Anthony K. Allam
Ashwin Viswanathan
Jason M. Schwalb
Parag G. Patil
M. Benjamin Larkin- 1School of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson, Houston, TX, United States
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Medical Group, West Bloomfield, MI, United States
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Surgical techniques for the management of pain
Chronic pain has reached epidemic proportions in the US, with an estimated 20% of the US population affected, more than cancer, heart disease, and diabetes combined (1, 2). Systematic reviews have linked chronic pain to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life, with the associated economic costs reaching up to $635 billion per year (3–6). Despite the magnitude of the problem, treating medically intractable chronic pain, including those patients with cancer-related pain, remains inadequate. While effective for acute pain, pharmacological therapy either fails to address chronic pain adequately or results in adverse effects, including gastritis, increased risk of pulmonary or cardiovascular complications, and addiction (7). When medical management proves unsuccessful or has undesired side effects, surgical approaches can help manage pain.
Surgical interventions with the primary goal of pain management in patients with medically intractable chronic pain or cancer pain can be divided into ablation and neuromodulation procedures. Ablative procedures aim to interrupt or destroy target pathways that either conduct pain or result in the sensation of pain (8). These targets include the dorsal root ganglion, the spinothalamic tract, the thalamus, and the anterior cingulate cortex. On the other hand, neuromodulation techniques aim to reduce pain through invasive or non-invasive modulation of neural signals in cortical and sensory pathways. Examples include spinal cord and deep brain stimulation. While neuromodulation procedures are often preferred due to their reversibility and adjustability, ablative procedures have simpler postoperative management and no long-term hardware-associated risks. In this Research Topic, we have compiled two review articles, 1 case report, and 1 case series exploring various ablative and neuromodulation techniques for managing chronic pain.
Spinal cord stimulation is a powerful tool to help alleviate neuropathic pain cost-effectively cheaper than medical management and primary spine surgery (9). One of the most successful neuromodulation procedures for pain management is spinal cord stimulation (SCS). In this procedure, SCS leads are implanted adjacent to the dorsal columns, delivering electrical impulses to reduce pain sensation. Initial stimulation profiles were tonic and induced paresthesias in the affected area; however, later advances allowed for intermittent stimulation in the form of high-frequency and burst stimulation without stimulation-induced paresthesias. Although early researchers hypothesized that the gate theory of pain was the primary mechanism of action, the continued efficacy of SCS, despite varying stimulation profiles, paints a more complex and nuanced picture. Sheldon et al. reviewed the effectiveness of SCS and briefly discussed dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) for the management of neuropathic pain (Figure 1A). In randomized controlled trials, the authors found high-frequency and burst stimulation superior to tonic stimulation. They further discussed the future of closed-loop SCS, where the intensity of stimulation is automatically adjusted to deliver the best pain-free outcomes. Current neurofeedback mechanisms for closed-loop SCS include accelerometry data and evoked compound action potentials.
Figure 1. (A) Examples of percutaneous SCS leads (LEFT) and paddle SCS leads (RIGHT). (B) Intraoperative coronal MRI thermometry images of the completed right (TOP) and left (BOTTOM) anterior cingulotomy laser-induced thermal lesions. (C) Thalamic anatomy. Sagittal and Axial planes of the thalamus through the CLp. AV, anterior ventral nucleus; CM, centre median nucleus, CeM, central medial nucleus; CL, central lateral nucleus; CLp, posterior central lateral nucleus; Hb, habenular nucleus; LD, lateral dorsal nucleus; Li, limitans nucleus; LP, lateral posterior nucleus; MD, mediodorsal nucleus; PuL, pulvinar; VA, ventral anterior nucleus; VL, ventral lateral nucleus; VM, ventral medial nucleus; VPM, ventral posterior medial nucleus; VPL, ventral posterior lateral nucleus.
The remaining three papers discuss ablative procedures to manage neuropathic and cancer-related pain. Chalil et al. performed a literature review and illustrated the efficacy of dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) injuries in their case series. The authors found that out of 692 patients who underwent DREZ lesioning for BPA injury pain in the literature, 567 were successful in reducing their pain by more than 50%. Furthermore, in a case series of 7 patients, they found that all but one patient achieved more than 50% reduction in pain, with the patients' mean visual analog scale (VAS) score decreasing from 7.9 ± 0.63 pre- to 2.1 ± 0.99 post-operatively. These results confirm pre-existing literature and highlight DREZ lesioning as an efficacious modality to reduce BPA injury pain.
