Yu Zhang1*
Ansgar J. Furst1,2,3,4- 1War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- 3Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- 4Polytrauma System of Care (PSC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
The brainstem is one of the most vulnerable brain structures in many neurological conditions, such as pain, sleep problems, autonomic dysfunctions, and neurodegenerative disorders. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography provide structural details and quantitative measures of brainstem fiber pathways. Until recently, diffusion tensor tractographic studies have mainly focused on whole-brain MRI acquisition. Due to the brainstem's spatial localization, size, and tissue characteristics, and limits of imaging techniques, brainstem diffusion MRI poses particular challenges in tractography. We provide a brief overview on recent advances in diffusion tensor tractography in revealing human pathways connecting the brainstem to the subcortical regions (e.g., basal ganglia, mesolimbic, basal forebrain), and cortical regions. Each of these pathways contains different distributions of fiber tracts from known neurotransmitter-specific nuclei in the brainstem. We compare the brainstem tractographic approaches in literature and our in-lab developed automated brainstem tractography in terms of atlas building, technical advantages, and neuroanatomical implications on neurotransmitter systems. Lastly, we summarize recent investigations of using brainstem tractography as a promising tool in association with pain.
Introduction
The brainstem is a central structure that connects the brain cerebrum to the spinal cord and cerebellum. The brainstem contains nuclei and fiber pathways that synthesize and transfer specific neurotransmitters and neuromodulators to the peripheral receptors and effectors for the regulation of such basic functions as arousal, motor function, memory, reward, nociception, and autonomic control. Along a dorsoventral axis, the brainstem consists of three subdivisions with distinctive parts: the dorsal side of the midbrain known as the tectum, including the mid-dorsal part of the aqueduct, a central region of nuclei and fibers known as tegmentum beneath the ventricular system, and a massive fiber communication system connecting to the spinal cord and the cerebellum in the ventral part. Nuclei and fiber pathways in the tectum relay pain signals from peripheral stimuli via the spinal cord to the cerebral sensory cortices that result in the sensation of pain (nociception). They also transmit anti-nociceptive signals down to the spinal cord which induces endogenous opioid-based analgesia (pain regulation). Many pain syndromes can be caused by damage to or dysregulation of the brain, brainstem, spinal cord and fibers connecting them. Invasive (surgical) inspection of such damage is often carrying considerable risk which is why non-invasive imaging techniques are a very attractive alternative.
Conventional brain structural MRI studies have assessed how gray matter volume and white matter integrity are associated with acute pain processing or the severity in chronic pain. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a specific structural MRI sequence that allows for non-invasive measurement of altered microstructural integrity in particularly white matter regions and tracts in human brain. DTI measures such as fractional anisotropy (FA) explain the strength of the orientational organization of microstructures, radial (RD), axial (AD) and mean (MD) diffusivities are likely to be sensitive to myelin/axon as well as non-specific physiopathology states. In neurological conditions, it is generally believed that reduced FA and increased MD, RD or AD are attributed to demyelination, loss of axons (1, 2), or an interrupted connection (3), which might represent potential damage of the structure in the testing anatomy. Several DTI studies (see Table 1), using non-hypothesis-driven whole brain voxel-wise analysis, found significant microstructural damage in many cerebral regions/fiber connections (some including brainstem fiber tracts) in painful conditions, such as temporomandibular disorders (4), episodic cluster headache (5) or traumatic brain injury-induced chronic headache (6), ankle muscle proprioception in low back pain (12), chronic irritable bowel syndrome (7), chronic pelvic pain (8), cervical spondylosis-induced pain (9), chronic musculoskeletal pain (10), and analgesia in response to pain stimuli (11). These studies have suggested that microstructural damage in the brainstem fiber connections may be associated with pain regulation or pain sensation. Figure 1 indicates the brain tracts that were found to be significantly affected by pain conditions from all published clinical studies reviewed in this article. The majority of these findings were reported in large fiber bundles and brainstem-to-cerebral cortical connections (16).
Table 1. Technical details and major findings of the DTI application studies (voxel-based, as well as tract-based) in pain.
Figure 1. Results from tract-based analyses based on DTI of pain studies: 
FA significantly reduced in patients; 
FA significantly increased in patients; 
FA was not significantly different; 
Reduced FA signficantly correlated with increased pain intensity/sensitivity; 
Increased FA significantly correlated with greater analgesic response; 
Not analyzed. [a] Cortical and subcortical areas of major fiber tracts (specific tracts included); [b] Some areas in the brainstem without specific definition of tracts. [c] Significant findings are presented based on RD instead of FA which showed a weaker significance. TMD, temporomandibular disorder; HC, healthy control; CH, cluster headache; MTBI, mild traumatic brain injury; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IC/BPS, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome; CS, cervical spondylosis with pain; CMP, chronic musculoskeletal pain; LBP, low back pain; CPSP, central post-stroke pain; TBSS, tract-based spatial statistics; SPM, statistical parametric mapping; CST, corticospinal tract; STT, spinothalamic tract; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; FPT, frontopontine tract; MFT, medial forebrain tract; PTR, posterior thalamic radiation; ALIC, anterior limb of internal capsule; PLIC, posterior limb of internal capsule; EC, external capsule; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle; DLF, dorsal longitudinal fasciculus; MLF, medial longitudinal fasciculus; MCP, middle cerebellar peduncle; ICP, inferior cerebellar peduncle.
To date, the human brainstem remains one of the most challenging regions to explore with DTI due to the difficulty of accurately delineating small nuclei and complex fiber connections in this area. It is thus necessary to create an atlas of the brainstem small nuclei/fiber tracts in standard neuroimaging space (e.g., in MNI space) (17, 18), and perform imaging analysis by co-registering individual DTI to the MNI space (or vice-versa).
