AUTHOR=Oostendorp Rob A. B. , Elvers Hans , van Trijffel Emiel , Rutten Geert M. , Scholten-Peeters Gwendolyne G. M. , De Kooning Margot , Laekeman Marjan , Nijs Jo , Roussel Nathalie , Samwel Han 

TITLE=Improved quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Results based on 16 years of routinely collected data

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pain Research

VOLUME=3

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pain-research/articles/10.3389/fpain.2022.929385

DOI=10.3389/fpain.2022.929385

ISSN=2673-561X

ABSTRACT=<p>Quality improvement is now a central tenet in physiotherapy care, and quality indicators (QIs), as measurable elements of care, have been applied to analyze and evaluate the quality of physiotherapy care over the past two decades. QIs, based on Donabedian's model of quality of care, provide a foundation for measuring (improvements in) quality of physiotherapy care, providing insight into the many remaining evidentiary gaps concerning diagnostics, prognostics and treatment, as well as patient-related outcome measures. In this overview we provide a synthesis of four recently published articles from our project group on the topic of quantitative measures of quality improvement in physiotherapy care, in this context specifically focused on patients with WAD in primary care physiotherapy. A set of process and outcome QIs (<italic>n</italic> = 28) was developed for patients with WAD and linked to a database consisting of routinely collected data (RCD) on patients with WAD collected over a 16-year period. The QIs were then embedded per step of the clinical reasoning process: (a) administration (<italic>n</italic> = 2); (b) history taking (<italic>n</italic> = 7); (c) objectives of examination (<italic>n</italic> = 1); (d) clinical examination (<italic>n</italic> = 5); (e) analysis and conclusion (<italic>n</italic> = 1); (f) treatment plan (<italic>n</italic> = 3); (g) treatment (<italic>n</italic> = 2); (h) evaluation (<italic>n</italic> = 5); and (i) discharge (<italic>n</italic> = 2). QIs were expressed as percentages, allowing target performance levels to be defined ≥70% or ≤30%, depending on whether the desired performance required an initially high or low QI score. Using RCD data on primary care patients with WAD (<italic>N</italic> = 810) and a set of QIs, we found that the quality of physiotherapy care has improved substantially over a 16-year period. This conclusion was based on QIs meeting predetermined performance targets of ≥70% or ≤30%. Twenty-three indicators met the target criterium of ≥70% and three indicators ≤30%. Our recommended set of QIs, embedded in a clinical reasoning process for patients with WAD, can now be used as a basis for the development of a validated QI set that effectively measures quality (improvement) of primary care physiotherapy in patients with WAD.</p>