Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Ophthalmol.
Sec. Retina
Volume 4 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1377098

Large Animal Model Species in Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapy Research and Development for Retinal Diseases: A Systematic Review

Provisionally accepted
Julia-Sophia Bellingrath Julia-Sophia Bellingrath 1Kang V. Li Kang V. Li 2Kanza Aziz Kanza Aziz 3*Jessica M. Izzi Jessica M. Izzi 4*Ying V. Liu Ying V. Liu 2*Mandeep S. Singh Mandeep S. Singh 2*
  • 1 Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
  • 2 Wilmer Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, United States
  • 3 Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 4 Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Retinal cell therapy modalities, in the category of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), are being developed to target several retinal diseases. Testing in large animal models (LAMs) is a crucial step in translating retinal ATMPs into clinical practice. However, challenges including budgetary and infrastructure constraints can hinder LAM research design and execution. Here, to facilitate the comparison of the various LAMs in pluriotent retinal cell therapy research, we aimed to systematically evaluate the species distribution, reported scientific utility, and methodology of a range of LAMs. Methods: A systematic search using the words retina, stem cell, transplantation, large animal, pig, rabbit, dog, and nonhuman primate was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Science Direct and GoogleScholar databases in February 2023. Results: We included 22 studies involving pluripotent stem cells (induced pluripotent stem cells or human embryonic stem cells) in LAMs, including non-human primates (NHP), pigs, dogs, and rabbits. Nearly half of the studies utilized wild-type animal models. In other studies, retinal degeneration features were simulated via laser, chemical, or genetic insult. Transplants were delivered subretinally, either as cell suspensions or pre-formed monolayers (with or without biodegradable scaffolding). The transplanted cells dose per eye varied widely (40,000 -4,000,000 per dose). Cells were delivered via vitrectomy surgery in 15 studies and by an "ab externo" approach in one study. Structural outcomes were assessed using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging. Functional outcomes included multifocal electroretinogram and, in one case, a measure of visual acuity. Generally, cell suspension transplants exhibited low intraretinal incorporation, while monolayer transplants incorporated more efficiently. Immune responses posed challenges for allogeneic transplants, suggesting that autologous iPSC-derived transplants may be required to decrease the likelihood of rejection.The use of appropriate LAMs helps to advance the development of retinal ATMPs. The anatomical similarity of LAM and human eyes allows the implementation of clinically-relevant surgical techniques. While the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 has provided a framework to consider alternative methods including tissue-on-a-chip and human cell culture models for pharmacologic studies, LAM testing remains useful for cell and tissue replacement studies to inform the development of clinical trial protocols.

    Keywords: Retinal Degeneration, Surgery techniques, Stem Cell Transplantation, preclinical (in vivo) studies, Immunosuppression

    Received: 16 Feb 2024; Accepted: 18 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bellingrath, Li, Aziz, Izzi, Liu and Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Kanza Aziz, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115, Massachusetts, United States
    Jessica M. Izzi, Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, 21205, Maryland, United States
    Ying V. Liu, Wilmer Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Mandeep S. Singh, Wilmer Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.