This article is a correction to:
Automated screening devices for vision screening in preschool children: A comparison of the PlusoptiX S12C photoscreener and retinomax K+3 autorefractor
Stephen C. Hunter
Donny W. Suh
Iliana Molina
Jennifer Espinoza2- 1University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States
- 2Department of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States
By Hunter SC, Suh DW, Molina I and Espinoza J (2022) Front. Ophthalmol. 2:1049622. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2022.1049622
In the published article, there was an error in the author list, and authors Iliana Molina and Jennifer Espinoza were erroneously excluded. The corrected author list appears below.
Stephen C. Hunter1*, Donny W. Suh2, Iliana Molina2 and Jennifer Espinoza2
1 University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
In the published article, there was an error. The Author Contributions and Acknowledgements sections contained incorrect information and have been updated to reflect the recognition of Iliana Molina and Jennifer Espinoza as authors.
A correction has been made to the Acknowledgements section. The section previously read:
“The authors wish to thank Iliana Molina and Jennifer Espinoza for their assistance with data acquisition, data processing, and for their contributions to the UCI EyeMobile for Children program”.
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The authors wish to thank the UCI EyeMobile for Children program for providing valuable vision screening services to children and supporting this research”.
A correction has been made to the Author Contributions section. The section previously read:
“SH and DS designed the study. SH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. SH and DS reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version”.
The corrected sentence appears below:
“SH, DS, IM, and JE designed the study. SH, IM, and JE executed the study and acquired subject data. SH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. SH and DS reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version”.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: vision screening, children, amblyopia, refractive error, amblyopia risk factor, photoscreener, autorefractor
Citation: Hunter SC, Suh DW, Molina I and Espinoza J (2023) Corrigendum: Automated screening devices for vision screening in preschool children: a comparison of the PlusoptiX S12C photoscreener and retinomax K+3 autorefractor. Front. Ophthalmol. 3:1215403. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1215403
Received: 01 May 2023; Accepted: 30 May 2023;
Published: 06 July 2023.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2023 Hunter, Suh, Molina and Espinoza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Stephen C. Hunter, huntersc495@gmail.com