This mini-review is aimed to provide a brief overview on recent advances in brainstem tractography based on DTI, particularly focusing on the technical improvement of automated tractographic approaches. We also discuss the neuroanatomical relevance of brainstem tractography to pain, practical applications and potential implications of brainstem tractography for clinical studies of pain. We hope this article will improve the understanding of the basic principles, help with result interpretation, and increase the appreciation of technical advantages/limitations in DTI tractography. A critical understanding of this technique will promote its use and foster its application in the clinical setting for surgical interventions (19, 20) treatment and evaluation.
Diffusion Tensor Tractography of the Brainstem
Manual Tractography
Diffusion tensor tractography offers orientation-based 3-dimensional reconstruction to display neural fiber tracts using data collected from DTI. Specifically, a tractographic algorithm integrates continuous voxel-to-voxel predominant orientations into a fiber streamline that connects distant brain voxels/regions. The initial step of tractography is to fit the non-directional (i.e., b = 0) image and the directional (at least 6) diffusion weighted-images to a tensor model with eigenvectors (i.e., the directions) and eigenvalues (i.e., the strength of diffusions along certain direction). After tensor fitting, tractographic approaches basically use deterministic algorithms (e.g., fiber assignment by continuous tracking – FACT) (21) or the probabilistic algorithms (22) to reconstruct fiber streamlines. These algorithms require placement of anatomical landmarks (region-of-interest, ROI) at one (a single “seed”) or two ends (a pair of “seed” and “target”) of the proposed tract to display pathway between distant brain regions. Deterministic tractography assumes a principal orientation at each voxel, and propagates streamlines from the “seed” voxel to the next voxel with similar principal direction, until stopping criterion (such as a low FA or a sharp angle). The deterministic tractography algorism runs simple, fast, reliable but is sensitive to low directional voxel (e.g., crossing fibers or noise), leading to underestimation/interruption of the streamlines. Probabilistic tractography assumes a distribution of orientations between voxels. It reacts “how likely” each other voxel orientation (according to their likelihood) is to lie along a fiber, and presents the connection likelihood or probability of the streamlines. Probabilistic tractography recovers more extensive fiber bundles but at the price of generating more invalid connections (i.e., overestimation/“false positive” fiber tracts) (23). Despite these limitations, in human medicine, diffusion tensor tractography visualizes anatomical fiber tracts of the most important pathways of the central nervous system, and has been useful in understanding human brain anatomy and surgical planning. Further, the quantitative measurement of fiber tracts provides evaluation of the microstructural status of the myeline membrane, axon bundles, and structural connectivity, and thus has great potential for studying pathological conditions and correlations with clinical symptoms.
A majority of diffusion tensor tractography approaches extract major cerebral fiber tracts that are well myelinated. Brainstem tractography is difficult and requires accurate ROI delineation by neuroanatomical experts because anatomical landmarks are small, fiber networks are short, poor myelinated, joining, and/or crossing over. Manual DTI tractography was used in many studies that aimed to represent the complex anatomy of the brainstem (24–29). Beyond providing normal brainstem anatomy, some other studies focused on specific pathways that have physiopathologic implication, such as the main sensory pathways [e.g., the medial lemniscus, spinothalamic, the cerebropontocerebellar_tracts (30–37), the cranial nerves and their nuclei (38–41), the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) (24, 42–44), the dopaminergic pathways, (45–48), and the medial forebrain bundle (49–53).
Automated Tractography and Atlas Building
Manually placing anatomical landmarks is time-consuming and relies on accurate placement of landmarks by neuroanatomical experts. Recent research studies have developed two popular strategies for automated white matter parcellation (54–56), including a white-matter-atlas-based fiber clustering method (57–61) and a landmark-based (through an atlas of gray and white matter ROIs) method (62–70). Both strategies launch individual tractography by transforming an atlas of fiber clusters/landmarks from standard space (e.g., MNI, ICBM, Talairach, etc.) to a subject's native space. In detail: (1) The Fiber clustering strategy provides anatomical fiber tract parcellation (including deep white matter tracts, short and medium range superficial fiber trajectories) by grouping streamlines into clusters on the basis of fiber similarity properties. (2) The landmark-based strategy aims to provide cortical or subcortical parcellations (i.e., ROIs) of the two termini of a fiber tract. Individual tractography can be performed by launching tractography using a “seed” and target ROIs, or extracting fiber streamlines only between the pair of the segmented ROIs from the whole brain tractography. A majority of the landmark-based strategies use the Freesurfer (http://freesurfer.net/) package which provides reliable cortical/subcortical-based-parcellation. However, automated tractography of the brainstem and deep brain areas is limited, due to the lack of an atlas with anatomical landmarks or standardized fiber clusters. Several studies (71–73) provided up to 13 major motor and sensory brainstem tracts using a high-quality high–angular resolution diffusion MRI (HARDI) data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) via manually-drawn ROI-based (71, 72), or clustering (73) strategies. Furthermore, few studies (71, 74) validated the anatomical precision of brainstem tractography with postmortem or histological sections. Two recent studies (75, 76) also presented similar brainstem tract atlas including motor, sensory, and reticular segments based on routine DTI-MRI sequences. One study built (77) an atlas of the spinal trigeminal tract (SpTV) for studies of trigeminal neuralgia.
Even though these studies (Table 2) of landmarks or fiber clusters in the brainstem are promising, the actual use of these atlases will largely depend on the imaging/IT environment of the end-user. For example, most brainstem fiber atlases have been built based on high-quality, high-resolution, long-duration diffusion scans of healthy young adults, whereas most clinical DTI data are acquired with lower resolution (>2 mm3) and a smaller number of directions (≤80) where some thin deep tracts often cannot be successfully visualized. Conventional DTI scans also tend to suffer from susceptibility-induced distortions in the skull-base and the brainstem area, which are difficult to correct. This may lead to an incorrect fiber anatomy in some cases. Furthermore, transforming atlas maps of young healthy brains to groups of individuals with significant changes in brain morphology due to pathological conditions often results in spatial inaccuracies such as misregistration which can ultimately lead to failed or distorted tractographic outputs. In this context, test-retest studies are needed to validate the reliability of brainstem tractographic atlases in the clinical setting. Nonetheless, when performing individual tractography on clinical data using a brainstem atlas, applying sufficient distortion correction (78), data-based customized registration (76), and quality control by neuroanatomical experts in addition to automated processing could improve reliability.
