Bullying Victimization and Life Satisfaction Among Rural Left-Behind Children in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the associations between bullying victimization and life satisfaction in primary school children and also investigate the interactive effects of left-behind status and bullying victimization on life satisfaction.

Materials and Methods: Bullying victimization was measured using the Chinese version of the revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Life satisfaction was assessed using the Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS). Life satisfaction is composed of five domains, namely, family, school, friends, environment, and self-satisfaction. Left-behind status of rural children was defined as one or both their parents migrating to working in cities. The data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U tests, Chi-square tests, and multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses.

Results: A total of 810 primary school children were involved, of which 8.5% reported bullying victimization, and 44.3% were left-behind children (LBC). We found that bullying victimization was negatively associated with all domains of life satisfaction (all p < 0.05). With further left-behind status-stratified analysis, we found that negative association between bullying victimization and friend satisfaction was more profound in the LBC group than in the non-LBC group [b(SE)= −0.133 (0.03) vs. −0.061 (0.026) for LBC and non-LBC, respectively, p < 0.05]. When further interaction analysis was conducted, we identified interaction effects between left-behind status and bullying victimization on friend satisfaction (p_interaction = 0.048). Similar interaction effect between bullying victimization and left-behind status on school satisfaction was also found (p_interaction = 0.004).

Conclusions: Bullying victimization was associated with low life satisfaction (including lower family, friends, school, self, and environment satisfaction). There were significant interactions between left-behind status and bullying victimization on friend satisfaction, as well as school satisfaction. Left-behind status of children may exaggerate the impact of bullying victimization on friends/school satisfaction rating.

Introduction

School bullying, including physical forms (e.g., kicking, hitting), verbal forms (e.g., teasing, called mean names, threatened), or psychological aggression (e.g., isolation or rumors), is a worldwide public health issue (1–4). According to a recent national representative study in China, the prevalence of school bullying victimization among primary school students (Grade 1–6) is the highest when compared with middle school (Grade 7–9) or high school students (Grade 11–12) (5). A further study in China showed that compared with high grade children (Grade 10), Grade 6 students have a 5.03-fold risk of being bullied (6). These findings indicate that bullying is likely to occur and is a significant concern for primary school students. Mounting evidence has demonstrated that bullying victimization increases the risk of negative and detrimental mental health problems, such as psychological distress, low life satisfaction, depression, and suicidality (7–10). These negative impacts are detrimental and progress into adulthood (11, 12).

Life satisfaction is a subjective assessment of life quality and is usually achieved by getting individual general needs, goals, or desires satisfied (13). If these basic but important needs or goals are not met or achieved, this usually results in unhappiness or contributes to further mental problems (14, 15). For school age students, their life satisfactions include different domains of life, namely, family, friends, school, self, and environment (16). Several studies have explored the association between bullying victimization and life satisfaction, demonstrating that bullying is associated with significantly lower life satisfaction (10, 17–19).

The left-behind children (LBC) phenomenon refers to the status of a child or adolescent with one or both their parents leaving their home or hometown for work for at least 6 months (20–23). The LBC phenomenon is highly prevalent in major labor export provinces, especially in central and western provinces (24). Hunan Province is a relatively deprived socioeconomic province, and the LBC phenomenon is quite common in Hunan Province. It has been estimated that there were 4.3511 million LBC in the rural area of Hunan Province according to a national survey conducted in 2010 (24). Also, a recent systematic review showed that 91 of 111 studies investigating health impacts of left-behind status were conducted in China (20). LBC are vulnerable to many health problems, such as depressive symptoms (25), oral health problems (26, 27), and delayed growth (28). Notably, emotional, behavioral, and metal health problems in LBC have been comprehensively examined in different countries. Measures have included bullying victimization, life satisfaction, depression, and suicide attempts (11, 20, 29–31). In previous studies, left-behind status or experience was shown to be a moderator of association between children's or teachers' behavior and students' mental traits (32, 33). For example, a school-based health survey in China conducted in 2017 showed that the association between self-esteem and aggressive behavior was more profound in participants with left-behind experiences, and this study found significant interactions between left-behind experience and self-esteem on aggressive behaviors (32). No previous studies have examined the moderating role of left-behind status on the association between bullying victimization and life satisfaction.

