SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1575813

Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden associated with recurrence among patients with early-stage cancers: a systematic literature review

Provisionally accepted
Raquel  Aguiar-IbanezRaquel Aguiar-Ibanez1*Yves  MbousYves Mbous2Sugandh  SharmaSugandh Sharma3Deepshikha  PawarDeepshikha Pawar3
  • 1Merck (Canada), Kirkland, Canada
  • 2Merck (United States), Kenilworth, New Jersey, United States
  • 3PAREXEL International (Hyderabad), TELANGANA, Telangana, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

IntroductionWhile cancer recurrences have been reported as negatively affecting patients’ prognosis and imposing an economic burden to healthcare systems, there is no comprehensive summary of evidence on how frequently recurrence occurs across early-stage cancers. The goal of this study was to assess recurrence rates and their resulting clinical, humanistic, and economic burden in patients with early-stage cancers.MethodsA narrative, systematic literature review was conducted including non-interventional studies evaluating adult patients diagnosed with cancer at early-stages (including: melanoma, triple negative breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, renal-cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, and bladder cancer). Selected studies were identified through electronic database searches, conference proceedings, and grey literature sources. Outcomes of interest included recurrence rates, post-recurrence survival, and the humanistic and economic burden associated with recurrences.ResultsAmong 82 studies included, 75 reported recurrence rates, eight investigated post-recurrence survival, five evaluated post-recurrence patient-reported outcomes, and seven examined the post-recurrence economic burden. Across most cancer types, recurrences occurred frequently, with later stages at diagnosis being associated with higher recurrence rates and shorter time to recurrence compared to earlier stage at diagnosis. Cancer recurrence was associated with lower survival, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), worsening cancer-related symptoms, and higher healthcare resource utilization. These outcomes were also more pronounced among patients diagnosed at later stages. Among cancer survivors, most patients experienced moderate fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Patients with clinically relevant FCR had worse cancer-related symptoms and reduced HRQoL compared to those without. Direct costs in recurrent patients (predominantly in the form of inpatient and outpatient costs) were the main drivers for the total healthcare costs incurred, irrespective of the cancer types and stages. Conclusion This study highlights the high recurrence rates experienced by patients diagnosed with early-stage cancer, particularly if diagnosed at later stages (Stage III), and their clinical, humanistic, and economic impact. Cancer stage at the time of diagnosis is a key indicator of recurrence risk and post-recurrence outcomes, emphasizing the importance of earlier diagnosis and the need for therapies that prevent recurrences to better mitigate their clinical, humanistic and economic burden.

Keywords: Recurrence1, Neoplasm recurrence, Local2, survival3, cancer4, Humanistic burden5, Cost of illness6, quality of life7

Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Aguiar-Ibanez, Mbous, Sharma and Pawar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Raquel Aguiar-Ibanez, Merck (Canada), Kirkland, Canada

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more