using ultrasonography have shown enlargement of in the thalamus of exposed subjects over the first six months of life (65, 66). Amplitude electroencephalographic (aEEG) recordings in opioid-exposed neonates showed increased discontinuity and low voltage recordings, as well as reduced or absent sleep-wake cycling; all these factors were associated with the severity of withdrawal and the need for pharmacotherapy (67–69). aEEG also detected brief seizures in more than half of the infants developing NAS (69).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has also demonstrated smaller volumes in the basal ganglia, deep gray matter, thalamus, ventrolateral nuclei, brainstem, and cerebrospinal and larger volumes in the right cingulate gyrus and left occipital lobe white matter in NAS (70, 71). Merhar and colleagues reported punctate white matter lesions in the brain of 8 of 20 opioid-exposed neonates (72). In addition to the macrostructural changes, opioid-exposed neonates also have microstructural abnormalities. Diffusion tract imaging of opioid-exposed neonates demonstrated quantitatively and qualitatively reduced fractional anisotropy (FA), which reflects fiber density, axonal diameter, and the degree of myelination, evidence of compromised white matter tract integrity (73, 74). Because reduced FA is associated with motor and cognitive deficits (75), these findings may explain the neurodevelopmental issues experienced by infants with NAS and emphasize the need to monitor this population more closely. The Outcome of Babies with Opioid Exposure (OBOE) study is an ongoing longitudinal cohort study designed to evaluate the impact of prenatal opioid exposure on brain structure-function relationships over the first two years of life (76).
Advanced neuroimaging can provide an even more sophisticated way to demonstrate the adverse impact of prenatal opioid exposure on the developing brain. Radhakrishnan et al. utilized resting-state functional brain MRI and showed significantly higher connectivity between the right amygdala and medial prefrontal region in the exposed cohort (77). Given the role of the amygdala in emotion, stress, and fear and of the prefrontal cortex in the executive function and working memory, this finding has important implications for future addiction-related behavior and risks. Furthermore, alterations in thalamocortical functional connectivity in the brain correlated with the severity of NAS (78). This emphasizes the utility of delineating the subtle yet intricate alterations in neural circuitry caused by prenatal opioid exposure. Another study using resting-state functional MRI also showed that infants with prenatal opioid exposure had smaller network volumes, particularly in the primary visual network, which may explain the higher risk of developmental and visual problems (79).
Visual evoked potentials (VEP) are another method that has demonstrated altered brain functioning in NAS (80). Although VEP does not directly correlate with visual function, it reflects neural maturity and myelination when recording activity over the occipital area. This can provide an objective measure of the visual pathway from the retina to the visual cortex (81). Opioid-exposed neonates have been found to have abnormal VEP including altered morphology, decreased amplitudes, and prolonged peak times (82, 83). These findings either normalized in the first few years of life or persisted until a decade later (80–82, 84), highlighting the importance of ongoing surveillance throughout life in these high-risk infants.
Neurodevelopmental outcomes and early intervention (EI)
Opioid-exposed neonates are at increased risk for developmental, behavioral, educational, and psychological/mental health issues later in life (85–89). Neonates with NAS requiring pharmacotherapy are even more vulnerable due to in utero and postnatal exposures. A multisite, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing methadone with morphine in NAS demonstrated the superiority of methadone on length of hospital stay, length of stay due to NAS, and length of treatment (90). Despite this finding, a follow-up analysis looking at developmental milestones at 18 months demonstrated that neonates in both treatment arms had similar neurobehavioral deficits and a higher rate of the atypical profile on the NNNS which is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes (91). Furthermore, a higher NAS severity index may be predictive of developmental outcomes at 18 months (92), highlighting the necessity for longitudinal follow-up in these high-risk infants.