In summary, bullying victimization is associated with significantly lower life satisfaction, and the left-behind status of children is likely to be a moderator in the association between bullying victimization and life satisfaction; in other words, there could be interaction effects between left-behind status and bullying victimization on life satisfaction and its different domains. Hunan Province is one of the provinces with the highest number of LBC in China. Bullying victimization and life satisfaction among LBC have been previously examined in Hunan Province. However, no previous studies have explored the interaction between bullying victimization and left-behind status in relation to life satisfaction in children, including family, friends, school, self, and environment satisfaction.

Based on the above discussion, we have proposed two hypotheses as follows: (1) bullying victimization is associated with lower life satisfaction, including the five domains (family, friends, school, self, and environment satisfaction) and (2) there are significant interactive effects between left-behind status and school bullying on life satisfaction (family, friends, school, self, and environment satisfaction).

To examine the hypothesis, we conducted a cross-sectional study on the children of Hunan Province, China, to verify the association of bullying victimization and life satisfaction. We also explored the interactive effects between left-behind status and school bullying on different domains of life satisfaction (family, friends, school, self, and environment satisfaction).

Materials and Methods

Location

This present study was conducted in Hunan Province, one of Central China's most populated provinces, with 68.22 million residents and an area of 211,800 km² in 2016. Hunan Province exports large quantities of labor force to other coastal developed cities every year. The left-behind phenomenon is quite common in children, especially in rural or western areas of Hunan Province. According to a national survey in 2010, the number of LBC in rural Hunan Province is estimated to be 4.3511 million (24).

Participants

A cross-sectional study was conducted among primary school students in three different districts in western Hunan Province in July 2018 using convenience sampling. At first, a total of 820 primary school students and 93 junior high school students were investigated. The sample of the junior high school students was limited, so in the present study, we only involved primary school students. Among these 820 primary school children, 10 children's questionnaires were incomplete (no data of life satisfaction). Therefore, the final sample size in this study was 810. The study was approved by the Research Ethical Review Committee Board of Hunan Normal University (2019-88). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their parents or other legal guardians prior to data collection.

Since the official announcement of the “Compulsory Education Law of the People's Republic of China” in April 1986, all children in China are required to receive a 9-year compulsory education in primary and junior middle school (primary school: from Grade 1 to 6, middle school: from Grade 7 to 9). In addition, previous studies in China have found that compared with high school or middle school students, primary school students have a significantly higher risk of being bullied (5, 6). Therefore, we chose primary school students (Grade 1–6) to explore the associations between bullying victimization, left-behind status, and life satisfaction.

Measurements

Bullying Victimization

For bullying victimization, we used the Chinese version of the revised Bully/Victim Questionnaire developed by Dan Olweus (34). We asked the participants six questions to be answered on a 3-point scale (0 = never, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often): in the past 30 days have you (1) been teased in a hurtful way; (2) been blackmailed; (3) been rejected or isolated by peers; (4) been threatened; (5) been hit, kicked, pushed, shoved around, or locked indoors; and (6) been made fun of due to your physical appearance (34). This questionnaire has proven to have good reliability and validity and has been used widely in China in previous studies (29, 35–37). The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.78 in the current study. Children reported at least one question of being bullied with the option of “often” in the past month being defined as being bullied as outlined in previous studies (36, 38).

Left-Behind Status

In this study, we used the definition of left-behind as defined in previous studies (20, 21, 23). When one or both parents migrate from where the child lives and leaves behind the child to live alone or with grandparents or other relatives for at least 6 months, then, the child is categorized as LBC (21–23). For further analysis, we divided the subjects into two groups: LBC with one parent migration group and LBC with migration of both parents group.

Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale

Life satisfaction was assessed using the Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS) Chinese version, with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.90 and a retest reliability of 0.869 obtained in previous studies (39, 40). The MSLSS has five subscales to measure five domains of life satisfaction: family, school, friends, environment, and self-satisfaction. The subscales have acceptable internal consistency and were validated in previous studies for children (39, 40). These are useful and widely used for the assessment of students' life satisfaction (16, 41–43). The Cronbach's alpha value of MSLSS in the present study was 0.869.