Table 2. Summary of studies of brainstem atlas building.
Brainstem Circuitry and Pain Modulation
Many experimental and preclinical studies have investigated brainstem small nuclei and circuits that are involved in pain (79), including the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), locus coeruleus (LC), dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, and a PAG-RVM-DH circuitry/axis that interconnects them. The PAG sends direct and indirect projection to RVM and DH (80). Part of PAG is involved in an endogenous analgesia, as direct stimulation of the PAG can suppress pain intensity in individuals with various chronic pain conditions (81–83). Numerous studies have suggested a potential mechanism of descending pain inhibition and its pathways through the PAG-RVM-DH axis (84–88). In contrast to the role of reducing pain, some experimental studies have suggested that excitation of the PAG-RVM-DH system can lead to a facilitating effect through the DH (89, 90), SpV (91), and RVM (92) resulting in hyperalgesia.
To extend our understanding of the PAG-RVM-DH pathways gained through experimental studies in animals, human brain functional MRI (fMRI) studies have been promoted to investigate brainstem functional activation patterns associated with pain sensitivity and pain modulation. An extensive number of fMRI studies have reported the brainstem being involved in descending analgesic responses in various pain conditions. For example, a resting state-fMRI study (93) reported patients with chronic orofacial pain show increased functional connectivity between the RVM, LC and PAG, as well as supratentorial regions (e.g., hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, and anterior cingulate cortex), possibly reflecting “top–down” engagement of the circuitry alongside altered reward processing in pain conditions. Other studies found that higher functional connectivity between PAG and RVM (or LC) is associated with higher pain scores in fibromyalgia (94), as well as in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain (93) and diabetic polyneuropathy-induced pain (95). Several studies (96, 97) investigated healthy volunteers during heat stimulation and distraction (e.g., participants were asked to perform a color-word Stroop distractor task while receiving thermal stimuli) and found that distraction was associated with a significant reduction of pain intensity with increased functional activation of the cingulate, hippocampus, thalamus, PAG, and brainstem regions, exerting a “top-down” influence on pain modulation during distraction. In addition to the PAG-RVM-DH pathways, several fMRI studies also revealed that greater functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortices to the amygdala and nucleus accumbens are associated with severer acute (98) and chronic pain (99–101).
Brainstem Tractography and Relevance to Pain
The neuroanatomical and neuropsychological studies of pain (102) suggest a complex network comprised of ascending and descending pathways in the brain. The descending pathway, also known as the “top down” pathway via the PAG-RVM-DH axis, has been demonstrated to be an endogenous analgesic system that is activated in response to pain stimuli. The ascending pathways transmit nociceptive signals from peripheral nerves to the sensory cortex via the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, brainstem, and thalamus (103). While these complex neurotransmitter pathways can be represented through tractography, our understanding of the anatomical connectivity and its implication in pain processing or pain control is still an emerging field of exploration.
Recent improvements in diffusion tensor tractography allow presentation of major brainstem pathways in humans. Given its role in pain modulation several studies performed diffusion tractography of the PAG manually (104) or a PAG site used in deep brain stimulation (DBS) (105–107) for treatment of chronic pain to identify fiber tracts that might be associated with pain. Tracts that are consistently presented in these studies include: (1) PAG to the thalamus, which overlaps with the superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP) and the spinothalamic tract (STT); (2) PAG to the medial prefrontal cortex through ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens, which overlaps with the medial forebrain tract (MFT); (3) PAG to the hypothalamus and RVM, which overlaps with the dorsal longitudinal fasciculus (DLF) and partially the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF). Further anatomical connections with the PAG beyond the brainstem area include amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (which overlaps with MFT), ventral posterior thalamus and primary somatosensory cortex (which overlaps with STT). A schematic map of the tracts that possibly relate to pain displayed in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Possible PAG connections based on DTI from Linnman et al. (84) and Zhang et al. (76). ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; Cerebell, cerebellum; dmPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; vlPFC, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex; WM, white matter; VTA, ventral tegmental area; SN, substantia nigra; RN, red nucleus; PAG, periaqueductal gray matter; LC, locus coeruleus; ML, medial lemniscus; Dent. Nc., dentate nucleus; STT, spinothalamic tract; NST, nigrostriatal tract; MFT, medial forebrain tract; DLF, dorsal longitudinal fasciculus; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle; MLF, medial longitudinal fasciculus.
On the basis of existing automated brainstem DTI tractographic atlases, Figure 3 presents an illustration of the fiber tracts that are highly relevant to pain and their relationship with key brainstem nuclei (e.g., PAG, LC and RVM). The anatomy of these brainstem tracts can be confirmed with known neuroanatomical books (108–111).
Figure 3. Illustration of ROI where the volumes of the brainstem nuclei and diffusion metrics were measured. Upper panel, Illustration of ROIs of the PAG, LC and RVM, which were delineated based on literature (108). The hot color scale represents probability of gray matter density (brighter color refers to higher gray matter density) within the ROIs. Middle panel, example of brainstem tracts of interests, including MLF (orange), DLF (cyan), SCP (green), NST (dark pink), MFT (yellow), CST (dark green), STT (blue), and the three brainstem nuclei (red). Lower panel, the anatomical relationships between brainstem tracts (non-red) and nuclei (red) on 4 brainstem axial slices. PAG, periaqueductal gray; LC, locus coeruleus; RVM, rostral ventromedial medulla; MLF, medial longitudinal fasciculus; DLF, dorsal longitudinal fasciculus; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle; NST, nigrostriatal tract; MFT, medial forebrain tract; CST, corticospinal tract; STT, spinothalamic tract.