Updated AAP guidelines on NAS has emphasized the need for close developmental, behavioral, and mental health screenings after infants are discharged from the hospital (94). All opiod-exposed infants should be referred for comprehensive services (e.g., NICU developmental follow-up programs, EI, etc.) as available. This is a focus of part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/treatment.html) in order to further monitor developmental milestones in these high risk infants (93, 94). Even though EI services are available in all areas in the United States, not all opioid-exposed infants and their families receive these services. Peacock-Chambers et al. showed that in Massachusetts, where the diagnosis of NAS serves as automatic eligibility for one-year EI services, less than half of eligible infants enrolled (95). The rate of EI referral was also shown to vary by custody status (two-fold higher for those discharged with their biological families than foster families) and length of hospital stay (greater referral for those with longer stay). EI referral did not equate to EI enrollment, with only half of referred infants actually enrollment. A national survey also confirmed suboptimal EI referral for opioid-exposed neonates and the discrepancy based on the need for pharmacotherapy, with those requiring pharmacotherapy getting a higher referral rate than those who did not (96). This finding is concerning since all opioid-exposed neonates are at risk for long-term adverse effects, irrespective of the severity of withdrawal and the need for pharmacotherapy (97). Other home-based services, such as the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program may also benefit these families.
Although a few follow-up studies did not demonstrate significant developmental deficits in children with prenatal opioid exposure, these children can actually demonstrate poorer school performance and worse functioning at adolescence (85, 87). However, these findings may be influenced by food and housing insecurity, psychological and physical stress, and many other environmental factors encountered in childhood. There is an urgent need to study the long-term impact of prenatal opioid exposure which should also include academic and family outcomes to determine if significant differences exist related to the types of treatments (non-pharmacologic/pharmacologic) as well as various therapeutic approaches (scheduled treatments compared to use as needed).
Ophthalmologic disorders
Neonates with prenatal opioid exposure are at risk for ophthalmologic abnormalities such as strabismus, nystagmus, reduced visual acuity, impaired smooth pursuit, and delayed visual development due to direct neurotoxic effects of opioids and/or other social and neurodevelopmental factors (98–101). A cross-sectional study of children with a history of prenatal opioid exposure showed a 10-fold risk of strabismus in the first three years of life, with the mean age of presentation at 8.3 months (102). Another study showed a 6-fold risk of strabismus and a 90-fold risk of nystagmus in the first five years of life (103). While exodeviations presented earlier in life (6.8 months), esodeviations presented later at 11.6 months (104). A cohort study in a million infants showed that those with NAS had an 8-fold risk of nystagmus, 4.7-fold risk of strabismus, and a 2-fold risk of ophthalmologic-related hospitalization before age 13 (86). A longitudinal cohort study in nearly 800,000 infants showed that substance-exposed infants had a significantly higher incidence of ophthalmologic-related hospital admissions compared to unexposed infants (47.0 vs. 32.0 per 10,000 person-years), with a much higher cumulative incidence that widened over time (399.8 per 10,000 by 12 years of age). Opioids were shown to have a greater impact on ophthalmologic-related hospitalizations than cocaine, cannabis, and others (105). Altogether, evidence supports the association between prenatal opioid exposure, abnormal visuomotor development, and the need for comprehensive anticipatory guidance and timely ophthalmology referrals for this population.
Conclusion
The study and understanding of NAS has advanced dramatically in the last several decades resulting in tremendous progress in the care of maternal-infant dyads affected by the opioid epidemic. The well-being of these families remains a major public health priority that must look beyond the short-term issues. In addition to efforts to reduce costs and length of hospital stay, clinicians and researchers must provide sound anticipatory guidance that prioritizes multifaceted care surrounding infants with NAS—nutrition, growth, cognitive and neurodevelopmental follow-up, physical therapy, ophthalmologic evaluation, and ample family support. Prenatal opioid exposure is a lifelong process with potentially deleterious effects if not closely monitored. All healthcare, government, industrial, and public health stakeholders must collaborate and advance care that focuses on both the short and longer-term preventive and curative measures for this vulnerable and high-risk population.
