Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1552932

The analysis about the metastases to Gastrointestinal tract: a literature review, 2000-2023

Provisionally accepted
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background Cancers of the gastrointestinal tract exhibit a high detection rate, ranking as the fifth most common malignant tumor and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. In addition to primary malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, secondary metastatic tumors significantly impact patient survival. The differentiation between primary and secondary gastrointestinal tumors remains a critical issue requiring further research and analysis.Methods This is a retrospective, observational study conducted from 2000 to 2023.We systematically searched the literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases from January 1, 2000, to November 31, 2023. Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal (GI) tract metastasis were included in the study.Results A total of 165 patients were enrolled in this study. The most prevalent primary tumors were breast cancer (50.30%), renal cancer (16.96%), lung cancer (16.36%), melanoma (12.72%), and liver cancer (3.63%). The median interval between the diagnosis of the primary tumor and the detection of GI metastatic lesions was 8.53 years (range: 1-25 years). The most frequent endoscopic finding was a solitary mucosal or submucosal lesion situated in the gastric body. Metastases to extragastrointestinal organs were observed in the majority of patients. The integration of endoscopic biopsy with pathological and immunohistochemical analyses is essential for identifying the tumor origin. Surgical intervention in patients lacking extragastrointestinal metastases may improve prognosis.Conclusions Breast, renal, lung, liver cancer, and melanoma were identified as the most frequent primary tumors. Clinical symptoms and endoscopic features were unable to predict the primary sites, which still require immunohistochemical analysis for accurate identification. The intervention modality and the presence or absence of distant metastasis significantly influenced patient prognosis.

    Keywords: Gastrointestinal tumors, Tumor metastasis, secondary, Endoscopy, breast cancer

    Received: 29 Dec 2024; Accepted: 01 Apr 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Tingting Sun, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more