The DLF connects hypothalamus, PAG and spinal cord via the ventral side of the aqueduct and fourth ventricle. The DLF anatomy is consistent with the inferomedial branch of the medial forebrain bundle that has been described in several DBS studies (112), which consists of fiber that connects through upper pons, retrorubral area, PAG, VTA in the midbrain and ends in the lateral hypothalamus. Using atlas-based automated brainstem tractography (76), our recent study reported that FA decrease and MD/RD/AD increase in the DLF are associated with increased pain intensity in a group of patients with fibromyalgia-like, chronic pain (13). The DLF appears to have the largest anatomical overlap with the described descending analgesic pathway which in turn suggests that damage of the DLF may result in impaired endogenous pain regulation.
The SCP connects the dentate nucleus with the thalamus, red nucleus, vestibular nuclei, and the reticular formation. It functions mainly as a network for motor coordination and postural control. The SCP at the midbrain level includes non-decussated and decussated branches that partly overlap with PAG and VTA (113). One study (12) using an automated atlas-based approach, reported FA decrease and MD increase of the SCP to be significantly associated with greater sensation of low back pain in response to ankle muscle vibration in healthy volunteers.
The MFT connects between deep cerebellar nuclei and anterior frontal regions. It traverses partially through the VTA, PAG, inferomedial thalamus, also passes through the anterior limb of internal capsule (ALIC) along with anterior thalamic radiation (ATR). Similar MFT connection, which is described as a superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle in a previous review article, is considered to be a seeking/pleasure pathway (112). DBS treatment on this pathway showed anti-depressive effects and modified the emotional pain state, suggesting that the MFT may have therapeutical implication for affective pain. Two studies investigated MFT (or fibers with similar anatomy) changes in response to pain in healthy subjects. One using a semi-automated approach (which manually delineates tractographic landmarks from the FreeSurfer parcellation atlas), reported that FA reduction and RD increase in the MFT are associated with higher pain sensitivity after heating stimuli (14). Another study, using a voxel-wise statistical approach with a FA-based tract skeleton, showed reduced FA in several tracts (connecting dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex with the PAG) was associated with better placebo analgesic responses (11), which supports the notion that lower FA in the MFT is associated with decreased sensitivity to painful stimuli.
The STT is known as a major sensory pathway that is highly trackable and reproducible by either manual or automated approaches. The STT consists of a spinothalamocortical pathway (pain and temperature sensation) and a medial lemniscothalamocortical pathway (conscious proprioception) (114). Both pathways are considered the main ascending sensory pathways of the body that travel rostrally in close proximity within the brainstem to the thalamus and to the somatosensory cortex (115). Several papers showed central post-stroke pain (those without signs of peripheral neuropathy) was related to injury of the STT detected by loss of the STT volume (116), thickness (117), or damaged microstructural integrity including FA decrease and MD increase (15).
Taken together, these studies applying diffusion tensor tractography in pain research demonstrated that some dorsal brainstem fibers may be involved in pain processing and modulation on the basis of these fiber tracts connecting the cerebral cortices through the PAG to the dorsal spinal cord. These studies consistently observed a significant correlation between a reduced microstructural integrity of the brainstem tracts connecting to PAG and increased pain intensity/sensitivity. These findings suggest a structural connectivity-related endogenous pain regulation. Specifically, substantial impairment (e.g., impaired axon or myeline membrane) of the brainstem fiber connection results in a dysfunction of the descending inhibition or modulation. Although the clinical application of diffusion tensor tractography in pain is still infrequent, the above evidence suggests that its inclusion in future studies may hold a lot of promise.
Limitations
Current pain research applying brainstem diffusion tensor tractography has been limited in several ways: (1) Most of the brainstem tractography atlases have been built based on healthy young adults with sophisticated diffusion protocols that would last longer than 50 min. A super-high resolution (e.g., 200 Mm isotropic voxel) using higher magnetic field strengths such as 7T scanner could further improve tractographic atlas building and analyses in microstructural level but 7T scanners are typically not available in hospitals as they provide limited clinical relevance. This is further complicated by the fact that atlases build on 7T data will not directly translate into lower field scans like the commonly used 3T clinical scanners. Conversely, clinical DTI protocols routinely tend to be no longer than 10 min with lower resolution (≤2 mm3) and fewer diffusion directions (≤80). Therefore, in clinical practice, small pathways may not be identifiable and mis-registration may often occur in patients with conditions affecting brain morphology including elderly patients. Further technical developments should be focused on improvement of quality and feasibility of clinical scans, as well as correcting errors due to low resolution, noise, artifacts, distortion and crossing-fibers during post-processing. (2) Although a number of existing diffusion tensor tractographic studies have consistently attributed a role to the structural connectivity of brainstem tracts in descending analgesic pathways, less is known whether these tracts might also be associated with ascending pain facilitation effects. It is technically even difficult because the diffusion tensor tractography expresses a bidirectional structure that cannot separate the afferent or efferent fiber inputs, thus cannot distinguish the ascending or descending pathways, respectively. (3) Generally, alterations of quantitative DTI variables explain non-specific biological features and therefore only permit indirect interpretations of the underlying pathophysiology. The important role of brainstem fibers was discussed here together with supporting evidence. Additional pathophysiologic validation is needed to further understand the role of brainstem fibers in pain and other conditions.
Conclusion
As a non-invasive, clinically feasible MRI sequence, DTI is a sensitive imaging method in detecting problems of structural integrity of human brain neural pathways. Recent developments in diffusion tensor tractography offer visualization and quantitative analysis of the status of small brainstem fiber tracts, in which several known pain-related neural pathways are included. A better understanding of the relationship between brainstem structural connection and chronic pain and/or pain modulation will be helpful for revealing the neurobiological basis and regulation mechanisms underlying pain.