Author contributions
EY: paper concept, writing and editing of manuscript. JD: paper concept and manuscript editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Haight SC, Ko JY, Tong VT, Bohm MK, Callaghan WM. Opioid use disorder documented at delivery hospitalization—united States, 1999–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2018) 67:845–9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6731a1
2. Winkelman TNA, Villapiano N, Kozhimannil KB, Davis MM, Patrick SW. Incidence and costs of neonatal abstinence syndrome among infants with medicaid: 2004–2014. Pediatrics. (2018) 141:e20173520. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3520
3. Tolia VN, Patrick SW, Bennett MM, Murthy K, Sousa J, Smith PB, et al. Increasing incidence of the neonatal abstinence syndrome in U.S. Neonatal ICUs. New Engl J Med. (2015) 372:2118–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1500439
4. Finnegan LP, Connaughton JF Jr, Kron RE, Enich JP. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: assessment and management. Addict Dis. (1975) 2:141–58.1163358
5. Finnegan LP, Kaltenbach K. Neonatal abstinence syndrome. In: Hoekelman RA, Friedman SB, Nelson NM, Seidel HM, Weitzman ML, editors. Primary pediatric care. St. Louis: Mosby (1992). p. 1367–78.
6. Jones HE, Kaltenbach K, Heil SH, Stine SM, Coyle MG, Arria AM, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure. N Engl J Med. (2010) 363:2320–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005359
7. Jones HE, Seashore C, Johnson E, Horton E, O’Grady KE, Andringa K, et al. Psychometric assessment of the neonatal abstinence scoring system and the MOTHER NAS scale. Am J Addict. (2016) 25:370–3. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12388
8. Lipsitz PJ. A proposed narcotic withdrawal score for use with newborn infants: a pragmatic evaluation of its efficacy. Clin Pediatr. (1975) 14:592–4. doi: 10.1177/000992287501400613
9. Zahorodny W, Rom C, Whitney W, Giddens S, Samuel M, Maichuk G, et al. The neonatal withdrawal inventory: a simplified score of newborn withdrawal. J Behav Pediatr. (1998) 19:89–93. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199804000-00005
10. Green M, Suffet F. The neonatal narcotic withdrawal index: a device for the improvement of care in the abstinence syndrome. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. (1981) 8:203–13. doi: 10.3109/00952998108999125
11. Grossman MR, Lipshaw MJ, Osborn RR, Berkwitt AK. A novel approach to assessing infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Hosp Pediatr. (2018) 8:1–6. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0128
12. Jilani SM, Jones HE, Grossman M, Jansson LM, Terplan M, Faherty LJ, et al. Standardizing the clinical definition of opioid withdrawal in the neonates. J Pediatr. (2022) 243:33–9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.12.021
13. Hwang CS, Kang EM, Kornegay CJ, Staffa JA, Jones CM, McAninch JK. Trends in the concomitant prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines, 2002-2014. Am J Prev Med. (2016) 51:151–60. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.014
14. Hanley GE, Mintzes B. Patterns of psychotropic medicine use in pregnancy in the United States from 2006 to 2011 among women with private insurance. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2014) 14:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-242
15. Sanlorenzo LA, Cooper WO, Dudley JA, Stratton S, Maalouf FI, Patrick SW. Increased severity of neonatal abstinence syndrome associated with concomitant antenatal opioid and benzodiazepine exposure. Hosp Pediatr. (2019) 9:569–75. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0227
16. Patrick SW, Dudley J, Martin PR, Harrell FE, Warren MD, Hartmann KE, et al. Prescription opioid epidemic and infant outcomes. Pediatrics. (2015) 135:842–50. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.03.002
17. Bhatt-Mehta V, Richards J, Sturza J, Schumacher RE. Impact of in-utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and opioids on neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. J Addict Med. (2019) 13:227–34. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000484
18. Bakhireva LN, Sparks A, Herman M, Hund L, Ashley M, Salisbury A. Severity of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome with prenatal exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pediatr Res. (2022) 91:867–73. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01756-4
