Annie Nguyen- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Roski Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Introduction
Glaucoma, an optic neuropathy that leads to progressive vision loss, is a leading cause of irreversible blindness globally in patients over forty years old, with more than three million Americans and around eighty million people worldwide affected by this disease, with open angle glaucoma (OAG) being the most common form (1). Ocular hypertension, a risk factor for development of glaucoma, is a condition that occurs when there is elevated intraocular pressure without optic nerve damage, with another three to six million Americans affected by this condition (2). Although there is currently no cure for glaucoma, reduction of intraocular pressure has been shown to slow down progression of the disease (3). Currently, the standard first-line treatment for OAG and ocular hypertension is chronic topical pharmacological management that target intraocular pressure lowering mechanisms (4). In the U.S., classes of topical therapy include the following: prostaglandin analogs (PGA), beta blockers, alpha agonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAI), rho-kinase inhibitors, combination formulations, and cholinergic agonists. PGA and beta-blockers are common first-line medications due to excellent daily dosing efficacy and favorable systemic safety profiles. However, oftentimes, more than one eye drop is necessary to achieve adequate IOP-lowering effects, and ocular side effects are major shortcomings (5).
Ocular surface disease (OSD), including meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), is a common notable debilitating problem that affects many patients receiving long-term topical therapy for glaucoma treatment (6). It causes significant morbidity and has a negative impact on treatment compliance, and quality of life (7). Meibomian glands (MGs) are sebaceous glands present in the tarsus of the upper and lower eyelids and secrete lipids that form the superficial layer of the tear film, essential in maintenance of the ocular surface. MGD is a chronic, diffuse, inflammatory abnormality of the MGs, commonly characterized by terminal duct obstruction and/or qualitative/quantitative changes in the glandular secretion, as defined by the International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (8). The prevalence of MGD in the normal population reported in the literature is highly variable and ranges from 3.5 to 70% and is one of the most common cause of dry eye and OSD (9). Severe MGD can lead to irreversible MG atrophy and chronic dry eye, with the impact of severe dry eye comparable to that of moderate to severe angina according to studies on quality of life impact of dry eye disease (10). With both glaucoma and MGD affecting the aging population and leading to irreversible damage, it is critical to appropriately address both conditions.
Recent findings on the use of glaucoma medications on meibomian glands
According to several studies, MGD is highly associated with use of IOP-lowering eyedrops, a negative inflammatory effect resulting from the active component, preservatives (particularly and most used, benzalkonium chloride or BAK), or both. In a 3-year longitudinal cohor study, Ambaw et al. found that after trabeculectomy, there was reduction of pro-inflammatory lipid mediators in tears. Soriano et al. reported that glaucoma topical treatments produce MGD, altering their structure and function (11). Kim et al. found that the prevalence of MGD was 82% in the group using topical glaucoma medications and 52.5% in the control group without glaucoma (12). In addition, Arita et al. found that long-term anti-glaucoma eye drop use affects MG morphology and function, with similar MG dropout in PGA and beta-blocker treated eyes (13). Cho and colleagues reported that patients with a higher burden of glaucoma agents had more unstable tear films and more severe MG dropout, with a sub-analysis supporting PGA having more effect on MG dropout than other types of eye drops (14). Mocan et al. found that 92% of patients on topical PGA monotherapy compared with 58% using a non-PGA medication had some signs of MGD (15). Ha et al. compared the effect of preservative-containing (PC) and preservative-free (PF) PGA formulations MG in patients with OAG and found that although both PC and PF formulations can cause damage to the MG in patients using PGA, PC formulations induced more ocular discomfort and more severe MG loss compared to PF formulations (16). Agnifili and colleagues reported that PGA/beta-blocker fixed combinations were less toxic towards MGs and goblet cells compared with the PGA (latanoprost) and beta-blocker (timolol) unfixed combination, with preservative-free-fixed combinations presenting the most tolerated profile (17). Similarly, Lee et al. found that longer duration of use and use of preservative-containing formulation of tafluprost were correlated with more negative effects on MGs (18). Konstas et al. discussed in a critical review the safety and tolerability using topical preservative-free agents in treatment of glaucoma (19).