Statistical Analysis

The characteristics of quantitative variables are described as median and interquartile range (IQR) since the variables were not normally distributed and were categorical variables by number and percentages. Chi-square tests were used to compare the categorical variables between boys and girls, and independent-samples Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare the quantitative variable differences between boys and girls. The associations between bullying victimization and life satisfaction (including its domains: family, friends, school, self, environment satisfaction) were examined by multivariate linear regression analyses with adjustments for age, sex, and ethnicity. The association between left-behind status and bullying victimization was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with adjustments for age, sex, ethnicity, education level of the father, and education level of the mother. Stratified analyses of the left-behind status of association between bullying and life satisfaction (including its domains: family, friends, school, self, environment satisfaction) were conducted, and then the interactions were tested using a multivariate general linear model including the interaction term with age, sex, and ethnicity as covariates. In the stratified analyses in our study, the interaction was defined as a different effect size in the subgroups, but the interaction was significant (p_interaction < 0.05) (44). For the significant interaction effects between left-behind status and bullying victimization, the adjusted means and standard errors of friend and school satisfaction score in different groups were obtained using general linear model with age, ethnicity, and sex adjusted (presented in the figure) (45–47). With regard to missing data in the present study, among these 820 primary school children, 10 children's questionnaires were incomplete (no data of life satisfaction). For the multivariate analysis, missing data were excluded for the statistical analysis (9). All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General Characteristics

A total of 810 children were involved in the present study; the median (IQR) age was 9 (7, 10) years, the median (IQR) bullying score was 0 (0, 2), and the median (IQR) MSLSS score was 24.03 (21.78, 25.98). There were 454 boys (56.0%) and 356 girls (44%). The prevalence of school bullying was 8.5% (8.8 vs. 8.1% for boys and girls, respectively). For the specific bullying victimization behaviors, no significant differences were observed between the boys and girls (p > 0.05). Boys reported significantly higher self-satisfaction than girls (median score was 4.86 vs. 4.57, p = 0.042). The prevalence of LBC was 44.3% (44.1 and 44.7% for boys and girls, respectively). Among the LBC, 179 children had only one parent migrated for work, and 180 children had both parents migrated (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Table 1. The general characteristics of the study population.

Association Between Bullying Victimization and Different Domains of Life Satisfaction

For the associations between bullying victimization and different domains of life satisfaction, the results are outlined in Table 2. With adjustments for potential covariates (age, ethnicity, and sex), bullying victimization was significantly associated with lower family satisfaction (b = −0.109, SE = 0.026, p < 0.001), friend satisfaction (b = −0.091, SE = 0.020, p < 0.001), school satisfaction (b = −0.095, SE = 0.021, p < 0.001), environment satisfaction (b = −0.065, SE = 0.022, p = 0.004), self-satisfaction (b = −0.076, SE = 0.025, p = 0.003), and the total MSLSS (b = −0.081, SE = 0.017 p < 0.001).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Association between bullying victimization and different aspects of children's life satisfaction.

Interaction Effect of Left-Behind Status and Bullying Victimization on Life Satisfaction

When stratified by left-behind status, we found that the associations between bullying victimization and some life satisfaction domains varied substantially in the LBC and non-LBC groups (Table 3). For the family, environment, and self-satisfaction domains, bullying victimization, no significant interaction effects between left-behind status and bullying victimization on their satisfaction score were noted (p_interaction > 0.05).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Interaction effect of left-behind status and bullying victimization on different domains of life satisfaction.

For friend satisfaction domain, in the non-LBC group, bullying victimization was negatively associated with the friend satisfaction score; compared with the no bullying group, those with bullying victimization had 0.061 lower score in the Ln value of friend satisfaction score than in non-LBC (b = −0.061, SE = 0.026, p = 0.021). While in the LBC group, bullying victimization was associated with friend satisfaction score with a more profound effect size of −0.133 (SE = 0.03, p < 0.001); this means that the bullying victimization group had 0.133 lower score in the Ln value of school satisfaction score in LBC. The adjusted mean of Ln friend satisfaction score with standard error by left-behind status and bullying victimization is shown in Figure 1A. With further interaction analysis, we found that there was a significant interaction between left-behind status and bullying victimization on friend satisfaction (p_interaction = 0.048).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Adjusted means and standard errors of Ln friend and school satisfaction scores stratified by left-behind status and bullying victimization. LBC: left-behind children. Non-LBC: non-left-behind children. Adjusted means and standard errors were estimated under general linear regression model with adjustment for age, ethnicity, and sex. (A) Friend satisfaction score and (B) school satisfaction score.