19. Loudin S, Haas J, Payne M, Linz MF, Meaney-Delman D, Honein MA, et al. Identifying co-exposure to opiates and gabapentin during pregnancy. J Pediatr. (2020) 217:196–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.029
20. O'Connor AB, Kelly BK, O'Brien LM. Maternal and infant outcomes following third trimester exposure to marijuana in opioid dependent pregnant women maintained on buprenorphine. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2017) 180:200–3. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.012
21. Fulroth R, Phillips B, Durand DJ. Perinatal outcome of infants exposed to cocaine and/or heroin in utero. Am J Dis Child. (1989) 143:905–10. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1989.02150200057018
22. Huybrechts KF, Bateman BT, Desai RJ, Hernandez-Diaz S, Rough K, Mogun H, et al. Risk of neonatal drug withdrawal after intrauterine co-exposure to opioids and psychotropic medications: cohort study. Br Med J. (2017) 358:j3326. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3326
23. Heintzelman J, Persons L, Melnykov I. Substance use during pregnancy: impact on Colorado community hospital. J Cannabis Res. (2020) 11(2):39. doi: 10.1186/s42238-020-00047-9
24. Dryden C, Young D, Hepburn M, Mactier H. Maternal methadone use in pregnancy: factors associated with the development of neonatal abstinence syndrome and implications for healthcare resources. BJOG. (2009) 116:665–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02073.x
25. Kaltenbach K, Holbrook AM, Coyle MG, Heil SH, Salisbury AL, Stine SM, et al. Predicting treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome in infants born to women maintained on opioid agonist medication. Addiction. (2012) 107(Suppl 1):45–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04038.x
26. Johnson K, Gerarda C, Greenough A. Treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Med. (2019) 24:133–41.
27. Yen E, Kraft W, Davis JM. Pharmacologic management of neonatal abstinence syndrome. In: Yaffe SJ, Aranda JV, editors. Neonatal and pediatric pharmacology: Therapeutic principles in practice, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer (2021). p. 530–40.
28. Meek JY, Noble L. Section on breastfeeding. Policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. (2022) 150:e2022057988. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-057988
29. Holmes AP, Schmidlin HN, Kurzum EN. Breastfeeding considerations for mothers of infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pharmacotherapy. (2017) 37:861–9. doi: 10.1002/phar.1944
30. Lembeck AL, Tuttle D, Locke R, Lawler L, Jimenez P, Mackley A, et al. Breastfeeding and formula selection in neonatal abstinence syndrome. Am J Perinatol. (2021) 38:1488–93. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713754
31. Ilett KF, Hackett LP, Gower S, Doherty DA, Hamilton D, Bartu AE. Estimated dose exposure of the neonate to buprenorphine and its metabolite norbuprenorphine via breastmilk during maternal buprenorphine substitution treatment. Breastfeed Med. (2012) 7:269–74. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2011.0096
32. Jansson LM, Choo R, Velez ML, Lowe R, Huestis MA. Methadone maintenance and long-term lactation. Breastfeed Med. (2008) 3:34–7. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2007.0032
33. Chu L, McGrath JM, Qiao J, Brownell E, Recto P, Cleveland LM, et al. A meta-analysis of breastfeeding effects for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Nurs Res. (2022) 71:54–65. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000555
34. Short VL, Gannon M, Abatemarco DJ. The association between breastfeeding and length of hospital stay among infants diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome: a population-based study of in-hospital births. Breastfeed Med. (2016) 11:343–9. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0084
35. McCarty DB, Peat JR, O’Donnell S, Graham E, Malcolm WF. “Choose physical therapy” for neonatal abstinence syndrome: clinical management for infants affected by the opioid crisis. Phys Ther. (2019) 99:771–85. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz039
36. American Physical Therapy Association White Paper. Beyond opioids: how physical therapy transforms pain management to improve health (2021). Available at: https://www.apta.org/contentassets/b9421650038941469c75d06a0a191069/beyond-opioids-white-paper.pdf (Accessed August 13, 2022).