Author Contributions
YZ and AF contributed conception and design of the review. YZ wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AF reviewed the first draft. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was funded by the War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC) of the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations and VA Clinical Science Research and Development (CSR&D) grant entitled the role of the brain stem in GWVI pathology (1 I01 CX002182-01).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Basser PJ, Jones DK. Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review. NMR Biomed. (2002) 15:456–67. doi: 10.1002/nbm.783
2. Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology. (1996) 201:637–48. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939209
3. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed. (2002) 15:435–55. doi: 10.1002/nbm.782
4. Moayedi M, Weissman-Fogel I, Salomons TV, Crawley AP, Goldberg MB, Freeman BV, et al. White matter brain and trigeminal nerve abnormalities in temporomandibular disorder. Pain. (2012) 153:1467–77. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.003
5. Teepker M, Menzler K, Belke M, Heverhagen JT, Voelker M, Mylius V, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in episodic cluster headache. Headache. (2012) 52:274–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02000.x
6. Leung A, Yang E, Lim M, Metzger-Smith V, Theilmann R, Song D, et al. Pain-related white matter tract abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury patients with persistent headache. Mol Pain. (2018) 14:1744806918810297. doi: 10.1177/1744806918810297
7. Ellingson BM, Mayer E, Harris RJ, Ashe-McNally C, Naliboff BD, Labus JS, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging detects microstructural reorganization in the brain associated with chronic irritable bowel syndrome. Pain. (2013) 154:1528–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.010
8. Farmer MA, Huang L, Martucci K, Yang CC, Maravilla KR, Harris RE, et al. Brain white matter abnormalities in female interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a MAPP network neuroimaging study. J Urol. (2015) 194:118–26. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.082
9. Li D, Xu H, Yang Q, Zhang M, Wang Y. Cerebral white matter alterations revealed by multiple diffusion metrics in cervical spondylotic patients with pain: a TBSS study. Pain Med. (2021). doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab227. [Epub ahead of print].
10. Lieberman G, Shpaner M, Watts R, Andrews T, Filippi CG, Davis M, et al. White matter involvement in chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Pain. (2014) 15:1110–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.002
11. Stein N, Sprenger C, Scholz J, Wiech K, Bingel U. White matter integrity of the descending pain modulatory system is associated with interindividual differences in placebo analgesia. Pain. (2012) 153:2210–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.07.010
12. Pijnenburg M, Caeyenberghs K, Janssens L, Goossens N, Swinnen SP, Sunaert S, et al. Microstructural integrity of the superior cerebellar peduncle is associated with an impaired proprioceptive weighting capacity in individuals with non-specific low back pain. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e100666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100666
13. Zhang Y, Vakhtin AA, Dietch J, Jennings JS, Yesavage JA, Clark JD, et al. Brainstem damage is associated with poorer sleep quality and increased pain in gulf war illness veterans. Life Sci. (2021) 280:119724. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119724
14. Geisler M, Rizzoni E, Makris N, Pasternak O, Rathi Y, Bouix S, et al. Microstructural alterations in medial forebrain bundle are associated with interindividual pain sensitivity. Hum Brain Mapp. (2021) 42:1130–7. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25281
15. Jang SH, Lee J, Yeo SS. Central post-stroke pain due to injury of the spinothalamic tract in patients with cerebral infarction: a diffusion tensor tractography imaging study. Neural Regen Res. (2017) 12:2021–4. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.221159
16. Martucci KT, Mackey SC. Imaging pain. Anesthesiol Clin. (2016) 34:255–69. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.01.001
17. Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. (2006) 31:968–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021
18. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. (2002) 15:273–89. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
19. Hunsche S, Sauner D, Runge MJ, Lenartz D, El Majdoub F, Treuer H, et al. Tractography-guided stimulation of somatosensory fibers for thalamic pain relief. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. (2013) 91:328–34. doi: 10.1159/000350024
20. Owen SL, Heath J, Kringelbach M, Green AL, Pereira EA, Jenkinson N, et al. Pre-operative DTI and probabilisitic tractography in four patients with deep brain stimulation for chronic pain. J Clin Neurosci. (2008) 15:801–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.06.010
21. Jiang H, van Zijl PC, Kim J, Pearlson GD, Mori S. DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. (2006) 81:106–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.08.004
22. Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Woolrich MW, Smith SM, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Boulby PA, et al. Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci. (2003) 6:750–7. doi: 10.1038/nn1075
23. Jones DK, Knosche TR, Turner R. White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. (2013) 73:239–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081
24. Edlow BL, Takahashi E, Wu O, Benner T, Dai G, Bu L, et al. Neuroanatomic connectivity of the human ascending arousal system critical to consciousness and its disorders. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2012) 71:531–46. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182588293
25. Nagae-Poetscher LM, Jiang H, Wakana S, Golay X, van Zijl PC, Mori S. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the brain stem at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2004) 25:1325–30.