As outlined above, there is an abundance of literature supporting pharmacological glaucoma therapy causes OSD. Interestingly but not surprisingly, severe OSD has been associated with poor medication compliance and IOP control. Lee and colleagues found that MGD can be an important clinical finding correlated with poor PGA monotherapy compliance in patients with normal tension glaucoma (20). In addition, Batra et al. described in a case series of four patients with inadequately controlled OAG and OSD the impact that OSD management can have on glaucoma outcomes: treating the OSD led to improved IOP control and forestalling the need for surgical intervention in these patients during the study period (21). Moreover, Boso and team found in their case series 74% of patients reported severe symptoms of dry eye disease with 50% of patients having tear film instability and 24% with MGD and that after ocular surface treatment, there was significant improvement of best correct visual acuity, dry eye symptoms, as well as mean IOP from baseline (22).
Recent findings on alternative first-line therapies for OAG and ocular hypertension
As aforementioned, OAG and ocular hypertension are habitually treated with standard first-line eye drops. However, due to its common side effects on the ocular surface, which can lead to poor compliance and glaucoma management outcomes, alternative first-line therapies should be considered. In 2019, the laser in glaucoma and ocular hypertension (LiGHT) trial, a pivotal study, was published, aimed to compare selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and eye drops to treat patients with OAG and ocular hypertension through a multicentered, observer-masked, randomized controlled trial, where 356 eyes were treated with SLT and 362 eyes were treated with eye drops (23). Compared to the eye drops group at 3 years, primary outcome questionnaire regarding health-related quality of life showed no difference, with also comparable secondary endpoints of visual acuity, IOP and visual field loss mean deviation. Eyes in the SLT group (93%) achieved IOP within target at more visits than in the eye drop group (91%). In addition, none of the eyes in the SLT group required glaucoma surgery compared to 11 eyes in the eye drop group by the end of the study. At the conclusion, 74% of SLT-treated eyes were successfully controlled without additional eye drops for at least 3 years after starting treatment. In addition, there was a 97% probability of SLT as first-line treatment being more cost-effective than eye drops in the UK healthcare setting where the study was based. Given good clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and drop freedom, SLT should be considered as first-line therapy, especially in patients with OSD and MGD.
In patients who are poor candidates for SLT and eye drop use remains a necessity, preservative-free topical glaucoma medications should be considered, especially in the setting of OSD and MGD. In clinical studies, OSD signs and symptoms are consistently better with preservative-free versus preserved formulations without compromising IOP control (24). Manufacturers are increasing their focus on production of preservative-free eye drops or BAK-alternatives and combination therapies aimed at abating exposure to harmful preservatives. Rouland et al. compared the efficacy and safety of preservative-free (PF) latanoprost to BAK-preserved latanoprost in ocular hypertension and primary OAG patients through an international, randomized controlled trial and showed that the PF-formulation had the same efficacy but better local tolerance than the BAK-containing PGA (25). Diminution of the corneal basal nerve density and decreased corneal sensitivity have also been reported from use of BAK-containing eye drops (26). Alternatives for BAK with better side effect profiles are currently available and include the following: SofZia (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), Polyquad (Alcon), and Purite (Allergan, an Abbvie company, Chicago, IL).
Until recent years, glaucoma surgery was unappealing due to relatively higher risk profiles compared to medical therapy. With traditional filtering surgery, risk of infection, inflammation, hypotony, and bleb-related complications are major concerns. More recently, the use of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) has gained a growing role in glaucoma management given its good safety profile and speedy recovery (27). MIGS could be considered in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma and/or those who are intolerant or noncompliant with standard medical therapy especially in those with OSD. Multiple studies have shown that MIGS with or with concurrent cataract surgery leads to better IOP control and decreased eye drop dependence (28, 29). Looking more specifically at the ocular surface, Schweitzer and colleagues through their prospective, single-arm clinical trial of 47 eyes showed that implantation of trabecular microbypass stents with cataract surgery led to improved IOP and medication reductions and improved ocular surface health (30). Tong et al. reported their findings on impression of conjunctiva showing reduced expression of inflammatory genes, improved conjunctival staining score and decreased tear osmolarity where none of the patients post trabeculectomy remained on anti-glaucoma eye drops 3 years after trabeculectomy (31). Baiocchi et al. assessed the quality of the ocular surface by in vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy in POAG treated with Xen 45 Gel Stent, medical therapy, and trabeculectomy and found that ocular surface inflammation was most notable in topical therapy followed by trabeculectomy followed by Xen 45 Gel stents (32). However, it is difficult to comment on the effect of individual factors in cross sectional studies.