37. Als H. Toward a synactive theory of development: promise for the assessment and support of infant individually. Infant Ment Health J. (1982) 3:229–43. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(198224)3:4%3C229::AID-IMHJ2280030405%3E3.0.CO;2-H
38. Maltese A, Gallai B, Marotta R, Lavano F, Lavano SM, Tripi G, et al. The synactive theory of development: the keyword for neurodevelopmental disorders. Acta Medica Medit. (2017) 33:257. doi: 10.19193/0393-63842017_2s_194
39. Velez M, Jansson LM. The opioid dependent mother and newborn dyad: non-pharmacologic care. J Addict Med. (2008) 2:113–20. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31817e6105
40. Wouldes TA, Woodward LJ. Neurobehavior of newborn infants exposed prenatally to methadone and identification of a neurobehavioral profile linked to poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 24 months. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0240905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240905
41. Barlow J, Herath NI, Bartram Torrance C, Bennett C, Wei Y. The neonatal behavioral assessment scale (NBAS) and newborn behavioral observations (NBO) system for supporting caregivers and improving outcomes in caregivers and their infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018) 3:CD011754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011754.pub2
42. Hahn J, Lengerich A, Byrd R, Stoltz R, Hench J, Byrd S, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: the experience of infant massage. Create Nurs. (2016) 22:45–50. doi: 10.1891/1078-4535.22.1.45
43. Çaka SY, Gӧzen D. Effects of swaddled and traditional tub bathing methods on crying and physiological responses of newborns. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. (2018) 23:e12202. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12202
44. Graeve R, Balalian AA, Richter M, Kielstein H, Fink A, Martins SS, et al. Infants’ prenatal exposure to opioids and the association with birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. (2022) 36:125–43. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12805
45. Azuine RE, Ji Y, Chang HY, Kim Y, Ji H, DiBari J, et al. Prenatal risk factors and perinatal and postnatal outcomes associated with maternal opioid exposure in an urban, low-income, multiethnic US population. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2:e196405. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6405
46. Leyenaar JK, Schaefer AP, Sawwerman JR, Moen EL, O’Malley AJ, Goodman DC. Infant mortality associated with prenatal opioid exposure. JAMA Pediatr. (2021) 175:706–14. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.6364
47. Harter K. Opioid use disorder in pregnancy. Ment Health Clin. (2019) 9:359–72. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2019.11.359
48. Bogen DL, Hanusa BH, Baker R, Medoff-Cooper B, Cohlan B. Randomized clinical trial of standard- versus high-calorie formula for methadone-exposed infants: a feasibility study. Hosp Pediatr. (2018) 8:7–14. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0114
49. Favara MT, Smieth J, Friedman D, Lafferty M, Carola D, Adeniyi-Jones S, et al. Growth failure in infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. (2022) 42:313–8. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01183-7
50. Yen E, Kaneko-Tarui T, Ruthazer R, Harvey-Wilkes K, Hassaneen M, Maron JL. Sex-dependent gene expression in infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. J Pediatr. (2019) 214:60–65.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.07.032
51. Kaplan HC, Kuhnell P, Walsh MC, Crowley M, McClead R, Wexelblatt S, et al. Orchestrated testing of formula type to reduce length of stay in neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics. (2020) 146:e20190914. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0914
52. Pandey R, Kanike N, Ibrahim M, Swarup N, Super DM, Groh-Wargo S, et al. Lactose-free infant formula does not change outcomes of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS): a randomized clinical trial. J Perinatol. (2021) 41:598–605. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00797-7
53. Alsaleem M, Dusin J, Akangire G. Effect of low lactose formula on the short-term outcomes of neonatal abstinence syndrome: a systematic review. Glob Pediatr Health. (2021) 8:2333794X211035258. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211035258