26. Wakana S, Jiang H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, van Zijl PC, Mori S. Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy. Radiology. (2004) 230:77–87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2301021640
27. Salamon N, Sicotte N, Alger J, Shattuck D, Perlman S, Sinha U, et al. Analysis of the brain-stem white-matter tracts with diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroradiology. (2005) 47:895–902. doi: 10.1007/s00234-005-1439-8
28. Soria G, De Notaris M, Tudela R, Blasco G, Puig J, Planas AM, et al. Improved assessment of ex vivo brainstem neuroanatomy with high-resolution MRI and DTI at 7 Tesla. Anat Rec. (2011) 294:1035–44. doi: 10.1002/ar.21383
29. Aggarwal M, Zhang J, Pletnikova O, Crain B, Troncoso J, Mori S. Feasibility of creating a high-resolution 3D diffusion tensor imaging based atlas of the human brainstem: a case study at 11. 7 T Neuroimage. (2013) 74:117–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.061
30. Stieltjes B, Kaufmann WE, van Zijl PC, Fredericksen K, Pearlson GD, Solaiyappan M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and axonal tracking in the human brainstem. Neuroimage. (2001) 14:723–35. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0861
31. Chen X, Weigel D, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Nimsky C. Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter tractography in patients with brainstem lesions. Acta Neurochir. (2007) 149:1117–31. doi: 10.1007/s00701-007-1282-2
32. Ramnani N, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Richter MC, Pinsk MA, Andersson JL, et al. The evolution of prefrontal inputs to the cortico-pontine system: diffusion imaging evidence from Macaque monkeys and humans. Cereb Cortex. (2006) 16:811–8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj024
33. Habas C, Cabanis EA. Anatomical parcellation of the brainstem and cerebellar white matter: a preliminary probabilistic tractography study at 3 T. Neuroradiology. (2007) 49:849–63. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0267-4
34. Kamali A, Kramer LA, Frye RE, Butler IJ, Hasan KM. Diffusion tensor tractography of the human brain cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathways: a quantitative preliminary study. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2010) 32:809–17. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22330
35. Prats-Galino A, Soria G, de Notaris M, Puig J, Pedraza S. Functional anatomy of subcortical circuits issuing from or integrating at the human brainstem. Clin Neurophysiol. (2012) 123:4–12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.035
36. Ford AA, Colon-Perez L, Triplett WT, Gullett JM, Mareci TH, Fitzgerald DB. Imaging white matter in human brainstem. Front Hum Neurosci. (2013) 7:400. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00400
37. Ulrich NH, Kockro RA, Bellut D, Amaxopoulou C, Bozinov O, Burkhardt JK, et al. Brainstem cavernoma surgery with the support of pre- and postoperative diffusion tensor imaging: initial experiences and clinical course of 23 patients. Neurosurg Rev. (2014) 37:481–91. doi: 10.1007/s10143-014-0550-x
38. Upadhyay J, Knudsen J, Anderson J, Becerra L, Borsook D. Noninvasive mapping of human trigeminal brainstem pathways. Magn Reson Med. (2008) 60:1037–46. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21682
39. Hodaie M, Quan J, Chen DQ. In vivo visualization of cranial nerve pathways in humans using diffusion-based tractography. Neurosurgery. (2010) 66:788–95. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367613.09324.DA
40. Zeng Q, Li M, Yuan S, He J, Wang J, Chen Z, et al. Automated facial-vestibulocochlear nerve complex identification based on data-driven tractography clustering. NMR Biomed. (2021) 34:e4607. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4607
41. Javad F, Warren JD, Micallef C, Thornton JS, Golay X, Yousry T, et al. Auditory tracts identified with combined fMRI and diffusion tractography. Neuroimage. (2014) 84:562–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.007
42. McNab JA, Polimeni JR, Wang R, Augustinack JC, Fujimoto K, Stevens A, et al. Surface based analysis of diffusion orientation for identifying architectonic domains in the in vivo human cortex. Neuroimage. (2013) 69:87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.065
43. Yeo SS, Chang PH, Jang SH. The ascending reticular activating system from pontine reticular formation to the thalamus in the human brain. Front Hum Neurosci. (2013) 7:416. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00416
44. Jang SH, Kwon HG. The ascending reticular activating system from pontine reticular formation to the hypothalamus in the human brain: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurosci Lett. (2015) 590:58–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.01.071
45. Zhang Y, Wu IW, Buckley S, Coffey CS, Foster E, Mendick S, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the nigrostriatal fibers in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. (2015) 30:1229–36. doi: 10.1002/mds.26251
46. Cousineau M, Jodoin PM, Morency FC, Rozanski V, Grand'Maison M, Bedell BJ, et al. A test-retest study on Parkinson's PPMI dataset yields statistically significant white matter fascicles. Neuroimage Clin. (2017) 16:222–33. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.020
47. Andica C, Kamagata K, Hatano T, Okuzumi A, Saito A, Nakazawa M, et al. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the nigrostriatal pathway in Parkinson's disease: retrograde degeneration observed by tract-profile analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2018) 51:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.02.046
48. Theisen F, Leda R, Pozorski V, Oh JM, Adluru N, Wong R, et al. Evaluation of striatonigral connectivity using probabilistic tractography in Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage Clin. (2017) 16:557–63. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.09.009
49. Galvez JF, Keser Z, Mwangi B, Ghouse AA, Fenoy AJ, Schulz PE, et al. The medial forebrain bundle as a deep brain stimulation target for treatment resistant depression: a review of published data. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2015) 58:59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.12.003
50. Hana A, Hana A, Dooms G, Boecher-Schwarz H, Hertel F. Visualization of the medial forebrain bundle using diffusion tensor imaging. Front Neuroanat. (2015) 9:139. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00139
51. Denier N, Walther S, Schneider C, Federspiel A, Wiest R, Bracht T. Reduced tract length of the medial forebrain bundle and the anterior thalamic radiation in bipolar disorder with melancholic depression. J Affect Disord. (2020) 274:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.008
52. Anthofer JM, Steib K, Fellner C, Lange M, Brawanski A, Schlaier J. DTI-based deterministic fibre tracking of the medial forebrain bundle. Acta Neurochir. (2015) 157:469–77. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2335-y
53. Coenen VA, Sajonz B, Reisert M, Bostroem J, Bewernick B, Urbach H, et al. Tractography-assisted deep brain stimulation of the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (slMFB DBS) in major depression. Neuroimage Clin. (2018) 20:580–93. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.08.020
54. Zhang F, Wu Y, Norton I, Rathi Y, Golby AJ, O'Donnell LJ. Test-retest reproducibility of white matter parcellation using diffusion MRI tractography fiber clustering. Hum Brain Mapp. (2019) 40:3041–57. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24579
55. O'Donnell LJ, Golby AJ, Westin CF. Fiber clustering versus the parcellation-based connectome. Neuroimage. (2013) 80:283–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.066
56. Sydnor VJ, Rivas-Grajales AM, Lyall AE, Zhang F, Bouix S, Karmacharya S, et al. A comparison of three fiber tract delineation methods and their impact on white matter analysis. Neuroimage. (2018) 178:318–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.044
57. Wassermann D, Bloy L, Kanterakis E, Verma R, Deriche R. Unsupervised white matter fiber clustering and tract probability map generation: applications of a gaussian process framework for white matter fibers. Neuroimage. (2010) 51:228–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.004
