
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Surgical Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1562260
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Bladder cancer is one of the most common genitourinary malignancies. Radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have become the accepted gold standard for the treatment of resectable muscular invasive bladder cancer due to its ability to surgically remove tumor tissue as thoroughly as possible and reduce the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis, thus improving patient survival. However, RC surgery is challenging and associated with many postoperative complications, requiring patients to have good physical condition to tolerate the procedure. Over the years, with the deepening of medical research and the accumulation of clinical practice, the disease spectrum of bladder cancer has changed significantly. At the same time, the treatment modalities for bladder cancer have also been continuously improved and updated, and bladder-preserving treatment programs have gradually emerged and demonstrated reliable efficacy. Bladder-sparing treatment aims to preserve the physiological function of the bladder while controlling tumor growth, thereby improving patients' quality of life. This approach has led an increasing number of MIBC patients to choose bladder-sparing treatment after considering their individual conditions. In this paper, we review the current methods of bladder-sparing treatment for MIBC patients and related studies to provide a reference for future research.
Keywords: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), Bladder-preserving therapy, Comprehensive Bladder-Preserving Therapy, Trimodality treatment, Multimodality treatment
Received: 17 Jan 2025; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang and Ke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ran Zhang, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Chang-Xing Ke, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.