For the school domain, a similar significant interaction effect between left-behind status and bullying victimization on school satisfaction was found (p_interaction = 0.004). In the non-LBC group, bullying victimization was not associated with significant school satisfaction (b = −0.041, SE = 0.031, p = 0.188). While in the LBC group, bullying victimization was associated with a significant lower level of school satisfaction with an effect size of −0.167 (SE = 0.032, p < 0.001), which means that the bullying victimization group had 0.167 lower score in the Ln value of school satisfaction score in LBC. The adjusted mean of Ln school satisfaction score with standard error by left-behind status and bullying victimization is shown in Figure 1B.

Discussion

Our study found that bullying victimization was negatively associated with life satisfaction (including family, friends, school, environment, and self-satisfaction); in addition, we found that there were interaction effects between left-behind status and school bullying on friend satisfaction, as well as school satisfaction. Left-behind status in children may exaggerate the impact of being bullied associated with different life satisfaction aspects. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the interaction effects of bully victimization and left-behind status on life satisfaction. Findings from our study could help develop better strategies for psychological interventions among children suffering bullying victimization, especially for those who are LBC.

Consistent with previous correlational studies (10, 48–52), we verified the negative impact of bullying victimization on different domains or the total score of life satisfaction. The study by Moore et al. on USA adolescents reported pervasive relationships between experiences of bullying and life satisfaction across a variety of domains of satisfaction (48). Also, a Spanish study showed that bullying victimization was associated with specific domains of life satisfaction (including school, family, friends, and self-satisfaction; environment satisfaction was not examined) (49). The studies by Blood and colleagues (52) and Rezapour et al. (51) both reported negative association between bullying victim and total life satisfaction. Slightly different with our finding, Bilic et al. found that children exposed to classic or cyber bullying showed less satisfaction with family and friends, but not significantly associated with school satisfaction in rural and urban areas of Croatia (19); this discrepancy may be due to the different ethnicities or different sample sizes (n = 562 and 810 for the study by Bilic and our study, respectively). The underlying reasons of association between bullying victimization and life satisfaction are not clear now, but there are some possible speculations. Firstly, because being bullied may lead to many negative mental problems, such as depression, social anxiety, and even suicide attempts (6, 53–55), these outcomes of being bullied substantially decrease the level of perceived life satisfaction. Secondly, low self-esteem could be a possible mediator for the association between school life satisfaction and being bullied (4). Additionally, the detrimental impact of experience of being bullied in primary school on psychosocial health (including life satisfaction) lasts into adulthood (12). So, it is important to make efforts to prevent bullying victimization and improve individual life satisfaction.

Notably, our study also identified significant interaction effects between left-behind status and bullying victimization on friend satisfaction, as well as school satisfaction. These findings suggest that left-behind status may exaggerate the negative impact of being bullied on friends or school satisfaction. The relationship with peers or friends in childhood is very important; it is reasonable and logical to expect that bullying victimization would affect friend satisfaction (19). Considering the absence of parents' support for LBC, experience of bullying victimization might lead to distrust, sense of insecurity or vulnerability, and subsequently result in lower friends or school satisfaction. So, if the children are suffering from bullying victimization, especially for LBC, efforts for providing enough peer and teacher support could be beneficial for improving their satisfaction or hope in life (56, 57). In addition, the direction of the associations between bullying victimization and life satisfaction requires further investigation. A recent study in China suggested that bullying victimization of LBC could be affected by school life satisfaction (4); so among LBC, the association between bullying victimization and life satisfaction could be bidirectional. Therefore, future in-depth qualitative interviews or intervention studies should be warranted to improve our understanding of this relationship. Although no previous studies have investigated the interaction between bullying victimization and left-behind status on life satisfaction, the study by Barzilay showed that there were significant interaction effects between bullying victimization and parental support and the risk of suicide attempts (54). Left-behind status or parent–child separation is related to a lower level of parent support (58). Therefore, the interaction between left-behind status and bullying victimization on friends/school satisfaction might be due to the low parent support in the LBC. However, the underlying mechanisms need further scientific investigation to confirm this interaction effect. Effective measures and strategies from different stakeholders (including the individual, peers, family, and school) should be implemented to improve these domains of life satisfaction in this specific vulnerable population.

