ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1576163

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Oncological Imaging TechniquesView all 5 articles

Quantitative MRCP metrics as an imaging biomarker to differentiate benign from malignant bile duct obstructions

Provisionally accepted
Kulyada  EurboonyanunKulyada Eurboonyanun1Julaluck  PromsornJulaluck Promsorn1Prakasit  Sa-ngiamwiboolPrakasit Sa-ngiamwibool1Chalerm  EurboonyanunChalerm Eurboonyanun1Sarah  FinneganSarah Finnegan2Carlos  FerreiraCarlos Ferreira2Amy  HerlihyAmy Herlihy2Elizabeth  ShumbayawondaElizabeth Shumbayawonda2*Rita  Maria LahoudRita Maria Lahoud3Isha  AtreIsha Atre4Aileen  O’SheaAileen O’Shea5Mukesh  HarisinghaniMukesh Harisinghani5
  • 1Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • 2Perspectum Diagnostics, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 3Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 5Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a difficult-to-detect rare cancer with high mortality rate and management costs. If detected early, surgical resection carries a 35% 5-year survival rate; this decreases to <11% 1-year survival rate when detected at later stages. Quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP+) provides measurements of the biliary tree and has been noted in clinical guidelines as having prognostic utility. We sought to determine whether MRCP+ metrics could differentiate benign and malignant biliary obstructions.In this retrospective study of 38 patients with biliary obstruction with histologic characterisation, 23 had malignant obstructions whilst 15 had benign obstructions. Patients underwent non-contrast and contrast MRCP alongside clinical assessment. Non-contrast MRCP images were post-processed with MRCP+. Mann-Whitney U test compared the metrics between groups. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP+ markers (duct number and dimensions, biliary tree and gallbladder volume) to stratify benign from malignant biliary obstructions was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).Results: All bile duct metrics were significantly higher in malignant biliary obstruction (p<0.05).Of the metrics assessed, total biliary tree volume was the most clinically meaningful predictor of malignancy, with a volume of ≥25ml differentiating between the two populations. A biliary tree volume of 25ml had an AUC of 0.79 to stratify between benign and malignant obstructions.Quantitative MRCP metrics, particularly total biliary tree volume, are shown here to differentiate malignant (CCA) from benign obstructions. As current pathways require either contrast administration or ERCP, quantitative MRCP may be an objective, non-invasive tool to identify CCA.

Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma, bile duct, Biliary obstruction, MRCP+, early diagnosis

Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Eurboonyanun, Promsorn, Sa-ngiamwibool, Eurboonyanun, Finnegan, Ferreira, Herlihy, Shumbayawonda, Lahoud, Atre, O’Shea and Harisinghani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Elizabeth Shumbayawonda, Perspectum Diagnostics, Oxford, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more