54. Shephard R, Greenough A, Johnson K, Gerada C. Hyperphagia, weight gain, and neonatal drug withdrawal. Acta Paediatr. (2002) 91:951–3. doi: 10.1080/080352502760272641
55. Martinez A, Kastner B, Taeusch HW. Hyperphagia in neonates withdrawing from methadone. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (1999) 80:F178–82. doi: 10.1136/fn.80.3.f178
56. Corr TE, Schaefer W, Paul IM. Body composition during the first 4 months in infants affected by neonatal abstinence syndrome: a pilot study. J Dev Orig Health Dis. (2022) 13:120–7. doi: 10.1017/S2040174421000052
57. Vance JC, Chat DC, Tudehope DI, Gray PH, Hayes AJ. Infants born to narcotic dependent mothers: physical growth patterns in the first 12 months of life. J Paediatr Child Health. (1997) 33:504–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1997.tb01659.x
58. LaGasse L, Gaskins RB, Bada HS, Shankaran S, Liu J, Lester BM, et al. Prenatal cocaine exposure and childhood obesity at nine years. Neurotoxicol Teratol. (2011) 33:188–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2010.11.002
59. Najafipour H, Beik A. The impact of opium consumption on blood glucose, serum lipids and blood pressure, and related mechanisms. Front Physiol. (2016) 7:436. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00436
60. Vallecillo G, Robles MJ, Torrens M, Samos P, Roquer A, Martires PK, et al. Metabolic syndrome among individuals with heroin use disorders on methadone therapy: prevalence, characteristics, and related factors. Subst Abus. (2018) 39:46–51. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1363122
61. Kaltenbach K, Finnegan LP. Perinatal and developmental outcome of infants exposed to methadone in-utero. Neurotoxicol Teratol. (1987) 9:311–3. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(87)90021-3
62. Towers CV, Hyatt BW, Visconti KC, Chernicky L, Chattin K, Fortner KB. Neonatal head circumference in newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics. (2019) 143:e20180541. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0541
63. Choo RE, Huestis MA, Schroeder JR, Shin AS, Jones HE. Neonatal abstinence syndrome in methadone-exposed infants is altered by level of prenatal tobacco exposure. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2004) 75:253–60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.03.012
64. Morimoto D, Washio Y, Hatayama K, Okamura T, Watanabe H, Yoshimoto J, et al. Head circumference in infants with nonopiate-induced neonatal abstinence syndrome. CNS Spectr. (2021) 26:509–12. doi: 10.1017/S1092852920001522
65. Schulson M, Liu A, Björkman T, Quinton A, Mann KP, Benzie R, et al. Mid-gestational enlargement of fetal thalami in women exposed to methadone during pregnancy. Front Surg. (2014) 1:28. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00028
66. Pasto ME, Deiling J, Graziani LJ, Ehrlich S, Finnegan LP. Disparity in hemispheric and thalamic growth in infants undergoing abstinence. NIDA Res Monogr. (1986) 67:342–8.3092088
67. Limjoco J, Zawadzki L, Belden M, Eickhoff J, Ikonomidou C. Amplitude-integrated EEG use in neonatal abstinence syndrome: a pilot study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2020) 33:3565–70. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1579190
68. Lust C, Vesoulis ZA, Zempel J, Gu H, Lee S, Rao R, et al. An amplitude integrated EEG evaluation of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Am J Perinatol. (2022). Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1055/a-1877-9291
69. Rana D, Pollard L, Rowland J, Dhanireddy R, Pourcyrous M. Amplitude-integrated EEG in infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. (2019) 12:391–7. doi: 10.3233/NPM-1834
70. Yuan Q, Rubic M, Seah J, Rae C, Wright IM, Kaltenbach K, et al. Do maternal opioids reduce neonatal regional brain volumes? A pilot study. J Perinatol. (2014) 34:909–13. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.111
71. Merhar SL, Kline JE, Braimah A, Kline-Fath BM, Tkach JA, Altaye M, et al. Prenatal opioid exposure is associated with smaller brain volumes in multiple regions. Pediatr Res. (2021) 90:397–402. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-01265-w
72. Merhar SL, Parikh NA, Braimah A, Poindexter BB, Tkach J, Kline-Fath B. White matter injury and structural anomalies in infants with prenatal opioid exposure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2019) 40:2161–5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6282
