Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Pediatr., 10 November 2014
Sec. Pediatric Urology

A foreseeable tissue engineering approach to overcome the neurogenic bladder-related detrusor/urethral rhabdosphincter dyssynergia

  • LD of Surgical Semeiotics, University of Parma, Parma, Italy

I have read, with high interest, the Jednak’s review article “The evolution of bladder augmentation: from creating reservoir to reconstituting an organ” (1), where the literature regarding this subject has been carefully taken into consideration. Particularly, about the tissue engineering-based augmentation cystoplasty, the attention has been focused on the results reached by Atala and his group in patients suffering from end-stage myelomeningocele-induced poorly compliant/high pressure bladder (2).

Nevertheless, such tissue engineered arrangement remains functionally conditioned by spinal cord neuropathy-due detrusor/urethral rhabdosphincter dyssynergia. Hence, in my opinion, it would be suitable, for these patients, to implant, after total cystectomy together with removal of the urethral rhabdosphincter, a tissue engineered neobladder–rhabdosphincter complex – quite not influenced by spinal cord neuropathy effects – provided with inside neobladder wall embedded tension micro-electro-sensors (correlatively to intra-neobladder pressure) with micro-loop antenna to send, beyond a properly adjustable wall tension value threshold, modulated wireless e-m signals toward a rhabdosphincterial receiver–converter micro-electro device to promote, in turn, by suitable e-m field generation, the rhabdosphincter relaxation simultaneously with the neobladder contraction. What should be quite reversible following the micturition-due intra-neobladder pressure drop below the arranged levels.

Bright advances in the scaffold fabrication, emerging from recent progress in the field of both nanotechnology and material science research – from different “smart” synthetic polymers to silk fibroin-based biomaterials – besides in stem-cell biology, could make feasible a suitable setting of micro-electro-sensors inside the mentioned bladder/rhabdosphincter tissue engineered complex (35).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Jednak R. The evolution of bladder augmentation: from creating a reservoir to reconstituting an organ. Front Pediatr (2014) 2:10. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00010

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ, Retik AB. Tissue engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet (2006) 367:1241–6. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68438-9

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shakhssalim N, Rasouli J, Moghdasali R, Aghdas FS, Naji M, Soleimani M. Bladder smooth muscle cells interaction and proliferation on PCL/PLLA electrospun nanofibrous scaffold. Int J Artif Organs (2013) 36:113–20. doi:10.5301/ijao.5000175

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chung YG, Algarrahi K, Franck D, Tu DD, Adam RM, Kaplan DL, et al. The use of bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds and SIS matrices to support bladder tissue regeneration in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Biomaterials (2014) 35:7452–9. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.044

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Alberti C. About recent developments of synthetic polymers for a suitable cell adhesion/growth support in tissue engineering-based either augmentation cystoplasty or neobladder. Ann Ital Chir (2014) 85:309–16.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neurogenic bladder, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, tissue engineering, pediatrics, urology

Citation: Alberti C (2014) A foreseeable tissue engineering approach to overcome the neurogenic bladder-related detrusor/urethral rhabdosphincter dyssynergia. Front. Pediatr. 2:122. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00122

Received: 22 September 2014; Paper pending published: 12 October 2014;
Accepted: 23 October 2014; Published online: 10 November 2014.

Edited by:

Lisandro Ariel Piaggio, Universidad Nacional Del Sur, Argentina

Reviewed by:

Germán Fernando Falke, Hospital Universitario Austral, Argentina

Copyright: © 2014 Alberti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: eneide94@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.