Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1573018

Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Anatomical Approach to Right Mesogastrium Excision and Its Clinical Significance

Provisionally accepted
Guofeng Pan Guofeng Pan 1,2Zhixing Guo Zhixing Guo 1Likui Huang Likui Huang 1Weihong Zhang Weihong Zhang 1Suping Li Suping Li 1Jian Chen Jian Chen 1Jihuang Wu Jihuang Wu 1Jianbin Weng Jianbin Weng 1Zipeng Zhu Zipeng Zhu 1Jianjin Lin Jianjin Lin 1Junpeng Li Junpeng Li 1Yanchang Xu Yanchang Xu 1*
  • 1 The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, Fujian Province, China
  • 2 Department of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: Radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer involves the en-bloc resection of the primary tumor and complete excision of the mesogastrium. However, the surgical boundaries and techniques for removing lymph nodes above the pylorus during gastric cancer surgery remain unclear. We aimed to investigate a novel, standardized approach for excising the right mesogastrium in gastric cancer patients undergoing suprapyloric lymphadenectomy, focusing on surgical techniques and outcomes.Methods: Our surgical technique includes identifying three key elements of the mesogastrium: the encircling portion, the suspension point, and the connecting segment. Using these anatomical landmarks, we resect adipose tissue containing lymph nodes from the right mesogastrium and perform root ligation of the right gastric vessels. We then perform D2 lymphadenectomy combined with complete mesogastrium excision (D2+CME). We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 376 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer, comparing outcomes between laparoscopic suprapyloric lymph node dissection guided by mesogastric anatomy and traditional methods.Results: A total of 376 patients were included, with 166 undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2+CME and 210 receiving traditional laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy. No significant differences were observed between the groups in age, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA score, tumor differentiation, tumor location, or surgical approach (P>0.05). The D2+CME group harvested significantly more lymph nodes than the traditional D2 group (43.84 ± 5.01 vs. 33.18 ± 2.96, P<0.001). The number of positive lymph nodes was also higher in the D2+CME group (6.12 ± 0.89 vs. 2.86 ± 0.55, P<0.001). The number of lymph nodes harvested from the right mesogastrium was greater in the D2+CME group (3.41 ± 0.48 vs. 1.32 ± 0.37, P<0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the D2+CME group (5.67 ± 0.41 vs. 9.96 ± 0.77, P<0.001), and dissection time was shorter (27.22 ± 1.50 vs. 31.31 ± 1.53, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in the number of positive lymph nodes in the right mesogastrium (P>0.05).D2+CME is a feasible and effective approach for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The mesogastric anatomical-guided method for suprapyloric lymph node dissection is safe, reliable, and improves lymph node dissection quality while reducing operative time.

    Keywords: Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, gastric cancer, mesogastric anatomy, right mesogastrium, Complete mesogastrium excision

    Received: 08 Feb 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Pan, Guo, Huang, Zhang, Li, Chen, Wu, Weng, Zhu, Lin, Li and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yanchang Xu, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, Fujian Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more