73. Monnelly VJ, Anblagan D, Quigley A, Cabez MB, Cooper ES, Mactier H, et al. Prenatal methadone exposure is associated with altered neonatal brain development. Neuroimage Clin. (2017) 18:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.033
74. Sikka P, Madan N, Yen E. Early white matter tract changes in neonates with prenatal opioid exposure: a pilot study. J Perinatol. (2022). Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01427-0
75. Loe IM, Adams JN, Feldman HM. Executive function in relation to white matter in preterm and full term children. Front Pediatr. (2019) 6:418. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00418
76. Bann CM, Newman JE, Poindexter B, Okoniewski K, DeMauro S, Lorch SA, et al. Outcomes of babies with opioid exposure (OBOE): protocol of a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Pediatr Res. (2022). Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02279-2
77. Radhakrishnan R, Elsaid NMH, Sadhasivam S, Reher TA, Hines AC, Yoder KK, et al. Resting state functional MRI in infants with prenatal opioid exposure-a pilot study. Neuroradiology. (2021) 63:585–91. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02552-3,
78. Radhakrishnan R, Vishnubhotla RV, Guckien Z, Zhao Y, Sokol GM, Haas DM, et al. Thalamocortical functional connectivity in infants with prenatal opioid exposure correlates with severity of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Neuroradiology. (2022) 64:1649–59. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-02939-4
79. Merhar SL, Jiang W, Parikh NA, Yin W, Zhou Z, Tkach JA, et al. Effects of prenatal opioid exposure on functional networks in infancy. Dev Cogn Neurosci. (2021) 51:100996. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100996
80. Mactier H, Hamilton R. Prenatal opioid—increasing evidence of harm. Early Hum Dev. (2020) 15:105188. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105188
81. Whitham JN, Spurrier NJ, Sawyer MG, Baghurst PA, Taplin JE, White JM, et al. The effects of prenatal exposure to buprenorphine or methadone on infant visual evoked potentials. Neurotoxicol Teratol. (2010) 32:280–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2009.09.001
82. McGlone L, Mactier H, Hamilton R, Bradnam M, Boulton R, Borland W, et al. Visual evoked potentials in infants exposed to methadone in utero. Arch Dis Child. (2008) 93:784–6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.132985
83. McGlone L, Hamilton R, McCulloch DL, Boulton R, Bradnam MS, Weaver LT, et al. Neonatal visual evoked potentials in infants born to mothers prescribed methadone. Pediatr. (2013) 131:e857–63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2113
84. McGlone L, Hamilton R, McCulloch DL, MacKinnon JR, Bradnam M, Mactier H. Visual outcome in infants born to drug-misusing mothers prescribed methadone in pregnancy. Br J Ophthalmol. (2014) 98:238–45. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303967
85. Yeoh SL, Eastwood J, Wright IM, Morton R, Melhuish E, Ward M, et al. Cognitive and motor outcomes of children with prenatal opioid exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2:e197025. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7025
86. Uebel H, Wright IM, Burns L, Hilder L, Bajuk B, Breen C, et al. Reasons for re-hospitalization in children who had neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics. (2015) 136:e811–20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2767
87. Oei JL, Melhuish E, Uebel H, Azzam N, Breen C, Burns L, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and high school performance. Pediatrics. (2017) 139:e20162651. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2651
88. Sherman LJ, Ali MM, Mutter R, Larson J. Mental disorders among children born with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Psychiatr Serv. (2019) 70:151. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800341
89. Merhar SL, McAllister JM, Wedig-Stevie KE, Klein AC, Meinzen-Derr J, Poindexter BB. Retrospective review of neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome. J Perinatol. (2018) 38:587–92. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0088-9
90. Davis JM, Shenberger J, Terrin N, Breeze J, Hudak M, Wachman EM, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of methadone vs. Morphine for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. (2018) 172:741–8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1307