58. Garyfallidis E, Cote MA, Rheault F, Sidhu J, Hau J, Petit L, et al. Recognition of white matter bundles using local and global streamline-based registration and clustering. Neuroimage. (2018) 170:283–95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.015
59. Guevara P, Duclap D, Poupon C, Marrakchi-Kacem L, Fillard P, Le Bihan D, et al. Automatic fiber bundle segmentation in massive tractography datasets using a multi-subject bundle atlas. Neuroimage. (2012) 61:1083–99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.071
60. Jin Y, Shi Y, Zhan L, Gutman BA, de Zubicaray GI, McMahon KL, et al. Automatic clustering of white matter fibers in brain diffusion MRI with an application to genetics. Neuroimage. (2014) 100:75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.048
61. O'Donnell LJ, Westin CF. Automatic tractography segmentation using a high-dimensional white matter atlas. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2007) 26:1562–75. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.906785
62. Wakana S, Caprihan A, Panzenboeck MM, Fallon JH, Perry M, Gollub RL, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. Neuroimage. (2007) 36:630–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.049
63. Wassermann D, Makris N, Rathi Y, Shenton M, Kikinis R, Kubicki M, et al. The white matter query language: a novel approach for describing human white matter anatomy. Brain Struct Funct. (2016) 221:4705–21. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1179-4
64. Hua K, Zhang J, Wakana S, Jiang H, Li X, Reich DS, et al. Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. Neuroimage. (2008) 39:336–47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.053
65. Lawes IN, Barrick TR, Murugam V, Spierings N, Evans DR, Song M, et al. Atlas-based segmentation of white matter tracts of the human brain using diffusion tensor tractography and comparison with classical dissection. Neuroimage. (2008) 39:62–79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.041
66. Yendiki A, Panneck P, Srinivasan P, Stevens A, Zollei L, Augustinack J, et al. Automated probabilistic reconstruction of white-matter pathways in health and disease using an atlas of the underlying anatomy. Front Neuroinform. (2011) 5:23. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00023
67. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2009) 10:186–98. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575
68. Sporns O, Tononi G, Kotter R. The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol. (2005) 1:e42. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042
69. Gong G, He Y, Concha L, Lebel C, Gross DW, Evans AC, et al. Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Cereb Cortex. (2009) 19:524–36. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn102
70. Bassett DS, Bullmore ET. Small-world brain networks revisited. Neuroscientist. (2017) 23:499–516. doi: 10.1177/1073858416667720
71. Meola A, Yeh FC, Fellows-Mayle W, Weed J, Fernandez-Miranda JC. Human connectome-based tractographic atlas of the brainstem connections and surgical approaches. Neurosurgery. (2016) 79:437–55. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001224
72. Tang Y, Sun W, Toga AW, Ringman JM, Shi Y. A probabilistic atlas of human brainstem pathways based on connectome imaging data. Neuroimage. (2018) 169:227–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.042
73. Yeh FC, Panesar S, Fernandes D, Meola A, Yoshino M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al. Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology. Neuroimage. (2018) 178:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.027
74. Adil SM, Calabrese E, Charalambous LT, Cook JJ, Rahimpour S, Atik AF, et al. A high-resolution interactive atlas of the human brainstem using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. (2021) 237:118135. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118135
75. Mate A, Kis D, Czigner A, Fischer T, Halasz L, Barzo P. Connectivity-based segmentation of the brainstem by probabilistic tractography. Brain Res. (2018) 1690:74–88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.010
76. Zhang Y, Vakhtin AA, Jennings JS, Massaband P, Wintermark M, Craig PL, et al. Diffusion tensor tractography of brainstem fibers and its application in pain. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0213952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213952
77. Burkett DJ, Garst JR, Hill JP, Kam A, Anderson DE. Deterministic tractography of the descending tract of the spinal trigeminal nerve using diffusion tensor imaging. J Neuroimaging. (2017) 27:539–44. doi: 10.1111/jon.12425
78. Irfanoglu MO, Walker L, Sarlls J, Marenco S, Pierpaoli C. Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results. Neuroimage. (2012) 61:275–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.054
79. Basbaum AI, Fields HL. Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annu Rev Neurosci. (1984) 7:309–38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.001521
80. Zhuo M. Descending facilitation. Mol Pain. (2017) 13:1744806917699212. doi: 10.1177/1744806917699212
81. Levy RM, Lamb S, Adams JE. Treatment of chronic pain by deep brain stimulation: long term follow-up and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. (1987) 21:885–93. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198712000-00017
82. Waters AJ, Lumb BM. Inhibitory effects evoked from both the lateral and ventrolateral periaqueductal grey are selective for the nociceptive responses of rat dorsal horn neurones. Brain Res. (1997) 752:239–49. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01462-X
83. Sessle BJ, Dubner R, Greenwood LF, Lucier GE. Descending influences of periaqueductal gray matter and somatosensory cerebral cortex on neurones in trigeminal brain stem nuclei. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. (1976) 54:66–9. doi: 10.1139/y76-010
84. Linnman C, Moulton EA, Barmettler G, Becerra L, Borsook D. Neuroimaging of the periaqueductal gray: state of the field. Neuroimage. (2012) 60:505–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.095
85. Willis WD, Westlund KN. Neuroanatomy of the pain system and of the pathways that modulate pain. J Clin Neurophysiol. (1997) 14:2–31. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199701000-00002
86. Heinricher MM, Tavares I, Leith JL, Lumb BM. Descending control of nociception: Specificity, recruitment and plasticity. Brain Res Rev. (2009) 60:214–25. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.009
87. Fields HL, Basbaum AI. Brainstem control of spinal pain-transmission neurons. Annu Rev Physiol. (1978) 40:217–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.40.030178.001245
88. Mayer DJ, Price DD. Central nervous system mechanisms of analgesia. Pain. (1976) 2:379–404. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(76)90080-4
89. Zhuo M, Gebhart GF. Biphasic modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission from the medullary raphe nuclei in the rat. J Neurophysiol. (1997) 78:746–58. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.746
90. Guo W, Robbins MT, Wei F, Zou S, Dubner R, Ren K. Supraspinal brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling: a novel mechanism for descending pain facilitation. J Neurosci. (2006) 26:126–37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3686-05.2006
91. Sugiyo S, Takemura M, Dubner R, Ren K. Trigeminal transition zone/rostral ventromedial medulla connections and facilitation of orofacial hyperalgesia after masseter inflammation in rats. J Comp Neurol. (2005) 493:510–23. doi: 10.1002/cne.20797
92. Bederson JB, Fields HL, Barbaro NM. Hyperalgesia during naloxone-precipitated withdrawal from morphine is associated with increased on-cell activity in the rostral ventromedial medulla. Somatosens Mot Res. (1990) 7:185–203. doi: 10.3109/08990229009144706
93. Mills EP, Di Pietro F, Alshelh Z, Peck CC, Murray GM, Vickers ER, et al. Brainstem pain-control circuitry connectivity in chronic neuropathic pain. J Neurosci. (2018) 38:465–73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1647-17.2017
94. Truini A, Tinelli E, Gerardi MC, Calistri V, Iannuccelli C, La Cesa S, et al. Abnormal resting state functional connectivity of the periaqueductal grey in patients with fibromyalgia. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2016) 34:S129–33.
