ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pain Res.

Sec. Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Pain

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1455792

This article is part of the Research TopicFacilitators And Barriers to Access to Multidisciplinary Pain CareView all 3 articles

Patient and Health Service Factors Associated with Enrollment in a Multidisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Indiana University Bloomington, Suite, Indiana, United States
  • 2Neuroscience Center, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
  • 3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Indiana University Bloomington, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
  • 4Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Despite multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (PRPs) being well-established as an effective treatment for chronic pain, the existence of such programs has been declining across the United States over recent decades.Objective: This study aims to identify factors associated with enrollment in a three-week, intensive outpatient PRP.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patient visits to a multidisciplinary pain evaluation clinic in 2023. The cohort was divided into those who did and did not subsequently enroll in a PRP program. Health service, demographic, and patient-reported outcome measures were compared between groups; continuous variables by independent samples Student's T-tests and categorical variables by chi-squared tests.Results: Of the 335 patients who had an evaluation in 2023, 48 went on to enroll in PRP (PRP-Yes group), and 287 did not (PRP-No group). Compared to PRP non-enrollers, the PRP-enrollers were more likely to have had a mental health (94% vs. 52%, p <.001) and physical therapy (94% vs. 48%, p<.001) assessment as part of their evaluation, had shorter lag times between their initial referral and medical evaluation (mean (SD) 43.5 (28.9) vs. 57.7 (41.7), p = .024), and had significantly greater anxiety, PTSD symptoms, somatic symptoms, and insomnia. Additionally, referral source, medical provider, and physical therapy provider seen differed significantly between PRP-enrollers and non-enrollers. PRP enrollment was not predicted by demographic variables including race, payer-type, or distance from the clinic.Discussion: Both personal and systemic factors were identified to be associated with enrollment in a threeweek multidisciplinary PRP. These findings highlight variables worth considering for clinical and research programs looking to increase PRP enrollment.

Keywords: Chronic Pain, Multidisciplinary Pain Clinics, Health Services Research, Pain rehabilitation, Healthcare provider

Received: 27 Jun 2024; Accepted: 25 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bushey, Flegge, Harris, Melendez and Hammond. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Michael A. Bushey, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Indiana University Bloomington, Suite, 5100, Indiana, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more