There are some limitations in our study. Firstly, the present study is a cross-sectional study that could only provide associations but not causal inference. Future studies should be longitudinal or even interventions that should be conducted to verify and better understand the associations outlined here. Secondly, this study was only conducted in three districts of Hunan Province by convenience sampling, which may limit generalizations to other areas of China. Thirdly, the current study only involved primary school students; therefore, the results obtained could not be generalizable to children of other ages or migrant status.

Conclusions

This study indicates that bullying victimization was associated with lower levels of life satisfaction across all domains of life (family, friends, school, self, and environment satisfaction), and left-behind status could interact with bullying victimization to have a negative impact on different domains of life satisfaction (including friends and school satisfaction). It appears that left-behind status in children may exaggerate the impact of bullying victimization on friend satisfaction, as well as school satisfaction.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Review Board of Hunan Normal University. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

YY, ZZ, and CZ conceived and designed the study. YY, CZ, MX, SY, MZ, SH, and YZe contributed for literature research, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and manuscript revision. YZh, XY, YW, JSB, and ZZ contributed for literature search and manuscript revision. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81903336), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2019JJ50376), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (18C0072), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (18A028), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773454), and The Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2020JJ5386, CZ).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the children who participated in this study and the teachers who contributed to this study.

References

1. Olweus D. School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2013) 9:751–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton B, Scheidt P. Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA. (2001) 285:2094–100. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Janssen I, Craig WM, Boyce WF, Pickett W. Associations between overweight and obesity with bullying behaviors in school-aged children. Pediatrics. (2004) 113:1187–94. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yan H, Chen J, Huang J. School bullying among left-behind children: the efficacy of art therapy on reducing bullying victimization. Front Psychiatry. (2019) 10:40. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Han Z, Zhang G, Zhang H. School bullying in urban china: prevalence and correlation with school climate. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2017) 14:1116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhang H, Zhou H, Tao T. Bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment among school-aged children in China. J Interpers Violence. (2019) 34:2363–75. doi: 10.1177/0886260518780777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Han Z, Fu M, Liu C, Guo J. Bullying and suicidality in urban chinese youth: the role of teacher-student relationships. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. (2018) 21:287–93. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zhang X, Han Z, Ba Z. Cyberbullying involvement and psychological distress among chinese adolescents: the moderating effects of family cohesion and school cohesion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:8938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238938

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Hong L, Guo L, Wu H, Li P, Xu Y, Gao X, et al. Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation among adolescents in the fujian province of China: a cross-sectional study. Medicine. (2016) 95:e2530. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ramos Salazar L. Cyberbullying victimization as a predictor of cyberbullying perpetration, body image dissatisfaction, healthy eating and dieting behaviors, and life satisfaction. J Interpers Violence. (2021) 36:354–80. doi: 10.1177/0886260517725737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Henry KL, Lovegrove PJ, Steger MF, Chen PY, Cigularov KP, Tomazic RG. The potential role of meaning in life in the relationship between bullying victimization and suicidal ideation. J Youth Adolesc. (2014) 43:221–32. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9960-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Blood GW, Blood IM. Long-term consequences of childhood bullying in adults who stutter: social anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, self-esteem, and satisfaction with life. J Fluency Disord. (2016) 50:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Antaramian SP, Huebner ES, Valois RF. Adolescent life satisfaction. Applied Psychology. (2008) 57:112–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00357.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Suldo SM, Huebner ES. The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between authoritative parenting dimensions and adolescent problem behavior. Soc Indic Res. (2004) 66:165–95. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2312-5_9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hui H, Hong JS, Espelage DL. Understanding factors associated with bullying and peer victimization in chinese schools within ecological contexts. J Child Fam Stud. (2013) 22:881–92. doi: 10.1007/s10826-012-9647-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Schnettler B, Orellana L, Lobos G, Miranda H, Sepulveda J, Etchebarne S, et al. Relationship between the domains of the Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale, satisfaction with food-related life and happiness in university students. Nutr Hosp. (2015) 31:2752–63. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.6.8593