Discussion
In this opinion article, it is the author’s preference and recommendation in the setting of pre-existing OSD and MGD, that those ocular comorbidities be considered when deciding on first-line therapy for new treatment or continued treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Given glaucoma is a chronic, progressive disease where decades of IOP control is necessary, care must be taken to avoid trading one problem for another and when both problems are present, both glaucoma and ocular surface disease should be addressed. Careful examination and recognition of OSD including MGD is critical. Several studies as mentioned above demonstrate the harmful side effects of topical medical therapy on the ocular surface, both from the active component of the drug and its preservatives. Avoidance of common first-line glaucoma medications such as PGA in those with OSD and MGD should be cogitated. Paradigm shifts such as SLT when appropriate as first-line therapy given its good safety profile and efficacy as well as cost-effectiveness will transform and improve glaucoma care. In addition, consideration of MIGS should be made for those with mild to moderate glaucoma on one or more eye drops with signs of OSD to avoid further issue.
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Funding
Unrestricted Grant to the Department of Ophthalmology from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY.
Conflict of interest
The authors declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol (2006) 90(3):262–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224
2. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol (2002) 120(6):714–830. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
3. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol (2002) 120(10):1268–79. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268
4. Li T, Lindsley K, Rouse B, Hong H, Shi Q, Friedman DS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of first-line medications for primary open-angle glaucoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology (2016) 123(1):129–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.005
5. McKinnon SJ, Goldberg LD, Peeples P, Walt JG, Bramley TJ. Current management of glaucoma and the need for complete therapy. Am J Manag Care (2008) 14(1 Suppl):S20–7.
6. Lee TH, Sung MS, Heo H, Park SW. Association between meibomian gland dysfunction and compliance of topical prostaglandin analogs in patients with normal tension glaucoma. PloS One (2018) 13(1):e0191398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191398
7. Chawla A, McGalliard JN, Batterbury M. Use of eyedrops in glaucoma: how can we help to reduce non-compliance? Acta Ophthalmol Scand (2007) 85(4):464. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00882.x
8. Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Craig JP, McCulley JP, Den S, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2011) 52(4):1930–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997b
9. Rabensteiner DF, Aminfar H, Boldin I, Schwantzer G, Horwath-Winter J. The prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction, tear film and ocular surface parameters in an Austrian dry eye clinic population. Acta Ophthalmol (2018) 96(6):e707–11. doi: 10.1111/aos.13732
10. Schiffman RM, Walt JG, Jacobsen G, Doyle JJ, Lebovics G, Sumner W. Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmology (2003) 110(7):1412–9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00462-7
11. Soriano D, Ferrandez B, Mateo A, Polo V, Garcia-Martin E. Meibomian gland changes in open-angle glaucoma users treated with topical medication. Optom Vis Sci (2021) 98(10):1177–82. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001782
12. Kim JH, Shin YU, Seong M, Cho HY, Kang MH. Eyelid changes related to meibomian gland dysfunction in early middle-aged patients using topical glaucoma medications. Cornea (2018) 37(4):421–5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001489
13. Arita R, Itoh K, Maeda S, Furuta A, Tomidokoro A, et al. Effects of long-term topical anti-glaucoma medications on meibomian glands. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2012) 250(8):1181–5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-1943-6
14. Cho WH, Lai IC, Fang PC, et al. Meibomian gland performance in glaucomatous patients with long-term instillation of IOP-lowering medications. J Glaucoma (2018) 27(2):176–83. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000841
15. Mocan MC, Uzunosmanoglu E, Kocabeyoglu S, Karakaya J, Irkec M. The association of chronic topical prostaglandin analog use with meibomian gland dysfunction. J Glaucoma (2016) 25(9):770–4. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000495
16. Ha JY, Sung MS, Park SW. Effects of preservative on the meibomian gland in glaucoma patients treated with prostaglandin analogues. Chonnam Med J (2019) 55(3):156–62. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2019.55.3.156
17. Agnifili L, Mastropasqua R, Fasanella V, Brescia L, Scatena B, Oddone F, Mastropasqua L. Meibomian gland features and conjunctival goblet cell density in glaucomatous patients controlled with Prostaglandin/Timolol fixed combinations: A case control, cross-sectional study. J Glaucoma (2018) 27(4):364–70. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000899