91. Czynski AJ, Davis JM, Dansereau LM, Engelhardt B, Marro P, Bogen DL, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonates randomized to morphine or methadone for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome. J Pediatr. (2020) 219:146–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.12.018
92. Flannery T, Davis JM, Czynski AJ, Dansereau LM, Oliveira EL, Camardo SA, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome severity index predicts 18-month neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates randomized to morphine or methadone. J Pediatr. (2020) 227:101–7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.034
93. Patrick SW, Barfield WD, Poindexter BB. Committee on Fetus and newborn, committee on substance use and prevention. Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Pediatrics. (2020) 146:e2020029074. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-029074
94. Zubler JM, Wiggins LD, Macias MM, Whitaker TM, Shaw JS, Squires JK, et al. Evidence-informed milestones for developmental surveillance tools. Pediatrics. (2022) 149:e2021052138. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052138
95. Peacock-Chambers E, Leyenaar JK, Foss S, Feinberg E, Wilson D, Friedmann PD, et al. Early intervention referral and enrollment among infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. (2019) 40:441–50. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000679
96. Yen E, Murphy HJ, Friedman H, Lucke AM, Rodday AM. Neonatal abstinence syndrome practice variations across pediatric subspecialty. J Perinatol. (2021) 41:1512–4. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00831-8
97. Hall ES, McAllister JM, Wexelblatt SL. Developmental disorders and medical complications among infants with subclinical intrauterine opioid exposures. Popul Health Manag. (2019) 22:19–24. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0016
98. Walhovd KB, Watts R, Amlien I, Woodward LJ. Neural tract development of infants born to methadone-maintained mothers. Pediatr Neurol. (2012) 47:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2012.04.008
99. McGlone L, Mactier H, Weaver LT. Drug misuse in pregnancy: losing sight of the baby? Arch Dis Child. (2009) 94:708–12. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.156851
100. Walhovd KB, Bjørnebekk A, Haabrekke K, Siqveland T, Slinning K, Nygaard E, et al. Child neuroanatomical, neurocognitive, and visual acuity outcomes with maternal opioid and polysubstance detoxification. Pediatr Neurol. (2015) 52:326–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.11.008
101. Melinder A, Konijnenberg C, Sarfi M. Deviant smooth pursuit in preschool children exposed prenatally to methadone or buprenorphine and tobacco affects integrative visuomotor capabilities. Addiction. (2013) 108:2175–82. doi: 10.1111/add.12267
102. Gill AC, Oei J, Lewis NL, Younan N, Kennedy I, Lui K. Strabismus in infants of opiate-dependent mothers. Acta Paediatr. (2003) 92:379–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00561.x
103. Cornish KS, Hrabovsky M, Scott NW, Myerscough E, Reddy AR. The short- and long-term effects on the visual system of children following exposure to maternal substance misuse in pregnancy. Am J Ophthalmol. (2013) 156:190–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.02.004
104. Yoo SH, Jansson LM, Park H-J. Sensorimotor outcomes in children with prenatal opioid exposure. J AAPOS. (2017) 21:316–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.05.025
Keywords: neonatal abstinence syndrome, short-term effects, long-term outcomes, nutrition, growth trajectory, brain development, ophthalmologic disorders, physical therapy
Citation: Yen E and Davis JM (2022) The immediate and long-term effects of prenatal opioid exposure. Front. Pediatr. 10:1039055. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1039055
Received: 7 September 2022; Accepted: 18 October 2022;
Published: 7 November 2022.
Edited by:
Henrietta S. Bada, University of Kentucky, United StatesReviewed by:
Enrique Gomez-Pomar, University of Kentucky, United StatesShekher Mohan, Liberty University, United States
© 2022 Yen and Davis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elizabeth Yen ZXllbkB0dWZ0c21lZGljYWxjZW50ZXIub3Jn
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Neonatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics