Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pain Res.
Sec. Veterinary and Comparative Pain
Volume 5 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1463688
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancement in Equine Pain Management View all 11 articles

Investigating conditioned pain modulation in horses: can the lip-twitch be used as a conditioning stimulus?

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 2 Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Lombardy, Italy
  • 3 Veterinary Department of the Swiss Armed Forces, Bern, Switzerland, Bern, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Study objective was to evaluate whether the application of a lip twitch could be proposed as conditioning stimulus in the context of a novel Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) assessment paradigm for use in horses.The study was a prospective, experimental, randomized trial. Twelve healthy horses were evaluated in two experimental sessions. The lip twitch was used as the conditioning stimulus in both sessions; electrical stimulation was used as the test stimulus in one session, while mechanical and thermal stimulations were used in the other. Differences between thresholds recorded before and during twitching (Δ) as well as their percent (%) change were computed for each stimulation modality as a measure of CPM. Heart rate and respiratory rate were recorded throughout the experiments to monitor physiological reactions, while the general level of stress and aversiveness toward twitching were scored using ad hoc behavioural scales. Based on these scores, interruption criteria were defined.Ten and seven horses completed the electrical and mechanical/thermal experimental sessions respectively. For electrical stimulation, median (IQR) Δ was -2.8 (-3.9, -1.1) mA and % change 87.9 (65.7-118.2) %; for mechanical stimulation, Δ was -18.2 (-6.4, -21.4) N and % change 343.5 (140, 365.3) %; for thermal stimulation, Δ was -3.1 (-9.2, -2.1) °C, while % change was not calculated. Heart rate and respiratory rates varied significantly over time, with higher values recorded during twitching. Median stress and aversion scores did not differ between the two sessions.

    Keywords: horse, CONDITIONED PAIN MODULATION, thermal threshold, Nociceptive withdrawal reflex, pressure pain threshold

    Received: 12 Jul 2024; Accepted: 08 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Blum, Gisler, Dalla Costa, Montavon and Spadavecchia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Severin Blum, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    Claudia Spadavecchia, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.