95. Segerdahl AR, Themistocleous AC, Fido D, Bennett DL, Tracey I. A brain-based pain facilitation mechanism contributes to painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Brain. (2018) 141:357–64. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx337
96. Valet M, Sprenger T, Boecker H, Willoch F, Rummeny E, Conrad B, et al. Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain–an fMRI analysis. Pain. (2004) 109:399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.033
97. Tracey I, Ploghaus A, Gati JS, Clare S, Smith S, Menon RS, et al. Imaging attentional modulation of pain in the periaqueductal gray in humans. J Neurosci. (2002) 22:2748–52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02748.2002
98. Keltner JR, Furst A, Fan C, Redfern R, Inglis B, Fields HL. Isolating the modulatory effect of expectation on pain transmission: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. (2006) 26:4437–43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4463-05.2006
99. Baliki MN, Petre B, Torbey S, Herrmann KM, Huang L, Schnitzer TJ, et al. Corticostriatal functional connectivity predicts transition to chronic back pain. Nat Neurosci. (2012) 15:1117–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3153
100. Mansour AR, Baliki MN, Huang L, Torbey S, Herrmann KM, Schnitzer TJ, et al. Brain white matter structural properties predict transition to chronic pain. Pain. (2013) 154:2160–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.044
101. Vachon-Presseau E, Tetreault P, Petre B, Huang L, Berger SE, Torbey S, et al. Corticolimbic anatomical characteristics predetermine risk for chronic pain. Brain. (2016) 139:1958–70. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww100
102. Khalid S, Tubbs RS. Neuroanatomy and neuropsychology of pain. Cureus. (2017) 9:e1754. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1754
103. Saab CY. Pain-related changes in the brain: diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Trends Neurosci. (2012) 35:629–37. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.06.002
104. Hadjipavlou G, Dunckley P, Behrens TE, Tracey I. Determining anatomical connectivities between cortical and brainstem pain processing regions in humans: a diffusion tensor imaging study in healthy controls. Pain. (2006) 123:169–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.027
105. Owen SL, Heath J, Kringelbach ML, Stein JF, Aziz TZ. Preoperative DTI and probabilistic tractography in an amputee with deep brain stimulation for lower limb stump pain. Br J Neurosurg. (2007) 21:485–90. doi: 10.1080/02688690701558358
106. Sillery E, Bittar RG, Robson MD, Behrens TE, Stein J, Aziz TZ, et al. Connectivity of the human periventricular-periaqueductal gray region. J Neurosurg. (2005) 103:1030–4. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.6.1030
107. Pereira EA, Lu G, Wang S, Schweder PM, Hyam JA, Stein JF, et al. Ventral periaqueductal grey stimulation alters heart rate variability in humans with chronic pain. Exp Neurol. (2010) 223:574–81. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.02.004
108. Brooks JC, Davies WE, Pickering AE. Resolving the brainstem contributions to attentional analgesia. J Neurosci. (2017) 37:2279–91. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2193-16.2016
109. Mendoza JE, Foundas AL. Clinical Neuroanatomy: A Neurobehavioral Approach. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media (2008). p. 704.
111. Splittgerber R, Snell RS. Snell's Clinical Neuroanatomy. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer (2019).
112. Coenen VA, Panksepp J, Hurwitz TA, Urbach H, Madler B. Human medial forebrain bundle (MFB) and anterior thalamic radiation (ATR): imaging of two major subcortical pathways and the dynamic balance of opposite affects in understanding depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2012) 24:223–36. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11080180
113. Merlini L, Vargas MI, De Haller R, Rilliet B, Fluss J. MRI with fibre tracking in cogan congenital oculomotor apraxia. Pediatr Radiol. (2010) 40:1625–33. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1653-3
114. Kamali A, Kramer LA, Butler IJ, Hasan KM. Diffusion tensor tractography of the somatosensory system in the human brainstem: initial findings using high isotropic spatial resolution at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol. (2009) 19:1480–8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1305-x
115. Yam MF, Loh YC, Tan CS, Khadijah Adam S, Abdul Manan N, Basir R. General pathways of pain sensation and the major neurotransmitters involved in pain regulation. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) 19:2164. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082164
116. Hong JH, Bai DS, Jeong JY, Choi BY, Chang CH, Kim SH, et al. Injury of the spino-thalamo-cortical pathway is necessary for central post-stroke pain. Eur Neurol. (2010) 64:163–8. doi: 10.1159/000319040
Keywords: diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion tensor tractography, brainstem, pain, descending pain modulation
Citation: Zhang Y and Furst AJ (2022) Brainstem Diffusion Tensor Tractography and Clinical Applications in Pain. Front. Pain Res. 3:840328. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.840328
Received: 21 December 2021; Accepted: 15 February 2022;
Published: 24 March 2022.
Edited by:
Pascal Tetreault, Université de Sherbrooke, CanadaReviewed by:
Daniel S. Barron, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United StatesCopyright © 2022 Zhang and Furst. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yu Zhang, yuzhangucsfedu@gmail.com; Yu.Zhang@va.gov