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Arnarsson A, Nygren J, Nyholm M, Torsheim T, Augustine L, Bjereld Y, et al. Cyberbullying and traditional bullying among Nordic adolescents and their impact on life satisfaction. Scand J Public Health. (2020) 48:502–10. doi: 10.1177/1403494818817411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Przybylski AK, Bowes L. Cyberbullying and adolescent well-being in England: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2017) 1:19–26. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30011-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Bilic V, Flander GB, Rafajac B. Life satisfaction and school performance of children exposed to classic and cyber peer bullying. Coll Antropol. (2014) 38:21–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Fellmeth G, Rose-Clarke K, Zhao C, Busert LK, Zheng Y, Massazza A, et al. Health impacts of parental migration on left-behind children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. (2018) 392:2567–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32558-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Zhao X, Chen J, Chen MC, Lv XL, Jiang YH, Sun YH. Left-behind children in rural China experience higher levels of anxiety and poorer living conditions. Acta Paediatr. (2014) 103:665–70. doi: 10.1111/apa.12602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhang X, Li M, Guo L, Zhu Y. Community-based family workshop intervention improved the social adaptation of left-behind children in rural China. Front Public Health. (2020) 8:506191. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.506191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Duan C, Yang G. The left-behind children in rual China. Popul J. (2008) 32:15–25. [in Chinese].

Google Scholar

24. Duan C, Lv L, Guo j, Z W. Survival and development of left-behind children in rural China: based on the analysis of sixth census data. Popul J. (2013) 35:37–48. [in Chinese].

Google Scholar

25. Tan M, Chen M, Li J, He X, Jiang Z, Tan H, et al. Depressive symptoms and associated factors among left-behind children in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2018) 18:1059. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5963-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Su H, Zhang Y, Qian W, Shi H. Impact of behavioural factors and living conditions on dental caries among pupils from shanghai and jiangxi province in china: a school-based cross-sectional study. Oral Health Prev Dent. (2019) 17:557–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

27. Qiu R, Li Y, Malla M, Yao J, Mo D, Dhakal N, et al. Impact of parental migration on oral health outcomes of left-behind school-aged children in Luchuan, southern China. BMC Oral Health. (2018) 18:207. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0683-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zhang N, Becares L, Chandola T. Does the timing of parental migration matter for child growth? A life course study on left-behind children in rural China. BMC Public Health. (2015) 15:966. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2296-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Yan L, Zhu Q, Tu X, Zuo X, Yu C, Lou C, et al. Bullying victimization and child sexual abuse among left-behind and non-left-behind children in China. PeerJ. (2018) 6:e4865. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4865

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zhao J, Li Q, Wang L, Lin L, Zhang W. Latent profile analysis of left-behind adolescents' psychosocial adaptation in rural China. J Youth Adolesc. (2019) 48:1146–60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-00989-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Adhikari R, Jampaklay A, Chamratrithirong A, Richter K, Pattaravanich U, Vapattanawong P. The impact of parental migration on the mental health of children left behind. J Immigr Minor Health. (2014) 16:781–9. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9809-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Yu BL, Li J, Liu W, Huang SH, Cao XJ. The effect of left-behind experience and self-esteem on aggressive behavior in young adults in china: a cross-sectional study. J Interpers Violence. (2020). doi: 10.1177/0886260520922373. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Li W, Gao WY, Fu WD. When does teacher support reduce depression in students? the moderating role of students' status as left-behind children. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:608359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Olweus D. The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion; University of Bergen (1996).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Zhang W, Wu J, KJ. Revision of Chinese Version of Olweus child bullying questionnaire. Psychol Dev Educ. (1999) 2:7–11+37.

36. Zhou Y, Guo L, Lu CY, Deng JX, He Y, Huang JH, et al. Bullying as a risk for poor sleep quality among high school students in China. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0121602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Gong Z, Han Z, Zhang H, Zhang G. Weight status and school bullying experiences in urban china: the difference between boys and girls. J Interpers Violence. (2020) 35:2663–86. doi: 10.1177/0886260519880170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Guo QZ, Ma WJ, Nie SP, Xu YJ, Xu HF, Zhang YR. Relationships between weight status and bullying victimization among school-aged adolescents in Guangdong Province of China. Biomed Environ Sci. (2010) 23:108–12. doi: 10.1016/S0895-3988(10)60039-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Li-li T, L W. Test of the Chinese version of multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale. Chin Ment Health J. (2005) 19:301–3. [in Chinese].