18. Lee SY, Lee K, Park CK, Kim S, Bae HW, Seong GJ, et al. Meibomian gland dropout rate as a method to assess meibomian gland morphologic changes during use of preservative-containing or preservative-free topical prostaglandin analogues. PLoS One (2019) 14(6):e0218886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218886
19. Konstas AG, Labbé A, Katsanos A, Meier-Gibbons F, Irkec M, Boboridis KG, et al. The treatment of glaucoma using topical preservative-free agents: an evaluation of safety and tolerability. Expert Opin Drug Saf (2021) 20(4):453–66. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1873947
20. Lee TH, Sung MS, Heo H, Park SW. Association between meibomian gland dysfunction and compliance of topical prostaglandin analogs in patients with normal tension glaucoma. PLoS One (2018) 13(1):e0191398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191398
21. Batra R, Tailor R, Mohamed S. Ocular surface disease exacerbated glaucoma: optimizing the ocular surface improves intraocular pressure control. J Glaucoma (2014) 23(1):56–60. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318264cd68
22. Mylla Boso AL, Gasperi E, Fernandes L, Costa VP, Alves M. Impact of ocular surface disease treatment in patients with glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol (2020) 14:103–11. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S229815
23. Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, Garg A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, et al. LiGHT Trial Study Group. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2019) 393(10180):1505–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32213-X
24. Goldstein MH, Silva FQ, Blender N, Tran T, Vantipalli S. Ocular benzalkonium chloride exposure: problems and solutions. Eye (Lond) (2022) 36(2):361–8. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01668-x
25. Rouland JF, Traverso CE, Stalmans I, Fekih LE, Delval L, Renault D, et al. Efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eyedrops, compared with BAK-preserved latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol (2013) 97(2):196–200. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302121
26. Martone G, Frezzotti P, Tosi GM, Traversi C, Mittica V, Malandrini A. An in vivo confocal microscopy analysis of effects of topical antiglaucoma therapy with preservative on corneal innervation and morphology. Am J Ophthalmol (2009) 147(4):725–35.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.019
27. Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, Hodapp E, Jampel HD, Samples JR, et al. Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology (2011) 118(7):1466–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.028
28. Ahmed IIK, Rhee DJ, Jones J, Singh IP, Radcliffe N, Gazzard G, et al. Three-year findings of the HORIZON trial: A schlemm canal microstent for pressure reduction in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology (2021) 128(6):857–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.004
29. Bicket AK, Le JT, Azuara-Blanco A, Gazzard G, Wormald R, Bunce C, et al. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgical techniques for open-angle glaucoma: An overview of cochrane systematic reviews and network meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol (2021) 139(9):983–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.2351
30. Schweitzer JA, Hauser WH, Ibach M, Baartman B, Gollamudi SR, Crothers AW, et al. Prospective interventional cohort study of ocular surface disease changes in eyes after trabecular micro-bypass stent(s) implantation (iStent or iStent inject) with phacoemulsification. Ophthalmol Ther (2020) 9(4):941–53. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00290-6
31. Tong L, Hou AH, Wong TT. Altered expression level of inflammation-related genes and long-term changes in ocular surface after trabeculectomy, a prospective cohort study. Ocul Surf (2018) 16(4):441–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.06.005
32. Baiocchi S, Mazzotta C, Sgheri A, Di Maggio A, Bagaglia SA, Posarelli M, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy: qualitative investigation of the conjunctival and corneal surface in open angle glaucomatous patients undergoing the XEN-gel implant, trabeculectomy or medical therapy. Eye Vis (Lond) (2020) 7:15. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00181-8
Keywords: glaucoma, meibomian gland dysfunction, ocular surface disease, MIGS, SLT
Citation: Nguyen A (2023) Should we reconsider first-line treatments for glaucoma in the setting of meibomian gland dysfunction and ocular surface disease: Glaucoma treatments and its effects. Front. Ophthalmol. 3:958955. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2023.958955
Received: 01 June 2022; Accepted: 13 January 2023;
Published: 06 February 2023.
Edited by:
Louis Tong, Singapore National Eye Cente, SingaporeReviewed by:
Divya Srikumaran, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United StatesCopyright © 2023 Nguyen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Annie Nguyen, YW5uaWUubmd1eWVuMkBtZWQudXNjLmVkdTs=; YW5ndXllbi5tZWRAZ21haWwuY29t