
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1577359
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The FLAME trial reported that focal boosting of prostate tumors up to 95 Gy in 35 fractions improves biochemical control (disease free survival). However, this treatment (regimen) is not commonly used in the United States. Methods: We investigated a focally boosted treatment of 84 Gy in 28 fractions (EQD2 108 Gy, BED 252 Gy). We retrospectively evaluated men with unfavorable-intermediate risk (uIR) and high risk (HR) prostate cancer treated with focal boost IMRT between 2019-2022. Results: Twenty men were included in the analysis, 2 (10%) uIR and 18 (90%) HR. 6 (30%) GG2, 3 (15% ) GG3, 7 (30%) GG4, and 4 (20%) GG5. There were 13 (65%) stage cT1, 4 (20%) cT2 and 3 (15%) cT3. One (5%) patient received short term ADT, 18 (95%) long term ADT, and 1 (5%) refused ADT. 18 (90%) men received elective pelvic nodal radiation. The mean baseline PSA was 25.1 ng/mL (range 4.2-73.4). The median baseline IPSS score was 11.1 . 4 patients had severe baseline urinary symptoms (IPSS ≥20). The mean baseline prostate volume was 57.4 cc (range 26.8-198.3). The mean volume of the 84 Gy boost target was 7.1 cc (range 2.3-15.0) and the mean proportion of the prostate boosted was 14.8% (range 2% -47%). Patients met all per-protocol normal tissue criteria of NRG-GU005, except for bladder D0.03cc with mean reported 79.2 (<73.5 Gy). At a median follow up of 42 months (range 18-63)), no patients have developed recurrence, metastasis, or death from prostate cancer. One patient died at 18 months from unrelated metastatic colorectal cancer. Acute grade 1-2 GU toxicity occurred in 13 (65%) patients, and acute grade 1-2 GI toxicity occurred in 4 (20%) patients. No patients developed grade 3+ acute or late GU or GI toxicity.A novel 28-fraction focal boosted IMRT treatment is feasible and has an acceptable preliminary toxicity profile. Oncologic results are promising but require longer follow up and prospective study.
Keywords: radiation oncologist, IMRT, SBRT, Radiotoxicity, Dosimetry
Received: 15 Feb 2025; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hands, Whalen, Frazier, Haji-Momenian, Andrawis, Provenzano, Bauman, Estephan, Aghdam, Chen, Goyal, Ojong-Ntui and Rao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yuan Rao, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.