As our understanding of pain has improved, we have learned that pain perception comprises three independent but highly connected components: affective-motivational, sensory-discriminative, and cognitive-evaluative (10). Effective surgical interventions must target one or more of these aspects to reduce pain effectively. While the procedures mentioned above focus on the sensory-discriminative aspect of pain, lesions of cortical and sub-cortical structures target the affective-motivational component of pain. Other ablative targets include the central lateral nucleus of the thalamus and the cingulate cortex. Allam et al. reviewed the role of the central lateral nucleus in processing the affective component of pain and suggested that lesioning of this nucleus may be relatively safe (Figure 1C). In many cases included in the review, patients achieved long-term pain relief even two years after the procedure, with few adverse events reported.
Cingulotomies have traditionally been performed to alleviate widespread pain with a significant psychological component, typically within the head and neck region (11). In this paper, the authors used a relatively novel technique to perform this procedure on a patient with widespread pain due to metastatic cancer. The case report by Allam et al. discussed the ablation of the anterior cingulate cortex via MR-guided laser-induced thermal therapy (MRgLITT) in their case report. MRgLITT has only been previously described as a technique for this treatment in five other patients at another institution (Figure 1B) (12–14). While inconclusive, the study supports and illustrates that an MRgLITT cingulotomy can effectively reduce the sensation of widespread cancer pain in appropriately selected patients.
A wide variety of ablative and neuromodulation techniques can be employed for pain management when pharmacologic management has proven inadequate. Most of these procedures, excluding spinal cord stimulation, lack substantial randomized controlled trials and are often used palliatively. Future research is necessary to define the best practices for these procedures to benefit those patients in pain who desire relief from their suffering.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, Nahin R, Mackey S, DeBar L, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2018) 67(36):1001–6. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2
2. Tsang A, von Korff M, Lee S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer M, et al. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain. (2008) 9(10):883–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.005
3. Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain. (2012) 13(8):715–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009
4. Fisher E, Heathcote LC, Eccleston C, Simons LE, Palermo TM. Assessment of pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and fear of pain in children and adolescents with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. (2018) 43(3):314–25. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx103
5. Hadi MA, McHugh GA, Closs SJ. Impact of chronic pain on patients’ quality of life: a comparative mixed-methods study. J Patient Exp. (2019) 6(2):133–41. doi: 10.1177/2374373518786013
6. IsHak WW, Wen RY, Naghdechi L, Vanle B, Dang J, Knosp M, et al. Pain and depression: a systematic review. Harv Rev Psychiatry. (2018) 26(6):352–63. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000198
7. Pacheco-Barrios K, Carvalho S, Leite J, Caumo W, Fregni F. Editorial: optimization strategies for pain management with neuromodulation. Front Pain Res. (2022) 3:1012790. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1012790
8. Franzini A, Moosa S, Servello D, Small I, DiMeco F, Xu Z, et al. Ablative brain surgery: an overview. Int J Hyperthermia. (2019) 36(2):64–80. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1616833
9. Kumar K, Rizvi S. Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation therapy in management of chronic pain. Pain Med. (2013) 14(11):1631–49. doi: 10.1111/pme.12146
10. Melzack R, Casey KL. Sensory, motivational, and central control determinants of pain: a new conceptual model. In: Kenshalo D, editor. The skin senses. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Charles C Thomas (1968). p. 423–39.
11. Viswanathan A, Harsh V, Pereira EAC, Aziz TZ. Cingulotomy for medically refractory cancer pain. Neurosurg Focus. (2013) 35(3):E1. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.FOCUS13236
12. Patel P, Patel Nv, Danish SF. Intracranial MR-guided laser-induced thermal therapy: single-center experience with the Visualase thermal therapy system. J Neurosurg. (2016) 125(4):853–60. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS15244
13. Patel Nv, Agarwal N, Mammis A, Danish SF. Frameless stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy to perform bilateral anterior cingulotomy for intractable pain: feasibility, technical aspects, and initial experience in 3 patients. Oper Neurosurg. (2015) 11(1):17–25. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000581
Keywords: ablative surgery, chronic pain, cancer pain, neuropathic pain, neuromodulation
Citation: Allam AK, Viswanathan A, Schwalb JM, Patil PG and Larkin MB (2023) Editorial: Surgical techniques for the management of pain. Front. Pain Res. 4:1120174. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1120174
Received: 9 December 2022; Accepted: 17 January 2023;
Published: 13 February 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by: Salahadin Abdi, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
© 2023 Allam, Viswanathan, Schwalb, Patil and Larkin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: M. Benjamin Larkin bWxhcmtpbkBiY20uZWR1
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Cancer Pain, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pain Research