ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Genitourinary Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1583806

Real World Prevalence of Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer in Asia: Do We Need a Rethink on Nomograms? Authorship

Provisionally accepted
Rachel  LauRachel Lau1Han Jie  LeeHan Jie Lee2Khi Yung  FongKhi Yung Fong1Alvin  LeeAlvin Lee2Yu Guang  TanYu Guang Tan2Yan Mee  LawYan Mee Law3Nye Thane  NgoNye Thane Ngo4Jeffrey  TuanJeffrey Tuan5Kae Jack  TayKae Jack Tay2Lui Shiong  LeeLui Shiong Lee6Christopher  ChengChristopher Cheng2Henry  HoHenry Ho2John  YuenJohn Yuen2Kenneth  ChenKenneth Chen2*
  • 1MOH Holdings (Singapore), Singapore, Singapore
  • 2Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • 3Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • 4Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • 5Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • 6Department of Urology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

IntroductionThe Briganti 2019 nomogram stratifies risk of lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer, reducing unnecessary pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP). However the applicability of the nomogram in diverse populations remains under-explored, with only one external validation study performed in an Asian population to date. We aim to evaluate the performance of the nomogram in a large tertiary Asian institution.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted, with analysis of the cancer registry in our tertiary institution of all patients who underwent RP with PLND between 1988 and 2023. The Briganti 2019 nomogram score was retrospectively calculated for each patient, and post-operative data was analysed to determine rates of LNI in order to determine the performance of the nomogram in our cohort.Results437 patients were included, with a median Briganti score of 11.2% (IQR 3.9–28.5%). The mean number of lymph nodes excised per patient was 15.1 +/- 12. 292 (66.8%) patients had a Briganti score greater than 7%, but only 8.6% were noted to harbour pN1 disease after RP. In our Asian cohort, the 2019 Briganti nomogram only had a moderate discriminatory ability with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.77. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of LNI in our population included percentage of positive biopsy cores [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.02, 95%CI 1.01–1.04, p=0.01] and extraprostatic extension on MRI prostate (OR 3.00, 95%CI 1.20–7.56, p=0.02).ConclusionThe Briganti 2019 nomogram, while effective in many settings, only had a moderate ability to identify patients with pN1 disease in our Asian cohort. With potential limitations in its generalisability to multiple populations, a re-evaluation of its thresholds and further calibration to other populations might be required.

Keywords: prostate cancer, Nomograms, diversity, staging, Radical Prostatectomy, Lymph node staging

Received: 26 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lau, Lee, Fong, Lee, Tan, Law, Ngo, Tuan, Tay, Lee, Cheng, Ho, Yuen and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kenneth Chen, Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more