
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Hematologic Malignancies
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1547138
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy with significant unmet medical needs, particularly in the treatment of relapsed and refractory disease. This study aims to describe the disease characteristics, various treatment regimens, and outcomes among patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) in the Greater Gulf region. Methods: A regional, retrospective study was conducted in Gulf countries to collect real-world data from the medical records of 148 patients with RRMM who relapsed 1-3 times in the past two years before the data collection period (July 2022 and February 2023). Results: The mean age of the study population was 59.4 years, and 64.2% of the participants were male. The VRd regimen (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone) was the most frequent first-line therapy among transplant-ineligible patients (40.2%) and the most common induction and consolidation regimen (43.9% and 66.7%, respectively) in transplant-eligible patients. Meanwhile, Rd (Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone) was the most common maintenance regimen (75%). DKd (Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone), KPd (Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone), and PVd (Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone) were the most widely used second, third, and fourth treatment lines, respectively (16.6%, 9.2%, and 12.5%). About 52.7% of patients were eligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT), and among them, a complete response (CR) was achieved in 47.7%. Furthermore, CR and very good partial remission rates decreased across all treatment lines. Renal impairment decreased across different treatment lines, from 23.6% in the first line to 6.3% in the fourth line. In contrast, respiratory complications demonstrated the highest incidence (>18%) in the 3rd and 4th treatment lines. Moreover, refractoriness to treatment increased from 1.3% in the first line to 34.6% in the fourth treatment line. Additionally, isatuximab was incorporated into 80%, 15%, and 5% of the regimens administered as second-, third-, and fourth-line treatments, respectively. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the real-world management and treatment choices for RRMM, including the utilization of SCT and novel therapies such as isatuximab.
Keywords: Medical Affairs Department, Sanofi One JLT building, 3rd Floor, Jumeirah Lake Tower, Dubai, UAE Dubai, 500001 Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/refractory, Gulf region, Real-world, , Relapsed/Refractory, Gulf Region, Real-world, Isatuximab
Received: 17 Dec 2024; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alhejazi, Alhuraiji, Nourallah, Alshehri, Usman, ELGohary, Malhan, Motabi, Al Farsi, Alshuaibi, Diab, Siddiqui, Taha, Abouzeid, Ahmed, Ali, Ghonema, Elkhazin, Moussa, Alrajhi, Rabea, Aktham, Bawazeer, Ali and Chouikrat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mohamed Zahir Chouikrat, Medical Affairs Department, Sanofi, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.