ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Thoracic Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1564114

This article is part of the Research TopicTherapies Approaches in Venous Thromboembolism Management and CoagulationView all 5 articles

TMEM132A: A novel susceptibility gene for lung adenocarcinoma combined with venous thromboembolism identified through comprehensive bioinformatic analysis

Provisionally accepted
Pei  XiePei XieYingli  LiuYingli LiuPingping  BaiPingping BaiYue  MingYue MingQi  ZhengQi ZhengLi  ZhuLi ZhuYong  QiYong Qi*
  • Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital CN, zhengzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Mounting evidence indicates that lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients are at elevated risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), presenting a major clinical challenge. This study utilized public databases to identify crosstalk genes (CGs) between LUAD and VTE, applied machine learning methods to discover shared diagnostic biomarkers, and explored their underlying mechanisms. Methods: Disease-specific genes for VTE were extracted from comprehensive genomic databases (CTD, DisGeNET, GeneCards, OMIM), while transcriptomic profiles of LUAD and VTE cohorts were retrieved from GEO via GEOquery implementation. Molecular crosstalk analysis identified candidate genes through differential expression algorithms and disease-association metrics. Functional annotation employed GO and KEGG analyses to elucidate the biological significance of identified CGs. LASSO regression analysis of VTE and LUAD matrices yielded overlapping diagnostic biomarkers.Immune contexture was characterized via CIBERSORT deconvolution, followed by correlation analyses between hub genes and immune infiltration profiles. Hub genes expression was corroborated through independent cohort validation and serological quantification. Diagnostic utility was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and nomogram.Therapeutic potential was assessed via DSigDB-based drug sensitivity profiling.: Through transcriptomic analysis, we identified 381 CGs, which demonstrated significant enrichment in inflammatory cascades, immunological processes, and coagulation pathways. LASSO regression analysis of LUAD and VTE cohorts revealed TIMP1 and TMEM132A as putative shared diagnostic biomarkers. TMEM132A exhibited significant correlation with immune cell infiltration patterns across both diseases, modulating the immune microenvironment. Validation cohorts and serological assessment confirmed elevated TMEM132A expression in LUAD and LUAD combined with VTE phenotypes. The diagnostic accuracy of TMEM132A was substantiated by ROC curves and nomogram analyses. Pharmacological sensitivity analysis indicated that TMEM132A may serve as a potential target for the therapeutic agents birabresib and abemaciclib. Conclusion: TMEM132A demonstrates diagnostic utility as a predictive biomarker for VTE occurrence in LUAD, suggesting its potential role as a susceptibility gene in this patient cohort.

Keywords: Lung Adenocarcinoma, Venous Thromboembolism, Lasso algorithm, Immune infiltration, Diagnostic biomarker

Received: 21 Jan 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xie, Liu, Bai, Ming, Zheng, Zhu and Qi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yong Qi, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital CN, zhengzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more