data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1553505
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein initially identified in prostate cancer (PCa) but also expressed in the neovasculature of various solid tumors. Recently, PSMA PET has emerged as a promising tool for detecting brain metastases (BMs) from non-prostatic cancers, offering diagnostic capabilities in addition to conventional imaging. This systematic review evaluates the role of PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals in imaging BMs, highlighting their comparative diagnostic performance and exploring their potential for theranostic applications.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET imaging in identifying brain metastases (BMs) from non-prostatic solid tumors were included. Both full research articles and case reports were considered to capture the breadth of current evidence. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and data were synthesized qualitatively.The review includes 23 studies reporting on 77 BMs from diverse primary malignancies, including lung, breast, salivary gland, thyroid, kidney, and melanoma. PSMA PET demonstrated high tumor-to-background ratios (TBR), enabling superior detection of BMs compared to conventional imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced MRI and [18F]FDG PET. In post-radiotherapy cases, PSMA PET effectively differentiated radionecrosis from tumor recurrence. Moreover, PSMA PET demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting thyroid metastases compared to traditional scintigraphy methods, highlighting its potential in cases where standard techniques yield inconclusive results.Conclusions: PSMA PET imaging shows significant promise in improving the diagnosis and management of BMs from non-prostatic cancers. While its theranostic applications remain underexplored, initial findings suggest promising avenues for integrating PSMA PET into personalized neuro-oncology care. Future studies should focus on standardizing imaging protocols, exploring PSMA PET utility in diverse tumor subtypes, and validating its role in clinical decisionmaking to maximize its impact on patient outcomes.
Keywords: brain metastases, Neuro-Oncology, Non-Prostatic Solid Tumors, Positron-Emission Tomography, PSMA PET, theranostics
Received: 03 Jan 2025; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dall' Armellina, Aghakhanyan, Rizzo, Fanni, Aringhieri, Faggioni, Cioni, Neri, Volterrani and Morbelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Gayane Aghakhanyan, Regional center of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.