Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oral. Health
Sec. Oral Health Promotion
Volume 5 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1481423
This article is part of the Research Topic Addressing Oral Health Disparities in Maternal and Child Populations View all 6 articles

Uptake of the Interim Canada Dental Benefit: An investigation of data from the first 18 months of the program

Provisionally accepted
Saif Goubran Saif Goubran 1Vivianne Cruz de Jesus Vivianne Cruz de Jesus 1Anil Menon Anil Menon 1Olubukola O. Olatosi Olubukola O. Olatosi 1Robert Schroth Robert Schroth 2*
  • 1 Department of Preventive Dental Science, Dr. Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
  • 2 Shared Health Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, Department of Preventive Dental Science, Dr. Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: In 2022, the Government of Canada introduced the Interim Canada Dental Benefit (CDB) to support Canadian families with children < 12 years of age. This program operated from October 1, 2022, to June 30, 2024, with two application periods. The purpose of this study was to analyze data on applications accepted by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) during the first 18 months of the program. Methods: This study used available data sourced from the CRA for applicants as of March 29, 2024, and assessed as of April 5, 2024. Data covered the entirety of the first period (October 1, 2022–June 30, 2023) of the Interim CDB and the first nine months of the second period (July 1, 2023–March 29, 2024). The rate of child participation was calculated using population data from Statistics Canada (2021). Results: Over the first 18 months of the Interim CDB, a total of 410,920 applications were submitted and $403M distributed; $197M for 204,270 applications in period 1 and $175M for 173,160 applications in the first nine months of period 2. Overall, 321,000 children received the Interim CDB in period 1 and 282,130 children received the Interim CDB in the first nine months of period 2. A total of 91.8% of applicants had a net family income < $70,000, receiving the maximum benefit amount. The provinces with the highest rate of child participation were Manitoba (77.1/1,000 period 1; 74.9/1,000 period 2), Ontario (82.5/1,000 period 1; 72.2/1,000 period 2), Nova Scotia (73.4/1,000 period 1; 71.1/1,000 period 2), and Saskatchewan (72.3/1,000 period 1; 68.2/1,000 period 2). Overall, there was an increase in the number of applications approved in period 2 compared to period 1. Conclusions: Uptake in the first three quarters of period 2 remained consistent and in many instances, revealed higher rates of applications by parents for the Interim CDB. However, it is uncertain how much of the funds were directly used for dental care. Analyzing this data will aid in policy recommendation for enhancement of the Canadian Dental Care Program.

    Keywords: Insurance, dental, Child, Health Policy, Public Health Dentistry, access to care

    Received: 15 Aug 2024; Accepted: 03 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Goubran, Cruz de Jesus, Menon, Olatosi and Schroth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Robert Schroth, Shared Health Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, Department of Preventive Dental Science, Dr. Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.