AUTHOR=Xu Fangxi , Aboseria Eman , Janal Malvin N. , Pushalkar Smruti , Bederoff Maria V. , Vasconcelos Rebeca , Sapru Sakshi , Paul Bidisha , Queiroz Erica , Makwana Shreya , Solarewicz Julia , Guo Yuqi , Aguallo Deanna , Gomez Claudia , Shelly Donna , Aphinyanaphongs Yindalon , Gordon Terry , Corby Patricia M. , Kamer Angela R. , Li Xin , Saxena Deepak
TITLE=Comparative Effects of E-Cigarette Aerosol on Periodontium of Periodontitis Patients
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oral Health
VOLUME=2
YEAR=2021
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oral-health/articles/10.3389/froh.2021.729144
DOI=10.3389/froh.2021.729144
ISSN=2673-4842
ABSTRACT=Introduction: Tobacco use is one of the main causes of periodontitis. E-cigarette are gaining in popularity, and studies are needed to better understand the impact of e-cigarettes on oral health.
Objective: To perform a longitudinal study to evaluate the adverse effects of e-cigarettes on periodontal health.
Methods: Naïve E-cigarette users, cigarette smokers, and non-smokers were recruited using newspaper and social media. Age, gender, and ethnicity, were recorded. Participants were scheduled for two visits 6 months apart. At each visit, we collected data on the frequency and magnitude of e-cigarette and cigarette use, and alcohol consumption. Carbon monoxide (CO) levels, cotinine levels, salivary flow rate, periodontal probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were also determined at both baseline and follow-up visits and compared between groups with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Periodontal diagnosis and other categorical variables were compared between groups with the chi-square statistic and logistic regression.
Results: We screened 159 subjects and recruited 119 subjects. One-hundred-one subjects (31 cigarette smokers, 32 e-cigarette smokers, and 38 non-smokers) completed every assessment in both visits. The retention and compliance rate of subjects was 84.9%. The use of social media and craigslist was significant in recruiting e-cigarette subjects. Ethnicity and race differed between groups, as did average age in the male subjects. Carbon monoxide and salivary cotinine levels were highest among cigarette smokers. Bleeding on probing and average PDs similarly increased over time in all three groups, but CAL uniquely increased in e-cigarette smokers. Rates of severe periodontal disease were higher in cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users than non-smokers, but interpretation is confounded by the older age of the cigarette smokers.
Conclusion: Among the recruited participants, CAL after 6 months was significantly worse only in the e-cigarette smokers. This study design and protocol will assist in future larger studies on e-cigarette and oral health.