40. ES H. Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychol Assess. (1994) 6:149–158. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.149

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Veronese G, Pepe A, Almurnak F, Jaradah A, Hamdouna H. Quality of life, primary traumatisation, and positive and negative affects in primary school students in the Gaza Strip. Lancet. (2018) 391 (Suppl 2):S14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30380-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Xing XY, Tao FB, Hao JH, Xu SJ, Su PY, Huang ZH. [Study on the school-related-factors of attempted suicide among rural middle school students]. Chin J Epidemiol. (2009) 30:21–5. [in Chinese].

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

43. Su PY, Tao FB, Sun Y, Huang K, Zhu P, Cheng XL. [Psychological well-being among adolescents of parents living with AIDS or HIV]. Chin J Epidemiol. (2007) 28:562–66.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

44. Dempfle A, Scherag A, Hein R, Beckmann L, Chang-Claude J, Schafer H. Gene-environment interactions for complex traits: definitions, methodological requirements and challenges. Eur J Hum Genet. (2008) 16:1164–72. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Holmbeck GN. Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. J Pediatr Psychol. (2002) 27:87–96. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.87

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. (2006) 31:437–48. doi: 10.3102/10769986031004437

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Shadel WG, Tharp-Taylor S, Fryer CS. Exposure to cigarette advertising and adolescents' intentions to smoke: the moderating role of the developing self-concept. J Pediatr Psychol. (2008) 33:751–60. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Moore PM, Huebner ES, Hills KJ. Electronic bullying and victimization and life satisfaction in middle school students. Soc Indic Res. (2012) 107:429–47. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9856-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Navarro R, Ruiz-Oliva R, Larrañaga E, Yubero S. The impact of cyberbullying and social bullying on optimism, global and school-related happiness and life satisfaction among 10–12-year-old schoolchildren. Appl Res Qual Life. (2015) 10:15–36. doi: 10.1007/s11482-013-9292-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Serra-Negra JM, Paiva SM, Bendo CB, Fulgencio LB, Lage CF, Correa-Faria P, et al. Verbal school bullying and life satisfaction among Brazilian adolescents: profiles of the aggressor and the victim. Compr Psychiatry. (2015) 57:132–9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Rezapour M, Khanjani N, Soori H. The types of bullying behaviors and its association with general life satisfaction and self-rated health among iranian pupils. J Res Health Sci. (2019) 19:e00436.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

52. Blood GW, Blood IM, Tramontana GM, Sylvia AJ, Boyle MP, Motzko GR. Self-reported experience of bullying of students who stutter: relations with life satisfaction, life orientation, and self-esteem. Percept Mot Skills. (2011) 113:353–64. doi: 10.2466/07.10.15.17.PMS.113.5.353-364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res. (2010) 14:206–21. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Barzilay S, Brunstein Klomek A, Apter A, Carli V, Wasserman C, Hadlaczky G, et al. Bullying victimization and suicide ideation and behavior among adolescents in Europe: a 10-country study. J Adolesc Health. (2017) 61:179–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Zhang H, Chi P, Long H, Ren X. Bullying victimization and depression among left-behind children in rural China: roles of self-compassion and hope. Child Abuse Negl. (2019) 96:104072. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Flaspohler PD, Elfstrom JL, Van De Rzee KL, Sink HE, Birchmeier Z. Stand by me: the effects of peer and teacher support in mitigating the impact of bullying on quality of life. Psychol Sch. (2010) 46:636–49. doi: 10.1002/pits.20404

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. You S, Furlong MJ, Felix E, Sharkey JD, Green JG. Relations among school connectedness, hope, life satisfaction, and bully victimization. Psychol Sch. (2010) 45:446–60. doi: 10.1002/pits.20308

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Humphreys KL. Future directions in the study and treatment of parent-child separation. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. (2019) 48:166–78. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1534209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar