AUTHOR=Martherus Tessa , Oberthuer André , Dekker Janneke , Kirchgaessner Christoph , van Geloven Nan , Hooper Stuart B. , Kribs Angela , te Pas Arjan B. 

TITLE=Comparison of Two Respiratory Support Strategies for Stabilization of Very Preterm Infants at Birth: A Matched-Pairs Analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pediatrics

VOLUME=7

YEAR=2019

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2019.00003

DOI=10.3389/fped.2019.00003

ISSN=2296-2360

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Objective:</bold> Respiratory support for stabilizing very preterm infants at birth varies between centers. We retrospectively compared two strategies that involved either increasing continuous positive airway pressures (CPAP), or increasing oxygen supplementation.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> Matched-pairs of infants (&lt;28 weeks of gestation) were born either at the Leiden University Medical Center [low-pressure: CPAP 5–8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and/or positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) 0.3–1.0; <italic>n</italic> = 27], or at the University Hospital of Cologne (high-pressure: CPAP 12–35 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, no PPV and FiO<sub>2</sub> 0.3–0.4; <italic>n</italic> = 27). Respiratory support was initiated non-invasively via facemask at both units. Infants (<italic>n</italic> = 54) were matched between centers for gestational age and birth weight, to compare physiological and short-term clinical outcomes.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> In the low-pressure group, 20/27 (74%) infants received 1–2 sustained inflations (20, 25 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) and 22/27 (81%) received PPV (1:19–3:01 min) using pressures of 25–27 cm H<sub>2</sub>O. Within 3 min of birth [median (IQR)], mean airway pressures [12 (6–15) vs. 19 (16–23) cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001] and FiO<sub>2</sub> [0.30 (0.28–0.31) vs. 0.22 (0.21–0.30), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001] were different in low- vs. high-pressure groups, respectively. SpO<sub>2</sub> and heart rates were similar. After 3 min, higher FiO<sub>2</sub> levels [0.62 (0.35–0.98) vs. 0.28 (0.22–0.38), <italic>p</italic> = 0.005] produced higher SpO<sub>2</sub> levels [77 (50–92) vs. 53 (42–69)%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001] in the low-pressure group, but SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> and heart rates were similar. While intubation rates during admission were significantly different (70 vs. 30%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.013), pneumothorax rates (4 vs. 19%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.125) and the occurrence of spontaneous intestinal perforations (0 vs. 15%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.125) were similar between groups.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> Infants (&lt;28 weeks) can be supported non-invasively at birth with either higher or lower pressures and while higher-pressure support may require less oxygen, it does not eliminate the need for oxygen supplementation. Future studies need to examine the effect of high pressures and pressure titration in the delivery room.</p>